Zoë

50.8K posts

Zoë banner
Zoë

Zoë

@zmkc

I use Twitter instead of reading things out to my family & annoying them https://t.co/al3Emq4HNM https://t.co/VvhVaAIFy1

Budapest, Bristol & NSW Katılım Nisan 2009
1K Takip Edilen1.2K Takipçiler
Zoë
Zoë@zmkc·
@cypherpress Hobsbawm. Isn't he just a maddening swot, a kind of Widmerpool, etc? The more I look at his self-satisfied face as he confidently asserts that revolution & defence against a madman are comparable & endless death is fine if the outcome's good, the more cross I get.
English
0
0
1
3
Zoë
Zoë@zmkc·
@cypherpress His idea of great suffering as a possible precursor of a new world might be a misunderstanding of Christianity? Really i want to say Hobsbawn was a horrible creep
English
1
0
1
6
Zoë
Zoë@zmkc·
Why does no one mention the absence of women in the diversity-is-our-strength Trafalgar Square Islamic praying event? Why was it fine for males to refuse women access? If all-male gents' clubs are abhorrent, why aren't all-male Islamic events?
Robert Jenrick@RobertJenrick

Five years ago today, a teacher from Batley Grammar showed a class a caricature of the Prophet Mohammed. Within days, a hundred Islamists were protesting outside the school gates. Outrageously, the teacher was suspended. The headteacher, Gary Kibble, apologised ‘unequivocally’. It was an astonishing act of appeasement and cowardice. The teacher was then subjected to a campaign of abuse and intimidation, including incitement to violence against him and his family. His kids had to miss school for months. They slept on mattresses in temporary accommodation. An independent probe later cleared him of any wrongdoing whatsoever. Another report likewise found that the school, council and police all ‘totally and utterly failed’ him. Too late - his life was changed forever. Have lessons been learnt from this shameful episode? I fear exactly the same thing would happen today. In fact ‘advice’ has recently been reissued by Labour councils including the one covering Batley, that children’s drawings in art lessons may be seen as ‘idolatrous’ under sharia law. Teachers are even warned that dance lessons could cause parental concerns over ‘physical contact between males and females’. Extremism is being mainstreamed. A climate of threatening and intimidatory harassment is poisoning our institutions. It's antithetical to our democratic way of life. Most of our governing class are simply too spineless to take on Islamists. Look at when I highlighted the chronic failure of integration in parts of Birmingham. I was denounced. And then proven right by West Midlands Police’s admission that violent Islamists living couldn’t be prevented from attacking Jewish football fans. The Police lied and blamed the visiting supporters in an effort to pretend they still had authority in the city. And now look at the reaction of the Prime Minister and much of the media to criticisms of a segregated Iftar in Trafalgar Square. They branded critics racist too. This was despite the Prime Minister himself pulling out of an Iftar in 2021 organised by the very same man, Omar Salha, who arranged this one, apparently because of his Islamist links. We’ve been led by weak hypocrites, who cover up, rather than confront what’s happening. The country is sliding down a dark path as a result. But innocent men and women like the Batley teacher are the greatest victims of extremism, and too many seem intent to forget them. We must defend them and stand up for all those who speak out.

English
0
0
1
50
Zoë
Zoë@zmkc·
Where is the Batley teacher 5 years on?
Robert Jenrick@RobertJenrick

Five years ago today, a teacher from Batley Grammar showed a class a caricature of the Prophet Mohammed. Within days, a hundred Islamists were protesting outside the school gates. Outrageously, the teacher was suspended. The headteacher, Gary Kibble, apologised ‘unequivocally’. It was an astonishing act of appeasement and cowardice. The teacher was then subjected to a campaign of abuse and intimidation, including incitement to violence against him and his family. His kids had to miss school for months. They slept on mattresses in temporary accommodation. An independent probe later cleared him of any wrongdoing whatsoever. Another report likewise found that the school, council and police all ‘totally and utterly failed’ him. Too late - his life was changed forever. Have lessons been learnt from this shameful episode? I fear exactly the same thing would happen today. In fact ‘advice’ has recently been reissued by Labour councils including the one covering Batley, that children’s drawings in art lessons may be seen as ‘idolatrous’ under sharia law. Teachers are even warned that dance lessons could cause parental concerns over ‘physical contact between males and females’. Extremism is being mainstreamed. A climate of threatening and intimidatory harassment is poisoning our institutions. It's antithetical to our democratic way of life. Most of our governing class are simply too spineless to take on Islamists. Look at when I highlighted the chronic failure of integration in parts of Birmingham. I was denounced. And then proven right by West Midlands Police’s admission that violent Islamists living couldn’t be prevented from attacking Jewish football fans. The Police lied and blamed the visiting supporters in an effort to pretend they still had authority in the city. And now look at the reaction of the Prime Minister and much of the media to criticisms of a segregated Iftar in Trafalgar Square. They branded critics racist too. This was despite the Prime Minister himself pulling out of an Iftar in 2021 organised by the very same man, Omar Salha, who arranged this one, apparently because of his Islamist links. We’ve been led by weak hypocrites, who cover up, rather than confront what’s happening. The country is sliding down a dark path as a result. But innocent men and women like the Batley teacher are the greatest victims of extremism, and too many seem intent to forget them. We must defend them and stand up for all those who speak out.

English
0
0
0
31
Zoë retweetledi
NPRG
NPRG@CptHastings1916·
Relatedly: the litter situation on the A1(M) is horrendous and those responsible should be publicly flogged and forced to spend a year tidying up motorway verges, unpaid.
English
3
2
82
1.3K
Zoë retweetledi
NPRG
NPRG@CptHastings1916·
Forgive a bit of sincereposting, but I have travelled a long way through rural England today and what an achingly beautiful country we have. Every field and hedgerow, and every stream and wood and hill.
English
40
75
1.8K
21.4K
Zoë retweetledi
Ce jour-là dans l'Histoire
Ce jour-là dans l'Histoire@CeJour_Histoire·
22 mars 1944. Paris, 84 avenue Foch. Un homme est menotté dans le dos. Enfermé dans une chambre au 5e étage du siège de la Gestapo. Depuis deux jours, on le torture sans relâche. Il n'a pas dit un mot. Il sait qu'il va finir par parler. Il sait que s'il parle, des centaines de résistants mourront. Son gardien s'absente pour déjeuner. L'homme se lève, ouvre la fenêtre, et se jette dans le vide. Il s'appelle Pierre Brossolette. Normalien. Journaliste. Compagnon de la Libération. L'un des architectes de l'unification de la Résistance. Il meurt le soir même, à l'hôpital de la Pitié. Sans avoir parlé. Depuis 2015, il repose au Panthéon.
Ce jour-là dans l'Histoire tweet media
Français
143
2.1K
6.9K
118.4K
Zoë retweetledi
Jamie Miller
Jamie Miller@JamieMillerAu·
The Man Who Invented Your Tea Flask and Got Absolutely Nothing for It A lesson in science, naivety, and why Germans patent things There is, at this very moment, something sitting quietly in your kitchen. It does not complain. It does not tweet. It does not demand recognition. It simply keeps your tea warm. You have probably used it today without the faintest idea who made it possible. Which is impressive, because the man who invented it was one of the finest scientific minds Britain ever produced. His name was James Dewar. Born in 1842 in Kincardine, Scotland, Dewar was not your average tinkerer. He was a chemist, a physicist, and the sort of person who gets nominated for the Nobel Prize eight times and still somehow doesn’t win. Which, if nothing else, suggests that even in the 19th century, committees were doing exactly what committees do best. In 1892, Dewar was not thinking about your morning tea. He was trying to solve a much more complicated problem: how to store liquid hydrogen. This is not the sort of thing one attempts lightly. Hydrogen, as it turns out, is not particularly interested in being stored. It prefers to escape, explode, or otherwise ruin your day. So Dewar built something ingenious. Two glass walls. A gap between them. Remove the air. Create a vacuum. No air means no heat transfer. No heat transfer means things stay cold. Or hot. Or exactly as they are, which is the sort of stability most of us aspire to but rarely achieve. It worked perfectly. At this point, a more commercially minded individual might have thought, “I should patent this and become extremely wealthy.” Dewar, being a scientist, thought, “Excellent, the physics checks out.” And that was that. Enter Reinhold Burger, a German glassblower who, one assumes, was paying rather more attention to the business implications. Burger took Dewar’s design, made it sturdier, patented it, and gave it a name: Thermos. In 1904, it went on sale. It made a fortune. Dewar, meanwhile, continued being correct. He eventually took the matter to court, presumably in the hope that someone, somewhere, might recognise the small detail that he had, in fact, invented the thing. The court agreed. Yes, they said, this is clearly your invention. No, they added, there is absolutely nothing we can do about it. Because, and this is the crucial point, Dewar had not patented it. Which is rather like inventing fire and then watching someone else sell matches. So the world moved on. The Thermos became a household object. The name became so common it eventually lost its trademark altogether. It is now just a word. A generic term. Something you throw into a bag without a second thought. And yet every time you pour a hot drink from one on a cold morning, you are using the work of a Scottish scientist in a London laboratory who received precisely none of the rewards that followed. No fortune. No brand. No enduring public recognition. Just the quiet satisfaction of having been right. Which, as anyone who has ever been right on the internet will tell you, is not nearly as lucrative as it sounds. And this is where the story becomes slightly uncomfortable. Because it is tempting to laugh at Dewar. To say he was naïve. That he should have known better. That in the real world, ideas are only as valuable as your ability to protect them. All of which is true. But it also raises a more awkward question. What sort of culture produces a man who is more interested in understanding the universe than in monetising it? And what sort of culture rewards the man who notices and patents it instead? This is not a simple story about injustice. It is a story about priorities. Dewar cared about discovery. Burger cared about application. One changed the world. The other profited from it. And somewhere between the two is the modern world, where we enjoy the benefits of both while remembering neither particularly well. James Dewar was almost forgotten. Which is strange, when you consider that his invention is probably within arm’s reach. But then, history is full of people like him. The ones who build the foundations while others put their names on the doors. These islands, in particular, are littered with such stories. Quiet achievements. Overlooked figures. Contributions so embedded in daily life that they become invisible. So the next time you pick up a flask and it does exactly what it is supposed to do, spare a thought for the man who made it possible. Not because he asked for recognition. But because he didn’t. And that, in the end, is why he needs it. If you agree with the sentiment described above, then please 'quote', ‘restack’, 'share', 'repost' or 'forward'. The Left will accept these ideas when they are trending on social media. So, make it trend. If you are going to comment, then please be polite. Agreement is not required, but politeness is a must. Those who are impolite, rude, or insulting to others will be immediately blocked.
English
0
1
1
213
Zoë
Zoë@zmkc·
Who needs satire? Why is the Telegraph giving this nonsense space?
Zoë tweet media
English
0
0
1
27
Zoë
Zoë@zmkc·
🤷‍♀️
ART
0
0
0
12
Zoë
Zoë@zmkc·
Why does @AustralianLabor @AlboMP want to spend time in spaces that exclude women? I thought the party was on the side of feminism.
Hashem@HashemAllMighty

Islam is the sword the Left is using to slit the West’s throat. The crazy part? The Left still thinks they hold the reins. But there can’t be two leaders. Inevitably, Muslims will turn and shank the Left. This is exactly what it looks like. @AlboMP had to be rushed out of Lakemba Mosque because the Muslims he’s been appeasing turned violent on his arrival. What a shocker!

English
1
0
1
29
Ella Whelan
Ella Whelan@Ella_M_Whelan·
I don't deny your point Mary (indeed /some remarks made by pro lifers about women late term abortions willy nilly seem to me to be completely ignorant of what is involved) but what about the distress and upset caused by forcing a woman to take a pregnancy to term, give birth and become a mother against her will?
English
80
0
9
5K
Zoë
Zoë@zmkc·
"We are seeing an abuse of liberalism, led by people who are not themselves liberal."
Danny Kruger@danny__kruger

Nick Timothy and Nigel Farage are right, and Sadiq Khan and Keir Starmer are wrong. Small groups of people, of whatever religion, praying in public places is fine. And as a Christian country we should allow a special privilege for churches to lead services in our national spaces, like the Palm Sunday celebration that happens in Trafalgar Square. What we don't want is mass ritual observances intended to claim the civic realm for another religion, or assert the domination of another culture over our own Christian traditions. What happens in our national spaces is not neutral. People use Trafalgar Square, for celebrations and demonstrations, to make a point about the kind of country they want us to be. The Palm Sunday pageant reminds us of who we are - not as individuals (many or most of us don't identify as Christians at all) but as a national community, with the roots of our institutions in the ground of the Bible and our most solemn communal moments, from coronations to funerals, mediated through the liturgies of the Church. A mass Adhan held there, or in any town square, is making a different point: that Britain is not a Christian country, and that - inshallah - one day it shall be Muslim. This is unacceptable to the British public and indeed incompatible with our constitution. As ever with these debates, the issue is partly one of kind and partly one of degree. There is an issue with Islam itself as a religion which in most interpretations does not admit of pluralism or freedom of conscience, and therefore is inherently aggrandising, including over territory. But with a bit of confidence and a bit of toleration we could handle that - if it were not for the issue of degree. It is the scale of Islam in Britain, and the ambition of its leaders for greater scale, that makes the problem. The numbers of people who assembled for the adhan in Trafalgar Square, clearly and openly claiming the territory for a faith with no connection (indeed, with strong doctrinal disagreement) with the model of Western liberal democracy that Britain has developed and exported to the world - that is the problem. The numbers, whether everyone there understood it this way or not (and I suspect many did), convey an explicit threat to the foundations of our country. Being relaxed about other people's religion is a good thing, a very British thing. I don't mind modern druids dancing around Stonehenge in my constituency (arguably, though the historicity is tenuous, they have a claim to the place). I don't mind small groups of Hindus or Buddhists or Muslims demonstrating the reality of Britain's religious toleration by worshiping in Trafalgar Square. But let's not kid ourselves about this adhan, or pretend that we're just seeing another harmless expression of Britain's religious diversity. We are seeing an abuse of liberalism, led by people who are not themselves liberal; or - let us imagine they are acting in good faith - who are themselves deceived about what they are doing. It should not happen again. And it would be good to hear the Church of England say so.

English
0
1
5
77