luciano
1.1K posts
AI Slop will never beat Real UGC in 100 years. here is why: > AI is deceptive > platforms force you to disclose AI generated videos > real humans feel 10x more organic and natural > 9/10 people ick when they see AI real human UGC reactions costs $3-5. $1 savings are not worth the engagement and brand reputation destruction. DM me, I send you 10 free UGC reactions from DansUGC.
I have scheduled a call with app reviewers on the 26th and will be adding some new features I think will differentiate me more Can’t lose hope yet
RevenueCat vs. Superwall fuck it I’ll explain the difference basically: revenuecat is your WIFE stable + lots of history, and you trust her you have decent sex (paywall targeting/experiments) but you know you can rely on her to pick up the kids and make you dinner (reliable data, no outages) superwall is your FUCKBUDDY more exciting + fun, but unpredictable crazy sex (paywall targeting/experiments) but her cooking is mid and she sometimes ghosts you (outages/bugs) my advice: if you are just getting started, go with the fuckbuddy. get married later. superwall’s whole UI will handhold you to what matters early on - today’s sales, paywall view rate, a/b tests, etc. these are most important when you’re getting started but when you outgrow the juvenile (but necessary) hookup phase… when you have meaningful MRR, thousands of subscribers, MMP setup, etc. you must take yourself seriously and get married revenuecat’s UI will handhold you to what matters most as a big app - subscription states, normalized revenue, customer cohorts, etc. and it’s just more reliable (crucial if you run an MMP) also, you can marry revenuecat and make superwall your mistress. this is what i do. and i currently spend most of my time with superwall because revenuecat confuses me notes: this whole post is haram used for illustrative purposes only do not cheat on your spouse i don’t condone adultery or casual sex also i respect tf out of women and acknowledge husband/lover could work here just as much as wife/mistress equalitymaxx additionally: most of what i said is with respect to the *UIs* of revenuecat and superwall you can run great paywall targeting/experiments in revenuecat and also get solid revenue data visualizations in superwall but the way they prioritize these in the UI has a real impact on how you use these products. and therefore, how you approach monetization choose wisely
f in the chat just got hit with the classic 4.3 spam rejection. which is wild because even though my app is a tracker, this is a sub niche where there isnt many apps i changed the name of the app and wrote an appeal. lets see how it goes
50k dol mes com essa ui... parece que o feio converte muito ainda
Trial que pede cartão de crédito converte cerca de 31.4% Trial sem cartão converte 8.9% Dado do Chartmogul de 2026 no mercado americano com 200 produtos analisados. Diferença de mais de 3X. Parece óbvio: Pede cartão, só entra quem tem intenção real de pagar, mas tem um custo escondido. Pedir cartão reduz signup. Você converte mais trial em pagante, mas tem menos trial para converter. Cenário A (Sem cartão): 1.000 visitantes → 85 trials → 7.5 pagantes (8.9% de conversão) Cenário B (com cartão): 1.000 visitantes → 30 trials → 9.4 pagantes (31.4% conversão) Eu sempre falo que freemium é bem menos efetivo que aquilo que se prega, tem aí mais um indício e não é o único. Lógico, isso é dado US, numa economia diferente, se você roda Brasil precisa considerar isso e o PIX que mesmo no "recorrente" tem uma dinâmica bem diferente em relação aos pagamentos mensais. Na prática tenho visto em todos os clientes que clientes de PIX recorrente tem maior churn que os clientes de cartão. Isso significa que pedir cartão no trial é a melhor opção? Possivelmente. Isso significa que PIX recorrente não presta? Não, inclusive dependendo do ICP você nem tenha essa alternativa de só trabalhar de cartão. Significa que você não deve pensar qual modelo converte mais, mas qual modelo atrai e retém o ICP certo.
