
Gregory Kaye CMW
4.4K posts


@OrangeFren @paoloardoino No. It’s their stable coin that was backed by XAUT- XAUT itself is alive and well.
English

Tether Gold XAUT is available on Ledn ❤️
Ledn@hodlwithLedn
Gold comes to Ledn. Bitcoin. @tethergold . The stablecoins the world runs on — on one platform. Held to the standard that's protected clients with a perfect track record since 2018. What's new on Ledn today: → Borrow and repay loans in USD₮ or USA₮ → Trade across 10 integrated pairs → Store BTC, Tether Gold (XAU₮), USD₮ and USA₮ And later this year: gold-backed loans. Learn more: ledn.io/post/hard-asse…
English

@Eunicedwong @BRICSinfo Even a broken clock is right twice a day. Trump may be a puppet but on this - I hope he’s right.
English

@BRICSinfo Since when does a US President dictate when a British Prime Minister should resign?
English

Gregory Kaye CMW retweetou

Saylor is a deep-state-controlled actor leading the largest psyop in Bitcoin and modern financial history. Through manipulation, gaslighting, distortion of facts, and false promises, he is attempting to convince people to abandon the idea of direct ownership of Bitcoin in exchange for leveraged, paper-based fiat IOU claims.
If you truly understand Bitcoin, fiat currency, and monetary history, it becomes clear that the narrative is designed to persuade you to hand over your capital so institutions and governments can accumulate more Bitcoin while you receive paper claims with no legal entitlement to the “Bitcoin per share” promised. Those claims can be diluted indefinitely while the real Bitcoin remains in their possession.
Anyone promoting this narrative is helping expand deep-state control over Bitcoin while claiming to be a Bitcoiner (anti-deep state). A walking contradiction and bad actor, whether they understand it or not. Bitcoin was designed to eliminate dilution risk, counterparty risk, and reliance on intermediaries, yet MSTR reintroduces all three through perpetual share issuance, leverage, and management risk. By those standards, the model is fundamentally anti-Bitcoin for the shareholder.
Bitcoin is money, not merely a speculative asset whose sole purpose is to increase in fiat terms while concentrating ownership.
But this is an inevitable stage in the evolution of open-source technology in a world dominated by powerful industrial complexes. In fact, this is a sign that Bitcoin is fundamentally valuable and is here to stay. Like the internet, Bitcoin will be used for both good and bad, offering both centralized and decentralized use cases, that is the cost of freedom. Just make sure you’re on the right side of history, not for Bitcoin’s sake, Bitcoin will do what it does, but for the sake of your own freedom and wealth. The truth always prevails.
Michael Saylor@saylor
Bitcoiners agree on the 99% that matters. We shouldn’t let the 1% divide us while nearly all global capital has yet to enter Bitcoin’s monetary network. The opportunity is bigger than the argument.
English

@saylor @bitcoinmalaya You are the 1% and so yeah, you message to turn our money, our freedoms money, into another @BlackRock controlled and manipulated asset should clearly sidestep you from the conversation. That’s a division I welcome.
English

Just realized it’s Father’s Day.
I’m not one for holidays, but I became a father 2 days ago… and now every single day feels like Father’s Day.
Our real job isn’t one Sunday a year, it’s being a living example for our kids every single day. I understood that long before she arrived
I’m already praying for her future husband. Men you’ve got to start early👊
English

@BillAckman I think your hedge fund is counting on the money printer going brrrrr… it’s how you’re and your ilk are making profits! (And me too) but that is also the answer. It costs nothing to silent tax everyone.
English

I don’t understand who is going to invest in a $300 billion reconstruction fund for Iran. The U.S. is not doing so, and why would the Qataris or any other country in the Middle East that was just attacked by Iran invest one penny to support Iran’s reconstruction?
Most of the damage inflicted on Iran was directed to military targets. Why would anyone want to help Iran rebuild its military capabilities?
Even if the funds were limited to humanitarian-related infrastructure, if there is such a thing, money is fungible, and we know the first freed up dollar will go to rebuild Iran’s ballistic and nuclear capabilities.
What am I missing?
English

@Eunicedwong @WhaleInsider We live in a world where that government is more trusted than the US government or any other government in the West. That is why they are going. If you have a better explanation please let me know! But here in KL - it’s all I can reason.
English

@ricardoXMR I may be an outlier. I trade all the other coins to buy more XMR. But your view is balanced and I respect it 100%!
English

@GregoryKayeUAE I don't think so too much, not many monero people are maximalists, there are a few, but most monero people are open-minded to other projects/tech
English


@mortimer_1 I am sure there is a brother or sister that developed unneeded condos.
English

So if you are a family that can’t afford your mortgage because of a job loss, you are forced to sell at the current market price
But if you are a developer that built product that no one wanted, you get a taxpayer funded bailout
The stupidity is amazing 🤦♂️
Steve Saretsky@SteveSaretsky
This is totally bananas.
English

@spoonmvn I agree with you. But the PR machine has already rendered otherwise sane people into sheep.
English

MSTR looked like an obvious honey pot, enticing Bitcoiners to trade their sovereignty away for leverage.
But now Saylor is literally spelling out the future he’s planning for you with STRF/C/K/E/D: you take all the risk, he gives you a slip of paper and keeps the Bitcoin.
How is this any different from crypto?
And look at our timelines. He’s captured what were once Bitcoiners who ruthlessly defended self-custody and transacting in BTC, into a cult that posts Saylorisms.
Every cycle this continues only makes the inevitable unwind larger.
Bitcoiners, jump ship before you get rekt.
English

People are astoundingly stupid. My comments about the departure tax is not that I should be treated differently from anyone else. I am making a point about the extent to which taxes are confiscatory. As I have previously explained, there was a time when ZERO cents of income tax were levied in Canada and the US. Then bit by bit, that "temporary" measure, to be applied to only a few, and at a very low percentage rate of your income, becomes a mammoth monster that takes more than 50% of your earnings. It can occur because there are no repercussions if governments do not balance their budgets (other than voting them out). Hence, what starts off as a small temporary tax on a few becomes an existential theft that is orders of magnitude larger than the so-called illegal extortion tax of the Mafia. It can exist only because the great majority of people BENEFIT from this form of parasitic taxation. But someone has to pay for everyone else, and when you are that someone, you are not necessarily pleased to be funding the ultimate Ponzi scheme. I'm making a moral, philosophical, and ethical argument. It's not just about me.
English
















