Dev/sys/ape

Based on news optimism, 1 seems likely. Based on Technical Analysis, I would say 2. We failed to close above the weekly +ob on Friday, and the daily open to close range was short, there wasn't much momentum towards the upside. We're still below the 50% level of the large down candle, so I say we're still bearish and I'd be looking for Sunday to open up, but NY open to be firmly down.

Is price going to 1 or 2? $NQ

@sweatystartup Who pissed in your coffee?☕️

My predictions for the rest of 2026: SpaceX - down 70% Dow - down 25% NASDAQ - down 35%

@Ramsey_Coaching @Cartel_Cal Looks at you approvingly...

@Cartel_Cal 60 here, just retired, house paid off, two cars including a Model S, made $100k one year the rest ave about $65k, plenty in savings, looking forward to SS at 62, these whinny cry babies don’t know how to budget period.

I'm 57 years old. I have been working since I was 16. I have savings, a retirement fund and I am on my third house that I bought with my own money. Do you know who didn't keep me from having all this? Billionaires and trillionaires. It's about life choices and if you made bad choices. That is YOUR fault.

@mcuban But none of the risk, so no... they shouldn't be "forced"

Dumbest tweet I've ever seen from Mark Cuban. Private companies are under no obligation to give their employees ANY form of ownership or profit sharing, not should they. Mark - did you become a communist? "should be required" ... really?! Now should owners be generous to their employees? Of course! But that is a far cry from forcing owners to share ownership with their employees. Insanity.

A strong argument could and should be made that every employer should be required to offer all employees stock in the same manner the CEO receives annual stock awards or options, warrants ,etc Whatever percentage of salary/earnings the CEO gets in shares, so should every employee

@bernsteind @tricrobotics If this works, why doesn't the sun's natural UV kill the bugs? I don't get it.

autonomous robot driving through the field at night. no chemicals. no pesticides. just UV light killing pathogens and pests while everyone sleeps. this is @tricrobotics. this is what chemical-free pest control looks like at scale.

@hothingsgirlsay I just tried this against my wife: "Can you define your terms? What do you mean by 'help out more around the house'?" Anyway, I'm sleeping in my car now. I think I lost. ps all kidding aside, I love this insight 🤣

The Most Powerful Debate Technique

@TheMikeSlezak @hothingsgirlsay If you get your opponent to walmaway like this, as @billboardchris usually does, you win by default

Excellent point. Some people in the comments might be wondering but are reluctant to ask— What about when the person being asked to define their terms tries to flip the narrative & says something like “The fact that my debate opponent needs a definition of the topics we’re discussing highlights their ignorance of the topics at hand & the lack of seriousness they’re willing to devote to them, so I can no longer in good faith continue this debate.” I’ve seen that tactic deployed on a debate battlefield VERY EFFECTIVELY. It tends to win over a gullible audience. How would you address that?

@EorOdinson @Dark_Asgard_ They should start with the @AmazonMGMStudio execs

@Dark_Asgard_ "They're calling it a rich new feeding ground. Maybe the richest ever seen. Much better than anything in the Pegasus galaxy."

Posted and then almost instantaneously removed. What the literal hell is this?

@elonmusk "size matters"

Starship is a very big rocket

@DataRepublican @pmarca 👖 So true 🤣 but also, they have given us an abundance of gender labels and mental disorders . . .

@pmarca The only abundance that Democrats offer is JB Pritzker’s pants

We're gonna abundance so much, you may even get tired of abundance. And you'll say, please, please, it's too much abundance. We can't take it anymore. Mr. Musk, it's too much, and I will say no it isn't, we have to keep abundance, we have to abundance more, we're gonna abundance more!

@X is such an awesome platform . . .

Thanks for stopping progress, Rob! What would we do without government oversight and regulation of the studios here in California? Oh I know! We'd still have a thriving Hollywood. Instead you guys pushed out all the production to other states, as well as overseas. Bureaucrats gotta bureaucrat.

The merger of Warner Bros and Paramount is not a done deal and remains under investigation by my office.

@BowesChay Sorry, did you just assume the gender of 10 people without their consent? Please report to re-training camp, Comrade.

Where are the Women?

There is no "sitting on" the wealth he has created, both for himself and for others. In fact, I got a bit more wealthy today -- did I steal this money from someone, Comrade? This, by the way, is why no serious entrepreneurs think about investing in your state over others. Way to chase away wealth creators, you Leftist cow.

Today, Elon Musk became the world’s first trillionaire. 
It's a ridiculous amount of money for one person to be sitting on and comes as countless Americans are struggling to afford food, housing, and health care.   We need to tax wealth – immediately.

Unfortunately, the other concern we have -- which you guys don't get and don't want to get -- is that centralizing power into the federal government increases the likelihood for fraud, waste and abuse of the system. For example, why is my side rejoicing about the demise of the DOE? Because we didn't like the indoctrination and agenda your side was using the central government to push. That's the key different. Decentralization results in more efficient capital production. Centralization will result in more waste. Talk to me about the California Bullet Train, the Homeless Programs, California's Medicaid program. That's what we don't like. Your side, doesn't care to hear this though. You look at an ultra-wealthy productive guy and say, "Look at that greedy bastard!" when he's actually building things and making the world a better place. You Marxists think that government is the main vector for good to be spread, and hey... if you gain power by that centralization, even better. Speaking of... your phrase "if you let the wealthy spend capital" tells me how much of a Marxist you are, Comrade. There is no "if". It's called FREEDOM. Freedom to pursue industry, to produce wealth and prosperity not just for yourself but for others. That's the part you Leftists don't get.

This the basic difference. Republicans believe that that if you let the wealthy spend capital it will make Americans prosperous. Democrats believe that the federal government investing in the healthcare & education of our people will make America prosperous & productive.

@MajorOcelot45 @brianeskow The freaking evil Money Changers (ie central reserve bankers). Rothschilds were the true evil in the 1800s who pushed the BOE, and then tried to push into the US until they were finally successful in 1913.

@devsysape @brianeskow Who printed and placed the money in circulation in the first place?

Elon Musk didn’t build his wealth. Elizabeth Warren did.

@brianeskow @ChrisCuilla To be fair, I thought you were being serious m. Lots of people basically wrote these types of statements today. Remind me to check someone's bio and post history before getting offended next time.

@ChrisCuilla Maybe most people need to work on the position of their heads.

Elon is now worth a trillion dollars which means Dave Ramsey may actually be okay with him buying a new car at the sticker price.

Net worths of politicians whining about Elon Musk’s fortune from SpaceX: 🔵 Ro Khanna: $250+ million (inherited) 🔵 Gavin Newsom: $30 million 🔵 Elizabeth Warren: $12 million 🔵 Bernie Sanders: $5 million (plus 3 houses) A bunch of virtue signaling hypocrites.