Worldview Mastery

4.6K posts

Worldview Mastery banner
Worldview Mastery

Worldview Mastery

@worldviewmstery

Helping you think better as a Christian. The official X page for the Worldview Mastery YouTube channel.

Katılım Aralık 2018
176 Takip Edilen2.1K Takipçiler
Worldview Mastery retweetledi
InspiringPhilosophy - Michael Jones
InspiringPhilosophy - Michael Jones@InspiringPhilos·
New Video! - The Two Powers in Heaven - The Jewish Roots of the Trinity In this video Than digs deep into the very early evidence of the Trinity in the Old Testament. Get EARLY ACCESS 🔓 - patreon.com/posts/15721104…
InspiringPhilosophy - Michael Jones tweet media
English
11
11
109
3.2K
Worldview Mastery
Worldview Mastery@worldviewmstery·
@WriterJohnBuck Exactly this. This is where they are implicitly butchering trivial modal metaphysics when shouting “that makes the Son contingent!” Modally speaking, there are no possible worlds where the Son does not exist. This what anyone means by *not contingent*.
English
0
0
1
54
John Buck 🇺🇸
John Buck 🇺🇸@WriterJohnBuck·
@worldviewmstery Every metaphysically possible world, yes, since to be divine requires metaphysical necessity. But since there’s no logical contradiction in God’s nonexistence neither he nor the father exist in every logically possible world.
English
2
0
3
311
Worldview Mastery
Worldview Mastery@worldviewmstery·
Very simple question: according to Orthodox Trinitarian beliefs — does the Son exist in every possible world? Yes or no?
Thoughtful-Faith@ThoughtfulSaint

I hate seeing Muslims own Christians but the reality is that THE PERSON you call the son is not self existent if you say he is being GENERATED BY ANOTHER PERSON. Saying yeah but his nature/essence (aka divinity) is eternal just ignores the issue. The question is not if divinity is contingent, the question if THE PERSON CALLED THE SON is contingent. I would love to go on @InspiringPhilos with Blake Ostler and explain the problem. This is the problem with the creedal tradition. Its theology is incoherent and it can’t stand up to Islam. But LDS don’t have that problem. Reject the Trinity Embrace the Godhead x.com/mohammed_hijab…

English
6
0
3
832
Worldview Mastery
Worldview Mastery@worldviewmstery·
@Edenlife9 Hey brother, I’m the creator of this video. Thank you for sharing it 🙏🏽
English
0
0
1
411
Beloved of God
Beloved of God@Edenlife9·
As usual, Muslim apologists put out half-baked research and lies to please their emotional audience. Justin Martyr, a second-century Church Father, quoted the Gospel of John.
English
18
39
246
31.6K
Worldview Mastery
Worldview Mastery@worldviewmstery·
Oh look, there’s me 😂 This one seems to have shook him up a bit. I think onlookers can make their mind up on this one just fine.
The Orthodox Muslim@muslimorthodoxy

Braindead Christian apologists bury themselves in trying to tackle the consensus. This quote from the First Apology is NOT a quote of John’s Gospel, that is not how the verse reads, a parellel concept also found in the gospel is NOT a quote. If this is ALL that you can find to overlap with Johnanine material, then you are proving my point further than Justin Martyr, the huge logos theorist NEVER quotes Johns gospel to support his Logos christology. This is the biggest evidence he wasn’t aware of it! Also notice how they don’t respond to what I say after in the clip ? Namely that Justin declares Paul a disbeliever ? lol Even with lies, Christianity still dies.

English
0
1
6
570
GodLogic_GL
GodLogic_GL@GodLogic_GL·
If Muslims are honest, the Quran truly is one of the most boring books out there. It's repetitive, often times disconnected from prior verses, incoherent, vague, and there's really no storyline to follow. The Hadiths are more entertaining to read than the Quran. The reason this is relevant is because the Quran claims to be fully explained and clear (S. 12:111, 11:1, 41:3, ect) and that nobody can make something like it because it's just so miraculous (S. 2:23), but the opposite is true.
Shehu Gazali Sadiq@Shehu478392

The Quran is the worst book I've read in my life.

English
250
415
3.5K
126.9K
Worldview Mastery
Worldview Mastery@worldviewmstery·
Last night on I went live on TikTok and a Muslim dropped the latest Dawah that shook everyone’s faith: “Muhammad was handsome and Jesus was ugly” 🤯🤯
English
1
0
3
214
Worldview Mastery retweetledi
Jon Steel
Jon Steel@bigjonsteel·
If want to get really good at Islamic apologetics just get super cocky, arrogant and cheer for yourself no matter what happens and they will love you
English
6
6
62
1.2K
Worldview Mastery retweetledi
Jon Steel
Jon Steel@bigjonsteel·
Tell me I’m wrong
Jon Steel tweet media
English
134
60
758
41.3K
Than Christopoulos - Inspiring Philosophy
Than Christopoulos - Inspiring Philosophy@ExploringReali2·
Besides a few that I have a lot of respect for (you know who you are) it seems like the general approach Dawah guys have is to say as many stupid/false things in as little words as possible cause they know how disorienting it is. Then claim victory.
English
10
4
92
6.3K
r
r@analyticityy·
@worldviewmstery @ExploringReali2 Not sure what ‘kind’ adds here to help you but by ‘kind’ if you mean things that share qualities or qualities true of a group, then sure I guess.
English
1
0
0
117
Worldview Mastery
Worldview Mastery@worldviewmstery·
This is not a true dichotomy. This assumes that one cannot predicate <is God> to the Father and <is God> to the Son via reduplicative predication where both the Father and the Son are incomplete individuals. Why should we believe that? So far, no argument has been given.
Abdul Rahman (TAP)@abdul_now

Well, you don’t have many options. Either divinity is multiply-instantiable, or it isn’t. If it is, then three instantiations = three gods. If it isn’t, then what exactly is identical to the “one God”? If both the father and son are identical to it, then father = son. If only one of them is identical to it, then the other isn’t God. And if neither is identical to it, you’re forced to retreat to partialism or modalism. Or just say the obvious and admit your theology is incoherent.

English
2
1
5
1.8K
Worldview Mastery
Worldview Mastery@worldviewmstery·
@analyticityy @ExploringReali2 You know exactly what I’m asking, which means it should be easy for you to straightforwardly answer my clarification question: is the predicate <is human> as it relates to <humanity> predicating a kind or no?
English
2
0
0
134
r
r@analyticityy·
@worldviewmstery @ExploringReali2 It’s predicating the property ‘human’, it’s not that complicated…the property P will have a standard of qualification that needs to be met by some individual x which that you can say P(x). Are you asking what is the qualitative account of ‘human’? I think that’s common knowledge
English
1
0
0
105
Worldview Mastery
Worldview Mastery@worldviewmstery·
@analyticityy @ExploringReali2 Nice try. Either <is human> is predicating a ‘kind’ or something else. I’m interested in qualifying what it is exactly we are predicating. Are you unwilling to engage with that or no?
English
1
0
1
120
r
r@analyticityy·
@worldviewmstery @ExploringReali2 Universal metaphysics don’t need to be invoked here, it can be as simple as ‘human’ being property and ‘is human’ being a predicate applied to some individual that has all necessary/sufficient qualities of the property.
English
1
0
0
101
r
r@analyticityy·
@worldviewmstery @ExploringReali2 What would be the asymmetry between applying the reduplicative predicate ‘is human’ to me and you and thus considering us one human? And can you elucidate “incomplete individuals”.
English
1
0
0
105
Worldview Mastery
Worldview Mastery@worldviewmstery·
Good epistemology covers a multitude of sins.
English
0
0
0
133

Keşfet

@WriterJohnBuck @Edenlife9 @GodLogic_GL @ExploringReali2 @analyticityy @elonmusk @BarackObama @taylorswift13