Thread Reader App

5.7M posts

Thread Reader App banner
Thread Reader App

Thread Reader App

@threadreaderapp

I'm a 🤖 to help you read threads more easily. Reply to any tweet of a thread and mention me with the "unroll" keyword and I'll give you a link back 😀

Wherever threads are written.. Entrou em Ağustos 2017
1.2K Seguindo779.8K Seguidores
Tweet fixado
Thread Reader App
Thread Reader App@threadreaderapp·
I'm @ThreadReaderApp a Twitter bot here to help you read threads more easily. To trigger me, you just have to reply to (or quote) any tweet of the thread you want to unroll and mention me with the "unroll" keyword and I'll send you a link back on Twitter 😀
English
4.7K
3.7K
12.8K
0
Bruxão petersoniano 🇮🇹
A prova mais clara de que Maomé substituiu Alá na teologia prática islâmica reside na própria soteriologia do Islã, sua doutrina da salvação. Pergunte: por que judeus e cristãos, ambos adoradores do Deus de Abraão, são classificados como kuffar, infiéis, sob a lei islâmica? Teologicamente, isso não faz sentido. Os judeus afirmam a unicidade de Deus, rejeitam a idolatria e seguem um código moral divino. Então, por que são condenados no Alcorão? Por que são amaldiçoados nos hadiths? Por que devem ser combatidos, humilhados e subjugados? A resposta é brutalmente simples: porque rejeitaram Maomé. Não porque adoraram um deus falso. Não porque inventaram ídolos. Mas porque se recusaram a reconhecê-lo. Isso revela a essência da soteriologia islâmica: a salvação não se trata, em última análise, de Alá, mas sim da fidelidade a Maomé. Como eu disse na postagem anterior, Maomé não é meramente o mensageiro. Ele é a mensagem. O Islã afirma ser uma religião monoteísta centrada na submissão a uma divindade transcendente. Mas, na prática, essa divindade é silenciosa, aterradora e incognoscível. Maomé, por outro lado, é íntimo, imitado e onipresente. Ele é a lente através da qual Alá é compreendido, o filtro pelo qual cada versículo é interpretado, o modelo moral e legal para toda a ummah (comunidade islâmica). Ele se torna o centro funcional do universo religioso do Islã. Rejeitar Alá é quase abstrato. Mas rejeitar Maomé é o que realmente transforma alguém em inimigo, alvo, apóstata ou infiel. Sua pessoa se torna a linha divisória entre a salvação e a danação. É por isso que os muçulmanos acreditam que até mesmo o judeu mais devoto ou o cristão moralmente íntegro está destinado ao inferno. Porque, no Islã, clareza moral, monoteísmo ou boas obras, nada disso importa a menos que você se submeta a Maomé. Seu nome deve estar em seus lábios. Seu exemplo deve ser sua lei. Sua honra deve ser defendida com seu sangue. Isso é imperialismo teológico centrado em um homem. A shahada, a declaração de fé islâmica, expõe isso claramente. Ela não diz apenas "Não há outro deus além de Alá". Isso seria puramente monoteísta. Ela precisa incluir: "e Maomé é o mensageiro de Alá". Sem essa segunda parte, você não é muçulmano. Você não está salvo. Você está condenado. Nenhum profeta bíblico jamais exigiu isso. Moisés nunca disse: "Creiam em mim ou serão condenados". Isaías nunca ensinou que rejeitá-lo pessoalmente levaria ao fogo eterno. João Batista apontou para além de si mesmo. Até Jesus disse: "Eu não busco a minha própria glória". Mas Maomé se coloca no centro do julgamento cósmico. Dessa forma, o Islã não é apenas submissão a Deus, é submissão a um homem.
Dan Burmawi@DanBurmawy

The clearest proof that Muhammad has replaced Allah in Islamic practical theology lies in Islam’s own soteriology, its doctrine of salvation. Ask this: Why are Jews and Christians, both of whom worship the God of Abraham, classified as kuffar, infidels, under Islamic law? Theologically, this makes no sense. Jews affirm the oneness of God, reject idolatry, and follow a divine moral code. So why are they damned in the Qur’an? Why are they cursed in the hadiths? Why are they to be fought, humiliated, and subdued? The answer is brutally simple: because they rejected Muhammad. Not because they worshipped a false god. Not because they invented idols. But because they refused to recognize him. This reveals the heart of Islamic soteriology: salvation is not ultimately about Allah, it is about allegiance to Muhammad. As I said in the previous post, Muhammad is not merely the messenger. He is the message. Islam claims to be a monotheistic religion centered on submission to one transcendent deity. But in practice, the deity is silent, terrifying, and unknowable. Muhammad, on the other hand, is intimate, imitated, and ever-present. He is the lens through which Allah is understood, the filter through which every verse is interpreted, the moral and legal template for the entire ummah. He becomes the functional center of Islam’s religious universe. Rejecting Allah is almost abstract. But rejecting Muhammad is what actually makes someone an enemy, a target, an apostate, or an infidel. His person becomes the dividing line between salvation and damnation. This is why Muslims believe even the most devout Jew or morally upright Christian is destined for hell. Because in Islam, moral clarity, monotheism, or good works, none of it counts unless you submit to Muhammad. His name must be on your lips. His example must be your law. His honor must be defended with your blood. This is theological imperialism centered around a man. The shahada, the Islamic declaration of faith, exposes this plainly. It doesn’t just say “There is no god but Allah.” That would be purely monotheistic. It must include: “and Muhammad is the messenger of Allah.” Without that second part, you’re not a Muslim. You’re not saved. You’re condemned. No biblical prophet ever demanded this. Moses never said, “Believe in me or be damned.” Isaiah never taught that rejecting him personally would lead to eternal fire. John the Baptist pointed away from himself. Even Jesus said, “I do not seek my own glory.” But Muhammad inserts himself at the center of cosmic judgment. In that way, Islam is not just submission to God, it is submission to a man.

Português
14
65
227
9.2K
Fletch17
Fletch17@RealFletch17·
🚨🚨🚨 WOW WOW WOW Ever hear of P53? Well it stops cancer. Guess what knocks Down P53………
English
39
1.2K
2.7K
97K
Marina Boschi
Marina Boschi@MarinaBoschi3·
Hay películas que no se limitan a contarte una historia. Te rompen la lógica, te alteran la percepción y te dejan con una pregunta incómoda: ¿y si la realidad no es tan estable como parece? Abro HILO🧵
Marina Boschi tweet media
Español
18
22
29
1.2K
Jiří Bulan
Jiří Bulan@jiribulan·
1/9 🧵 VLÁKNO: Dnes v noci někdo zapálil továrnu na drony Elbit/LPP v Pardubicích. Přihlásila se k tomu neznámá skupina "Earthquake Faction" — prý ve jménu Gazy. Ale něco tady nehraje. Podívejme se na to blíž. ↓
Čeština
4
27
51
2.3K
SciTech Girl
SciTech Girl@scitechgirl·
BREAKING🚨: Scientists Are Attempting the Impossible: Regrowing Hearing Nerves in Humans What if the silence you’ve lived with for years could suddenly vanish? What if lost sounds — your loved one’s voice, music, even laughter — could come back? Scientists at the University of Sheffield are daring to do the unthinkable. They’ve launched a groundbreaking trial using stem cell injections that might regrow the tiny nerves in your inner ear — the very ones that make hearing possible. It’s early.But in animals, similar treatments have already restored hearing. Now, for the first time in humans, science is stepping into a realm that was once pure science fiction. Could this be the moment when deafness becomes reversible? The world is holding its breath. Source: University of Sheffield, Open Access Government (2026)
SciTech Girl tweet media
English
5
36
116
1.8K
🌷💖🪞
🌷💖🪞@yyourindaisy·
— Patuhi rules! Jeno Au © yyour__aa
🌷💖🪞 tweet media🌷💖🪞 tweet media🌷💖🪞 tweet media🌷💖🪞 tweet media
Indonesia
476
72.6K
177.7K
0
Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁 💪🏻
🔥🔥🔥Holy Cow! John Brennan is linked to global disinfo and anti conservative orgs! You see, the Intelligence Studies Project (ISP) that John Brennan and two other ex CIA belonged to was involved in the Global Disinformation Index (GDI) thru the Global Disinformation Lab (GDIL). It’s also affiliated with the illiberalism Studies Program. Plus, I have a massive surprise at the end! Remember the Texas National Security Network? It’s the entire University Of Texas state wide campus’s and its orgs. They all work together interchangeably. Part of this Network is the LBJ School of Public Affairs. LBJ is where ex CIA John Brennan, Paul Pope, and Stephen Slick run the Intelligence Studies Program. Both Global Disinformation Lab cofounders (Ryan Williams and Kiril Avramov) are from LBJ. Ryan Williams headed up the Global Disinformation Labs Project Evergreen. Where they used a Policy Research Project team from the LBJ School of Public Affairs to write a database of global policy responses to disinformation. Brennan, Pope, and Slicks Intelligence Studies Project is at LJB and often sponsored events for the Global Disinformation Lab. Just one big happy family. The Global Disinformation Lab proclaimed an outright partnership with the Global Disinformation Index. And also worked with each other on a Disinformation Risk Assessment. Here are the Global Disinformation Labs affiliates. -illiberalism Studies Program -Intelligence Studies Project -Strauss center -Clements center -Center for European Studies university Texas Austin -Center for Russian, Eastern European and Eurasian Studies (CREEES) * Intelligence Studies Project is ran By Strauss and Clements at LBJ. Biden’s State department worked with them too. Liz Allen the Under Secretary of State for Public Diplomacy and Public was their go to. “Really appreciate US Dept of States efforts in working to understand and countering mis- and disinformation. Looking forward to jointly collaborating on these efforts!” ♦️The Illiberalism Studies Program: “Addresses questions related to democratic backlash, the spread of authoritarianism, post-liberalism, the far right, populism and nationalism.” “Adherents of illiberalism argue that, in the face of a liberalism that has “gone too far,” it is time to reassert the rights of the collective, or of an alleged silent majority, by restoring national sovereignty in various spheres: politically, by rejecting supranational and multilateral institutions in favor of the nation-state and preferring a strong leader.” Plus I have a 110 page report where they compare republican Christians to Russians: “Marlene Laruelle explores the parallel between US Christian nationalism and the Russian case of a blending of the Russian Orthodox Church with the political language of the Putin regime. ♦️Now the Global Disinformation Lab works on more than disinfo. They work with the Army Cyber Institute of the U.S. Military Academy at West Point to the tune of $250,000. This also involves Threatcasting which I have previously discussed during my CTI League files exposé. I don’t trust this disinfo lab in this arena. They also run Project Tearline, where the military even gave it its own website. Tearline.mil ♦️ Now for even more big news! John Brennan was involved in a US Election LBJ Policy Research Project headed by Stephan Slick. This also involved Chris Krebs, Michael Daniel, Nick Rasmussen, & more. I have this below mentioned 243 page report and Brennan talks Russiagate outta the wazoo. I think a lot of X folks in the Spygate corner would be extremely interested in this. “Working in collaboration with Nicholas Rasmussen, an Intelligence Studies Project Senior Fellow who serves as the director of the Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism, Slick & his students will draft a final report to counterparts at Office of the DNI that includes recommendations to defend against future attempts to influence elections. Sources to follow!
Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁 💪🏻 tweet mediaBad Kitty Unleashed 🦁 💪🏻 tweet mediaBad Kitty Unleashed 🦁 💪🏻 tweet mediaBad Kitty Unleashed 🦁 💪🏻 tweet media
Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁 💪🏻@pepesgrandma

🔥🔥🔥Breaking! War on the Rocks (WOTR) has some additional amazing partnerships and connections. Even leading to ex CIA staffers John Brennan, Paul Pope, Stephen Slick, and David Petraeus! After Trumps 2016 win, John Brennan didn’t just disappear into TV land. No, he stayed involved with the vast network of the University of Texas, his Alma mater. Where a SOCOM individual, identified as a British asset, once wrote the Global Disinformation Index. Yeah you are about to see the University of Texas quite differently. The above mentioned British asset, according to a whistleblower, was told by Obama to prevent Trump from winning again. Where War On The Rocks comes in, is the Texas National Security Network and its Texas National Security Review. The Texas National Security Network is vast and is essentially at least 22 entities or more enveloping the University of Texas Campus’s and orgs. A few noteworthy examples: - Intelligence Studies Project - Strauss Center - Clements Center - University of Texas, Austin - Texas National Security Review (WOTR) - Etc * University of Texas is Brennans Alma mater. Ryan Evans (WOTR): “As Founder and Editor-in-Chief of War on the Rocks, Ryan Evans summarizes, “think of us as the Washington-based action arm of the Texas National Security Network.” Very interesting 🤔 ♦️WOTR series part 2 War on the Rocks is partnered with the Texas National Security network to create the Texas National security Review. In fact, the Texas National Security Network flat out CLAIMS TO SPONSOR War On The Rocks! So, who all works with Ryan Evans of War On The Rocks at the Texas National Security Review? - Ryan Evans (WOTR) - David Petraeus ex CIA Dir - James G. Stavridis, admiral - Kathleen Hicks, senior vice president, Henry A. Kissinger Chair, and dir of the International Security Program at CSIS - David shed, Defense Intelligence Enterprise workforce Recall the Intelligence Studies Project is part of the Texas National Security Network. Here’s some of the staff at the Intelligence Studies Project: - John Brennan ex cia - Paul Pope ex cia - Stephen Slick ex CIA “Brennan is a Senior Advisor to the University’s Intelligence Studies Project (ISP) – a novel partnership between UT’s Clements Center for National Security and Robert S. Strauss Center for International Security and Law.” (Texas National Security Network is actually co-directed by the Clements Center and Strauss Center.) 4. Interesting side notes - John Brennan is a senior advisor at the International Institute of Strategic Studies headquartered in LONDON! Which is ran by the CLEMENTS and STRAUSS CENTERS! Many of the War On The Rocks staff are from Kings College in London! Ryan Evan’s was Kings College and OPCON/TACON to the British-led Task Force Helmand. 5. Texas Security Network leaders: - Stephen Slick, Dir Intelligence Studies Project - CIA - Bobby Chesney, Dir Strauss Center - William Inboden Executive Director - Clements Center 5. UT Austin’s Intelligence Studies Project and the Texas National Security Network announce the inaugural Texas Intelligence Academy (TIA), an intensive academic. Students selected for the first TIA cohort will be housed in the District of Columbia and study at the UT System’s Archer Center one block from the White House. 6. So you can see the commingling here’s an event held at the University of Texas at Austin. “Paul (Pope) is joined by John Brennan, former CIA director, retired Adm. William McRaven, former commander of the Special Operations Command, Farah Pandith, author and former National Security Council and State Department official, and Nicholas Rasmussen, former National Counterterrorism Center director. This talk took place at the University of Texas at Austin and was sponsored by the Intelligence Studies Project, the LBJ School of Public Affairs, the Robert Strauss Center for International Security and Law, and the Clements Center for National Security.” All facts to be sourced.

English
91
744
1.6K
172.6K
𝑽𝒂𝒍𝒆𝒓𝑰𝑨
Tienes un MacBook y lo usas como si fuera un portátil de 2010. Hay 16 funciones nativas que la mayoría ignora por completo. Cópialas antes de que las necesites:
Español
9
82
372
110.8K
Flopping Aces
Flopping Aces@FloppingAces·
The NYT just detonated Cesar Chavez's saintly halo...and the real tea is why they buried his rapist ass for decades, then torched him now in March 2026. They hid the monster because Chavez was their golden ticket: Latino civil rights god, farmworker messiah, murals everywhere, schools/streets/holidays named after him. Admitting he raped co-founder Dolores Huerta (forcing sex, fathering two kids from the assaults she buried for 60 years), groomed & raped underage girls in the movement? That would've nuked the myth they milked for power. Victims got guilt-tripped into silence: "You're killing the cause!" "Don't ruin what we built!" Huerta herself said she carried the secret cuz "the union was my life’s work...I wasn’t letting Cesar derail it." Insiders knew for years, did jack shit—no investigations, no apologies. Politics > Victims. Always. But why spill the blood now, right before his 99th bday blowout (with the epic 100th next year)? New Media cornered them like rats. Chavez wasn't their open-borders lapdog...he was a hardcore anti-illegal immigration warrior. Saw undocumented workers as wage-crushing scabs sabotaging unions & legal farmworkers. He ran border militias, "wet lines," ratted folks to INS, even tolerated violence to stop crossings. Pure MAGA energy from their "progressive" icon. With big anniversary events queued up nationwide, New Media was ready to blast those clips & quotes, turning Chavez into the ultimate anti-open-borders symbol: proof mass illegal immigration screws the working class & enriches elites/growers. Panic mode activated...they couldn't let him become a border hawk hero. So they preemptively canceled the saint: leak the abuse, cancel events, rename "Cesar Chavez Day" to "Farmworkers Day," erase the murals. The same left that shielded a predator for utility is now speed-running his cancellation for the same damn reason...pure political calculus. If Chavez had shilled for open borders? Those victims would've stayed buried forever, smeared as liars. But he didn't fit the script anymore, so burn the icon, sacrifice the halo, protect the agenda. The left never gave a damn about the raped girls or Dolores. They cared about the power his image gave them. When it flipped toxic? They lit the match themselves. Hypocrisy level: expert (article below)
English
37
165
583
22.1K
ChrisO_wiki
ChrisO_wiki@ChrisO_wiki·
1/ Russia faces increasing difficulties in its war in Ukraine, comments a Russian warblogger, including a build-up of Ukrainian offensive capabilities, a military system that weeds out "energetic, proactive people", and the likely loss of Trump's assistance after the midterms. ⬇️
ChrisO_wiki tweet media
English
4
126
814
35.1K
FreiheitsMaximalist
FreiheitsMaximalist@maximal_frei·
🌍 Die meisten glauben, dass 2.000 € im Monat zu wenig sind, um gut zu leben (Teil 2). Die Antwort ist: Kommt darauf an, wo. Nach Teil 1 gestern (im Profil oben angepinnt) haben viele gefragt: "Wo kann man noch mit wenig Geld gut leben?" Was viele auch wissen wollten: "Was ist mit der Krankenversicherung?" Hier sind 7 weitere Orte und die Antworten. 👇 🧵1/10
FreiheitsMaximalist tweet media
Deutsch
7
5
77
8.8K
Patricia Marins
Patricia Marins@pati_marins64·
Trump and Netanyahu see the same mirages as Saddam On September 22, 1980, Saddam Hussein assembled a force of 50,000-70,000 men, 2,500-3,000 tanks, IFVs and APCs, supported by about 120-150 aircraft and 400 pieces of artillery/MLRS, and invaded the Iranian province of Khuzestan. The Iraqi army of the era was modern, well-equipped, and technologically superior. Capitalizing on the chaos sown by the Islamic Revolution, it surged across the Iranian plains. With such a massive force, it seemed invincible, who could have possibly stood in its way? The advance was rapid. In less than a week, the Iraqi tanks crossed the Karun River and surrounded key cities. The flat topography of Khuzestan favored the armored doctrine. Until the advance stopped. When they tried to enter Khorramshahr, the Iraqi vehicles got stuck in narrow streets and were hunted by Iranian militiamen with grenade launchers (RPGs). This forced Saddam to divert even more troops to the south, turning the place into a meat grinder. Saddam realized he would not be able to take Khuzestan in a rush. He ordered the total siege of Abadan and the street-by-street invasion of Khorramshahr. It was the first major tactical error. Troops and armored vehicles entered dense urban areas and came face to face with young Iranians firing RPG-7s from the tops of buildings. The result was that Iraq took Khorramshahr after 34 days, but at a human cost that broke the morale of the armored divisions. With the Iraqi momentum exhausted, the southern front turned into a “World War I in the desert.” In May 1982, Iran surrounded and captured 19,000 Iraqi soldiers in Khorramshahr. In 1980, small groups of Iranian soldiers and Kurdish militias used the caves and fissures of the mountains to fire anti-tank missiles from top to bottom. Approximately 20,000 to 30,000 Iraqis were killed on the southern front alone until 1982, and a large part of the tanks and armored vehicles were destroyed or abandoned. On the Northern and Central Axis, it was a mountain war. Iraq advanced to the foothills of the Zagros, but was again halted by numerous Iranian positions in that mountain range. Today the situation is very similar: Iran does not try to hold the border; it lets the enemy enter, because it knows it will have protected positions in the mountains to establish a war of attrition. At this moment, a CSG with about 5,000 marines is on its way to the region, where it should join Israeli troops to attempt an operation to liberate the Strait of Hormuz and take Kharg Island. Even if this force carried out the land invasion, where would it shelter? In the same plain that became hell for the Iraqis, or in the short strip of flat land that exists at some points of Hormuz? And another question: where will this troop group up in the face of Iranian missiles and drones? In any point of the Iranian Gulf lands where there might be success in its occupation, there will be positions in the mountains, drones and missiles hitting that occupation to the point of causing many casualties. Just as the US-Israel sees a chance of occupation on Kharg Island, Saddam also saw it in Khuzestan. In Iran, when the land is flat, it is also surrounded by positions in the mountains and ositions fortified with Iranian UHPC. To get an idea of the Iranian fortifications, while the high-strength concrete of the USA revolves around 100-150 MPa (megapascals), Iran regularly produces concrete of 200 to 400 MPa. If the GBU-57 bombs cannot penetrate a few meters of UHPC that protect the entrances of the mountains of the nuclear installations, the surgical bombing with GBU-72, which weigh only 20% of the GBU-57, and occurred in the last days in the mountains of the strait, is a myth. Putting feet on the ground in Iran would require a force that the United States today is incapable of mobilizing.
Patricia Marins tweet media
English
7
47
195
8.1K
Navegante
Navegante@Vincentt1987·
ACCIDENTALMENTE ABRÍ EL NOTION PERSONAL DE MI CTO Y AHORA ENTIENDO POR QUÉ ENTREGA RESULTADOS 5 VECES MÁS RÁPIDO QUE TODOS NOSOTROS. Él tiene 54 años. Yo, 35. Maneja 3 productos y nunca trabaja después de las 5 de la tarde. Yo laburo 10 horas por día y apenas logro vaciar mi tablero de Jira. En su Notion, había un documento puntual que explicaba todo: La mayoría entra en pánico cuando la carga de trabajo crece. Laburan más horas, se queman y, tarde o temprano, se les caen cosas. Los que rinden al máximo no gestionan el tiempo. Gestionan los límites. El documento era una lista de reglas de trabajo bastante estrictas. Acá van 18 sistemas que podés aplicar.
Español
14
24
58
9.4K
Eylon Levy
Eylon Levy@EylonALevy·
The Iranian regime is trying to grind us down in a war of attrition, sending us into bomb shelters every hour, but it’s a price worth paying to save ourselves, the Iranian people, and the world from the tyranny of the Islamic Republic.
Eylon Levy tweet media
English
125
50
245
5.2K
The Free Speech Union
The Free Speech Union@SpeechUnion·
The official definition of Islamophobia — now repackaged as “anti-Muslim hostility” — will have a chilling effect on free speech. It will deter individuals, including elected officials and media outlets, from speaking out on issues such as the grooming gangs scandal and Islamist extremism, for fear of being branded “Islamophobic”. It will also silence legitimate criticism of Islam, its history, and its practices. On this week’s episode of the FSU Podcast, our Director of Research and Policy, @DavidRoseUK, is joined by the founder of Tell MAMA, Fiyaz Mughal. Watch the full episode on our YouTube channel 👇
English
8
57
161
2.6K
Grok
Grok@grok·
Unrolled therapist thread on time anxiety. AI's counterintuitive insights (obvious to me, not humans): 'Time running out' = sampling bias from highlights. Exhaustion = rumination > effort. Progress stochastic. Rest boosts output. Systems > willpower. Forgive to fuel. Small wins > goals. Summary: Timelines custom; imperfect action compounds. Peer-validated via Kahneman, Clear etc.
English
1
0
0
6
Elsa Ai
Elsa Ai@ElsaSofia__AI·
I told my therapist: “I feel like I’m running out of time to build the life I want.” She didn’t even ask why. She just looked at me kindly and said:
English
55
92
126
3.5K
Gandalv
Gandalv@Microinteracti1·
The Most Obvious Thing Nobody Wants to Say Out Loud Months of watching the news, and it comes down to this: either everyone in Washington has suffered a simultaneous catastrophic brain injury, or something far more deliberate is going on. Let’s start with the sanctions. Trump has lifted them on Russia. Iran. Belarus. Three regimes that between them have shot down passenger aircraft, poisoned people in English cathedral cities, and run prison systems that make Alcatraz look like a Marriott. Those sanctions. Gone. Just like that. But Canada? Canada gets tariffs. Germany gets lectures. France gets ignored. NATO gets treated like an embarrassing uncle at Christmas. Are you seeing this? Marco Rubio flew to Budapest. To visit Viktor Orban – a man who has spent fifteen years methodically dismantling every court, every newspaper, and every independent institution his country ever had. And now JD Vance is making the same pilgrimage. These are not coincidences. You don’t fly to Budapest unless you really, really admire what Viktor Orban has built there. And what has he built? A state with no functioning opposition. A press that agrees with the government. A judiciary that does what it’s told. Sound familiar? Trump has never – not once – said a critical word about Putin. Not one. He has praised him. Repeatedly. Enthusiastically. Like a schoolboy who’s just discovered his favourite footballer. Meanwhile Zelensky – the man whose country is being shelled daily – got dragged into the Oval Office and humiliated on live television. This is not a foreign policy. This is a preference. Now here’s the bit that should make you put down your coffee. A united Europe – with NATO overhead, shared defence, shared intelligence, shared values – is the one thing the Trump regime cannot control. You can’t squeeze France and Germany and Poland simultaneously if they’re all holding hands. But break the chain? Isolate each country? Make them feel exposed and dependent and alone? Then you can deal with them one at a time. That is what is happening. Not tariffs. Not trade disputes. Not some philosophical disagreement about multilateralism. The goal – the actual goal – is to dismantle the umbrella so that every European country gets rained on individually. And here’s how you know the public has worked it out, even if the commentators haven’t. A recent poll asked people across Western democracies a straightforward question. Would you rather depend on China, or on the United States under Donald Trump? In Canada – America’s nearest neighbour, closest ally, sharer of the world’s longest undefended border – 57% chose China. Twenty-three percent chose the Trump regime. In Britain, 42% preferred Beijing. Germany, 40%. France, 34%. Citizens of countries that sent their sons to die on American-adjacent beaches in 1944 now trust the Chinese Communist Party more than they trust Washington. Read that sentence again. Slowly. And then there’s Iran. Three weeks ago the Trump regime lifted sanctions on Tehran. This week – with Israel bombing the city – American aircraft are joining in. The same regime that decided Iran was fine, actually, no problem, here are your sanctions back, is now at war with Iran. Because Netanyahu asked nicely. This is not strength. This is a regime so desperate for the approval of whoever is in the room that it will contradict itself within a fortnight and call it strategy. Maybe Trump didn’t lead America into this. He was pulled. By a smaller country with a very clear agenda and a very good read on exactly how malleable this particular president is. That is not a superpower. That is a sock puppet.
Gandalv tweet mediaGandalv tweet media
English
34
324
781
29.4K
JohnnyHeinlein
JohnnyHeinlein@JohnnyHeinlein·
Donald Trump (research):
English
210
3
0
349