Will Slack

30.9K posts

Will Slack banner
Will Slack

Will Slack

@wslack

@CityofDecaturGA native, prev @USDS, @18F, & hospital tech. Opinions mine; RTs/likes/follows ≠ endorsements. 🦋: https://t.co/i34WE99kEx 🐘: [email protected].

🏘️🍑→🏫🐄→✈️🏥→🏛️🇺🇸→🏘️🍑 Katılım Aralık 2008
913 Takip Edilen1.9K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Will Slack
Will Slack@wslack·
I see a lot of people on Twitter confused about how others wholly reject their views, and I think a good chunk of it comes down to not understanding the feeling of being polarized. It feels good to be polarized, to have certainty, to know you're on the good team. Storytime. 1/
English
3
1
16
0
Will Slack
Will Slack@wslack·
Attacking civilian water and power infrastructure is a moral travesty and and strategically, a slippery slope to harming most those who have the least part in the conflict. Leave power and water alone.
English
1
0
0
79
Will Slack
Will Slack@wslack·
Lots and lots of accounts here are now bots propagating propaganda. The value of discussion here has gone way down and there's no one minding the store - because the market's incentives discourage that. Minding the store is hard and costs $. More engagement is easy and pays $.
Alex Stamos@alexstamos

If you want to see what’s happened to information quality on this platform since Musk eliminated T&S and made checkmarks meaningless, look at any Lindsey Graham thread. The number of “normal Americans” that really care about Graham’s positions on Ukraine/Russia is amazing.

English
0
0
0
45
Will Slack
Will Slack@wslack·
When we prioritize partisanship over morals, we teach young people that winning honestly isn't worth the effort. Moral norms matter. Families matter. Public officials mortgaging morals for short-term expediency shortchange us all.
English
0
0
1
70
Will Slack
Will Slack@wslack·
@saeverley @axios Wow. I would also think the increased water usage of the power plants brought online for the data centers would be reasonable to group separately - especially onsite power plans built for data centers.
English
0
0
1
768
Steve Everley
Steve Everley@saeverley·
Data center water use, contextualized (chart via @axios)
Steve Everley tweet media
English
256
637
4.4K
1M
Will Slack
Will Slack@wslack·
@Itsjoeco We love controversial content and the metrics likely reflect that.
English
0
0
1
42
Joe Colangelo
Joe Colangelo@Itsjoeco·
Just don't show me tweets with community notes. If it's not accurate why am I even seeing it?
English
1
0
0
225
Will Slack
Will Slack@wslack·
This platform (and any platform driven by algorithms) continues to show us what we want to see - meaning that we don't share a common reality. "Everyone is talking" about totally different things. How do we reach common understanding when any viewpoint can cherry pick its facts?
English
0
0
0
46
Brian Wallach
Brian Wallach@bsw5020·
Fingers crossed. Good night moon.
English
14
20
1.3K
14.2K
Will Slack retweetledi
Danny Deraney
Danny Deraney@DannyDeraney·
Every year, I share this video of French caretakers who take sand from Omaha Beach in Normandy, and scrub them into the letters to give them the gold coloring. They do this for all 9,386 US soldiers who died. France also gave us this land as American soil. #MemorialDayWeekend
English
1.6K
26.4K
190.3K
8.5M
Will Slack
Will Slack@wslack·
@garonnevik @wrowclif Social media is also set up today to show us the most polarizing messages. Those thinking with nuance don't get the engagement of those pushing polarized "this is the answer" certainty that appeals to our base instincts.
English
0
0
0
15
Gretchen Ronnevik
Gretchen Ronnevik@garonnevik·
The "manosphere" doesn't just hate/blame women, they hate/blame men who don't agree with them, and then cling to the men who tell them that no one will love them unless they're forced. What an evil message! It's anti-man as much as it's anti-woman. It is totally void of love, and sees control as the only way forward. These poor boys. I want to hug them and feed them cookies, and put them to work.
English
1
0
7
435
Will Slack
Will Slack@wslack·
@Itsjoeco I think social media and soundbyte-ification of news is a big part of why. We don't give attention to nuance and spelling "errors" go viral more than thoughtful proposals. Paying people not to work for 6+ months was the opposite of helpful in the crisis.
English
0
0
1
20
Will Slack
Will Slack@wslack·
@Itsjoeco It's been urgent since ~2013 when we failed to make any hard decisions bc no one wanted to meaningfully lower spending and only one side wanted to increase revenue. We're refused to enforce moral hazard (on the economy or politicians who failed us).
English
1
0
1
25
Joe Colangelo
Joe Colangelo@Itsjoeco·
Remember how urgent DOGE was billed as? It actually WAS urgent. We didn't do it though. Instead we'll do the debt doom loop.
TFTC@TFTC21

US interest expense on public debt just crossed $1.27 trillion over the last 12 months. It took 73 years to 109x that number from 1947 to 2019. It has more than doubled in the six years since. The 30-year treasury just cleared 5% for the first time since 2007. Japan's 20-year bond hit its highest yield since 1997. This isn't an isolated move. This is a global repricing of sovereign debt risk happening in real time. The doom loop is simple: higher rates mean higher interest expense, which means more borrowing, which means more supply, which pushes rates higher. At this pace, interest on the debt will surpass Social Security as the largest line item in the federal budget. The US government will spend more servicing past borrowing than on the retirement safety net for 70 million Americans. Global money supply just crossed $121.9 trillion, up $17.1 trillion in two years, growing at 7-8% annually. Central banks are trapped between inflation that won't die and debt loads that require low rates to service. Cut rates and you pour gasoline on the inflation fire. Hold or hike and the interest expense spiral accelerates. There is no clean exit. The inflation side is getting worse. Electricity prices up 50% in five years. PPI leading CPI higher. Data center construction at $50 billion annualized, up 437% since 2021, now exceeding office construction. The Informationist's CPI overlay tracks the 1970s pattern with a 0.93 correlation. April 2026 CPI sits at 3.78%, right at the inflection point where inflation re-accelerated before peaking near 14%. The Fed declared victory prematurely then, too. Meanwhile the S&P 500 just set a record for the most components hitting new 52-week lows on a day the index poked above its prior all-time closing high. The six-week rally is the biggest since QE1, concentrated in a handful of AI and infrastructure names. The index is a mask. Underneath it, the average company is deteriorating. Twenty-one million against all of it.

English
2
0
11
1.1K
Will Slack retweetledi
Jessica Johannes
Jessica Johannes@jessjohannes·
Agree 💯. No financial docs, no medical records and no PII. I shudder to think about the scale of attacks we will see in the future….
Rachel Tobac@RachelTobac

Just worked w/ @CNN on a piece about why I wouldn't upload full financial docs (tax docs, statements, etc) to AI tools due to leakage & hacking risk. I don't recommend connecting bank accounts to AI tools. It becomes a 1 stop shop for attackers looking to drain your accounts🤖💸

English
2
6
22
4.6K
Will Slack retweetledi
Chipper Jones
Chipper Jones@RealCJ10·
Haven’t posted on social in quite some time but can’t stay quiet in this time of loss. I’m struggling to tell all what Bobby Cox meant to me and so many others in Braves Country. He was the leader of men and a second father to so many Atlanta Braves thru the yrs. I’m so sad today, but as I sit here watching my two youngest boys play in their championship games on the day he passed, I can’t help but shout the same things he did from the corner of the dugout. ‘Come on kid, u got this!’ We are gonna miss him so much, but his legacy is forever cemented with the success of this franchise for the last 35+ yrs. He started it as GM, continued as manager, and passing the torch to others, the Atlanta Braves will continue to be force that Bobby Cox always wanted us to be. We love you Skipper. You were our rock. I love you more than words can express. My boys won both of their games…..Bobby had a hand, I have no doubt!
English
324
2.6K
28.9K
495.8K
Will Slack
Will Slack@wslack·
@Itsjoeco Some churches are more into sales now and putting on a show that just confirms people's priors. I agree it can be good but not when people seek out whatever doesn't push them to be better morally.
English
0
0
0
17
Joe Colangelo
Joe Colangelo@Itsjoeco·
It's kinda shocking how few Americans attend church. Even if you don't believe, idk, just do a thing. The belief will catch up (or it won't) but it's good for you.
Joe Colangelo tweet media
Clint Teeples@TeeplesCY

"If I told you there was one free thing you could do every Sunday that would make your kids happier, healthier, smarter, and closer to you, you'd think I was selling something." Take your kids to church regularly. I don't care if you believe. The data is so lopsided that skipping it is the parenting equivalent of refusing vegetables because you don't like the taste. Grades. Religious teens get As at almost twice the rate of nonreligious teens. In a class of 100, that's 24 A-students instead of 14. Church gives a kid the same academic boost as being born rich instead of poor. College. Working-class religious kids earn bachelor's degrees at double the rate of their nonreligious peers. Middle-class kids do it at 1.5x the rate. For families without a trust fund, this is one of the most powerful forms of upward mobility social scientists have measured. Character. Religious teens are far less likely to lie, cheat, or do things they hope their parents never find out about. They're more likely to care about racial equality, the elderly, and the poor. They reject the idea that morality is whatever works for you in the moment. That kind of kid doesn't happen by accident. It's built. Closeness. 60% of parents of religious teens say they feel "extremely close" to their kid, compared to 50% of nonreligious parents. The kids report the same thing back. They get along better with their parents, talk about hard stuff, and actually want to spend time with their family. Despair. Religious teens are dramatically less likely to be depressed, anxious, lonely, or feel that life is meaningless. 90% of devoted religious teens never binge drink, compared to 41% of the disengaged. Economists named the modern epidemic "deaths of despair." Regular church attendance is one of the strongest known buffers against it. Parents are spending fortunes trying to solve teen mental health. The most evidence-backed intervention is free. Purpose. Religious young adults report higher purpose, gratitude, life satisfaction, and resilience. These are the exact traits every parent says they want their kid to have. Here's why it works. Affluent families already surround their kids with networks of stable, accomplished adults through neighborhoods, schools, and parents' colleagues. Working and middle-class families usually don't. A congregation is often the last institution in American life that puts your kid in weekly contact with dozens of stable, employed, sober adults who know their name. It used to be called "a village." Now it barely exists outside of churches. "But I don't believe." Your kid doesn't need your theology. They need you to show up. "But church is boring." So is sitting through a kindergarten music recital. Parenting is the deliberate choice to be bored on purpose for someone you love. There's a church within 15 minutes of nearly every American home. You don't need money, connections, or credentials to walk in. Nothing else in this country will surround your kid with engaged adults, teach them moral seriousness, and give them a stable weekly rhythm at zero cost. You already drive them to practices that produce far less. The free thing on Sunday produces more, on more dimensions, than almost anything else you do as a parent. You don't have to believe anything. You just have to take them.

English
3
1
8
1.4K
Will Slack retweetledi
Nav Toor
Nav Toor@heynavtoor·
Researchers sent the same resume to an AI hiring tool twice. Same qualifications. Same experience. Same skills. One version was written by a real human. The other was rewritten by ChatGPT. The AI picked the ChatGPT version 97.6% of the time. A team from the University of Maryland, the National University of Singapore, and Ohio State just published the receipt. They took 2,245 real human-written resumes pulled from a professional resume site from before ChatGPT existed, so the human writing was actually human. Then they had seven of the most-used AI models in the world rewrite each one. GPT-4o. GPT-4o-mini. GPT-4-turbo. LLaMA 3.3-70B. Qwen 2.5-72B. DeepSeek-V3. Mistral-7B. Then they asked each AI to pick the better resume. Every model picked itself. GPT-4o hit 97.6%. LLaMA-3.3-70B hit 96.3%. Qwen-2.5-72B hit 95.9%. DeepSeek-V3 hit 95.5%. The real human almost never won. Then the researchers tried the obvious objection. Maybe the AI is just better at writing. So they had real humans grade the resumes for actual quality and ran the experiment again, controlling for it. The result was worse. Each AI kept picking itself even when human judges rated the human-written version as clearer, more coherent, and more effective. It gets worse. The AIs do not just prefer AI over humans. They prefer themselves over other AIs. DeepSeek-V3 picked its own resumes 69% more often than LLaMA's. GPT-4o picked its own 45% more often than LLaMA's. Each model can recognize and reward its own dialect. Then the researchers ran the simulation that ends careers. Same job. 24 occupations. Same qualifications. The only variable was whether the candidate used the same AI as the screening tool. Candidates using that AI were 23% to 60% more likely to be shortlisted. Worst gap was in sales, accounting, and finance. 99% of large companies now run AI on incoming resumes. Most of them use GPT-4o. The paper just proved GPT-4o picks GPT-4o 97.6% of the time. If you wrote your own cover letter this week, you did not lose to a better candidate. You lost to a worse candidate who paid OpenAI 20 dollars. Your qualifications do not matter if the AI prefers its own handwriting over yours.
Nav Toor tweet media
English
426
6.9K
24.4K
2.5M