sartt

@MAGAlodon45_47 @mattvanswol You're a fool. You run your mouth or pick fights with people surrounded by their friends, expect to get your ass kicked. Thats been a fact in human history for over 100,000 years, and its not changing, some how people like you have forgotten that. Strength In Numbers.

You can't even string together a coherent sentence with proper capitalization and punctuation. According to you, NOBODY EVER makes up excuses to attack others. NEVER! Low IQ POC strikes again. It never fails. You people prove to me time and time again that you're not compatible with western society.

@MAGAlodon45_47 @mattvanswol Make up points that have nothing to do with the video ✅ Doesn't Understand something that happens in numerous fights✅ Attempts to use the I.Q attack on someone, as if it gives you some invisible aura of superiority✅🤣 Talks about Western Society, Yet you've had 2 World wars.✅

@MAGAlodon45_47 @mattvanswol you clearly are the one with low I.Q people dont just make up shit when people are fighting, they always give the reason during the fight. This how i know all you do is sit on twitter, you've never been in a real fight before. Talk Shit Get Hit.

@woobywo @mattvanswol Are you that stupid that you believe everything without proof? Just because someone CLAIMS he was the aggressor, doesn't make him the aggressor. You must be black because this is incredibly low IQ.

@Pewpew841 @BrandonFugal @michaelshermer @MickWest PEOPLE have done that to him , multiple times, ven used his own garbage to debunk him and mock him, he keeps coming back.

@woobywo @BrandonFugal @michaelshermer @MickWest Lol blocking him is the exact *wrong* thing to do with a disinformation agent. You have to counter the bs they spread.

Agreed, show us the data @BrandonFugal Better still show us all aliens & their spaceships—that would put an end to all this speculation. Does anyone care about pilot credentials or multi-sensor data for the Chinese spy balloon? No. Why? Because we have the balloon! @MickWest

@SeamusMacCuladh @RadioGenoa same thing the british say about your people

@RadioGenoa No sympathy rip he probably raped murdered robbed one ☝️ of above 👆 or all of the above’ take the kid gloves of sort them out

Today in Italy a North African criminal resisted arrest by the police and died while handcuffed.

African American says “racism still exists” because a majority of boats are owned by White people.. Victim mentality.

@MAGAlodon45_47 @mattvanswol you can listen to them in the video even say he hit first. Something im sure your selective hearing just chose to tune out.

@woobywo @mattvanswol Okay, show me the video where he started the fight. I'll wait.

@BrandonFugal @michaelshermer @MickWest @BrandonFugal Mick west is a certified traitor government misinformation agent. Just block him, as he is going to be dealt with the same as the rest of the traitors to the United States of America.

Right, because the gold standard for unknown aerial phenomena is “show us the dead aliens or GTFO”. Brilliant epistemology, Mike. They didn't recover the spy balloon because it was prosaic…they shot it down precisely because they knew what it was. That's the opposite of UAPs, where military pilots with impeccable credentials, plus the actual professionals who analyze sensor & radar data for a living, all record objects doing physics-defying maneuvers that aren't balloons. But sure, keep demanding the mothership land on your lawn while dismissing every case that doesn't come with a souvenir. The Chinese balloon had wreckage…these things have 80+ years of consistent multi-witness, multi-sensor reports from the very people who fly jets & interpret the data for national security. Demanding “all the aliens” is just a lazy way to avoid engaging with the data you claim doesn't exist. Classic skeptic move: raise the evidentiary bar so high that nothing can clear it, then declare victory. How's that working out for the “it's all weather balloons” crowd these days?

@BrandonFugal @michaelshermer @MickWest @MickWest ahh yes mick wet the government misinformation agent. When you are tried for high treason Do you want the firing squad or the noose? We know you work for the Cabalistic government mick.

@Sargasmica @mattvanswol @FBI @DHSgov YOU ARE ALSO GUILTY! BECAUSE YOU WATCHED IT! YOU TOO WILL PAY THE PRICE!

@mattvanswol @FBI @DHSgov FIND THESE THUGS AND BYSTANDERS THEY ARE ALL GUILTY OF HATE CRIMES ... THE BYSTANDERS ARE GUILTY OF THE CRIME AS WELL EVEN THOUGH THEY DIDN'T BEAT THE MAN THEY ARE FULLY FULLY FULLY GUILTY OF THE SAME CRIME ... NO MORE OF THIS SHIT ... I AM DONE ...

@SirBylHolte the scene with the huge guys in armor was funny a.f though

I'm sure "The Odyssey" will do great but, FACTS: Production: $250M Marketing: $125M Distribution/other costs: $25–50M Total investment: $400–425M Also, studios do not keep 100% of ticket sales - they ultimately receive about 50% of worldwide box office (more domestically, less internationally). So if total costs are: $400 million, breakeven = $800 million worldwide $425 million, breakeven = $850 million worldwide And for anyone who claims it only needs $375–500 million to break even, that implies Universal spent nothing for the nationwide/global marketing campaign, and that theatres take no part of that box office. Just wanted to get this out there before the lies start.

@MarieIsabellaB @mattvanswol crime in chicago isnt high.

@mattvanswol But of course Brandon Johnson will say crime isn’t that bad

🚨#BREAKING: An absolutely MASSIVE "takeover" in Chicago has left three people sh0t, and 1 person de*d after HUGE BRAWLS broke out... ...IN FRONT OF POLICE OFFICERS at the takeover. Teens as young as THIRTEEN were involved and seen BEATING EACH OTHER. HOW IS THIS AMERICA?!!!!

@MAGAlodon45_47 @mattvanswol he started the fight.

@mattvanswol THEY HATE YOU, AND WOULD DO THE SAME THING TO YOU IF YOU HAD THE CHANCE.

@Based_Gam_Gam @mattvanswol he started the fight

@mattvanswol you would never walk in a jungle without a gun would you? Why do you think its any different here?

@mattvanswol He started the fight.

@NgocThach74 im sorry... wtf was the very first hit? that was uncalled for she wasn't even doing anything.

Some of them should be banned. I had to rewatch that clip to fully understand the context.

@RadioGenoa @RadioGenoa ahhh yes, you once again post a video mid fight with no context.

White women are not safe everywhere. This one-sided violence must end.

@senatejr *pull yourself up by your bootstraps" ahhh old fuck.

My dad sold the family house for $820,000. Gave me nothing. "Build your own wealth," he said. He bought that house in 1986 for $61,000. That house doesn't exist anymore. Not at that price. Not for me. Not for anyone my age.

@HomerPavlos Did Achilles have a male lover. Yes. or No.

They say that the words "gay" and "homosexuality" did not exist in ancient Greece because it was completely normal, just like pederasty. WRONG. I will easily humiliate everyone who tries to manipulate the Classics. The words existed, and they clearly denoted something reprehensible. In this post, I will prove why everyone is lying. First, let me clarify that I do not deny that homosexuality existed, that would be false. However, it is anti-scientific and insidious to deliberately try to turn the entire Greek history, mythology, and personalities into homosexuals without original primary sources to support it. This is done with malice and deceit. I cite some words from ancient Greek that carried the etymology of "gay" with a very negative meaning: 1. κίναιδος (kinaidos) = κινεῖν τὴν αἰδῶ = the lewd man, the one who stirs pleasure, the fornicator. The "ai" is a diphthong. The one who stirs shame and disgrace for himself. It is derived from moving the shame (αἰδῶ), or from moving the genitals. 2. ἀνδροβάτης (androbates) = ἀνήρ + βαίνω = the active kinaidos (the active homosexual male). 3. ἀρρενοκοίτης (arrenokoites) = ἄρσην + κοι- (from κεῖμαι, to lie down) + -της = the man who lies with males, who has intercourse with men, homosexual ≈ synonyms: sodomite. 4. καταπύγων (katapygon) = κατα- + πυγ(ή) + -ων = lustful, vulgar, worthless, lewd, kinaidos. These four words were insulting characterizations. In ancient Greek texts, they are used to mock the "gay" man of the time. This alone shows that it was not a normal institution or something natural, but something condemned. The issue with the vases is also anti-scientific. Out of the half a million vases that exist, depictions of homosexuality appear in only 0.001% of them. Is this a serious argument or source to claim that homosexuality was an institution and the norm? Anyone who supports this is lying. Also the 95% of this 0.001% can't be proven that depict homosexuality, it's just a theory from some "academics". Now let’s move on to some laws from our sources. 1. "I think I should also speak about eros (love) for boys, since this too has to do with education. Other Greeks, either the Boeotians who live together in close pairs of men and boys, or the Eleans who enjoy the bloom of youth, have different customs. Some completely forbid lovers from conversing with boys. Lycurgus, however, in contrast to all these, approved of the following: if a worthy man admired the soul and virtue of a boy and tried to make him a perfect friend and associate with him, he praised this relationship and considered it the best form of education. But if someone appeared to desire the boy’s body, he considered this shameful and legislated that lovers should abstain from their beloved boys in the same way parents abstain from sexual relations with their children or siblings with each other. I am not surprised that some do not believe this, because in many cities the laws do not oppose desires toward boys." Source: Xenophon, Constitution of the Lacedaemonians, Chapter 2. 2. "The Spartan love had nothing shameful in it. If ever an adolescent dared to commit lewd acts with another, it was in no one’s interest for the two to disgrace Sparta; they were either exiled from their homeland or, even worse, lost their lives." Source: Claudius Aelianus, Varia Historia, Book 3. 3. "You may take this matter seriously or as a joke, but you must always remember that when a man unites with a woman to produce a child, the pleasure they feel is entirely natural. Homosexual intercourse, however, is contrary to nature and is committed because men and women cannot restrain their desire for pleasure." Source: Plato, Laws 636c. 4. "If someone appeared to desire the body of the boy, Lycurgus considered this very shameful and legislated that the lovers of the boys should abstain from sexual acts (Aphrodisia) as much as parents abstain from their children and brothers from brothers." Source: Xenophon, Constitution of the Lacedaemonians 2.13.5–14.1. 5. "It was permitted to fall in love with the noble soul of a boy, but to approach boys erotically was something shameful and disgraceful, because in that case they loved the body and not the soul. Whoever was convicted of approaching a boy in a shameful erotic way was punished with lifelong atimia (loss of civic rights)." Source: Plutarch, Ancient Customs of the Spartans, Chapter 7. 6. Solon restricted many practices of society that created an atmosphere of “disorder” (lack of order and organization, but also meaning marital infidelity) and “akolasia” (lack of moral restraint and surrender to pleasures, especially sexual ones). The prohibition of excessive female laments and dirges at funerals of strangers aimed to limit excessive passion, which the ancients identified with the emotional female nature and considered dangerous to the male life that had to be based on reason, calculation, and composure. Plutarch specifically notes in the ancient text that it does not befit men to display excessive passion in mourning (but of course nowhere else either), because it was “unmanly” and “womanish” (something that did not fit the Greek ideal). Source: Plutarch, Solon 21.4. 7. Socrates explains the myth of Ganymede and refers to Achilles and Patroclus: "I wish finally, Callias, to prove to you also through mythology that not only humans but also gods and heroes prefer the friendship of the soul rather than the use of the body. Zeus, as is known, after having relations with mortal women he fell in love with for their physical beauty, left them mortal. But those he loved for the beauty of their soul, he made immortal. Among them are Heracles, the Dioscuri, and others. I also maintain that Ganymede was taken up to Olympus not for the beauty of his body, but for the beauty of his soul. The name itself confirms my opinion, because in a passage of Homer it says 'γάνυται δέ τ’ ἀκούων' which means 'he enjoys listening to him.' There is also another Homeric passage: 'πυκινὰ φρεσὶ μήδεα εἰδώς,' meaning 'he who had wise thoughts.' From these two things, therefore, Ganymede, having received his name not as pleasant-bodied but as pleasant-minded, has been honored among the gods. (i.e., not because of a beautiful body but because of wisdom. Zeus symbolized the Mind/Intellect and was the father of Athena, the goddess of Wisdom. Our mind begets wisdom.) But also Achilles, Niceratus, is portrayed by Homer as having most gloriously avenged the death of Patroclus not as his lover, but as his friend. And also Orestes and Pylades, Theseus and Pirithous, and many other of the best demigods are extolled not because they sleep together, but because each admired the other and together they performed the greatest and most glorious deeds." Source: Xenophon, Symposium [8.28–31]. 8. Proclus gives us the meaning of the terms "lover" (erastes) and "beloved" (eromenos), which had nothing to do with their modern meanings: "After calling Parmenides and Zeno lover and beloved, or the one teacher (guide) and the other initiated disciple (perfected by the verb τελέω, meaning to initiate), [he makes] the lover and teacher cross such a great sea of words toward the beloved and the disciple initiated by him." Source: Proclus, Commentary on Plato’s Parmenides. In classical antiquity, the lover and the beloved, in correspondence, are considered, at least for those who have studied Plato’s dialogue Phaedrus in depth, as teacher and student. In this work, Plato presents this relationship as an erotic one, meaning a relationship of attraction, between the one who seeks knowledge and the one who provides it. By the term “eros,” therefore, is meant the relationship based on feelings of deepest friendship and respect between two people. In the eyes of the adolescent or child, the teacher-lover was the embodiment of the ideal, the ideal person he aspired to imitate, to adopt the love of beauty, and to pursue moral virtues. After all, this was the meaning of Paideia (education) in antiquity. When we talk about pederasty in antiquity, we should not equate it with modern homosexuality. Primarily because it was a pedagogical relationship. I emphasize: pederasty had nothing to do with romantic-sexual love as we say today, but with upbringing and education, in the spirit of that era. It was a relationship between an older man and a younger one, which ended when the youth reached adulthood. The continuation of the relationship was a social stigma. Of course, the relationship could sometimes take on a sexual character (in some cities, as Xenophon informs us, but not in Athens and Sparta), but rarely in the form of sodomy, and it was always condemned by society. It is wrong to equate pederasty with homosexuality. Many Greek academics and foreign historians equate these two concepts. This happens because many newer historians, both foreign and Greek, who deal with ancient texts, do not know them from the originals. Unfortunately, many younger historians do not know ancient Greek and read the ancient authors mainly through bad translations that are paraphrases.What I have to tell you is that pederasty does not mean the renunciation of the youth by his friend, i.e., of his masculine identity. It was not an act that operated against his manliness. In classical Athens, this institution was an element of the upbringing of young men of the upper social class. It certainly included the initiation of the youth by the mentor-elder into erotic life and what a young boy needs to know (today, doesn’t the mother do the same with her daughter or the father with his son?).It is characteristic that most depictions (on vases) include only touching and not sexual intercourse as we understand it. What is of great importance for the value of societies is that in Athens this institution appears either quite limited or is treated with mockery in the comedies of Aristophanes and in other poets, historians, and writers in general. If it were something established and natural, then why would Aristophanes emit such harsh mockery? What should impress us is the legal protection of young people from the possibility of their prostitution. A foreign historian writes that adolescence was not an easy matter for attractive young Athenians. They had to avoid the stigma of those who submitted to unnatural contact. Homosexuality for emotionally immature youths was like walking a tightrope, as social disapproval and comments would not be long in coming. Thus we understand that what is disapproved of is not an institution. And it cannot be an institution, because there is also a multitude of words that exist to condemn these unnatural pleasures (ἀνδροβάτης, ἀρρενοκοίτης, καταπύγων, γυναικάνηρ, γυναικείας, γυναικίζω, etc.). Homer Pavlos

@KingTunde_SZN THERES?

No one has been able to answer this correctly RT Winner takes $7,000 Ends in 48 hours