Jesse Ian Lardiés

5.2K posts

Jesse Ian Lardiés banner
Jesse Ian Lardiés

Jesse Ian Lardiés

@JesseBoxing

Ancient Mysteries & Modern Innovations https://t.co/Xny7887H8Q Tamales & Más on FB https://t.co/j34cxeCnpF

Orlando/Panamá/Miami/México Присоединился Aralık 2013
1.2K Подписки324 Подписчики
Tiffany Savage 🇺🇸
Tiffany Savage 🇺🇸@patriot_savvy·
If Shawn Ryan hasn’t invited (or won’t platform) Erika Kirk on his show, that should tell you everything you need to know about whose team he’s really on. Instead of staying unbiased and asking the tough questions the rest of us are demanding answers to or letting Erika tell her side of the story, it looks like he’s joined the podcast mafia of grifters, lending his platform to push narratives that protect the “insiders” rather than pursue the truth. Real journalists challenge power, even (especially) when it’s uncomfortable. This? This feels like controlled opposition. America deserves better than another echo chamber. What say you, Shawn @ShawnRyanShow @ShawnRyan762 ? Time to have the real conversations or keep playing gatekeeper?
English
815
92
867
72.1K
Jesse Ian Lardiés
Jesse Ian Lardiés@JesseBoxing·
@elonmusk Will someone wealthy donate to my family (gf, myself and cat), please? $tamalesandmas 🙏🏻
English
0
0
1
6
Blake Neff
Blake Neff@BlakeSNeff·
“akin to rhetoric that caused Trump’s assassination attempt.” Yes, calling somebody a psychopath who murdered her husband, platforming obvious fabulists babbling about Fort Huachuca in order to activate schizos, and encouraging people to harass and spy on Erika in real life will draw that comparison.
Candace Owens@RealCandaceO

NBC is now citing the Shawn Ryan interview as an example of conversations that are deadly to Erika. Real e-mail. They say it’s akin to rhetoric that caused Trump’s assassination attempt.

English
554
219
1.7K
139.1K
Andrew Kolvet
Andrew Kolvet@AndrewKolvet·
Lol. Then why are you having a melt down?! Because you have no proof for your insanely slanderous claims and theories, I called you on it, and you're resorting to name calling and personal insults instead. Let's see if you know how to read your own words to Shawn Ryan: “Bibi offered to take Turning Point USA to the next level, and Charlie said no … Somebody in Andrew Kolvet’s family orbit reached out to me and said that that definitively happened because Andrew said that when Charlie said no, he lost millions.” So once again, where is your proof of these millions I lost out on? Your entire fable hinges on some mysterious unnamed “source” you claim is in my “family orbit.” Cool story, Candace. “WE ARE SO CLOSE GUYS!”
Candace Owens@RealCandaceO

Hey Andrew—It turns out you just don’t know how to read. The first 4 points are indeed my allegations. Number 5, is in question format and explicitly underscores a separate follow-up regarding the number that was being reported by other journalists at that time—not me. I was never told a specific number by you which is pretty clear from the tweet you just shared. In short— you just proved my point you absolute clown. 🤡

English
913
476
4.2K
378.4K
Brian Atlas
Brian Atlas@BrianAtlas·
Offering $50,000 to Candace Owens to debate Andrew Wilson on my podcast. Happy to discuss terms, bring in an additional moderator, etc. @RealCandaceO
English
576
217
3.4K
233K
MrBeast
MrBeast@MrBeast·
First person to reply with the exact number of pennies in this room win $10,000
MrBeast tweet media
English
471.7K
7K
205.4K
44.3M
Andrew Wilson
Andrew Wilson@paleochristcon·
You realize after Tyler Robinson is thrown in prison for the rest of his life or given the death penalty I am never going to let any fa$$ots who tried unsuccessfully to gas light me about it for months live it down right?
English
944
155
3.4K
316.3K
Andrew Kolvet
Andrew Kolvet@AndrewKolvet·
Again, this is Candace admitting she has ZERO proof. I ask for proof, and she screams “I’ll take a lie detector test, guys, I promise!" She's adding caveats, hedging, and changing her story... But it’s important to point out what she just did here. The psychology behind it is wild. She gets called out for a bald-faced lie - a central lie to her entire narrative - then immediately retreats back to two true things that are insignificant, in an attempt to confer truth onto the original, key lie. Yes, we politely declined having Netanyahu on the show. So what? And yes, months later CK took a call from him after he wrote him a letter. Again, so what? Neither are extraordinary, and neither explain her next ridiculous leap that Netanyahu offered “to take TPUSA to the next level” and that I lost out on either "millions" or "billions" when CK declined (all complete idiocy). Originally I was supposed to be her source for this fairytale, but I deny it. So all she has left is a friend of the family, someone in the general familial "orbit." Lol Originally it was about "taking TPUSA to the next level," but now apparently TPUSA wasn't really going to get any of that money, only The Charlie Kirk Show. She can’t admit to her audience that she’s just wrong about this because it’s a core, foundational myth fueling her daily YouTube soap opera (where she’s the one actually making millions of dollars!). She has no proof, and she knows it. She probably fell for an internet rumor from wackjob Max Blumenthal and now she’s flailing to save face. Enjoy the show.
Candace Owens@RealCandaceO

I should add a caveat — I was never told it was millions or billions or any specific amount. Just an offer to “take it to the next level”. I was then told from a family friend of Andrew’s that when Charlie said no to Bibi, Andrew complained that he lost out on millions. That makes me think the money would have come in through the Charlie Kirk Show structure—not the TPUSA 501c3 structure. Given the subsequent Salem media FARA filings, that is what I assume is most likely. The specific 150 million dollar amount did not come from Andrew. There is no question an offer came in though.

English
2K
866
7.1K
767.6K
Jay Anderson
Jay Anderson@TheProjectUnity·
Flopped before it dropped. Historically brutal.
Jay Anderson tweet media
English
63
46
1.5K
65.9K
Alley Files
Alley Files@alleytopfiles·
Back to work! To me this looks like there’s a piece of metal on the left side where the arrow is along with paper? It’s obviously burnt edges. I don’t know any ideas ?? @wishabirchwood @lindseey_loo
Alley Files tweet mediaAlley Files tweet mediaAlley Files tweet media
English
29
9
95
5.5K
Artifex Memoriarum
Artifex Memoriarum@ArtifexMemor·
.@FBI we need answers. The man in white, directly behind Charlie, simulated holding a gun and firing the moment he was shot. I’ve clipped that moment here. Incredible catch by @Brittainiconn, I had missed this entirely.
Erica C@Brittainiconn

@ArtifexMemor Does nobody see the guy in the background, White shirt, making shooting motions at the exact time Charlie was shot? WTF is that about?

English
92
82
402
43.6K
Mario Nawfal
Mario Nawfal@MarioNawfal·
🇺🇸 Candace says a 4-hour sit-down with Erika Kirk flipped how she sees the widow, because she now thinks Erika told her a lie. She asked Erika how details about Charlie Kirk's death got out. Erika reportedly said the surgeon "went rogue" and talked to a PR guy without her okay, who then tweeted it all without her okay either. Candace says she got other information later that made her believe that story did not add up. Writer: Julie
Mario Nawfal@MarioNawfal

🇺🇸 Candace Owens is making explosive claims about Charlie Kirk's death, saying his spokesman Andrew Kolvet told her by phone days after the killing that "it was supposed to be you." She believes Charlie "knew something," pointing to an August dinner where she claims Netanyahu called and offered to take Turning Point USA "to the next level," an offer she says Charlie refused. She claims Erika Kirk confirmed the call happened but downplayed it as a casual check-in, which Candace says is a lie based on what she was told by people in Kolvet's orbit. Asked directly if she thinks Charlie was killed for going against Israel, Candace answered "1,000%." Writer: Julie

English
43
30
172
58.3K
Andrew Kolvet
Andrew Kolvet@AndrewKolvet·
Quite literally all of this is BS. Lets address one claim at a time... Netanyahu did NOT offer TPUSA millions. It's literally just an internet rumor popularized by crank Max Blumenthal. Even if Netanyahu had offered, Charlie would not and could not have accepted because TPUSA cannot accept foreign money. Even if Netanyahu had done so (which again, he did not) and CK could accept (he could not) and had CK asked my opinion (he did not), I would have told him to turn it down. I did NOT lose “millions” when CK turned down said money (that was never offered and he couldn't accept) because on top of everything, I don’t make any money off donations. I have exactly zero to do with fundraising. In fact, it was my one stipulation I made to Charlie years ago when we started working together. Nothing against it, it’s just not my thing. I NEVER told Candace any of this because it didn’t happen. I NEVER told any family members any of this either, because again, it never happened. If Israel offered us money, prove it. Show the proof. You wont be able to because it's a lie and always has been.
Shawn Ryan@ShawnRyan762

“He said to me on the phone, it was supposed to be you, verbatim. At the moment, I just took it as poorly expressed grief. He was crying, I was crying. I thought he said, it was supposed to be you. It was supposed to be you. So I have questions about that now.” “What scares me more is considering the world that our children will inherit if we stay quiet. We feel the squeeze. We feel the evil. We feel the cloud. It’s there. And you have a bunch of people who, whether it’s for money or for fear, are allowing it to happen. There are so many historical lessons about what can happen to a country when good men do nothing.” @RealCandaceO

English
3.8K
2.3K
12.9K
2.4M
Chris Martenson
Chris Martenson@chrismartenson·
@baroncoleman We didn't hit the chain. Made sure of that. But, of course, we also shot one straight through the neck (even though that's not the direction a 30-06 bullet trapped in the neck could have taken). The chain snapped in these, too (the last image in the series shows this clearly)
English
38
3
68
12.1K
Chris Martenson
Chris Martenson@chrismartenson·
My team recreated the broken necklace and puffed out shirt effect 6 times out of 6 using gel block tests and a 30-06 and a necklace comparable to the one Charlie Kirk was wearing that day. The explanation is that because fluids cannot be compressed when 2,000+ ft-lbs of force is suddenly dumped into a fluid environment, what you see instead is violent expansion. Note the shirt gyrations in our videos match those of CK's. The expansion happens in thousandths of a second, while typical video is in hundredths, causing all sorts of video artifacts. Our video below was shot at 460 fps and with strong lighting, allowing us to see things more clearly. Hope that helps.
Travis@NihiloX

Attention fedslopers, TPUSA whores, and anyone who genuinely believes Charlie was shot with a 30-06: This is two sequential frames. At 60fps, 0.01667 seconds had elapsed, or if we're being generous, 0.0333 seconds at 30fps. The shirt aside, how would a temporary cavity result in his hairline standing straight up? Keeping in mind that it necessarily must be a result of the temporary wound cavity, as Charlie, for all intents and purposes, had not and was not moving yet within the 0.01667 - 0.0333 seconds you see here. Open to being wrong, give me your best explanation.

English
576
126
1.4K
752.4K