Nobody

I really don't care if athletes engage with sex workers or recreational drugs (both should be legal) but anything that suggests a lack of consent is instantly gross.

I'll bite. Let me focus on one bit in your writing, because it's crucial for understanding the dynamic between Israel and moderate Democrats like yourself. Suppose a two-state solution is implemented. It's all signed, borders agreed, Jerusalem is divided, euphoria, we're partying like it's the '90s. There's peace. Three years later, there is a mega-attack, several times the scale of Oct 7. Thousands dead. Perhaps it's the PA government, which was never honest about peace. More likely, it's after a Hamas-led coup. Or perhaps it's by a rogue Hamas cell that the PA government could nver fully reign in (Hamas operates in the Jenin area and defies state sovereignty much as Hezbollah does today in South Lebanon). Either way, thousands are dead, the scenes even more apocapyptic than on Oct 7. The Israeli government declares war on the State of Palestine. They also announce: "We agreed to Palestinian statehood on the assumption that it's the price of peace, but there is no peace; our citizens have been massacred. Therefore, the peace agreement is null and void. We derecognize the State of Palestine and will reoccupy its territory". Question: what will you do? What will be your reaction? Will you say: "That's totally fair, I was wrong"? Or will you call for deescalation, urge Israel to give a proportional response, explain that it wasn't Palestine, it was Hamas, and demand that Israel sit down with the Palestinians to find a diplomatic solution (*another* diplomatic solution, this time *really*!) to avoid a *third* Oct 7-like event? For Israelis contemplating the wisdom of placating the moderate wing of the Democrats by agreeing to a two-state solution, it is absolutely crucial to know what moderate Democrats like you would do in such a scenario. Please reflect on the question, and please be honest with me and especially with yourself.