Yanal Khalil retweetledi
Yanal Khalil
99 posts

Yanal Khalil
@yanalgrowth
destroyed your attention span + building @contentrewards | second acc: @alexxgrowth
🇸🇦 Katılım Temmuz 2020
26 Takip Edilen583 Takipçiler
Yanal Khalil retweetledi

hint:
-> the views are 4000x more
-> the CPC is 200x more effective
Alex@alexxgrowth
i just spend $5,000 on a billboard and $5,000 on a clipping campaign the result difference is genuinely ridiculous comment "BILLBOARD" and i'll send you the video documentary when it's out
English
Yanal Khalil retweetledi

@jessegrowth I'm a travel app owner I want to message but your DMs are off
English

@oneclip_media @ScarfaceTrades_ i would aruge its the middlemans fault
English

5m views generated.
$0 paid.
That’s the ROI @ScarfaceTrades_ got by scamming 5 top-tier clippers on a "trial."
He ghosted over a measly $5k tab.
Imagine having 2 supercars and still scamming like a broke boy.
Cheap clients are the most expensive mistake you'll make.


English

"we need to go viral!"
"why?"
"because... everyone's doing it?"
"what happens if you get 10M views and zero revenue?"
"..."
this conversation happens every day.
brands are chasing views like it's the only metric that matters.
your CMO literally cannot tell the difference between 10M useless views and 1M views that actually convert.
same dopamine hit. same screenshot for the board meeting. same zero revenue.
client last week: "our influencer got us 5M views!"
me: "how much revenue?"
them: "we... don't know?"
me: "so you spent $15k and have no idea if it worked?"
when they realized views ≠ money, everything changed.
they stopped hiring expensive influencers. stopped celebrating vanity metrics. stopped paying upfront for bs.
we deployed 2,000 faceless creators instead.
7.7M views last week = $61k-92k revenue tracked
cost: $15.4k
their profit: $45k-76k
here's the test:
if someone asks "How much revenue per thousand views?"
and you can't give a REAL FUCKING NUMBER...
you're lying to yourself.
real success: more money in the bank than you spent.
fake success: "we went viral!"
the only thing that matters is revenue per view and cost per acquisition.
if you're doing $50k+/mo and want performance marketing that actually tracks to revenue
DM me

English

Instagram's "Boost Post" button is a $50 intelligence test that identifies users who don't know how advertising works...
Every time someone clicks it, Zuckerberg's system categorizes them as low sophistication and extracts maximum revenue for minimum results.
Here's the technical breakdown:
Boost has ZERO pixel integration. Can't track conversions. It optimizes for "engagement" which means likes from 13-year-olds in the Philippines. No audience exclusions. No A/B testing. No retargeting capability. No frequency controls.
You're paying $50 to get vanity metrics. 1,000 likes. 0 sales.
It's designed as a tax on ignorance...
Sophisticated advertisers use Ads Manager where they install conversion pixels, build custom audiences, run retargeting sequences, A/B test creative. It's complex because it actually works.
But here's what I do instead...
I've been running organic-only campaigns for 3 years. $100k/month. Never clicked "Boost" once.
My "ad spend" is paying clippers to create content. 500 pieces of UGC going viral simultaneously. That's my advertising budget and it returns 100x what any paid ad could.
Stop subsidizing Meta's bottom line with the "I don't know what I'm doing" button...
English

@jessegrowth Hating on another guy for 0 reason at all is pretty gay as well.
English

@leezer321 what does it scrape exactly for the audience demos?
English
















