Harry Bosch

There was no such thing as “illegal immigration” back then. Immigration was open and encouraged, and it was assumed that the person was permanently settling here. Therefore, a reasonable question to ask is “What would the 1866 Congress think about invaders/unwelcome migrants?”

@TaylorLorenzNOT @cabsav456 Correct. The guy who helped build the amendment absolutely had allegiance as a factor. It’s clearly discussed here. And illegal migrant is the same as an invader/invading army. This leftist is making up her own rules and claiming SCOTUS “narrow exceptions” are constitutional

@cabsav456 This is just a blanket assertion. Do you have any response to the “not subject to any foreign power” language in the 1866 Act, and the framer saying the 14A jurisdiction clause is meant to refer to the same thing. Jurisdiction can be legal or allegiance-based.

The birthright citizenship challenge has essentially no chance on the merits. The Fourteenth Amendment says: "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside." Some people are trying to argue that the phrase "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" excludes the children of undocumented immigrants. But think about what "subject to the jurisdiction" actually means. Can undocumented immigrants be arrested by U.S. police? Yes. Can they be sued in U.S. courts? Yes. Can they be prosecuted for violating U.S. laws? Yes. Can they be taxed? Yes. Can they be detained & deported by the U.S. government? Yes. In other words, they are plainly subject to U.S. jurisdiction. The narrow historical exceptions were things like children of foreign diplomats & members of invading armies... people who were not subject to the ordinary authority of U.S. law. Everyone else born here falls under U.S. jurisdiction. If someone can be arrested, prosecuted, imprisoned, taxed, and deported by the United States, claiming they are somehow not "subject to the jurisdiction" of the United States is a very difficult argument to make. Case closed. People would be smart to stop setting unrealistic expectations.

@cabsav456 @libertarian_ass “Didn’t make it in the constitution”. Cool, Show me where invading armies or diplomats are in the constitution. You’re wrong. There is absolutely an allegiance factor. If there wasn’t, native Americans would’ve had jus soli citizenship. SCOTUS got it wrong in Wong Ark

That's a selective reading of the debates and irrelevant because that language never made it into the Constitution. The same Congress that drafted the Fourteenth Amendment rejected proposals that would have limited citizenship to children of citizens, which strongly suggests the omission was deliberate. More importantly, the Supreme Court settled this issue in Wong Kim Ark, holding that U.S.-born children of foreign nationals are citizens except for narrow exceptions like diplomats and invading armies. Undocumented immigrants do not fall into either category. As a conservative, I believe in following the text as written, not rewriting it to get a preferred policy outcome. The text doesn't say "children of citizens". Neither originalism nor textualism allows you to add words that aren't there.

@cabsav456 Wrong. International allows for each country to prosecute criminals according to their laws. When this was argued native Americans were born inside the US (on US soil) and exempt from birthright. These are illegal invaders, like an invading army.

Today, I am admitting to murder. Yes, you heard that correctly. I’m admitting to murder. 23 children in Sierra Leone have lost their Iives because of me. Instead of sending $350 to Africa, I decided to use that money on a new lift master and garage tune up

Hopefully this dissuades people from applying for a cushy forever WFH government job that entitles them to a 1M DMV house and forever benefits/pension

@1RICKYSPANISH @JonathanTurley Except the red states are cowards. They’ll say they have principles and continue playing by the rules until they’re all voted out by illegal migration and mail in votes. Complete and utter spineless cowards and cucks

@JonathanTurley So what you're saing is, all red states need to not give totals until we "Find" votes received when the fuck ever, and count them till we win. You know, the Dems playbook.

We are twenty minutes away from the final decisions. I will be covering the releases. While much attention is on birthright citizenship and the transgender cases, keep Trump v. Slaughter in mind. The overturning of Humphrey's Executor would be another win for executive power...

John Kasich lives in a $2 million dollar home next to a country club in Westerville, OH. The population is 83% White. 0 TPS Haitians live there. He’s OK with Springfield and similar towns being overrun by tens of thousands of foreigners with an incompatible culture because he doesn’t have to deal with it.

@Brick_Suit @nicksortor How do you know he’s just not saying this to quell the anger? Highly doubt they did all this just to piss off their voter base

@nicksortor Screw looking at 350,000 cases individually. They can all go back (many to South America where they lived before Biden opened the floodgates) and we can look at them individually when they reapply for a visa. They. Must. Leave.

🚨 NEW: DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin says the **350,000** Haitians in the US under TPS can apply for a visa or even permanent residence to potentially avoid deportation These people had YEARS to apply. DHS must officially revoke their TPS NOW. No slow walking this! Per Mullin: "These individuals have a couple of choices: they can try to apply for a for a permanent residence here, they can apply for a temporary visa if they choose to, or they can choose to go back." Haitians with pending criminal charges, prior felony charges, or are on welfare are generally NOT eligible for permanent residence, but each case will be looked at individually, Mullin says. "If they want to go back, we'll help them with that. I'm talking directly to the individuals that are with the temporary protected status: either try to fill out the paperwork and be here underneath a permanent status, or we'll help you get back to your country."

ethereum:native retesting the low from 2 weeks ago. It’s barely hanging on. Are you all ready for another leg lower?

@nytmike @nytimes Executive power will crush you little Michael. He’s running the show, fuck outta here with your “independent” boards. You and your entire Democrat cabal are thugs

NEW/EXCLUSIVE: The White House secretly pressured arm of the govt that is supposed to be independent and protect federal workers from unfair political firings. After WH pressure the board made monumental decision in Trump’s favor, expanding his power to fire fed employees like DOJ prosecutors. nytimes.com/2026/06/28/us/…

Shoutout to all the Democrats who didn’t just tell us Haiti was beautiful, but recited Soros garbage talking points, went on live tv, and wore t-shirts flexing Haiti only to tell us it’s a permanent shithole

@OG_Harmacist @GregoryKBovino Imagine he uses his middle name and calls the party KGB

@GregoryKBovino @GregoryKBovino why don't you run for office? Grassroots wise you'll kill it. The people want someone like you in office. Not these weak ass rinos.

I guess Republicans want to lose the midterms….Promising mass deportations won big. Then DHS says long-term TPS Haitians can now apply for permanent residence? Huh? That's not enforcement, that's the old 'temporary means forever' filter that got us in this situation to begin with. Polls: Harvard/Harris had 56% supporting deporting all illegals, 78% for criminals. NYT/Siena at 54%. Americans want removals, not more loopholes. Ignore the base that elected you and watch enthusiasm evaporate by 2026. Deliver the promise or lose the House. Mass deportations now and, oh, don’t shut down detention facilities!

@mattforney I’m not indifferent. I’m joyous

The future depends on you being indifferent to this.

@StephenM It doesn’t shock them. It angers them that you have the power to reveal their subversive tactics. That’s why they are violent. Remain mission strong Stephen. And get @GregoryKBovino back if you can.

This may shock the media to hear but for 99.999% of its history there was not a Haitian TPS diaspora in Springfield, Ohio. The Democrats illegally airlifted the Haitian migrants to Springfield in the months before President Trump took office.

@FirstSquawk Round them up, forcibly is preferred

US Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin: Migrants with temporary protected status should pursue permanent residency or return home

Can somebody ask @grok what percentage of US congressional democrats have posted about Haiti in the last 72 hours

@Saul_Sadka You are vastly overestimating your knowledge.

@HarryB0sch Yea, you are vastly overestimating the window with which the world is run.

Just so everyone understands what’s going on here: Sohrab Ahmari, who is a longtime personal friend and travel buddy of JD Vance, and who was privy to the development of the farce MOU that is falling apart, is counter-signaling Trump’s deal to try to bring peace between Israel and Lebanon, something everyone except absolute IRGC stooges must support. Insane how openly and completely the highest reaches of Western power have allowed themselves to be penetrated.

@obamonarchist @caduceus415 @DKThomp @feelsdesperate So why does America have to save Africa? Has any country saved our homeless people? Drug addicts? People who are in massive debt?

@HarryB0sch @caduceus415 @DKThomp @feelsdesperate Borders are useful for administrative purposes. It’s impractical to govern without clear delineations. People don’t give away every dollar because money has a diminishing marginal value.

There are some center-to-right wing accounts I follow that are more offended by the possibility that some public health sources are over-estimating the death count from Musk carelessly destroying US global health programs than by the core fact that Musk really did carelessly destroy US global health (and bragged about it relentlessly) in a way that clearly killed people. These people know who they are, and they're wrong.

@arkiewildman73 @KirbStompUGA @DudespostingWs “I don’t like the fact you predicted all of my pitchers shitty pitches and then accurately guessed the 4th one which you nuked, so what I’m gonna do is try to take you out” That’s great baseball, and no they wouldn’t have done that

@KirbStompUGA @DudespostingWs I’m strictly talking about their response to the hotdogging

Randy Arozarena stepped out of the box on three straight pitches because he knew the pitcher wasn’t throwing him a strike. The count went to 3-0. Next pitch, he absolutely nuked a home run. One of the most disrespectful at-bats in MLB history.