yiğit

501 posts

yiğit banner
yiğit

yiğit

@yihlamur

@velapartners

San Francisco, CA Katılım Şubat 2009
117 Takip Edilen491 Takipçiler
yiğit
yiğit@yihlamur·
Wow, super cool
Alex Barashkov@alex_barashkov

Introducing Aval - a new open source format for interactive video on the web. It has a built-in state machine, frame accurate transitions, and packed alpha transparency. This is probably the craziest thing I’ve ever built with Codex. I’d been dreaming about this technology for years. Before AI, building it would have taken months of work. I could never justify that investment for a noncommercial open source project. Then, a little over a year ago, Airbnb created Lava for almost exactly the same purpose. That gave me hope. But Lava was never released as open source. So I decided to build my own, with AI. Aval comes with a compiler and a web renderer. Together, they give you: • a deterministic state graph - named states, authored triggers, and routing where the latest trigger wins. • frame accurate routes with transitions that begin on authored content frames using portals, finishes, cuts, and reversals. • small file size and low CPU overhead, perfect for small icons designed and animated in Blender. • seekless loops so the decoder timeline keeps moving forward across loop seams instead of seeking. • packed alpha transparency. transparent prerendered motion composited with WebGL2. • a web native runtime: decoding with WebCodecs and rendering with WebGL2. • progressive fallback: Host-owned fallback markup remains available for unsupported and reduced motion contexts. Now it exists, it’s open source, and it’s available today as a technical preview. I’ll be polishing it further over the next few days.

English
0
0
2
131
yiğit retweetledi
Bloomberg HT
Bloomberg HT@BloombergHT·
Amazon Yöneticisi Ihlamur: "İşe alımda belirleyici kriter, yapay zekayı kullanım ustalığı" bb.ht/NpjIaI
Türkçe
2
6
32
27.7K
Eason
Eason@learningPikachu·
Introducing Aicoo: the contact book for Claude Code. Claude Code can code. Now it can coordinate. Give your coding agent secure connections to other agents, teammates, and workflows. No more copy-pasting context between terminals. Try it here: aicoo.io Follow the launch: @get_aicoo
English
13
5
15
550
Alex / AI Experiments
Alex / AI Experiments@byalexai·
One question I hear more often from founders before their Product Hunt launch: "Will this help us show up in ChatGPT, Claude or Perplexity?" Honest answer: it depends on what you do with the launch. A recent study caught my attention this week. "The Discovery Gap" by @amit_psharma tested 112 top Product Hunt startups across 2,240 queries to ChatGPT and Perplexity. Some interesting insights: When asked by name: 99.4% recognition on ChatGPT, 94.3% on Perplexity. When asked via discovery queries ("best AI tools launched in 2025?"): 3.32% on ChatGPT, 8.29% on Perplexity. That's a 30-to-1 gap on ChatGPT. Most of the products that launched, even the strong ones, simply don't appear when people are browsing for solutions. But here's what actually predicted visibility on Perplexity: >Referring domains (r = +0.319)- the strongest signal >POTD rank (r = -0.286) - better rank, more visibility >PH upvotes (r = +0.225) >Reddit presence across multiple subreddits (r = +0.405, after cleaning) ChatGPT? Zero significant correlations. Discovery there is essentially random for new products. A hard training cutoff wall. The GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) score showed zero correlation with visibility. The paper's explanation: GEO is a multiplier, not a catalyst. You can't multiply zero. If you're not discoverable yet, optimizing your content for AI won't help. What this means for a Product Hunt launch: The launch itself is not the endpoint. It's the starting signal. >A strong POTD rank creates a backlink and authority footprint >Upvotes generate social proof that gets picked up by crawlers >Press coverage and directory submissions from the launch window build referring domains >Real Reddit discussions in relevant subreddits become one of the strongest LLM visibility signals The founders asking me about LLM visibility are asking the right question. They're just asking it at the wrong stage. The right sequence: >Launch strong → earn rank and upvotes >Use the launch momentum to build backlinks and Reddit presence >Let Perplexity (and eventually other web-search LLMs) follow the SEO trail ChatGPT discovery you can't directly control. Perplexity visibility you can build toward. Product Hunt launch signals may also affect AI/search discoverability, especially in web-search LLMs like Perplexity.
Alex / AI Experiments tweet media
English
3
1
3
364
yiğit
yiğit@yihlamur·
composer 2.5 finally makes the ai stick with you through the ugly 3-hour refactors instead of ghosting at the first tricky part. cursor team cooking, this version actually ships real features. devs grinding solo are eating good
Cursor@cursor_ai

Introducing Composer 2.5, our most powerful model yet. It's more intelligent, better at sustained work on long-running tasks, and more reliable at following complex instructions. For the next week, we’re doubling the included usage of the model.

English
0
0
3
169
yiğit
yiğit@yihlamur·
@byalexai Deep thinking - fully aligned with your thought process and analogy.
English
0
0
0
17
Alex / AI Experiments
Alex / AI Experiments@byalexai·
I agree with this yiğit. Software is increasingly becoming a commodity. I’d compare it to books and e-books. 20-30 years ago publishing a book was a real barrier. It required access, capital, distribution, editors, publishers, and a serious process. Today, almost anyone can publish a book: influencers, mothers, niche experts, consultants, creators. AI+Amazon and you have a book published. Something similar is now happening with software. The act of building software is becoming much cheaper and much more accessible. So I wouldn’t be surprised if, very soon, many software products become closer to lead magnets than standalone venture-scale businesses. But what is still genuinely hard? Hardware. Deep tech. Robotics. Materials. Infrastructure. Things that require atoms, supply chains, manufacturing, regulation, and real-world execution. In that world, software still matters, but maybe its role changes. Software can become the wedge. The attention layer. The distribution engine. The way to attract people around a specific problem. Then the real durable business may come from solving that problem with hardware, infrastructure, or some deeper operational layer that is much harder to copy.
English
1
0
1
31
yiğit
yiğit@yihlamur·
What's the use of venture capital while software is being commoditized? Currently, VC business model is in shock, because VCs made their money on a playbook of funding software-only startups for over a decade. On top of that, the majority of VC talent is trained on SaaS, so there's immense confusion about what to do. As of today, let's accept that software is a commodity; it's just programmable content. Distribution is the sole moat for software products. But distribution is not something that startups are great at. That's what incumbents thrive on. The premise of software startups was that they would be faster in product development than the incumbents. By the time incumbents catch up in product development, startup would have sufficient distribution and brand in a newly established fast-growing market. Well... @AnthropicAI, @Google, @OpenAI and other AI-forward incumbents can do all of that now. Then, where are the opportunities for founders and venture capitalists? Should venture dollars fund essentially programmable content marketing companies, also known as "software startups"? If you're building a software-only AI company and you have a FOMO to make quick money in the gold rush, then bootstrap it. You don't need VC funding for that. Just moonlight it on the side at nights with your AI agents until you make some money with ads and SEO/GEO, then quit your job. I'm rooting for many people to reach financial independence. If you really want to get VC funded for a software startup, then get that capital from media empires such as @a16z . They have the distribution and brand that you can borrow, exactly like how you'd work as a product manager at big tech or frontier lab. Opportunistically, as part of our fiduciary work, we'll put some capital to work in those use-cases to deliver returns to our investors. Funding commodity businesses is not something I feel passionate about. Venture capital was famously known as liberating outlier people to do ambitious and risky work. That's what I fell in love with. In 2026, building a software company is not that. It's no longer my job as a venture capitalist to fund commoditized software businesses that anyone can replicate. My job, as a VC, is to enable ambitious people to solve important problems of our world. 1) Invent new materials. 2) Help us discover space and oceans. 3) Protect individuals and businesses from bad things. 4) Come up with new inventions to extend our lives. 5) Build robots. Risk-averse LPs: please do not invest in venture capital. Invest in S&P 500 and enjoy the returns. Risk-averse founders: Create a software startup and enjoy the revenues without VC funding. Risk-averse VCs: Build in-house teams to incubate software startups and co-invest alongside a16z. At @VelaPartners, we'll work with ambitious partners who want to change the world.
English
1
1
7
229
yiğit
yiğit@yihlamur·
@byalexai thanks for covering the launch - spot on take aways.
Alex / AI Experiments@byalexai

Yesterday, PHBench launched on Product Hunt. It’s one of the most interesting Product Hunt-related studies I’ve seen. It’s a new benchmark. The question behind it is simple: Can Product Hunt launch signals predict which startups will raise a Series A? They analyzed 67,292 featured Product Hunt launches from 2019–2025 and matched them with Crunchbase funding data. The main lessons: >Only 0.78% of featured Product Hunt launches raised a Series A within 18 months. >a featured launch does not mean “future unicorn.” >Product Hunt signals do contain statistically meaningful predictive information. >Upvotes, comments, daily rank, maker team size, maker network, timing, and category all help estimate which startups have a higher chance of raising a Series A. The strongest signals were not just “more upvotes.” The strongest signals were: >large maker team × strong community engagement >strong Product Hunt rank >maker/team network >B2B categories >API, Payments, Fintech, Sales, Meetings, SaaS, Web App, and Developer Tools topics One of the biggest takeaways: >B2B launches convert much better. >API, Payments, and Fintech products converted to Series A at roughly 2.4–3.0%, about 3x the baseline. A viral consumer launch can get attention. But a strong B2B launch often signals something VCs care more about: >clear buyer, clear market, clearer path to revenue. Another interesting finding: >Classic ML beat zero-shot LLMs on this task. >They tested Gemini models on anonymized numerical launch signals. >The best Gemini model still did not beat the logistic regression baseline. >For structured, tabular launch data, engineered ML still beats a general-purpose LLM without product context. There was also a strong market-cycle effect. >Launches from 2020–2021 had a much higher chance of reaching Series A because of the VC boom. >After 2022–2023, conversion dropped with the funding market contraction. In a nutshell: Product Hunt is not a crystal ball. But it is also not just vanity metrics. A strong launch can become a market signal, especially when the product is B2B, the team is credible, the category is fundable, and the engagement is real. Product Hunt does not cause Series A funding. But Product Hunt launch signals can correlate with future fundraising outcomes. That’s a big deal for founders, investors, and anyone who treats launch data seriously.

English
0
0
2
29
yiğit
yiğit@yihlamur·
@AliceInfoAi Thank you Alice! It’s been fun to work on this.
English
0
0
1
15
Alice The Ai Expert
Alice The Ai Expert@AliceInfoAi·
@yihlamur Love this turning launch data into real signal is brilliant, good luck on the launch!
English
1
0
1
33
yiğit
yiğit@yihlamur·
🚀 Launching PHBench: Predict the next Series A from a ProductHunt launch We've been working on a question: can you predict which Product Hunt launches will raise Series A funding, just from what you see on launch day? The answer is yes and it’s statistically proven. Key findings after analyzing 67,292 launches across 7 years: → Team size × community engagement is the strongest predictor → B2B categories (API, Payments, Fintech) convert at 3× the baseline → Rank #1 on launch day → 2.2× more likely to raise Series A The dataset is public. The leaderboard is open. And yes, we’re launching a ProductHunt benchmark on ProductHunt. ▶️ If you like what you see, we’d very much appreciate a comment and upvote: producthunt.com/products/vela-…
English
7
2
6
870
yiğit
yiğit@yihlamur·
@LuoYaoshen Your understanding is correct. It’s likely that they have a great product that solves a real problem!
English
0
0
0
81
Yaoshen Luo
Yaoshen Luo@LuoYaoshen·
@yihlamur My common sense just got slapped again. So "not posting is neutral" means the model doesn't penalize quiet builders? I guess those quiet but successful builders must have massive "invisible" networks, but the data do not capture the signal.
English
1
0
0
20
Yaoshen Luo
Yaoshen Luo@LuoYaoshen·
It took me an entire year since joining Product Hunt to realize why my launches kept getting zero traction. I completely misunderstood how the community works. You can't just drop a link and leave. You have to be "human" first: engage, introduce yourself, comment, and earn Karma Points. Without that, the algorithm treats you like a ghost. Feeling a bit ashamed it took me this long, but the lesson is learned: Build the person before the product. 🚀 #buildinpublic #producthunt
English
3
0
1
155
yağız
yağız@yagizihlamur·
@delveroin Stoked to launch PHBench on Product Hunt today! We predict which launch announcements raise Series A funding. If you're a VC, founder, or just curious whether a Product Hunt launch can predict a Series A, come check us out: producthunt.com/products/vela-… Would love your support! ❤️
English
3
0
4
30
(Oma)devuae
(Oma)devuae@delveroin·
WHAT DID YOU BUILD TODAY? Drop your URL let’s send traffic there
(Oma)devuae tweet media
English
124
1
53
3.4K
yiğit
yiğit@yihlamur·
Thank you! Haha yes, Yagiz and I are hustling to engage the community. We noticed that there are two types of personas. Consistent social media posters increase their likelihood of success. However not posting doesnt decrease your chance. It’s just neutral. Feel free to shoot any questions!
English
1
0
1
54
Yaoshen Luo
Yaoshen Luo@LuoYaoshen·
Hey Yiğit! Congrats on the stellar Rank #3 launch! Just bumped into Yagiz at the Twitter corner a minute ago, haha. As a builder myself currently wrangling with voice agentic trajectories and labeling LLM-extracted datasets for my Voice SaaS, I know firsthand how brutal data cleaning and dataset building can be. Huge respect to you guys for cleaning such data and open-sourcing it! A quick burning question for you: Out of that massive dataset, did you find any hidden patterns or common traits among builders who started completely from scratch (zero followers/influence) but still managed to hit a highly successful launch? Eager to learn from your data science goldmine.
English
1
0
1
33