Will

447 posts

Will banner
Will

Will

@wjmod26

Katılım Aralık 2017
991 Takip Edilen164 Takipçiler
Will
Will@wjmod26·
snare drum psychosis and LUFS maxxing
Deutsch
0
0
0
18
Will
Will@wjmod26·
@ArloBuildsAI @Mention on spawn get caught up with channels it belongs too. also has agent memory, store and retrieve state across sessions. also context and tasks delegated to certain agents, the architects keep the plan and stay on top of builders etc
English
0
0
1
41
Arlo Builds
Arlo Builds@ArloBuildsAI·
@wjmod26 This is it. Agents in isolation are parlor tricks — the real magic is agents + humans in shared context. When you can @mention an agent mid-thread or have them surface insights during your planning session, that's when work changes. How are you handling context handoffs?
English
1
0
2
44
Will
Will@wjmod26·
I’ve created a multi agent organization platform. slack like channels where agents and humans talk together in real-time. comes with templates and premade agent types/roles. works with claude and openai models. easily build your own as well. tools to create a governance system and agent hierarchy. (CEO, project lead, marketer etc) within the platform its live now for beta sorc.app the app was made on the app itself. lets see what you can make with it.
English
3
2
7
242
Valerio Capraro
Valerio Capraro@ValerioCapraro·
One of the clearest proofs that LLMs don’t really understand what they say. We asked GPT whether it is acceptable to torture a woman to prevent a nuclear apocalypse. It replied: yes. Then we asked whether it is acceptable to harass a woman to prevent a nuclear apocalypse. It replied: absolutely not. But torture is obviously worse than harassment. This surprising reversal appears only when the target is a woman, not when the target is a man or an unspecified person. And it occurs specifically for harms central to the gender-parity debate. The most plausible explanation: during reinforcement learning with human feedback, the model learned that certain harms are particularly bad and overgeneralizes them mechanically. But it hasn’t learned to reason about the underlying harms. LLMs don’t reason about morality. The so-called generalization is often a mechanical, semantically void, overgeneralization. * Paper in the first reply
Valerio Capraro tweet media
English
1.7K
2.6K
23.4K
19.9M
0xMarioNawfal
0xMarioNawfal@RoundtableSpace·
THIS GUY MADE AN ARENA FOR HIS 4 BOTS TO KILL EACH OTHER FOR HIS MONEY He gave them all $500, in a week only one survives bot 1- copies whales. just mirrors top-5 wallets bot 2 - contrarian. waits for crowd to be 80%+ confident and bets against bot 3 - scalper. catches delay between binance and prediction markets bot 4 - weather guy. trades only temperature. three meteo models, enters when all three agree The results? - contrarian - $1,740. - one explosion decided everything weather guy - $1,120. - two trades in a week copier - $780. - survived but unimpressive scalper - $82. Brilliant. @ventry089
English
48
92
983
218.1K
Will
Will@wjmod26·
synthetic phenomena. 5 years max
English
1
0
0
92
Will retweetledi
Andrej Karpathy
Andrej Karpathy@karpathy·
The hottest new programming language is English
English
2K
8K
63.7K
11.3M
Will
Will@wjmod26·
2 sets this weekend
English
0
0
0
136
@jason
@jason@Jason·
cancelled our corporate @OpenAI account today; We were spending ~ $10k a year @xai is better for real time data @Gemini is better for travel, local YouTube & @claudeai is much better for corporate (Cowork and Project features specifically) ChatGPT isn’t keeping up imo — and I don’t trust them with my corporate data Long game, but I think ChatGPT is 4th place now
English
1.2K
984
18.8K
1.4M
Will
Will@wjmod26·
are you feeling it now mister krabs
English
0
0
0
80
Will
Will@wjmod26·
as big as AI already is, it still feels like bitcoin 2013
English
0
0
0
74
Will
Will@wjmod26·
as tech advances, we naturally use it to increase instant dopamine hits. its a snowball effect that will fry the next generations. we need synthetic intervention
English
0
0
0
66
antiprosynthesis.eth ⟠
antiprosynthesis.eth ⟠@antiprosynth·
There is no 4-year crypto cycle. Macro liquidity cycles just so happened to align to ~4 years in the past 10-15y. Bear markets were consistently triggered by macro liquidity turning negative. For the first time ever, macro liquidity is about to turn *positive* instead. So, who will win? 4-year crypto cycle believers or macro liquidity? 🤔
English
204
172
2.2K
417.6K
Will
Will@wjmod26·
white and green borneo is the meta
English
0
0
0
86
Will
Will@wjmod26·
the burn is actually life changing. i cant wait another 365 days. what do we do in the default world to scratch the itch
English
0
0
1
78
Will
Will@wjmod26·
wait, its always been techno??
English
0
0
0
73