WizSec Bitcoin Research

2K posts

WizSec Bitcoin Research banner
WizSec Bitcoin Research

WizSec Bitcoin Research

@wizsecurity

Bitcoin and MtGox related research by @nikuhodai.

Tokyo, Japan Katılım Ekim 2012
128 Takip Edilen9.4K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
WizSec Bitcoin Research
WizSec Bitcoin Research@wizsecurity·
As the initial MtGox bitcoin repayments have finally begun, first of all a big thank you to the dedicated creditor community which has steadfastly navigated and helped each other through this unprecedented situation for over a decade.
GIF
English
8
5
34
8.7K
WizSec Bitcoin Research
WizSec Bitcoin Research@wizsecurity·
@BitMEXResearch Was that really SSRN taking action though? The updated PDF is still not the original whitepaper, but rather one based on CSW's previous forgery. Looks more like he simply uploaded a new fake that just removes his name.
WizSec Bitcoin Research tweet media
English
1
0
15
572
BitMEX Research
BitMEX Research@BitMEXResearch·
Today the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) finally removed the forged metadata on the Bitcoin white paper they host, removing "Craig Steven Wright" as the author papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf… Before and after
BitMEX Research tweet mediaBitMEX Research tweet media
English
24
19
126
23.1K
WizSec Bitcoin Research
WizSec Bitcoin Research@wizsecurity·
@Coinulaire It was also clearly not the only non-existent case citation in Wright's application, so this wasn't some one-off thing. Do you suppose a judge makes these kinds of statements lightly?
WizSec Bitcoin Research tweet media
English
0
0
1
112
WizSec Bitcoin Research
WizSec Bitcoin Research@wizsecurity·
@Coinulaire That's "Anderson v Her Majesty's Attorney General for the Isle of Man [2021] UKPC 20". Wright's "[2013] UKPC 2" was an entirely different case. It's not a typo of the year, number *and* parties, it's just a random mashup of adjacent data, i.e. exactly how AI hallucinations work.
English
1
0
2
126
WizSec Bitcoin Research
WizSec Bitcoin Research@wizsecurity·
Craig Wright was just denied permission to appeal the UK court decision declaring him not to be Satoshi Nakamoto. He thus remains the only human with that distinction; legally speaking, we are all (potentially) Satoshi, except Craig Wright. reddit.com/r/bsv/comments…
English
7
11
98
3.6K
WizSec Bitcoin Research
WizSec Bitcoin Research@wizsecurity·
WizSec Bitcoin Research tweet media
BitMEX Research@BitMEXResearch

COPA vs CSW – 01 Nov 2024 We are back at the Rolls Building in London, for another hearing with Justice Mellor. In the courtroom is the Bird & Bird legal team, along with their KC Mr Jonathan Hough. The session is expected to start in 3 minutes. We believe the hearing is about a contempt of court application from Bird & Bird against CSW, in relation to possible breaches of the injunction which resulted from the main trial. 🧵

ZXX
1
1
16
1.8K
WizSec Bitcoin Research
WizSec Bitcoin Research@wizsecurity·
@Tak_Horigoshi @hascendp6 Well, he didn't say *that* was his official Twitter account? Also, it's not called Twitter anymore so by definition it can't be his Twitter account. Checkmate coretards. /s
English
0
0
5
95
*WuCoin*
*WuCoin*@hascendp6·
Imagine verifying your Twitter account in your own name, Tweeting from it for two years and then trying to convince a court that it belongs to somebody else on the say-so of nodding lady. This is Craig Wright's evidence that he's not in contempt of court. 🤦🏽‍♂️ #COPA #Faketoshi #BSV
*WuCoin* tweet media*WuCoin* tweet media*WuCoin* tweet media
English
6
0
43
1.7K
WizSec Bitcoin Research
WizSec Bitcoin Research@wizsecurity·
@DrFunkenstein6 @Tak_Horigoshi Like Nigerian scam emails, the messaging being awful and easily debunkable actually helps select for the most gullible people. Doubt he's clever enough to do it intentionally, but survival of the fittest itself selects for this behavior among scammers.
English
0
0
7
114
a void (leaks)
a void (leaks)@Tak_Horigoshi·
Craig Wright is (surprise!) lying to his fans about the fake list of addresses that he produced for court in Florid purporting to be a list of his Bitcoin holdings. Does this dumb idiot not realize the court documents, like the one below bearing his signature, are public?
a void (leaks) tweet mediaa void (leaks) tweet mediaa void (leaks) tweet media
a void (leaks)@Tak_Horigoshi

And here it is. "The receipt of these documents and my inspection of them allowed me to recognize the authenticity of the other documents, including the list of public addresses."

English
11
5
73
4.3K
a void (leaks)
a void (leaks)@Tak_Horigoshi·
Craig today: we had no idea about the authenticity of any of the lists of addresses Craig’s signed sworn statement: I recognize the authenticity of the list of addresses Prison. Can’t come soon enough to this piece of shit fraud
English
2
0
22
318
WizSec Bitcoin Research
WizSec Bitcoin Research@wizsecurity·
@Twentynothing00 @Arthur_van_Pelt @gavinandresen And yet instead of listening to the signs that Craig was a fraud, Gavin was primarily focused on helping Craig improve his messaging so he wouldn't look like a fraud to others. Well and truly captured by the con long before the "key signing".
English
0
0
9
152
Mark Hunter
Mark Hunter@Twentynothing00·
It is actually painful to see how close @gavinandresen was to rumbling Craig within a few days of their introduction.
Mark Hunter tweet media
English
10
5
64
3.9K
WizSec Bitcoin Research
WizSec Bitcoin Research@wizsecurity·
@CSWr18714397 That's not what CPR PD 5A paragraph 5.1 says. Are you getting your legal advice from ChatGPT? #5.1:~:text=The%20date%20on%20which%20a%20document%20was%20filed%20at%20court%20must%20be%20recorded%20on%20the%20document" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">justice.gov.uk/courts/procedu…
English
3
0
14
418
S Tominaga (Aka Dr Craig Wright)
S Tominaga (Aka Dr Craig Wright)@CsTominaga·
CPR PD 5A, Paragraph 5.1: "A document which is filed electronically is to be treated as filed on the day on which it is recorded by the court as having been received by the court at the place where the proceedings are being conducted."
S Tominaga (Aka Dr Craig Wright) tweet media
English
15
37
163
23.3K
WizSec Bitcoin Research
WizSec Bitcoin Research@wizsecurity·
If you have questions like "why didn't I get 21% of my BTC?", then read my explainer on the payouts and the unit of account that payout rates refer to. Long story short: it's complicated, and the actual payout number you presumably care about is 15-16%. blog.wizsec.jp/2021/02/mtgox-…
English
0
0
2
593
WizSec Bitcoin Research
WizSec Bitcoin Research@wizsecurity·
There's no need to dox yourself with revealing questions as long as your repayments are roughly in those ranges; you're fine and everything is going according to plan, don't worry.
WizSec Bitcoin Research tweet media
English
1
1
4
697
WizSec Bitcoin Research
WizSec Bitcoin Research@wizsecurity·
As the initial MtGox bitcoin repayments have finally begun, first of all a big thank you to the dedicated creditor community which has steadfastly navigated and helped each other through this unprecedented situation for over a decade.
GIF
English
8
5
34
8.7K
WizSec Bitcoin Research
WizSec Bitcoin Research@wizsecurity·
@Arthur_van_Pelt It's clearly the threat of digging into the funding that motivates Calvin to keep paying, so unsurprisingly Mellor keeps it hanging over their head like the sword of Damocles. Well done.
English
1
0
13
290
Arthur "lynch mob" van Pelt 🔥 ∞/21M ⚡
Arthur "lynch mob" van Pelt 🔥 ∞/21M ⚡@Arthur_van_Pelt·
On a sidenote, what is *very* interesting here, is that all kinds of parties in 2 of these cases, from Bitcoin devs to Blockstream, are trying to find out who is funding Craig Wright. "Try again when Wright is not paying", Justice Mellor ruled yesterday.
Arthur "lynch mob" van Pelt 🔥 ∞/21M ⚡ tweet media
English
2
0
23
4.1K
Arthur "lynch mob" van Pelt 🔥 ∞/21M ⚡
Arthur "lynch mob" van Pelt 🔥 ∞/21M ⚡@Arthur_van_Pelt·
Summary. Pineapple Hack case: "The claim is certified as totally without merit.", Craig pays all costs. Copyright case: "Claim is dismissed as totally without merit.", Craig pays all costs. CobraBitcoin case: "All 6 previous orders 2021-2023 are set aside."
*WuCoin*@hascendp6

Wright v LAWR update. Costs & consequences. 'Civil contempt...criminal investigation...criminal proceedings..civil restraint...regulatory or disciplinary complaint or proceedings...most serious abuse...fraud...false & fraudulent...totally without merit.' #COPA #Faketoshi #BSV

English
5
7
100
8.2K

Keşfet

@BitMEXResearch @Coinulaire @Tak_Horigoshi @hascendp6 @Twentynothing00 @DrFunkenstein6 @Arthur_van_Pelt @gavinandresen