Jesse Ian Lardiés
5.2K posts

Jesse Ian Lardiés
@JesseBoxing
Ancient Mysteries & Modern Innovations https://t.co/Xny7887H8Q Tamales & Más on FB https://t.co/j34cxeCnpF



🚨Watch Brian Harpole’s posture when the shot rings out. No flinch. No adrenaline spike. It’s the chilling demeanor of a man whose to-do list has just cleared its most important item of the day.


America is the most powerful empire. Yet, it has not annexed another sovereign country since 1898. It’s arguably the most morally constrained in history. No previous hegemonic power with military superiority exercised so little direct annexation during its period of dominance.

NBC is now citing the Shawn Ryan interview as an example of conversations that are deadly to Erika. Real e-mail. They say it’s akin to rhetoric that caused Trump’s assassination attempt.

Hey Andrew—It turns out you just don’t know how to read. The first 4 points are indeed my allegations. Number 5, is in question format and explicitly underscores a separate follow-up regarding the number that was being reported by other journalists at that time—not me. I was never told a specific number by you which is pretty clear from the tweet you just shared. In short— you just proved my point you absolute clown. 🤡



I should add a caveat — I was never told it was millions or billions or any specific amount. Just an offer to “take it to the next level”. I was then told from a family friend of Andrew’s that when Charlie said no to Bibi, Andrew complained that he lost out on millions. That makes me think the money would have come in through the Charlie Kirk Show structure—not the TPUSA 501c3 structure. Given the subsequent Salem media FARA filings, that is what I assume is most likely. The specific 150 million dollar amount did not come from Andrew. There is no question an offer came in though.

@LionelMedia A shocking amount of force.










@ArtifexMemor Does nobody see the guy in the background, White shirt, making shooting motions at the exact time Charlie was shot? WTF is that about?


🇺🇸 Candace Owens is making explosive claims about Charlie Kirk's death, saying his spokesman Andrew Kolvet told her by phone days after the killing that "it was supposed to be you." She believes Charlie "knew something," pointing to an August dinner where she claims Netanyahu called and offered to take Turning Point USA "to the next level," an offer she says Charlie refused. She claims Erika Kirk confirmed the call happened but downplayed it as a casual check-in, which Candace says is a lie based on what she was told by people in Kolvet's orbit. Asked directly if she thinks Charlie was killed for going against Israel, Candace answered "1,000%." Writer: Julie

“He said to me on the phone, it was supposed to be you, verbatim. At the moment, I just took it as poorly expressed grief. He was crying, I was crying. I thought he said, it was supposed to be you. It was supposed to be you. So I have questions about that now.” “What scares me more is considering the world that our children will inherit if we stay quiet. We feel the squeeze. We feel the evil. We feel the cloud. It’s there. And you have a bunch of people who, whether it’s for money or for fear, are allowing it to happen. There are so many historical lessons about what can happen to a country when good men do nothing.” @RealCandaceO



My team recreated the broken necklace and puffed out shirt effect 6 times out of 6 using gel block tests and a 30-06 and a necklace comparable to the one Charlie Kirk was wearing that day. The explanation is that because fluids cannot be compressed when 2,000+ ft-lbs of force is suddenly dumped into a fluid environment, what you see instead is violent expansion. Note the shirt gyrations in our videos match those of CK's. The expansion happens in thousandths of a second, while typical video is in hundredths, causing all sorts of video artifacts. Our video below was shot at 460 fps and with strong lighting, allowing us to see things more clearly. Hope that helps.



Attention fedslopers, TPUSA whores, and anyone who genuinely believes Charlie was shot with a 30-06: This is two sequential frames. At 60fps, 0.01667 seconds had elapsed, or if we're being generous, 0.0333 seconds at 30fps. The shirt aside, how would a temporary cavity result in his hairline standing straight up? Keeping in mind that it necessarily must be a result of the temporary wound cavity, as Charlie, for all intents and purposes, had not and was not moving yet within the 0.01667 - 0.0333 seconds you see here. Open to being wrong, give me your best explanation.

Andrew says this is NOT what happened. Unsurprising that Candace's anonymous source was wrong.






