Olimjon Sadykov

79 posts

Olimjon Sadykov

Olimjon Sadykov

@write2sd34

Katılım Haziran 2023
44 Takip Edilen119 Takipçiler
Xenia
Xenia@Ksenia9753·
Сегодня для меня грустный день- день раставания с моей сеточкой @JunoNetwork . И удаления из своего имени слова "Validator". (Ибо какой я валидатор без сети?) Мы пробыли вместе год и три месяца. К сожалению после последнего пропозла,- "сокращение валидаторов до 25",мы вылетели из активного сета. Я обратилась к @dimiandre , написала в дискорд другим валидаторам о помощи (я готова была Валидировать в убыток, просто только чтобы не терять её и всё что с ней связано), но в ответ тишина. Мне очень жаль. 😔 На самом деле, я грущу не только по сети, но и по тем событиям, что связаны с моим валидаторством☺ Со школой Валидаторов, с теми замечательными людьми которые помогали, делегировали, вытаскивали меня из инектива в прошлый раз, радовались, когда получила делегацию☺По всему этому) Я бы хотела сказать им всем всем спасибо ❤ И Владимиру Понимающему @ponimajushij , благодаря которому я стала Валидатором, и который в первых рядах помогал нам отдавая своё. И моим менторам из школы валидаторов @synctems, особенно, моему дорогому любимому @write2sd34 Олиму, за безграничное терпение❤ Моему напарнику Володе @Vladimi82174032 чудесный и умный парень А ещё))) конечно тому кто несмотря ни на что в любое время дня и ночи приходил на помощь☺. Я говорю о тебе, мой дорогой Доктор) @dron_Of . Сколько мы провели часов вместе (ночами 😅) за командной строкой))) сколько ты убил своих нервов (и моих тоже😁) Но это были прекрасные часы. И я бы их не променяла ни на что другое. Всем моим сообществам,в которых я состою, и которые мне помогали, я тоже говорю 🙏💕спасибо А ещё я встретила много новых людей и друзей☺ У меня появились друзья валидаторы Juno @vovscorp замечательные мальчишки, которые всегда предлагали свою помощь ❤🤗и я этого не забуду. Именно по этим событиям и людям, я грущу и буду скучать. Потому что сегодня разрываю ту связь которая нас соединяла. Мне очень жаль.💔
Xenia tweet media
Русский
6
2
23
252
Olimjon Sadykov retweetledi
Metarchy
Metarchy@MetarchySpace·
We've passed! 🥳🥳🥳 Metarchy is succesfully passed the Stage 1 of the #BuildGames on @avax Now, we are moving to the Stage 2 - MVP 🦾 And the deadline already on the March, 9 🤯 All our human team is working with AI-agent team! Do It Together! ✊✌️✋
Metarchy tweet media
English
14
13
32
763
Olimjon Sadykov
Olimjon Sadykov@write2sd34·
@aaronetwork How's goin? Don't you shut down your bullshit network yet? All your RPC's and block explorers are unavailable... 🤦‍♂️
Olimjon Sadykov tweet mediaOlimjon Sadykov tweet media
English
1
0
1
40
POSTHUMAN ∞ DVS
POSTHUMAN ∞ DVS@POSTHUMAN_DVS·
On behalf of the entire POSTHUMAN validator community, we want to wish Nikolai @Nikolai88392454 a Happy Birthday! 🥳🥳🥳 Thank you for all your contributions to the development of the community, NFT-Avatars, and SubDAO! May your enthusiasm continue to inspire and never fade! 🙏🙏🙏 We wish you Endless Will, Eternal Youth, and Physical Immortality! 🦾💜🧬
POSTHUMAN ∞ DVS tweet media
English
3
2
12
169
Olimjon Sadykov retweetledi
POSTHUMAN ∞ DVS
POSTHUMAN ∞ DVS@POSTHUMAN_DVS·
Today is a special day for us! Today is Olim's @write2sd34 Birthday! 🥳🥳🥳 Olim, our dear friend, thank you for all your contributions to the development of the digital tools and infrastructure of the POSTHUMAN validator 🙏 May your presence continue to delight both your physical offline family and your digital online family 🤗 We wish you Endless Will, Eternal Youth, and Physical Immortality! 🦾💜🧬 Accept this gift as a fond memory: omniflix.market/c/onftdenom16a…
POSTHUMAN ∞ DVS tweet media
English
2
1
13
195
POSTHUMAN ∞ DVS
POSTHUMAN ∞ DVS@POSTHUMAN_DVS·
We understand why projects leave, and it's not the projects' fault @cosmoslabs_io is guilty for the exodus of projects from @CosmosEcosystem Over the course of its first year of existence, speaking on behalf of @cosmos, Cosmos Labs told a ton of projects that we now have social-darwinism, and the strongest will survive, and that other projects will receive no support from Cosmos Not only is this all nonsense, coz those who unite best will survive, as mutual aid is the most important factor in evolution. And so we see how weak humans, uniting with horses and dogs, have wiped out the strong mammoths from the evolutionary race The most important point is that Cosmos Labs is not the entire Cosmos Starting with the fact that Cosmos Labs' Voting Power is definitely less than @CosmostationVD, continuing with the fact that @interchain_io ICF failed to prevent the passage of a proposal about the community's lack of trust in ICF After this, ICF allocated 20 million from its funds and handed it over to Skip Protocol (which became Cosmos Labs) This raises two important points: 1) If the community doesn't trust ICF, then why do we trust Cosmos Labs (an ICF protégé)? Cosmos Labs is the same ICF, just from a different perspective 2) Cosmos Labs' Voting Power is even lower than ICF's, as ICF long ago lost most of its ATOMs, and as a result, they were unable to counter the proposal about ICF's lack of trust. And Cosmos Labs doesn't spend ICF funds on increasing its Voting Power. That is, Cosmos Labs cannot represent Cosmos' position; it can only speak for itself. The problem is that other projects believe Cosmos Labs is the "leader of Cosmos," and whatever @0xMagmar says is taken as the position of the entire Cosmos Hub No one would be against good leaders, but since the ICF declared Cosmos Labs the "leader of Cosmos," ATOM has been 3-4 times smaller The best thing Cosmos Labs has come up with is convincing institutions to launch private blockchains on the Cosmos SDK. And Cosmos Labs' role in this is to explain to institutions how to use the Cosmos SDK, which is, roughly speaking, created at the expense of ATOM holders (if anyone doesn't understand how this is connected, we can explain it) And there's nothing wrong with explaining to people how to launch blockchains on the Cosmos SDK. The Validator School @synctems has been doing this for three years... It's just not clear what benefit this will bring to ATOM holders... Cosmos Labs will gain fame and recognition, and maybe even get paid. But it won't be Cosmos Hub that gets paid, it will be Cosmos Labs! Even if Cosmos Hub gets paid, for it to be beneficial for ATOM holders, they'd have to pay a lot, and pay regularly Currently, a total of 272 million ATOMs are staked: So, if institutions pay $272 million for an explanation of how to launch a blockchain using the free, open-source Cosmos SDK, each ATOM holder will receive $1 for each ATOM they stake. But it's a one-time payment. And who would pay that kind of money for training that costs $300 per person, especially on a regular basis, is simply impossible to imagine In addition, hundreds of blockchains have already been launched on the Cosmos SDK, and among them are a ton of successful blockchains: @binance, @cronosapp, @injective, @noble_xyz - but this simply doesn't affect the price of ATOM And if any bank or payment system launches a blockchain on the Cosmos SDK, it won't affect the price of ATOM. Basically, the gist of the complaint is this: - ICF, which the community doesn't trust, declares that Cosmos Labs is now the "leader of Cosmos," and ICF is washing its hands of it. - Everyone hopes and expects Cosmos Labs (as true leaders) to lead Cosmos to a bright future. - If ICF was simply cutting budgets, but at least doing something useful, then Cosmos Labs only made things worse: they stopped EVM implementation, froze payments for ISC development, promoted separatism and social Darwinism, thereby triggering a wave of Cosmos project exits, and generally tarnished Cosmos's reputation. For conspiracy theorists: Cosmos Labs is @jaekwon project to get everyone to turn away from @cosmoshub and switch to @_atomone 😅 And it would be funny if it weren't so sad... While communicating with the ICF was nearly impossible - they simply ignored any requests that weren't in their best interests. They didn't take on the role of Cosmos's leaders, simply being "one of the foundations that helps development" While communicating with Jae Kwon and Atom One is easy, and they're very approachable, which draws attention to Atom One, communicating with Cosmos Labs is a pain We've yet to meet anyone who said they enjoyed communicating with Cosmos Labs Everyone I spoke with said that communicating with Cosmos Labs is difficult, that they're aggressive, and that they act arrogant We can confirm: Cosmos Labs has surprisingly low soft skills. All our attempts to make friendship and develop Cosmos together were met with callous negativity It feels like these people don't understand friendship, cooperation, or mutual assistance... They're not responsible. It's best not to take their word for it; they don't keep it What can we take away from this? 1) Stop thinking that Cosmos is crap just because Cosmos Labs claims to be a leader. Cosmos ≠ Cosmos Labs If you don't like Cosmos Labs, that doesn't mean Cosmos is crap And the fact that you don't like Cosmos Labs is a completely natural reaction of a healthy person; you're not alone; almost everyone feels the same way. The only people who won't tell you Cosmos Labs is crap are the people who receive funds directly from Cosmos Labs, and there aren't many of them 2) Stop believing that Cosmos Labs are some kind of leaders who want to make Cosmos Hub better Cosmos Labs' opinion ≠ Cosmos' opinion. They don't take any actions in the interests of Cosmos Hub or ATOM holders They pursue the interests of their small, centralized group, and what they say on behalf of Cosmos is a ridiculous mistake. 3) Stop thinking that Cosmos is unsaveable. Cosmos has every chance of success if we stop believing in the previous two points and take on the development of Cosmos, ignoring the existence of Cosmos Labs. Or at least delegate this responsibility to those who want to develop Cosmos This is our vision of how we can resurect Cosmos, and we will be pleased for a feedback: dorian-carriage-980.notion.site/Cosmos-Resurre…
English
29
52
166
218.2K
Olimjon Sadykov
Olimjon Sadykov@write2sd34·
I'm so proud to participate in Q4 Posthuman Campaign
POSTHUMAN ∞ DVS@POSTHUMAN_DVS

🔥 The Q4 Posthuman Campaign is live on Centrifuge! If you're part of the Cosmos Ecosystem — this moment is made for you In the new Q4 Posthuman season, you’ll find fresh quests, rewards, #airdrops and bonus activities. And for #NFT holders, there are exclusive extra missions! 🚀 💎 NFT collections in the bonus program: Posthuman Avatar-50 👽 Posthuman Avatar 🎭 Weird Friends 👻 @weirdfriennds Red Planet 🪐 (MiAmigos) @Red_Planet_Dao Mammonts 🐘 @MammothOverlord Sloth 🦥@CelestineSloths Bad Kids 👶 @badkidsart Mad Science 👨‍🔬 @madscientists_x DeFiGeeks 😎 @DeFiGeeksNFT Expedition ⛵️ @expedition_pics OMie 🥒 @OnchainOMies LLamaZone 🦙@TheLlamaZone CosmosNibble 💡 @CosmosNibble Pingeon Bandit 🐦 @StarGops_nft CosmosNews 📰 @CosmosEcosystem Dungeon🐉@cryptodungeonma 💫 How to participate: 1️⃣ Join our Discord - discord.gg/nm3wAFQp3Z and get your NFT holder role - 🎩・roles👈 channel 2️⃣ Go to Centrifuge - centrifuge.digital/posthuman, connect your wallet and Discord, and complete quests! 3️⃣ Earn XP, which will be converted into $PHMN at the end of the quarter⏳ 🎯 The main goal of the Posthuman campaign is to reward active contributors across the @cosmos ecosystem! 🚀 Start now! 👉 Join @centrifuge_dig and take part in Q4 Posthuman!

English
0
1
1
45
Olimjon Sadykov
Olimjon Sadykov@write2sd34·
so excited to get staking rewards for Q3 from POSTHUMAN VALIDATOR!
POSTHUMAN ∞ DVS@POSTHUMAN_DVS

POSTHUMAN Staking Rewards — Q3 2025 Distributed! 🎉 Friends, we’re happy to announce that all our delegators have received: 1. Governance SBTs of varying rarity levels for staking $PHMN during Q3 2025 📦 Visit omniflix.market to admire your SBTs! 2. NFT Spheres of different rarity tiers , from Common to Diamond — distributed proportionally to your stake 🌐 Learn more about NFT Spheres and Avatars here: avatars.posthuman.digital 👽 Thank you all for your participation and support in decentralized governance! Your stake is our shared strength, and we’re glad to celebrate your activity 🦾💜🧬

English
0
0
2
27