Predator exposer

Trans men trans women and non-binary people are all valid, but I don't support all trans people. Some of you bitches are dumb as hell.

@notcapnamerica Which one?

Is that Kristi Noem’s husband?

@acnewsitics @EricLDaugh Those are his people idk about that. But early in the video Dana had to grab Trump's hand to keep him from falling over lol

@EricLDaugh They turned the music up loud to drown out all the boos. 🤣🤣🤣

🚨 JUST IN: President Trump just WALKED OUT to an electric UFC 327 crowd in Miami — and Sec. MARCO RUBIO is with him tonight! The man is in his element 🔥 LOVE that Marco is here, he's been crushing it lately 🇺🇸

@EricLDaugh Dana almost knocked him over with a slight bump lol

@jaderants Now chant it 3 times and click your heels

a transphobe is just someone grounded in objective reality

@BiardMacGuineas @daniellismore Whered the red paint come from

@CallHimAaron @daniellismore

J.K. Rowling’s Case Against Trans People Falls Apart Under Basic Scrutiny J.K. Rowling’s writing on her site presents itself as cautious, evidence based and protective of women. It is none of those things in any reliable sense. It is a political essay built out of selective fear, anecdote, conflation and repeated framing tricks that turn a small and vulnerable minority into a public threat. Once the central claims are checked against mainstream psychological definitions, clinical guidance and the better available reviews, the structure gives way very quickly. The first problem is basic description. Rowling writes as though trans identity is a fashionable belief system imposed on reality. That is false. Major professional bodies continue to define gender identity as a person’s internal sense of gender and distinguish it from biological traits, expression and sexuality. That does not mean every clinical pathway is simple or that every policy question has one easy answer. It means the existence of trans people is not a fiction created by slogans or websites. It is a recognised human phenomenon described across medicine and psychology for years. Her second move is more political than scientific. She repeatedly folds trans women into a category of male risk and then treats that association as common sense. That is the engine of the piece. It asks readers to accept that recognition itself is dangerous. The trouble is that this is not evidence. It is suspicion dressed up as safeguarding. A rights claim by one group does not become invalid because another group can imagine its misuse. That logic would destroy the basis of civil protection in every direction. She also leans heavily on the idea that affirming trans people means suppressing women or erasing sex. That is another false construction. Recognising gender identity does not abolish sex based medicine, sex based data collection or serious discussion of violence against women. Clinical guidance and professional standards continue to treat sex related health needs as real while also recognising transgender patients as deserving of competent care. The claim that one can only defend women by rejecting trans people is not a medical conclusion. It is an ideological choice. On healthcare her essay suggests that trans identification is being irresponsibly indulged and that medicine has surrendered to fashion. The actual evidence base is more careful than either side’s loudest slogans. For adults, established clinical standards and recent reviews continue to support access to gender affirming care with assessment, informed consent and monitoring. Reviews published in 2024 and 2025 report that gender affirming interventions are associated overall with improved mental health, body satisfaction and quality of life, while also noting that evidence quality varies and further research is needed. That is a long way from the picture of mass delusion that Rowling promotes. For children and adolescents the picture is more contested and the honest position is narrower. The Cass Review in England and later NHS England work show that the evidence for some youth interventions remains limited and that services need stronger assessment, clearer pathways and better long term research. That supports caution and reform. It does not support broad hostility to trans people, nor does it justify using uncertainty in paediatric care as a weapon against trans adults or against social recognition itself. Rowling’s essay repeatedly makes that jump. It is a political jump, not a scientific one. She also gives the reader the impression that transition is commonly regretted and that medicine is running ahead of human reality. The best known systematic reviews do not support that picture. Regret after gender affirming surgery appears low in the published literature, including systematic reviews and more recent follow up work. That does not mean regret never happens or that every clinic gets

@john_ford77 @daniellismore You stroke out half way through?

@CallHimAaron @daniellismore You boys are absolutely incensed at women who stand between you and children. Having your supply cut off of boys who go through the age of consent before they go through puberty has properly enraged you. It’s funny.

@DataRepublican Oh damn, you must be super racist then

Every so often, I think about Kirk's assassination. To him, I was one of thousands... To me, he stood second only behind behind Elon Musk in altering the course of my life. I will never forgive it.

Did anyone else learn about trans people through transphobia? Like the anti trans narrative is trans kids are groomed by overzealous allies, but I learned about trans people from the media making trans people the butt of their jokes and casual transphobia from family members.

@Nick_Decap Some people have trouble speaking when they know they're full of shit

Her hands are shaking, her voice is trembling. Clearly this girl would rather be doing anything else, but she is being forced to fight this fight because the adults have failed her.

@Oliviatayl60965 What advice would you give to parents whos kids have gone no contact with them?

For ROGD parents: Here is great advice from Stephanie Winn, a therapist for parents whose child is suffering from gender dysphoria. This also worked on my child who has now desisted. You can never win any arguments with gender ideology because it's designed that way. They will cite this usual mantra. "It's not up for debate", "This is a human right", "You are transphobic" "You don't love me" but you must try to keep planting seeds no matter how hard it is. So that they can access the right information, not the propaganda. "When you try to convince your child that their gender identity is wrong, you’re not just challenging an idea. You’re threatening something that has become structurally important to their psychology. The identity is doing something for them — protecting them from fears, giving them a sense of belonging, providing an explanation for discomfort they don’t otherwise know how to name. It’s what I call a load-bearing delusion. And when you attack a load-bearing wall, the whole structure feels like it’s going to collapse. So their response isn’t rational, even if they dress it up in rational language. It’s defensive. It’s survival. And every time you come at them with another argument, another article, another “have you considered” — you’re giving them another opportunity to practice defending the position. You’re actually strengthening the neural pathways associated with the belief. On top of that, there’s the adolescent ego to contend with. Teenagers have a deep, almost biological need to see themselves as autonomous, independent thinkers. If you say “you’ve been misled” or “you’re being naive,” there is an automatic wall that comes up. Not because what you’re saying is wrong, but because admitting you’re right would mean admitting they were foolish — and their ego can’t tolerate that." stephaniewinn.substack.com/p/planting-see…

@WomenAreReals @listen2tish Thats an odd claim for a group of raging misogynists to make

👏 We are pro-woman! Go @listen2tish !!!

@TheFamousArtBR @ukhomeoffice @metpoliceuk Why would a practitioner of hate speech such as yourself narc on someone for hate speech?

@ukhomeoffice @metpoliceuk I’d like to report this as hate speech ☝️

Asylum handouts and accommodation will be removed for illegal migrants who abuse Britain’s generosity.

@AbbyJohnson You guys force your religion on people. You're a bunch of groomers

It’s not hateful to be a Bible-believing Christian. It’s hateful to try to gaslight Bible-believing Christians into thinking we’re hateful just because we refuse to conform to the world. It is not hateful to refuse to affirm sin.

@BriannaWu Brianna Wu

The problem is Democrats now primarily define ourselves by what they’re not. Republicans have gone in a genuinely bigoted direction on race, gender and LGBT issues. But instead of sharpening our thinking, a lot of the left has replaced it with moral signaling. We’re not racist like Republicans, so someone like Mahmoud Khalil must be a hero. We’re not transphobic, so any kind of gender nonconformity gets treated like it automatically points to medical transition. The instinct, to not be bigoted, is right. But the way it plays out is lazy. It turns into reflex instead of judgment. And that’s where it breaks down. There are edge cases. Terrorism, security, gender medicine, where Republicans are pointing at real issues. Not cleanly, not kindly, but not completely wrong either. And we just refuse to engage with that. If your whole identity is “not them,” you stop thinking. You just react.

@sappholives83 Im so proud of you for not getting pervy with this post

This utter loser is complaining because he’s ranked #513 in the men’s division, and is no longer allowed to cheat by competing against women. Guess he just needs to try a little harder lmaooooo. 🤷‍♀️

@RepBrandonGill How do you think he will feel when he learns his dad is a pedo protector

Happy 11 months to Winston!

@KDansky All 10 of you are h̶e̶r̶o̶e̶s̶ losers

Cheers to everyone who made it out today! I hope you're all having a great time at the pub.

@SexMattersOrg Guess sex doesnt matter

If you were at #OneYearLater, or if you weren't, find out more here sex-matters.org/one-year-later

@fancyfox55 @mrpaytonw @sappholives83 Whoever is most fun @sappholives83 is a pedophile though

@CallHimAaron @mrpaytonw Oh now you're pretending to be an anti- @sappholives83 Who is next? 😂🤣

As a gay man, it is exhausting watching other gay people call people “Nazis” based on the fact they don’t believe men can be women—something that is rooted in fact and has absolutely zero to do with us as gay men.

@fancyfox55 @mrpaytonw Not so much anti "hazel" as spreading the word that hazel is a trans man named Aaron. Idk why you guys call him hazel

@CallHimAaron @mrpaytonw You made an entire account to be an anti-hazel and you're calling other people a giant puss? Fucking stupid. 😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣