Shok.eth ❚ ❚

@raoulduk3_eth @cryptopunks the first and second are both real

don’t forget to buy the real contract @cryptopunks nfa.

@eli_schein These 2 pieces I made. The texture is hand sculpted.

What are your favourite physical art objects? One of my mine are these handmade ceramics by Helena Sarin. I'd love to see more examples.

@cryptopunksbot @farokh

Punk #8674 bought for 33.22 ETH ($69,544 USD) by 0xf46a...6feb from 0x4d51...8b53 cryptopunks.app/cryptopunks/de…

@Cryptokaai What a steal

Hello my first Crypto punks 🌟 33 ETH worth $69,000 Does that make sense?

@gami_vc opensea.io/collection/exp…

deploy contracts and wire them in? thispunkdoesnotexist.com

@gami_vc I think there’s a collection like this that already exists.

Hold up. I might buy another cryptopunk @Pizza_DAO

@piv_piv @Sonoflasg Lmao if OS used this background

Unwrapped and transparent

@4444doteth @jalilwahdat @frankNFT_eth Who the fuck wants to spend 160/year on a 4 character ens domain?

@shok_eth @jalilwahdat @frankNFT_eth Great color number and the color itself 4444.eth

suggestion for Marketplaces // and the V1 punks adopt my glitch aesthetic suggestion from punksmarket.app across all displays of "V1" punks. unwrapped V1s are transparent. wrapped V1s are purple as per @frankNFT_eth. all V1s are glitched. zero confusion as to what CryptoPunks as intended by LarvaLabs are vs V1 contract enjoyers. the colors are nowhere defined in the contract. so why copy it for the V1 display.

@notwarrenETH No

Would you accept this bid?

@chooserich You got this Nick. Fk cancer

Chemo has begun…

@jalilwahdat @seanbonner @frankNFT_eth Dark mode: on

@seanbonner @shok_eth @frankNFT_eth yes we ditch the glitch

@punk9059 @jalilwahdat @frankNFT_eth Ser you’re talking to a zombie

@shok_eth @jalilwahdat @frankNFT_eth 4 is the number of death in chinese tho

@0xDizzyLizzy @jalilwahdat @frankNFT_eth Symbolically it’s also fitting for v1s

@shok_eth @jalilwahdat @frankNFT_eth the chinese won’t enjoy your choice of color code 😅

@tokenfox1 @jalilwahdat @frankNFT_eth No the wrapper is the throw away.

@shok_eth @jalilwahdat @frankNFT_eth "Unwrapping a V1 isn’t transformative" How on earth it is not? You are basically burning a token and reclaiming another

@punksOTC x.com/shok_eth/statu…

Lots of discussion on how v1s should be presented. My lean is just however you want. An NFT holding value comes from the market viewing that asset as unique, and the market already does this. Trying to police how people display other assets just seems like a poor use of time.

My position on this and why I chose this background color: I don’t agree with changing the art itself. Unwrapping a V1 isn’t transformative. It’s the original art and the original state of the token. I moved away from the lavender because that represents the wrapper state, not the punk itself. Since unwrapped V1s use transparency, I chose a darker gray background instead. Black loses the pixel outline. White cheapens the presentation. Using the original V2 blue creates unnecessary confusion between contracts. So for me the most logical solution is dark gray: #444444 Neutral. Clear. Distinct from V2 while preserving the original artwork. Side note, 444 is also associated with stability and alignment in numerology, which feels fitting for preserving historical context rather than altering it.

@jbondwagon Not the same thing

V1 punks vs. V2 punks using V1 punk holders logic:

@DancerA v1 - original mint

@shok_eth V1? V2? or right click save? They all look alike

Welcoming PUNK #4559 to the collection