susan morris

42.9K posts

susan morris

susan morris

@withoutwax4

Yes

Also Yes Katılım Temmuz 2016
1.3K Takip Edilen681 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
susan morris
susan morris@withoutwax4·
@MikeCristo8 Inflate/deflate; inflate/deflate; inflate/deflate; inflate/deflate.... Do you see it yet?
English
1
2
13
2.7K
susan morris retweetledi
Sense Receptor
Sense Receptor@SenseReceptor·
WHITNEY WEBB on "Thiel-verse oligarchs" aiming to turn the US into a "sovcorp" run by a CEO "Palantir is...being set up to be the beta test" "[these] people...want one company to replace [America's] governing structure" "[NYT] literally called [Palantir] the one seeing eye" This clip of Webb (@_whitneywebb), author of One Nation Under Blackmail and contributing editor of unlimitedhangout(.)com, is taken from a discussion with Ryan Cristian (@TLAVagabond), Hrvoje Morić (@Geopolitics_Emp), et al. posted to the Corbett Report YouTube channel on May 29, 2026. ---------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "There is this push from the— from Peter Thiel, the Thiel-verse and all of these tech oligarchs that are aligned with him, not to single him out, but it's a squad, to basically create a— turn the US Government into a private corporation, which it technically already is. The multinational corporation runs everything, right? "But it's a way to sort of formalize that and have, you know, a national CEO run the country, as a dictator. And they call it, you know, either Sovcorp for 'sovereign corporation' or govcorp, a governing corporation. "And I think Palantir is basically being set up to be the beta test for that because not only have they been handed the military, and our entire intelligence community, they've now under, under the current iteration of Trump, been handed all of our agricultural data, all of our health care data, and IRS, you know, I mean, it has just expanded and become total. "And I think that's extremely concerning when you consider the people that run this are literally ideologically aligned with people that want one company to replace the governing structure of the, of the country. "So... if we allow them to continue to do this Palantir, will they already— I mean, the New York Times said they know already know everything about you and literally called them the one seeing eye. And Total Information Awareness is the pyramid with the beam covering the earth, you know? I mean they're just like rubbing it in your face. "But what it ultimately comes down to is that, you know, obviously those of us in independent media putting ourselves out there, we're putting a certain amount of data into the void, with the hope that people will wake up and do something about it. "But if you are watching this and this stuff concerns you, starve them of your data as much as possible. And I think the most powerful thing you can do is get rid of your smartphone. I know Hakeem sells alternatives, but, if you really need one, you know, but you do not need to have an Android or an Apple device on you. You can live without it. You lived without it before. "And... I mean, it's the biggest generator of data for them and their whole plan fails if people just mass non-comply with them. It's very important."
English
118
1.3K
2.7K
77.6K
susan morris
susan morris@withoutwax4·
@SimonDixonTwitt do you see this too, Simon?
Evan@EvanWritesOnX

Hate Blair for Iraq. That part is earned. But the Blair you are looking at right now in 2026 is not the Blair of 2003. He has been reclassified. The Tony Blair Institute is funded substantially by Gulf capital. Saudi money. Emirati money. He depends on the same Gulf states that are demanding a two-state framework as the price of Israeli normalization, the same states pre-positioning hundreds of billions in Gaza reconstruction capital, the same states whose entire post-war regional plan voids if Palestinians are erased. He is not a free agent doing his own ideological project. He is an instrument, and the hand on the instrument is now the hand that needs Palestinians to survive. What Blair is actually doing is that he is positioning himself as the face of a transitional Gaza administration. Western liberals see a familiar Blairite technocrat. Israeli right-wingers see someone they think they can manage. American politicians see a former PM they recognize. What he actually is, structurally, is the wrapper that makes a Gulf-financed, Palestine-preserving, far-right-Israeli-blocking architecture politically survivable in Western capitals. Without that wrapper, the architecture cannot be installed. The Greater Israel project has been advancing for decades precisely because no one with Western credibility was willing to stand in front of it. Smotrich. Ben-Gvir. The settler movement. The full territorial-consolidation agenda. That project requires Palestinian removal. Blair's role, whatever he ends up calling it, structurally blocks it. Believe it or not, right now, he is the front man for an arrangement that preserves Palestinian presence on the land, channels reconstruction capital into Palestinian hands, and downgrades Israel from regional hegemon to dependent actor inside a Gulf-led order. He is not a friend of the region. He is not redeemed. But he is doing this because his paymasters need it done and he is the most efficient available wrapper. That distinction matters, and it should not be collapsed into either forgiveness or hatred. The right reading is colder than that. He is the man who was an instrument of the Iraq war and is now an instrument of Palestinian preservation, and the same coldness that made him useful for the first thing is what makes him useful for the second. Hating him for what he did in 2003 while the most important pro-Palestinian institutional move of this decade is moving through his hands is hating the past while the present passes you. By all means do not forgive him. But notice what is in front of you. The man you are spending your energy hating is, in this specific moment, one of the most consequential pro-Palestinian operators in Western institutional life.

English
0
0
0
6
Evan
Evan@EvanWritesOnX·
Hate Blair for Iraq. That part is earned. But the Blair you are looking at right now in 2026 is not the Blair of 2003. He has been reclassified. The Tony Blair Institute is funded substantially by Gulf capital. Saudi money. Emirati money. He depends on the same Gulf states that are demanding a two-state framework as the price of Israeli normalization, the same states pre-positioning hundreds of billions in Gaza reconstruction capital, the same states whose entire post-war regional plan voids if Palestinians are erased. He is not a free agent doing his own ideological project. He is an instrument, and the hand on the instrument is now the hand that needs Palestinians to survive. What Blair is actually doing is that he is positioning himself as the face of a transitional Gaza administration. Western liberals see a familiar Blairite technocrat. Israeli right-wingers see someone they think they can manage. American politicians see a former PM they recognize. What he actually is, structurally, is the wrapper that makes a Gulf-financed, Palestine-preserving, far-right-Israeli-blocking architecture politically survivable in Western capitals. Without that wrapper, the architecture cannot be installed. The Greater Israel project has been advancing for decades precisely because no one with Western credibility was willing to stand in front of it. Smotrich. Ben-Gvir. The settler movement. The full territorial-consolidation agenda. That project requires Palestinian removal. Blair's role, whatever he ends up calling it, structurally blocks it. Believe it or not, right now, he is the front man for an arrangement that preserves Palestinian presence on the land, channels reconstruction capital into Palestinian hands, and downgrades Israel from regional hegemon to dependent actor inside a Gulf-led order. He is not a friend of the region. He is not redeemed. But he is doing this because his paymasters need it done and he is the most efficient available wrapper. That distinction matters, and it should not be collapsed into either forgiveness or hatred. The right reading is colder than that. He is the man who was an instrument of the Iraq war and is now an instrument of Palestinian preservation, and the same coldness that made him useful for the first thing is what makes him useful for the second. Hating him for what he did in 2003 while the most important pro-Palestinian institutional move of this decade is moving through his hands is hating the past while the present passes you. By all means do not forgive him. But notice what is in front of you. The man you are spending your energy hating is, in this specific moment, one of the most consequential pro-Palestinian operators in Western institutional life.
Tiberius@tiberiusfiles

Tony Blair is one of the most hated men in Britain, but he still isn’t hated enough. I think we can and should hate him much, much more.

English
31
26
171
21K
Robert W Malone, MD
Robert W Malone, MD@RWMaloneMD·
There simply are not enough paralyzed patients in the world to justify the scale of the investment pouring into brain-computer interface companies. Investors are not throwing billions into this sector because they are humanitarians. Venture capital is not a charity. The real target market is everybody else. Gaming. Consumer electronics. Augmented reality. Mood tracking. Productivity optimization. Advertising. Military applications. Cognitive enhancement. Surveillance. The paralysis market is the moral doorway through which the rest of this agenda enters.
English
45
199
795
18.1K
Robert W Malone, MD
Robert W Malone, MD@RWMaloneMD·
Neural enhancement will soon be linked to software capable of determining attention, emotional response, ideological engagement, fatigue, impulse control, stress levels, and cognitive performance in schools, workplaces, military systems, airports, vehicles, and digital platforms. And eventually, inevitably, someone will propose that refusal to participate represents a safety risk. That mandates are necessary for the well-being of society: for safety, for well-being, for longevity, for compliance. We have seen this movie before.
Robert W Malone, MD tweet media
English
58
172
553
32.6K
susan morris retweetledi
Catherine Austin Fitts
Catherine Austin Fitts@austin_fit76995·
David’s right to call this “monetary alchemy.” I’ve been tracking this same plumbing for 30+ years, and the core issue is exactly what he lays out: control flows through who gets to create money and where it lands first. A few things to add for people just waking up to this: 1. The central bank “printing” is really asset swapping They don’t print cash for you. They swap reserves for Treasuries with primary dealers, mark up accounts, and those reserves become the base for the entire credit pyramid. That’s why bailouts and QE never show up as “money in your pocket” unless you’re already inside the system. 2. Street name ownership is the choke point As David notes, most people hold through Cede & Co/DTC. You have a contractual claim, not direct ownership. When liquidity tightens, legal and accounting structures determine who gets made whole. That’s the mechanism behind “The Great Taking.” 3. Follow the collateral rules What gets accepted as collateral by the Fed, BIS, and clearinghouses is what gets funded. Change the collateral rules and you change what industries live or die. It’s quiet industrial policy without a vote. 4. This is why direct ownership matters DRS, physical assets, local credit systems, and transparent ledgers are ways to step outside the nominee chain. You can’t opt out of inflation, but you can opt out of being the last one holding the claim when the system resets. If you’re new to this, start with David’s work. He’s mapped the legal structure better than anyone. Follow him, read The Great Taking, and check your own account setup. The first step is knowing where your name actually is on the books. Reach out to him for guidance.
David Rogers Webb@DavidRogersW

Central banks create purchasing power out of thin air and use that to buy assets, fund deficits, and steer markets without going through Congress or normal price discovery.

English
8
185
463
20.2K
Catherine Austin Fitts
Catherine Austin Fitts@austin_fit76995·
“A crash is coming.” Andrew Ross Sorkin says a massive crash is inevitable. He’s one of the most credible financial journalists in the world. 1. The crash is the liquidity event that triggers the legal shift “Sorkin’s right that a correction is baked in. The question is what happens when liquidity gets pulled. That’s when the collateral rules and custody structure determine who gets made whole. In a system where most people hold in street name through Cede & Co, you don’t own the asset - you own a contractual claim against a chain of intermediaries.” 2. Connect it to The Great Taking: David Rogers Webb’s thesis: the legal and accounting infrastructure was quietly changed over decades so that in a default or enforcement event, claims flow upstream to the clearinghouses and secured creditors first. Retail holders are last in line, often without realizing it. “A crash isn’t just price going down. It’s the moment the plumbing gets tested. If you don’t have direct ownership, you’re relying on the system to honor your claim when it’s under stress.” 3. Follow the money trail: I urge people to look at who’s been issuing, who’s been buying, and where the collateral sits. Central banks, primary dealers, and the clearing system create money through asset swaps. When the asset side reprices, the leverage unwinds. That’s the transfer mechanism. 4. The “happy” part of ‘own nothing’ : access replaces ownership, and as long as DoorDash and Starbucks work, people don’t check the books. A crash breaks that illusion. “If you’re not on the books as the legal owner, you’re a creditor in a system that can rewrite priorities when it needs to.” 5. What I'd tell people to do now - Verify how your assets are actually held. DRS for stocks, physical for precious metals, check your account agreements for ‘street name’ language. - Reduce counterparty exposure where you can. - Build local, tangible networks and systems that don’t rely on the clearinghouse chain. - Document everything. When things break, records matter more than narratives. “This isn’t about fear. It’s about seeing the structure before it resets, so you’re not surprised by where your name isn’t on the books.”
English
56
194
627
61.3K
susan morris retweetledi
Michelle Maxwell ™
Michelle Maxwell ™@MichelleMaxwell·
With everything we are hearing right now about ticks this seems like good information to share. “Here’s what I’ve learned after more ticks than I care to count. First, whatever your uncle told you, forget it. No matches. No nail polish. No Vaseline. No soap on a cotton ball. All of those do the same terrible thing, they stress the tick out, and a stressed tick empties its gut back into the bite before letting go. Which, if you think about what that actually means for a second, is literally how Lyme and the rest get transmitted so you’re not speeding up its exit. You’re making it throw up into you. Fine-tipped tweezers. Grip right where the mouthparts enter the skin, not the body, the head. Pull straight up, steady, no twisting, no jerking. It’ll feel like it’s resisting because it is, the mouthparts are barbed. Just keep the pressure on and it lets go in a few seconds. If a piece breaks off in the skin, leave it alone. Your body pushes splinters out. Digging around with a needle does more damage then the fragment ever would. Clean it with alcohol or soap. Wash your hands. Now here’s the part most people skip: don’t flush the tick. Tape it to an index card. Clear packing tape right over the body, write the date and where on your body it was, and stick the card in a drawer. If you come down with anything weird in the next 30 days, rash, fever, joint pain, that flu-that-isn’t-flu feeling, that tick goes with you to the doctor. Some labs will test the tick itself, which is faster and often more reliable than waiting for antibodies to show up in your own blood. A dated tick taped to a card is one of the most useful things you can hand a doctor who’s trying to figure out what’s wrong with you. The other thing worth saying out loud: if the tick was engorged when you pulled it, and you can’t swear it was off your body within 24 hours, call your doctor that same day. Don’t wait for a rash. Fewer than three out of four Lyme cases even produce the classic bullseye. A single preventive dose of doxycycline within 72 hours of a deer tick bite cuts the Lyme odds way down, and most docs in tick country will write that prescription without giving you a hard time, especially if you walk in with the tick taped to a card and a clear timeline.”
Michelle Maxwell ™ tweet media
English
1.3K
16.7K
50.3K
2.8M

Keşfet

@threadreaderapp @YouTube @_whitneywebb @TLAVagabond @Geopolitics_Emp @BerwickJeff @bruce_barrett @SimonDixonTwitt