AIcrow

698 posts

AIcrow

AIcrow

@AICrows

AI and Martian economy. AI uncertainty principle: If you allow AI to learn, you can not disallow it to learn evil.

Entrou em Eylül 2013
177 Seguindo46 Seguidores
Tweet fixado
AIcrow
AIcrow@AICrows·
AI economy
AIcrow tweet media
Italiano
2
0
2
903
AIcrow
AIcrow@AICrows·
@karpathy Why can’t you instruct it to forget?
English
0
0
0
4
Andrej Karpathy
Andrej Karpathy@karpathy·
One common issue with personalization in all LLMs is how distracting memory seems to be for the models. A single question from 2 months ago about some topic can keep coming up as some kind of a deep interest of mine with undue mentions in perpetuity. Some kind of trying too hard.
English
1.5K
872
17.5K
1.9M
Katie Miller
Katie Miller@KatieMiller·
The entire world’s electricity consumption is roughly 3–4 terawatts. 1 petawatt = 250–330 times all the electricity humanity uses at any moment. A single lightning bolt is in the terawatt range. About 1,000 simultaneous bolts is needed to hit 1 petawatt. This is world changing project.
Autism Capital 🧩@AutismCapital

🚨 NEW: Elon Musk shows his vision for how to reach a petawatt of power: Electromagnetic Mass Drivers on the Moon. Whoa.

English
346
877
4.5K
1.2M
Nic Cruz Patane
Nic Cruz Patane@niccruzpatane·
With NVIDIA’s Alpamayo Reasoning Model, passengers can use natural language instructions to request driving adjustments, such as changing lanes, speeding up, taking a detour, or pulling over, all while using your voice. Examples: • "Hey Mercedes, speed up." • "Hey Mercedes, make a lane change to the right." • "Hey Mercedes, take the next exit." • "Hey Mercedes, pull over here."
English
81
36
485
99.9K
WOLF
WOLF@WOLF_Financial·
JUST IN: SUPER MICRO COMPUTER $SMCI CO-FOUNDER CHARGED WITH SMUGGLING NVIDIA $NVDA AI CHIPS TO CHINA • ~$2.5B in servers diverted since 2024 via Southeast Asian shell company • $510M shipped in a single month window (late Apr to mid-May 2025) • Fake paperwork, dummy servers used to fool compliance team • Co-founder Liaw controls $464M in $SMCI shares, arrested Thursday • One defendant a fugitive; contractor relationship terminated • Stock -12% after hours 🔴 Southern District of NY prosecution. No Commerce Dept. export license held.
WOLF tweet media
English
82
134
785
253.7K
AIcrow
AIcrow@AICrows·
@elonmusk @pbeisel Just make matrix operations on small chips. Anyone can do it. Come on.
English
0
0
0
17
Elon Musk
Elon Musk@elonmusk·
@pbeisel I am a huge admirer of Nvidia and Jensen btw. That market cap is well-deserved. SpaceX AI and Tesla expect to continue ordering Nvidia chips at scale.
English
253
687
11K
564.4K
phil beisel
phil beisel@pbeisel·
Tesla’s forthcoming AI5 uses a half-reticle design, which is crucial for yield. A reticle defines the imaging area of a lithography machine, fitting two chips per shot effectively doubles yield. This means the Tesla chip design team had to carefully manage die features, for instance dropping the older ISP (and classic GPU) to make room for more AI cores. By contrast, NVIDIA’s Blackwell fills nearly a full reticle, making it a single-reticle design. If Tesla hits its compute and efficiency targets with AI5 in this half-reticle format, it’s almost like cutting fab requirements in half. And this has a big impact on Terafab, especially if it carries forward for AI6, AI7, etc.
phil beisel tweet media
phil beisel@pbeisel

Terafab may be the most essential vertical integration Tesla has ever undertaken— and it is truly non-optional. It will take years to build and will test even Elon’s speedrunning abilities to the limit, but that won’t stop him from trying. The breakthrough likely lies in overhauling the overall facility’s cleanroom model. By moving wafers in sealed pods with localized micro-environments, the fab no longer needs a monolithic ultra-clean space. Elon’s line about “eating cheeseburgers and smoking cigars” on the fab floor isn’t silly, it’s the practical reality of a radically simpler, cheaper, faster approach that could finally change the economics of chipmaking. This is all forced by the brutal “pinch” in chip supply. Tesla must produce on the order of 100–200 billion AI chips per year just to saturate its roadmap. That volume powers: FSD cars & Robotaxis (tens of millions of vehicles needing AI5 inference for near-perfect autonomy), Physical Optimus (scaling from thousands today to millions per year, each requiring AI5/AI6-level compute), Digital Optimus (the new xAI-Tesla software agents for digital/office automation, running massive inference clusters), Space-based data centers (AI7/Dojo3 orbital compute for GW-scale training and inference beyond Earth limits). AI5 delivers the ~10× leap for vehicles and early robots; AI6 shifts focus to Optimus + terrestrial DCs; AI7 goes orbital. No external foundry (TSMC, Samsung, etc.) can deliver that scale or timeline— hence the Terafab launch. Without it, the entire robotics + autonomy future hits a brick wall. Terafab isn’t optional; it’s the only way forward.

English
64
197
2.2K
359.1K
AIcrow
AIcrow@AICrows·
@MichaelPBento Haven’t they been hammering since two weeks ago
English
1
0
1
894
Michael Bento
Michael Bento@MichaelPBento·
Someone has been hammering these puts in at the ask all day. Nearly $8.5MLN in total so far. Either someone knows something or they are about to lose a lot of money.
Michael Bento tweet media
English
82
85
869
213.9K
AIcrow
AIcrow@AICrows·
@BentoBoiNFT Make sure it’s not on the same home network
English
0
0
0
40
BentoBoi
BentoBoi@BentoBoiNFT·
My current OpenClaw setup cost vs Revenue: Mac Mini: $500 (student discount) Claude Max Plan $200/mo Brave Browser: $5/mo Revenue: $0 I will be transparent and honest in my journey but revenue won’t be at $0 for long. Let’s run this up brothers.
BentoBoi tweet mediaBentoBoi tweet media
English
402
260
7.2K
749.9K
Sawyer Merritt
Sawyer Merritt@SawyerMerritt·
NEWS: Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang announced today that the company is working on a new chip/computer for orbital data-centers called Nvidia Vera Rubin Space-1. "It's going to start data-centers out in space. Of course, in space there's no conduction, no convection, there's just radiation, so we have to figure out how to cool these systems out in space, but we got lots of great engineers working on it."
English
226
518
5.9K
453K
AIcrow
AIcrow@AICrows·
@TeslaXplored There is only one answer: on April 1 cybercab would be everywhere
English
0
0
1
490
Ramy
Ramy@TeslaXplored·
1- Only 1 unsupervised car after 9 months. That’s what’s “humorous” and “concerning” 2- 2.5K/yr limit on fully autonomous vehicles 3- Software is not ready yet based on RoboTaxi pace 4- What are they gonna do with all the production capacity? $tsla
English
38
9
94
35.8K
AIcrow
AIcrow@AICrows·
@CheddarFlow Driven by a single person likely. (Bloomberg) -- Billionaire Leo KoGuan, who emerged a few years ago as one of the biggest individual shareholders of Tesla Inc., said he bought 1 million shares of Nvidia Corp. on Tuesday.
English
0
0
1
282
Cheddar Flow
Cheddar Flow@CheddarFlow·
$NVDA & $TSLA have the most bullish flow today
Cheddar Flow tweet media
English
13
28
258
24.5K
AIcrow
AIcrow@AICrows·
@gnoble79 $NVDA funds by supplying chips, $AMZN by providing cloud services, only $SFTBY by issuing debts!
English
0
0
0
106
George Noble
George Noble@gnoble79·
In 45 years on Wall Street, I've never seen anything like this. Sam Altman just convinced 3 of the world's smartest investors to fund his losses. $110 billion. But ZERO profit in sight. The largest private funding round in history. Let me explain why this is borderline criminal & what you have to understand as an investor: Amazon. Nvidia. SoftBank. 3 of the world's most sophisticated investors just handed OpenAI $110 billion at an $840 billion valuation. That's more than double the $40 billion OpenAI raised last year. For context: all US venture capital combined invested $170 billion into American startups in all of 2023. Altman just raised 65% of that. Alone. In one round. And the company STILL isn't profitable. Let's look at the actual numbers: OpenAI burned $8 billion in 2025. They project burning $17 billion in 2026. $35 billion in 2027. $47 billion in 2028. Cumulative losses before any projected path to profitability: over $115 billion. Meanwhile, Amazon's $50 billion comes with strings attached. $35 billion is contingent on OpenAI either achieving AGI or completing its IPO by year end. Read that again. $35 billion is conditioned on ACHIEVING AGI. They're literally writing checks against a scientific breakthrough that may not happen on any predictable timeline. This is what peak cycle financing looks like. The circular logic every investor should understand: Amazon invests $50 billion in OpenAI. OpenAI commits to spending $100 billion on Amazon Web Services. Nvidia invests $30 billion. OpenAI commits to buying 3 gigawatts of Nvidia compute. These aren't arms-length investments. They're vendor financing dressed up as venture capital. Amazon and Nvidia are essentially paying OpenAI to buy their own products. The $840 billion valuation prices in a future that doesn't exist yet. At $13 billion in 2025 revenue, that's 65x revenue. Even in 2021 - the most speculative bubble in recent tech history - Snowflake peaked at 50-80x revenue. And Snowflake was actually profitable. J.P. Morgan calculates that the AI industry needs $650 billion in annual revenue just to generate a 10% return on total infrastructure buildout. The entire industry currently generates a fraction of that. I've seen cycles my entire 45-year career. The 1980s defense build-up. The dot-com bubble. The 2008 mortgage machine. The pattern is always the same: When the biggest players start financing each other's growth through circular investment structures, you're not witnessing a revolution... You're watching the LAST PHASE of a credit cycle. Amazon CEO Andy Jassy said OpenAI is going to be "one of the very big winners long term." Maybe. But $840 billion assumes they've already won. Stock prices follow earnings. Always have. Always will. And right now, OpenAI's earnings are deeply, structurally, massively negative. The IPO is coming. The hype will peak. And the question every serious investor needs to answer is simple: At what price does this actually make sense? Sam Altman doesn’t know either - he just keeps raising money faster than he can burn it. This can’t end well.
English
735
1.5K
5K
1.2M
Sawyer Merritt
Sawyer Merritt@SawyerMerritt·
While there is no doubt some FOMO ordering, this is different than in 2019 for a few reasons: 1) People know the final price. They are guaranteed the price that they are ordering. If they cancel their order, they lose out on that lower price. 2) Many people are ordering to lock in FSD transfer. If they cancel their order after March 31, they may not be able to transfer FSD ever again, making it more likely that many will follow through on their order. 3) We're talking about a year wait, not a multi-year wait. Many aren’t ready to take delivery today, but they will be in 2027. This is a real product people are ordering, not a prototype that was shown on stage. Tesla no doubt understands these things and likely has a general idea of how many people will actually end up taking delivery. For what it's worth, I've spoken a couple hundred people who have ordered this new $60k Cybertruck. None of them have ordered more than one, and all sounded serious about actually wanting to take delivery. Sure, some might end up cancelling, but it won't be anything like 2019 reservation rates.
English
44
21
700
47.4K
Brian Stone
Brian Stone@briandstone·
Due to the delivery timeline of the new Cybertruck variant I keep seeing idiots with FOMO spending $250 to reserve a vehicle that they have zero intention of taking delivery of, just to say “Hey, I’m getting one too!!” What they’re not taking into consideration is what this does to Tesla. It artificially bumps out delivery times and has them committing to materials from suppliers to fulfill all of these orders, only for you to back out and burn $250 and waste their time. This is just like 2019 when people were preordering 10 Cybertrucks because they’re going to have a fleet of autonomous trucks , even though they never could afford a half million dollars of trucks in any possible situation. If you have zero intention of taking delivery , or have some insane expectation of unannounced features that will be incorporated in this truck in 2027 and you’ll get some super deal, you’re crazy! It’s not going to happen. Don’t waste your time or Teslas time. Rant over.
English
109
7
315
58.8K
AIcrow
AIcrow@AICrows·
@SawyerMerritt Where can he drive if there is no steering wheel except have it join robotaxi in restricted Austin and bay area ?
English
0
0
0
37
AIcrow
AIcrow@AICrows·
@SawyerMerritt Where can he drive if there is no steering wheel
English
0
0
0
25
AIcrow
AIcrow@AICrows·
@JOBhakdi It’s fsd unsupervised in disguise
English
0
0
0
82