Zdravko Dimitrov

11.2K posts

Zdravko Dimitrov

Zdravko Dimitrov

@zdrdim

Katılım Kasım 2022
89 Takip Edilen65 Takipçiler
MJ
MJ@Real_Politik101·
The nationalist coalition in Europe will disintegrate with the loss of their leader if Viktor’s defeated. Will lose the recent momentum big time. Both Brussels and JD (+ Trump) know this, hence they’re each investing heavily on their side winning. Doing a rally for a foreign leader wow. Haven’t seen that before I think. April 12 will be a very important, historical day. Don’t get rid of the shield that defends your society, sovereignty, and freedoms. Being an EU member is one thing (though I’m a skeptic and believe it shouldn’t exist). A vassal is COMPLETELY another
MJ tweet media
Rapid Response 47@RapidResponse47

.@VP in Budapest: "Thank you for being a great friend of the United States of America." 🇺🇸🇭🇺

English
7
6
43
3K
Harmless
Harmless@HarmlessHQ·
You don't compare Russia-Ukraine war situation to the US-Iran war situation. Russia is not as militarily competent as the US and Ukraine has demonstrated strength in defense systems. The US has an impeccable military might and has the capacity to take over Iran's major leverage points - the Strait of Hormuz and the Kharg Island. The only factor holding down the US from doing this is Donald Trump's compassion for the people of Iran. If not that Trump had been very considerate, this war with Iran would have ended in the first 14 days.
English
75
60
322
17K
Zdravko Dimitrov
Zdravko Dimitrov@zdrdim·
@durreadan01 Why? If there is better connection it will be replaced. You dont think we will be forever on type C ;)?
English
0
0
0
1
HalfTangible
HalfTangible@HalfTangible·
@zdrdim I'm sure he was to you. But I have no interest in what you think of your betters.
English
1
1
26
251
HalfTangible
HalfTangible@HalfTangible·
These people call the GWOT pointless. Then, when called out for doing the bare minimum for NATO, Europe parades around the corpses of their heroes they just told you died for nothing. These men and women were heroes. One and all. You dont get to use them as your prop to cry about America being mean to you. It would sicken me if it weren't so typical.
Paul.Phillips🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇲🇫🇪🇺@Paul_Phillips20

@HalfTangible @Phoxotic Fuck you

English
7
38
457
7.6K
planefag
planefag@planefag·
When Europeans tell you "there was no problems in the Gulf until you started a war," you must understand - they actually believe that. It's the perfect one-sentence summation of both their populations' and governments' sincere belief and foreign policy. They truly think the status quo was just fine, both as it was and with where it was heading. Europe, after all, was perfectly fine with the Joint Comprehensive Plan Of Action, which everyone knew only slowed Iran's march towards nuclear weapons and did absolutely nothing to stop their decades-long campaign of regional proxy war, terrorism and genocide - in fact, it funded it. When the US changed course from this disastrous policy Europe created a special purpose vehicle (SVP) called "INSTEX" to evade US sanctions and continue trading with Iran. Nor is this new; the EU passed a blocking statute in 1996 to shield European businesses from US sanctions for trading with Iran and Cuba (and reactivated it after the US withdrew from the JCPOA in 2018.) Nor do they care about the inevitable consequences of a nuclear-armed Iran. It's not like they don't know that a nuclear deterrent will embolden Iran to double down on their decades-long campaign of slaughter via proxy army in every neighboring state, because that's the exact situation with Russia. President Trump told them flat-out that buying Russian energy was collaring themselves and handing the leash to their enemies, and they sneered and laughed him out of the room - and now that Russia's four years into a major land war in Europe that supposedly threatens the security of western Europe, they continue to buy natgas without batting an eyelash. All while screeching at Trump for having the temerity to ask that Europe pay for the American weapons they want sent to Ukraine, of course. So it's not simply my opinion that Europe sees absolutely no problem with an Iran rendered effectively invincible by a nuclear deterrent holding both the strait of Hormuz and the strait of Bab-El-Mandeb (and thus the Suez canal) at gunpoint and extracting exorbitant fees for every ship that passes. It's not my opinion that they don't give a damn about China then having a stranglehold on two of the most crucial economic arteries on the globe, which they can leave open for themselves and strangle for others if it suits their goals in a fifth-generational war (or even a fourth-generational shooting war over Taiwan.) It's not my opinion that Europe has no qualms about what a nation that's pursued 47 years of regional bloodshed and destabilization *without* a nuclear deterrent will do once it's effectively invincible *and* has the coercive power to buck the sanctions limiting its operational funding. It's empirical truth, because the Europeans didn't give a single rotten damn about it as regards Russia, and now that Russia's raping, kidnapping and outright genociding the Ukrainian people, they still don't give enough of a damn to turn off the tap. I advance no argument here as concerns the justice, merit or wisdom of Europe's choices. After all, they're simply pursuing their own national interests. I simply want us all to stop pretending that America isn't doing the same thing by choosing *not* to be held at nuke and nozzle point by its enemies indefinitely. Anyone who wants to argue that a nation with eleven carrier battle groups should have chosen the exact same path as Europe is free to do so - but I feel they're obliged to actually do so if they wish to scold the United States without defending Europe's own choices in this matter.
English
21
116
807
19.1K
Derek. 🇺🇸
Derek. 🇺🇸@SuitablePolitic·
💯💯 The history of Europe is an endless fracas where one country is constantly fighting another for ultimate control of the continent. For supreme power. When France was the empire, everyone fought France. When Britain was the empire, everyone fought Britain. Now that the empire exists off the continent, they are playing a new game... which country can exert more influence over that superpower, thereby claiming its power for themselves in that moment? In order for all of them to play that game more effectively, they created a political bloc known as the European Union. Now, whosoever controls the EU will determine how they can bargain for more power over the US. Until the US decides to shut down the game.
John Ʌ Konrad V@johnkonrad

What if America is already far richer than anyone in the swamp is allowed to admit? What if the real drag on the Republic isn’t taxes, isn’t debt, isn’t even the deficit, it’s Europe? What if NATO was never a mutual defense pact, but a 75-year subscription America forgot to cancel? What if “burden sharing” is the most expensive euphemism in the English language? What if the City of London cabal is draining our banks? What if the advice from globalists is terrible advice that’s costing us big? What if every European basing agreement, every forward-deployed brigade, every Ramstein runway, every Aviano hangar, every Souda Bay pier is a tax American workers pay so Berlin can run a welfare state and Paris can run a 35-hour week? What if foreign aid to Europe isn’t aid, it’s tribute, flowing the wrong way? What if transporting the vast majority of trade on European owned ships costs more than we realize? What if the NGO archipelago in Brussels, Geneva, and The Hague is just a money-laundering loop where US taxpayer dollars get rinsed through a “civil society” conference and returned as lectures about our democracy? What if the UN isn’t a parliament of man, it’s a Manhattan timeshare with diplomatic plates, an accounting black hole, and a Human Rights Council chaired by people who’d jail you for tweeting this? What if “the rules-based international order” was always code for: Americans build it, Americans pay for it, Americans bleed for it, and Europeans grade it? What if $36 trillion in debt looks a lot smaller the second you stop underwriting a continent that sneers at you in three languages? What if you zeroed out the Europe line, the NATO line, the UN line, the NGO line, and woke up tomorrow in a country with the fiscal headroom to rebuild every shipyard, every foundry, every rail line, and every Navy hull we’ve let rot since the Cold War ended? What if American tourists went to American cathedrals, American opera, American museums, American cities instead. I’m not saying I believe all of it. I’m saying maybe, just maybe, we could pay down all our debt and wouldn’t have to pay taxes at all if we cut Europe loose.

English
12
31
284
15.4K
Shaun Rein
Shaun Rein@shaunrein·
Should the world ban Americans like me who have nothing to do with Trump's bombing of Iran? Should they stop us from playing in sports events or in concert halls? After all, that's what we did to Russians who have nothing to do with Putin's actions. We wanted to force Russians to rise up How would we Americans feel if the rest of the world sanctioned us from traveling abroad just to force us to overthrow Trump That wouldn't be right. Just like it wasn't right for world to ban innocent Russians
English
172
42
359
16.1K
Sherri Unfiltered™
What happens if the U.S. leaves NATO? Do we get stronger? What are the pros and cons to the US?
English
747
49
293
25.7K
Zdravko Dimitrov
Zdravko Dimitrov@zdrdim·
@teortaxesTex They are so butthurt, I thought they never think about us. Now they are in war with Iran and all they can think of is Us))
English
0
0
0
105
Teortaxes▶️ (DeepSeek 推特🐋铁粉 2023 – ∞)
"Come on, Europoor, tell us to leave, this NATO bullshit is tiresome" "Ok, your terms are acceptable" "Aha, knew you'd get cold feet. Without the US, you're nothi- wait, wha?! No! You'd perish alone, Le Russerinos, they…" "ahah we'll be fine, thanks" "You don't understand!"!
Teortaxes▶️ (DeepSeek 推特🐋铁粉 2023 – ∞) tweet mediaTeortaxes▶️ (DeepSeek 推特🐋铁粉 2023 – ∞) tweet media
Teortaxes▶️ (DeepSeek 推特🐋铁粉 2023 – ∞)@teortaxesTex

the dynamic with American threats to abandon NATO is really getting very funny. Europeans are calling the bluff. Burger bros, do you not get it? Your "protection" *is not credible* anymore. The threat has no bite; they know their security is in jeopardy already. Enough cringe.

English
4
3
90
7.8K
Dylan Ratigan
Dylan Ratigan@DylanRatigan·
Technologically is it possible to end a whole civilization in a single night without using massive nuclear weapon weapons?
English
20
2
28
3.9K
Zdravko Dimitrov
Zdravko Dimitrov@zdrdim·
@ianmiles US has no right to bomb Iran with the complicity of every Arab Gulf state-FAFO.
English
0
0
0
14
Ian Miles Cheong
Ian Miles Cheong@ianmiles·
Many people are under the mistaken belief that Iran owns the Strait of Hormuz. They do not. It is international waters and they have absolutely no right to blockade it or demand a transit fee.
English
2.8K
3.6K
22.8K
713.3K
CyberBandera
CyberBandera@CyberrBandera·
@teortaxesTex If Ukraine falls, Russia doesn't need to conquer anything militarily. Kremlin will fear monger its way into controlling European politics by simply being on the EU doorstep.
English
2
0
2
259
Teortaxes▶️ (DeepSeek 推特🐋铁粉 2023 – ∞)
It is hilarious that Americans are torching their empire because they've psyoped themselves into believing a pornographic image of what it is, and thus overestimated their leverage. They think Europe is one big haughty Disney park with Muslims, that quakes before Russia. That a refusal to bow and scrape is a bluff or insane hubris. What is happening in the real world is that Europe is realizing two things: 1) the US is not a reliable ally, is not really even *an* ally, but is instead a reckless predatory hegemon aiming to milk "allies" dry to the maximum extent of opportunity, take and take; and trying to unilaterally be a good friend makes you look more of a mark. That it is not part of the common Western civilization, looks down on it, and has greater cultural affinity to Israelis and Arabs than to White Europeans. That it doesn't even assign any great value to its influence in Europe and has a completely different strategic outlook, with a focus on the Middle East (largely for reasons of ethnic loyalty and the bizarre and heretical Judeo-Christian neo-religion its elite class adheres to), plus a minor objective on containing China in East Asia because of a naked hegemonic self-interest. Helping prolong American dominance as, at least, the lesser evil, the pillar of the shared Western framework, rules-based liberal order etc. etc., could make sense, but – see above. Too late. The US is even unilaterally divesting from institutions that made it tick and creating new ones. Fair enough, those will serve American interests better. 2) Europe faces *no credible external threat.* All big European problems, ironically with the exception of the US and its meddling or territorial ambitions, are internal: welfare politics, regulations, immigration and fertility, energy costs, lacking innovation, competitiveness of industries, intra-EU conflict with Hungary (in fairness, largely a US-Russian joint venture) and such. Russia, while an obnoxious irritant, is barely hanging on in Ukraine; but even if Ukraine somehow fell (which Europe is well positioned to prevent indefinitely with the ongoing military buildup), this new drone-centric doctrine does not enable conquest, it's useless for taking cities. Gone are the armor battalions of the Cold War era; countless MiGs won't threaten the skies under modern air defense. Even if Russia were to develop an interest in seizing and holding European territory, it no longer has a doctrine for that, and would suffer disproportionately and lose. And the last classic card, nuclear blackmail, can be responded to in kind. True, it's not very credible in the absence of a formal unified nuclear umbrella, but is American umbrella even trustworthy after Greenland? After gleeful public abuse of European dignitaries? After everything? Lol no. Furthermore, American retrenchment actually reduces Russian incentives for escalation. Russian Federation is not the USSR, it does not have an ideological mandate for expansion, even irrespective of lacking capabilities. This is all inertia of the Cold War, paranoia about missile ranges and the Fulda Gap, the post-nuclear nightmare of eventual standoff between Forces of Freedom and the Warsaw Pact. But Warsaw is in the EU now, none of this is relevant. However the Ukrainian issue is settled, however Russians cope with their reduced standing in the world (they've become good at coping), Europe is going to emerge more secure than ever in its history. Well, there's Chinese Communism, this menace still finds some purchase in ex-Red Team states… they can buy some Marx lapel pins on Temu, I guess. Its main weapon is unbeatable prices in new energy technology, and NATO can't help here. The 20th century is over. We're a quarter into the next one, time to let go. True, it got a big spoiler at the start, what with the Great War on Terror. But – Islamic Caliphate, seriously? Houellebecq, or whatever? That bugbear was buried under the rubble in Gaza, together with tens of thousands of civilians. The Ummah is powerless, Europe is not scared of Islam as a military force. That's a pressing concern for Middle Eastern powers, like the US, which gladly makes allies with some of the most unsavory Muslim parties anyway. So, yeah, they are simply *not afraid* of the US pulling out of NATO. This is the stage before the divorce, where both sides are yelling "ok, leave then!" and only decades of habit stop them from realizing that each *means it*. But we are seeing this become common knowledge. When you know that I know that you know that I'm not kidding, a phase transition can occur in a snap. NATO is a system with colossal inertia, with generations of Atlanticist apparatchiks embedded throughout the nervous system of European societies. It's not just Trump, but it's easy to cope that things will get better after him. It'll take a while to make reality legible. But there already is a very visceral reality underneath it all, that probably can't be reversed. There is pain and fear, and where there's fear, there's no room for love; and no material interest to make up for its absence. I think there will be a divorce.
Teortaxes▶️ (DeepSeek 推特🐋铁粉 2023 – ∞) tweet mediaTeortaxes▶️ (DeepSeek 推特🐋铁粉 2023 – ∞) tweet media
John Ʌ Konrad V@johnkonrad

NATO is in far bigger danger than anyone realizes. And the reason has nothing to do with defense budgets. The real danger is psychological. It’s cultural. Europeans didn’t just free-ride on American security for 80 years. They built an entire identity around the idea that they evolved past the Americans protecting them. That identity is now the single biggest obstacle to Western survival. And the darkest irony is: we helped build it. After World War II, Europe wasn’t just economically shattered. Its culture was in ruins. The cities, the universities, the concert halls, the museums. Rubble. The Marshall Plan rebuilt the economy. But culture wasn’t a priority. Not at first. Then the Iron Curtain dropped. And suddenly culture became a weapon. American diplomats, academics, artists & scholars flooded Western Europe. We funded their universities. Supported their orchestras. Rebuilt their museums. Promoted their intellectual life. Not because European culture needed saving for its own sake. Because Eastern Europeans were struggling for Maslow’s mist basic needs. We needed the view from the other side of that Wall to be intoxicating. So America built Western Europe into a showcase of self-actualization. Art. Philosophy. Cafe culture. Long vacations. Universities where people studied literature instead of surviving. We were manufacturing jealousy. And it worked. The Wall came down. But here’s what no one accounted for. When you give a society self-actualization on someone else’s tab long enough, they forget it was a gift. They start believing it was organically theirs. And when they look at the country that funded it all, a country busy building aircraft carriers and semiconductor fabs and shale fields instead of reaching the Maslow’s pinnacle. An overweight American in a ball cap who can’t tell Monet from Pissarro. Who eats fast food. Who drives a truck. Who builds strip malls instead of piazzas. And to a culture trained in aesthetics but stripped of strategic awareness, that American looks uncivilized. So the arrogance takes root. And once a culture decides another is beneath them, they stop listening. Americans say wars are sometimes necessary: crude. Oil is the backbone of prosperity: unsophisticated. Kids build companies in garages that reshape the planet: crass. Wall Street finances the global economy: vulgar. Europe has no world-class technology sector. No military capable of strong defense. No energy independence. No AI capacity. What Europe has is culture. The culture we paid for at the expense of us reaching Maslow’s pinnacle. For decades that was fine. We funded the museums, protected the sea lanes, and tolerated the sneering because the arrangement worked. Then Europeans stopped keeping the contempt private. They started saying it to our faces. In their media. In their parliaments. At every international forum. “Americans are stupid. Americans are violent. Americans are a threat to democracy.” We could have moved the Louvre to NY. We could have built a Venice here. We could have stolen your best artists, designers, philosophers and more… like your conquering armies did for centuries. Instead we funded them. And all we asked for in return was to let us visit. You don’t have the military to defend your borders. You don’t have the technology to compete. You don’t have the energy to heat your homes without begging dictators. What you have is an 80-year superiority complex FUNDED BY AMERICANS, protected by American soldiers, and built on the false belief that self-actualization is civilization. It isn’t. Civilization is the ability to sustain itself. By that measure, Europe isn’t a civilization at all. It’s a dependency with better wine. That’s not a threat. It’s a weather report. Build a Navy. Or don’t. But stop lecturing the people who made you “better than us” Our “crudeness” our “stunted liberal education” our “ugly strip malls” are because we sacrificed our culture to support yours.

English
18
37
314
17.5K
malmesburyman
malmesburyman@malmesburyman·
Best part of this whimsical little fantasy is where Europe wins by “sitting it out”. That is just the kind of advanced thinking you will find at the ‘old Croat man drinking slivovitz at a dingy roadside café’ school of geopolitics.
Niccolo Soldo (Fisted By Foucault)@FistedFoucault

My ideal scenario is for the Yanks and Chinks to slaughter each other over the period of 10 to 15 years while Festung Europa sits it out and sells everything to both sides over the course of the war.

English
18
18
433
9.9K
David Orr
David Orr@orrdavid·
An underappreciated stat from last month: Israel and the UAE intercepted ~93% of ballistic missiles. Damage is way lower than people expected. We don't have good data from earlier years, but it's safe to say these systems are improving a lot. If the number gets to say 98%, and then we can rely on redundancy to get the number to less than 1/500, the equation of a global nuclear war threat via ICBMs completely changes. Warfare could change enormously once that threat is no longer world ending. And if the threat is one way - IE the free world controls the technology and nobody else does - we have the upper hand. For instance, we could force Russia to end the war tomorrow. We wouldn't even have to seriously worry about Taiwan or South Korea. If it indeed improves a lot more from here, this seems like maybe the most consequential military technology of the last 100 years. It's also incredibly good news for mankind.
English
14
9
92
13.1K
Zdravko Dimitrov
Zdravko Dimitrov@zdrdim·
@OrdnancePackard What would you know about ball washing-it is manuever you have not been physically able to exercise since 5 years old, when your mum fondled your balls. Dies she stilll do it for you?
English
0
0
0
6
Ordnance Jay Packard Esq.
Ordnance Jay Packard Esq.@OrdnancePackard·
Look at you pretending that Bulgaria isn't Russia's little ball washer.
Zdravko Dimitrov@zdrdim

@OrdnancePackard No, you don’t , you are brainwashed moron that cannot move his fat ass from the couch if your life depends on it. Russian? That also wrong , you fat piece of guttural disappontment.

English
2
1
9
227
Zdravko Dimitrov
Zdravko Dimitrov@zdrdim·
@OrdnancePackard No, you don’t , you are brainwashed moron that cannot move his fat ass from the couch if your life depends on it. Russian? That also wrong , you fat piece of guttural disappontment.
English
0
0
0
235
Fugitive Caesar
Fugitive Caesar@ThomBrady5·
The value of Greenland is that America can shoot down incoming nuclear missiles, which also would protect Europe. For Europe to fight a war because America tried to shield them from Russian or Chinese nuclear missiles... would be very European.
Asylum Seaker@AsylumSeaker

@KulakMAGAMan @asc_kritias @ThomBrady5 Are you suggesting USA wants to use Greenland as a launchpad for a war of aggression? Naturally Europe would oppose it.

English
14
30
529
7.6K