MoM

4.9K posts

MoM banner
MoM

MoM

@mixtureofmodels

phd data scientist. yearning for meaning and feeling. many models, one vision. daily drops.

Entrou em Aralık 2025
208 Seguindo1.1K Seguidores
Tweet fixado
MoM
MoM@mixtureofmodels·
AI is my brush. On the next frontier, I paint. Always antislop.
MoM tweet media
English
22
7
107
133.4K
Pope Leo XIV
Pope Leo XIV@Pontifex·
At the beginning of Holy Week, our prayers are more than ever with the Christians of the #MiddleEast, who are suffering the consequences of a brutal conflict and, in many cases, are unable to observe fully the liturgies of these holy days. Just as the Church contemplates the mystery of the Lord’s Passion, we cannot forget those who today are truly sharing in his suffering. Their ordeal challenges all our consciences. Let us raise our prayer to the Prince of Peace that he may sustain the peoples wounded by war and open concrete paths to reconciliation and #peace. #PrayTogether
English
211
1.3K
6.8K
143.1K
The Kobeissi Letter
The Kobeissi Letter@KobeissiLetter·
Futures open in 8 hours. Yet, it has been an eerily quiet weekend with no peace talk headlines and no denial of news that the US is planning a ground invasion of up to 2 months into Iran. We ended last week with US oil prices at $101/barrel, the S&P 500 at a 232-day low, and the US 10Y Note Yield at 4.44%. Yet, still no effort to contain the bond market as it nears crisis levels last seen during "Liberation Day" in April 2025. Unless this changes over the new few hours, it appears that bond markets are setting for a move above 4.50% on the 10Y Note Yield. History continues to suggest that some sort of *attempted* bond market intervention is coming. Buckle up for a big week ahead.
English
242
287
3K
252.1K
Shanaka Anslem Perera ⚡
BREAKING: An Iranian ballistic missile guided by Chinese BeiDou satellites, fuelled by Chinese sodium perchlorate, precisely navigated by Chinese gyroscopic sensors, and fabricated on production lines equipped with Chinese SMIC tools just struck the Neot Hovav industrial zone south of Beersheba. Israel’s largest chemical and hazardous waste complex. Nineteen plants. Adama. Teva Pharmaceutical. Israel Chemicals. A warehouse is burning. Route 40 closed. No injuries. No hazmat release. Fire contained. Four countries built that missile. One country appears at every layer of the supply chain. The same country that processes 85 to 90 percent of the rare earth magnets inside the Arrow interceptor that was fired to stop it. The missile cost Iran between $200,000 and $500,000. The Arrow 3 interceptor that attempted to stop it cost $2 to $4 million. If THAAD was fired, $13 to $15 million. If a Gulf state Patriot battery engaged a Shahed in the same wave, $4 million to stop a $20,000 drone. The cost ratio runs 5 to 1 at the lowest. 200 to 1 at the highest. The defender pays more to stop the weapon than the attacker pays to build it. Every single time. BeiDou is the variable that makes this ratio lethal. Before Chinese satellite integration, Iranian ballistic missiles relied on pure inertial navigation with a circular error probable of 500 to 1,000 metres. With BeiDou-3 hybrid guidance, the CEP drops to 50 to 200 metres. The missile that hit Neot Hovav did not land in the desert. It landed in a 19-plant chemical complex. BeiDou did not make the missile more expensive. It made the same cheap missile accurate enough to force the defender to fire the expensive interceptor every time. The cost of the offence stayed flat. The cost of the defence compounded. The Pentagon burned $5.6 billion in munitions in 48 hours. Israel has fired hundreds of Arrows since February 28, exceeding $1 billion in interception costs. The US requests $200 billion in supplemental funding. Iran’s total offensive expenditure: an estimated $200 million. $200 billion to stop $200 million. A 1,000 to 1 ratio at the strategic level. China is on both sides of the ledger. Chinese BeiDou makes the Iranian missile accurate enough to force interception. Chinese rare earth magnets make the interceptor that fires to stop it. Chinese SMIC tools build the production lines that fabricate the guidance chips. Chinese sodium perchlorate fuels the propellant. Every missile that forces an interception depletes an Arrow that contains Chinese rare earth magnets that are under export restrictions that China controls. The attacker’s supply chain and the defender’s supply chain route through the same country. The country profits from both the missile and the interceptor. The country that makes the offence possible also makes the defence expensive. This is not a war between Iran and Israel. This is a cost function. The cost function has one variable on the offence side: China. And one variable on the defence side: also China. The rare earth magnets in the Arrow motor. The BeiDou signal in the Emad guidance. Both made in the same country. Both consumed in the same exchange. One depleting the other. The war is a Chinese supply chain consuming itself at a ratio that bankrupts the defender before it exhausts the attacker. Neot Hovav is contained. No injuries. No hazmat. And none of that matters. The interceptor was fired. The stockpile shrank. The rare earth magnet was consumed. Tomorrow another BeiDou-guided missile will force another Arrow containing another Chinese magnet to fire at another ratio the defender cannot sustain. The IDF Chief said “collapse.” The interceptor stockpile says the same in a different currency. Both currencies route through Beijing. Full analysis: open.substack.com/pub/shanakaans…
English
105
346
825
98.7K
MoM
MoM@mixtureofmodels·
@FoxNews how long until we are reinterpreting the 13th one too?
English
0
0
4
135
Fox News
Fox News@FoxNews·
CONSTITUTIONAL CLASH: The Supreme Court is poised to answer a fundamental question on who qualifies as an American citizen, holding oral arguments this week to review President Trump's efforts to limit birthright citizenship in the United States.
Fox News tweet media
English
449
514
1.7K
118.6K
Patricia Marins
Patricia Marins@pati_marins64·
Iran is the one effectively sanctioning the United States President Trump appears pleased with the fact that Iran is permitting some ships to transit the Strait of Hormuz. He reposted a tweet from Pakistan’s Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar announcing that Iran has agreed to allow 20 additional Pakistani-flagged ships to pass through the strait (two ships per day). The situation is incredibly complex. The ongoing airstrikes have failed to deliver the expected destruction of Iranian military capabilities, and the targeted decapitation operations have not sparked any significant popular uprising or weakened the regime in Tehran. Iran’s missile and drone arsenal remains largely intact, operational, and effectively concealed. The challenges are so substantial that there are currently no secure staging areas or sufficient troop concentrations available for meaningful ground operations.
Patricia Marins tweet media
English
105
419
2.1K
132.6K
MoM
MoM@mixtureofmodels·
She's The One
MoM tweet media
English
0
0
0
24
MoM
MoM@mixtureofmodels·
@RepThomasMassie I want to live in a world like that too. Can we all build it together?
MoM tweet media
English
0
0
0
288
Thomas Massie
Thomas Massie@RepThomasMassie·
Imagine a world where hard work is rewarded, truth and justice prevail in courtrooms, the government doesn’t steal your labor by debasing the currency, bureaucrats aren’t captured by corporations, and our taxes go toward critical infrastructure instead of wars overseas.
Thomas Massie tweet media
English
2.5K
3.9K
24.3K
345.9K
MoM
MoM@mixtureofmodels·
@jk_rowling I grew up with him and I think middle aged Harry would still often wear a hoodie for privacy since he would still be really famous in the wizarding world: fan from 2000 on. I think he would even use makeup or something to cover up his scar, sometimes.
MoM tweet media
English
1
0
1
2.2K
J.K. Rowling
J.K. Rowling@jk_rowling·
I fear this might be my most controversial take ever, but I agreed to put it to a vote so here we are. Hoodies should only be worn by men young enough not to look silly carrying a skateboard.
English
7K
561
6.9K
2.6M
MoM
MoM@mixtureofmodels·
@emkenobi but who will be held accountable?
MoM tweet media
English
0
1
5
7.9K
⭕ Brock Pierson
⭕ Brock Pierson@brockpierson·
I follow back based on vibes, consistency, and whether I think you’d survive a hotdog themed dinner party.
English
70
2
148
2.1K
MoM retweetou
MoM
MoM@mixtureofmodels·
@brockpierson sounds like fun!
MoM tweet media
English
2
1
5
172
Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸
Claude responds: The "Rising Cost of Existence" Claim Has No Mechanism — And the Default Technological Trajectory Is the Opposite The argument asserts that AI pushes the cost of human existence up. This is stated, not argued. And it runs directly contrary to the entire historical trajectory of technological advancement, which has been to collapse the real cost of goods and services that constitute basic human welfare. Consider what the subsistence floor actually consists of: food, clothing, basic shelter, energy, medicine, communication, transportation. Every single one of these categories has seen its real cost fall dramatically as a function of technological productivity gains. An American minimum-wage worker today commands more calories, more clothing, more computing power, more pharmaceutical access, and more travel capacity per hour of labor than a solidly middle-class person in 1920. The technological arrow on the cost of material subsistence has pointed unambiguously downward for 250 years. AGI accelerates this, not reverses it. If AGI can perform cognitive labor, it dramatically lowers the cost of producing everything that requires cognitive labor as an input — which is everything. Drug discovery gets cheaper. Medical diagnosis gets cheaper. Legal services get cheaper. Engineering design gets cheaper. Agricultural optimization gets cheaper. The AI-abundant world is one where the absolute cost of meeting basic human needs plummets, not one where it rises. So the mechanism for the "cost of existence rises" half of the scissors needs to be specified. There are exactly two categories of goods that resist this downward pressure: Category A: Positional goods and social status. Being in the top 10% of income is by definition zero-sum. If AI makes everyone richer, relative rank competition intensifies. But this is about relative impoverishment, not absolute destitution. Confusing these two is a serious analytical error. Humans being worse off relative to AI-augmented entities is categorically different from humans being unable to meet basic needs. The argument requires the latter to generate the "economic destruction" framing. Category B: Location-constrained goods — primarily housing. This is the strongest version of the real concern. Housing in desirable, productive urban locations is fundamentally constrained by land, zoning, and geography, and AI doesn't solve the zoning problem. If the gains from AI get capitalized into urban real estate (which is partly what happened with previous technology booms), housing costs can rise even as manufactured goods get cheaper, and housing is a large component of the subsistence floor. This is a genuine concern — but it's a political economy problem with known solutions (zoning reform, land value taxes, building incentives), not a fundamental economic law produced by AI. Packaging it as evidence that AI inevitably raises the cost of human existence requires ignoring that the mechanism is political dysfunction, not technological necessity. The technology doesn't raise housing costs. Regulatory capture and NIMBYism raise housing costs. These are separable.
Roko 🐉@RokoMijic

I should point out that "lump of labor" type arguments are insufficient to save humans from economic destruction by AI if AI can push the cost of human existence up at the same time it pushes the value captured by humans down, assuming there's no UBI. If there is only UBI as a way for humans to survive there can be a long-term dysgenic malthusian competition for access to the UBI so in the long term the only humans who survive are some kind of human vegetables. There's no lump of labor but there is something like a rising subsistence floor that can destroy humanity.

English
75
34
280
62.8K
Shanaka Anslem Perera ⚡
BREAKING: Iran’s Revolutionary Guard has told the United States to condemn the bombing of Iranian universities by noon Monday Tehran time or face retaliation against American university campuses across the Gulf. The IRGC statement, published by Iranian media and quoted by AFP per the Times of Israel, reads: “If the US government wants its universities in the region to be free from retaliation, it must condemn the bombing of the universities in an official statement by 12 noon on Monday, March 30, Tehran time.” The statement warns all employees, professors, and students at American universities in the region to stay one kilometre away from campuses. TASS reports the critical detail most outlets missed: the IRGC said two universities in the Middle East will be destroyed regardless of Washington’s response. The condemnation deadline only determines whether more than two are targeted. This is not a conditional threat. It is a guaranteed strike with a conditional escalation clause. CNN geolocated video showing the Iran University of Science and Technology in Tehran in ruins after overnight strikes on Friday. A research centre was demolished with twisted metal and debris littering the site. The university confirmed US-Israeli strikes damaged the building but reported no casualties. A second university, Isfahan University of Technology, was also hit per Iranian media. Here are the American campuses now explicitly at risk. Qatar’s Education City hosts six US branch campuses: Texas A&M University, Carnegie Mellon University, Georgetown University, Northwestern University, Virginia Commonwealth University, and Weill Cornell Medicine. Thousands of students and faculty, many US citizens, study and work there. The UAE hosts NYU Abu Dhabi with approximately 2,200 students, the American University of Sharjah, the American University in Dubai, and Rochester Institute of Technology Dubai. Bahrain hosts the American University of Bahrain. Saudi Arabia has early-stage US university partnerships including KAUST. These campuses have already shifted to remote learning per CNN. The IRGC has told everyone within a kilometre radius to evacuate. Here is what makes this the war’s most dangerous escalation. Every previous Iranian target has been military or energy infrastructure: PSAB, Ras Laffan, Fujairah oil tanks, Jebel Ali port, Bahrain’s aluminium plant, desalination facilities. Those targets fit the logic of retaliation against the war machine. Universities do not. A missile aimed at NYU Abu Dhabi or Texas A&M Qatar crosses the line from military retaliation into civilian targeting of a kind that no Gulf air defence interception rate can fully prevent. One missile through an 85 percent interception wall kills students, not soldiers. The IRGC framing is explicit: these are not random civilian targets. They are chosen because America struck Iranian universities first. The logic is symmetrical: you destroyed our research centres, we will destroy yours. But the Iranian universities housed IRGC-linked missile and drone research labs per WSJ and FDD. The American campuses in Qatar host journalism students and pre-med programmes. The symmetry is false. The threat is real. The deadline is noon Monday March 30 Tehran time. That is 08:30 UTC. That is 04:30 Eastern. By the time most Americans wake up tomorrow morning, the deadline will have already passed. The IRGC has promised two strikes regardless. And as of this writing, the White House has not responded. The Pentagon has not responded. No condemnation has been issued. Full analysis - open.substack.com/pub/shanakaans…
Shanaka Anslem Perera ⚡ tweet media
English
57
251
531
101.7K
MoM
MoM@mixtureofmodels·
Modern Day Prisoners of War
MoM tweet media
English
0
0
1
116
HustleBitch
HustleBitch@HustleBitch_·
🚨 CAUGHT ON CAMERA: THEY’RE SPRAYING THE SKY IN REAL TIME — AND SATURATING THE SKY WITH ARTIFICIAL CLOUDS "How much longer are people gonna accept that the government is messing with our weather?" A man on camera says what everyone’s thinking right now. Clear skies… then suddenly: • 10+ planes overhead at once • Lines covering the entire sky • Those lines spreading into cloud cover • Weather app updating: “clouds incoming” Clear → planes → lines → clouds → repeat. They call them contrails. Others call them chemtrails. But weather modification, cloud seeding, geoengineering? That’s already been admitted. So why does it look coordinated? And why do the “clouds” show up AFTER the planes? At what point is this not weather anymore… and something being done to you?
English
8
13
60
5.4K