Only Updoots

2.2K posts

Only Updoots banner
Only Updoots

Only Updoots

@OnlyUpdoots

Former MAGA (But not a libtard). Christian. Truth seeker. Morons will be blocked.

Entrou em Nisan 2024
179 Seguindo68 Seguidores
Only Updoots
Only Updoots@OnlyUpdoots·
@TheMarcitect Why is it that all this space coverage always ends up being about poo?🤣
English
0
0
0
13
The Architect.
The Architect.@TheMarcitect·
Is it me or does this 23 million dollar toilet look like it's out of a 1979 camper van?
The Architect. tweet media
English
251
135
1.3K
24K
Providence Wire
Providence Wire@providence_wire·
I’m not sure which is worse, the MAGA cultist or the radical left.
English
792
120
907
37.3K
Jen X🗽
Jen X🗽@jenrenee·
Trump Derangement Syndrome is so bad… They support rapists over victims They support murderers over cops They support fraud over taxpayers They support terror over security They support chaos over freedom Do they ever ask themselves why?
English
962
142
594
30.8K
Kimberly Ross
Kimberly Ross@SouthernKeeks·
I have zero patience for flat-earthers and the “space photos are staged” crowd. They treat ignorance like it’s a personality trait worth broadcasting.
English
239
110
1.3K
18.4K
Dikachi
Dikachi@Thekacci·
When we are done addressing the silly Flat earthers, we would deal with the moon landing unbelievers
English
30
15
100
3.6K
Only Updoots
Only Updoots@OnlyUpdoots·
@ManaByte This post seems extraordinarily vaxxed and boosted 💉💉💉💉💉
English
0
0
0
2
Jeremy
Jeremy@ManaByte·
I’m going to be very sincere with you. If you think: The Earth is flat. We never landed on the moon. Space doesn’t exist. Please do the human race a huge favor and never breed.
Jeremy tweet media
English
777
385
4.3K
88.9K
DemonstrableReality
DemonstrableReality@flatsmackin·
I asked for a physical demonstration. I got cartoons. 🤪🤪🤡🤡
DemonstrableReality tweet media
English
16
1
16
1.1K
Javier de la Cuadra
Javier de la Cuadra@JavierDlacuadra·
Ahora sí hablemos en serio de la foto. Este es un trino para interesados en fotografía, astrofotografía y el que quiera ¿Por qué esta foto es increíble? Algún conspiranóico, dándoselas de suspicaz, preguntó que por qué esta foto tomada por el comandante del Artemis II se veía más opaca que la foto tomada por la tripulación del Apolo 17 en 1972. Bueno. Acá viene lo emocionante. Esta fotografía hubiera sido imposible tomarla con una cámara análoga; y no cualquier cámara digital puede tomarla. El archivo original de esta foto está disponible para su descarga en la página de la NASA. En las propiedades del archivo se puede ver con qué cámara fue tomada y los ajustes de exposición que se usaron. Hasta el serial de la cámara. Esto, primero que todo, garantiza que la foto que estamos viendo no fue creada digitalmente, ni con IA, sino capturada por una cámara real por un humano. Sé que no es suficiente argumento para los conspiranóicos, pero ni modos. Esa que está ahí es la Tierra. Ahora sí lo interesante. ¿Por qué se ve como más opaca que la del 72? porque resulta que en la cara de la tierra que vemos en esa foto, está de noche; si hacen zoom pueden ver el brillo de la iluminación nocturna. Pero ¿cómo, si es de noche, puede verse como si fuera de día? Porque la foto se hizo con un altísimo ISO de 51200! El ISO es la sensibilidad del sensor a la luz. Con la mayoría de cámaras digitales, con ISOs de más de 6400, el ruido es tanto que la foto se ve prácticamente ilegible. Pero la cámara que tiene el comandante Reid Wiseman es una NIKON D5, que no es una cámara muy nueva; tiene 10 años de haber sido lanzada. Pero su sensor es reconocido por garantizar una calidad decente de imagen con ISOs altos. Y eso, para los que siempre preguntan cómo se hace una buena foto del cielo, es fundamental ¿Por qué? Pues para poder tomar fotos de los astros sin tener que bajar mucho la velocidad de exposición. Porque si bajas mucho la exposición apra que entre más luz, queda capturado el movimiento de los astros y de la rotación de la Tierra, cuando estás en la Tierra. Así que un iSO tan alto hizo posible que Wiserman pudiera disparar a una velocidad de 1/4 de segundo. Que es baja, pero no tanto. Es digamos, el límite para la astrofotografía. Por eso esta foto tiene ruido, porque de todas formas es un ISO altísimo. Pero lo que más me emociona a mí, es que la tomó con un lente 14 -24mm F2.8. Es decir, en terminos coloquiales, que esta foto no tiene zoom. Para que lo dimensionen: cuando uno quiere tomar una foto de la Luna desde la Tierra que salga así de "cerca" tiene que usar un lente de unos 400mm de distancia focal. Wiserman usó un ¡gran angular de 22mm! Es decir que él estaba viendo la Tierra asi de grande frente a sus ojos. Porque la foto no fue recortada en edición y eso lo sabemos porque en las propiedades del archivo siempre aparece cuando una foto fue editada. El archivo está limpio, tiene la resolución original de la cámara. La tierra era inmensa frente a su mirada. Hermoso. Pero para mí lo más mágico de esta foto, incluso más que las auroras boreales, es que se ve como la luz de sol, que está del otro lado de la tierra, ilumina nuestra atmosfera. Y eso es magia pura, porque esa atmosfera tiene una composición milimétricamente perfecta para permitir que la vida, tal y como la conocemos, sea posible. Esta foto, es un regalo precioso para la humanidad. Les dejo al link para que descarguen la foto en alta resolución y el pantallazo de las propuedades del archivo.
Javier de la Cuadra tweet media
Español
488
5K
19.5K
946.5K
Seattle Extremist
Seattle Extremist@SeattleIndepen1·
We really went to the moon. They don’t do hoaxes to inspire you. They do hoaxes and false flags to terrify and demoralize you. If anything, the people behind the hoaxes and false flags are the ones ultimately pushing flat Earth nonsense and “Apollo was a hoax” gibberish. They don’t want you to know about the greatness of your ancestors.
Seattle Extremist@SeattleIndepen1

You’re spot on. I have to say I admire your patience. The weird thing to me is how these people are so passionate about topics they know nothing about. Such as the Van Allen belt. Everyone bringing that up is just reciting a meme. And then there are the jokers who don’t know anything about photography, perspective, or light who think they possess skills to analyze photos. They see the same person photographed through two different types of lenses and make wild declarations, “these aren’t the same person! Look at how much rounder his head is! They are clearly using clones!” Besides, and here’s where it become relevant: the Apollo mission was a huge inspiration that led a generation of American boys into the sciences. That is something our current rulers weren’t happy about. After they got rid of Nixon they shut down NASA quickly. They don’t do false flag events or hoaxes to inspire people. They do those things to terrorize and foment wars. The people behind the hoaxes in our society are more likely to be behind all this flat earth nonsense and “we didn’t go to the moon” bs. They are the ones who want us demoralized and unaware of our past achievements.

English
29
24
206
6.6K
Breadman
Breadman@BTCBreadMan·
Is there a single better example of the Dunning Kruger effect than the millions of complete retards who believe with all their heart that we never visited the moon because they are not personally satisfied by the ample supporting evidence?
English
150
43
597
17.2K
Peter Hague
Peter Hague@peterrhague·
The Moon landing deniers coming out in forces is a sign of desperation on their part. The fact that humanity is going there again is deeply threatening to them. Not only will Artemis yield great benefits for science, exploration, and development - it will also produce a torrent of additional evidence that these people are stupid.
English
117
138
1.4K
24.8K
Snedgie 🦫
Snedgie 🦫@Snedgie·
the launch of Artemis II has made me realise how many moon landing deniers exist and it baffles me how many people could be that stupid
English
155
399
5K
48.7K
Frank J. Fleming
Frank J. Fleming@IMAO_·
You can prove the moon landing without talking any about the evidence of it but simply by talking about the implausibility of a conspiracy to fake it. For one, are we supposed to believe that weird-smelling basement-dwellers are able to see it as obviously fake but the Soviets, who had the most knowledge and most motivation to expose it as a fraud, were fooled by it? Or was America’s greatest enemy in on the conspiracy? And that’s a fraction of the problem with the conspiracy narrative.
English
134
53
739
28.4K
Jikkyleaks 🐭
Jikkyleaks 🐭@Jikkyleaks·
As I'm totally shadowbanned this week I might as well post the proof that the NASA Apollo 15 hammer and feather drop video was fake. Enjoy your weekend. Sound on! @taoeffect @DravenS17 @ShadowofEzra @BGatesIsaPyscho #NASAgate #DefundNASA
Greg Slepak (@[email protected])@taoeffect

@Burki677 @TheStarman923 5.84 (incorrect t=1.2) and 5.4 (correct t=1.13), are clearly not equal to 6ft. You forgot to shift the line up to match his feet. Anyway, this is how we know they're not on the moon.

English
27
146
504
46.6K
InThisTogether
InThisTogether@_InThisTogether·
To suspect the moon landings were faked is not to claim the Earth is flat, nor that space is a dome, nor that modern technology doesn't exist. I have seen a lot of this on X recently. It is like saying if you think 9/11 was a false flag you also think royals are lizards.
Jeremy@ManaByte

Earth isn’t flat, the Moon landing wasn’t faked, and space isn’t some CGI dome. These claims fall apart the moment you look at the technology we use every day. None of it works unless Earth is a sphere in a real cosmos. Start with GPS. Your phone calculates your position by comparing timing signals from satellites orbiting Earth. Those satellites move at precise speeds and altitudes that only make sense in a real vacuum. If Earth were flat or if space were fake, GPS would fail instantly. No navigation, no rideshare apps, no airline routing, no global timing systems. The entire system depends on orbital mechanics that match what physics predicts for a spherical planet. Satellite internet, satellite TV, and weather forecasting all rely on the same reality. We watch storms form from orbit. We track hurricanes across oceans using data from satellites operated by different countries and private companies. These systems agree with each other because they are observing the same real planet from space. If space were fake, every meteorologist, every aerospace engineer, every telecom company, every airline, and every military on Earth would have to coordinate a perfect lie for decades. That is not possible. Now to the claim that NASA fakes photos of Earth. This is one of the easiest conspiracy theories to debunk because NASA is not the only source of Earth images. Not even close. Dozens of countries and private companies have their own satellites that photograph Earth constantly. Weather satellites from Europe, Japan, India, and South Korea all produce their own full‑disk images. Private companies like Maxar and Planet Labs take high resolution photos of Earth every day for commercial clients. Amateur radio operators receive live images directly from NOAA satellites using equipment you can buy online. None of these systems rely on NASA. None of them match a single centralized source. Yet they all show the same spherical Earth from different angles at different times. If NASA were faking Earth photos, every other space agency and every private satellite operator would have to fake them too. They would also have to coordinate the lighting, cloud patterns, storm movements, and surface features in perfect sync. That is not happening. The simplest explanation is the correct one. Multiple independent systems are photographing the same real planet. The Moon landing is even harder to deny once you look at the tech. We still interact with the equipment the astronauts left behind. Observatories fire lasers at the retroreflectors sitting on the lunar surface and receive the return signal at the exact predicted intervals. This is not a theory. It is a measurement that universities and independent facilities repeat all the time. You cannot fake a laser return from nearly 240,000 miles away. Even the internet used to spread these conspiracies relies on space infrastructure. Undersea cables carry most traffic, but satellites handle the rest. The timing, routing, and handoff between systems only work because the satellites are actually in orbit. If space did not exist, the global communications network would collapse. The irony is simple. The technology that flat Earth believers and Moon landing deniers use to post their claims is the same technology that proves them wrong. The evidence is not hidden. It is built into the functioning of the modern world. You can reject the conclusions, but you cannot reject the infrastructure that makes your phone, your internet, your weather alerts, your maps, your flights, and your entire digital life possible. These conspiracies do not just fail scientifically. They fail technologically, mathematically, and logistically. They only survive when people stop paying attention to the systems they rely on every day.

English
41
20
91
4.3K
Chris Martz
Chris Martz@ChrisMartzWX·
Everything is a conspiracy when you don’t understand how anything works.
English
187
1.3K
8.9K
221.3K
₿en Wehrman
₿en Wehrman@benwehrman·
According to NASA, there are "millions" of pieces of debris orbiting around our globe, including over 40,000 manmade satellites, all flying at a mind-boggling 17,000+ MPH (that's 10x the velocity of a speeding sniper rifle bullet) Who is manning the Artemis II Xbox controller to dodge all of these objects careening around at 20x the speed of sound, in all different directions, any one of which would completely decimate the spacecraft and all astronauts inside it? 🤔
English
337
353
1.6K
180.3K
kook 🏝️
kook 🏝️@KookCapitalLLC·
ever since i exposed the moon landing as fake my notifs are crazy non-stop normie fights all day in the comments i can say this for sure you do not want to align with the group that believes the moon landing was real they are completely retarded npcs 😂 moon landing = fake
English
126
42
674
13K