@AudreyHurtburn Also, nurse from UNDER the shirt, not over it. Its not that hard to be more discreet.
English
Raven Rubottom
5.6K posts
I nursed 3 babies over 7 years, so I'm very supportive. However, mothers who do this come off as attention-seeking. It's totally unnecessary. Just drape a baby blanket over your shoulder while in public. Sounds crude, but the reality is strangers are not comfortable seeing an entire breast exposed and sucked on in a restaurant.
English
Maybe I’m in the minority and I’m just completely desensitized due to breastfeeding for as long as I have but I genuinely don’t see anything wrong with this
Liberta Cherguia 🇪🇺@MbarkCherguia
This woman’s receiving backlash for breastfeeding her (kind of old) child inside a restaurant on Mother’s Day, where other patrons were also trying to enjoy their Mother’s Day and meals with loved ones. What do you think? Did she deserve the backlash?
English
@NottaPundit @JdavisWx @KanekoaTheGreat To be fair, there's no "actual" evidence of TR doing it either.
English
@JdavisWx @QuothByRaven @KanekoaTheGreat If that's the case, then it'll likely come out in the trial.
But so far, there is absolutely no ACTUAL evidence of anyone else being involved.
When you see stufd like "unmarked Egyptian planes" following him, and other crap like that, your BS detector should be blaring.
English
What a misleading headline from The Daily Mail.
The ATF ran a tool mark analysis on a bullet jacket fragment recovered from Charlie's autopsy.
The result was "inconclusive" — not "no match."
The jacket was too fragmented to compare, which also partially explains the lack of an exit wound.
The bullet shattered on impact.
"Inconclusive" means insufficient evidence to draw any conclusion.
It doesn't mean the bullet "did NOT match" the rifle like the headline says.
The defense wants to use "inconclusive" as exculpatory evidence — but the prosecution wants to run chemical or molecular analysis comparing the jacket alloy to ammunition recovered with the gun.
Unlike tool mark analysis, it doesn't require an intact bullet.
The defense is trying to block that testing from happening.
That's the nuance of the real story.
Daily Mail@DailyMail
Bullet used to kill Charlie Kirk did NOT match rifle allegedly used by suspect Tyler Robinson, new court filing claims trib.al/sWEJfeN
English
The "chemical analysis" they say they will use was debunked 20 years ago. They used to use it, but had to stop because it was considered so bad that hundreds of cases where it was used had to disregard it upon appeal. The FBI themselves stopped using it because it is junk science. The first time it was used was JFK... they want to bring it back for CJK, go figure.
English
Raven Rubottom ретвитнул
BREAKING - A Baltimore mom is receiving massive praise after returning to the same food stand her son robbed just days before to reconcile with the owner, return the money, and apologize for her son’s actions, confirming she placed him in a treatment facility.
English
@EricLDaugh I don't know a single person IRL or in the webisphere that are jealous of her. They love her or hate her, but safe to say, no one is jealous of her.
English
🚨 BREAKING: President Trump just said Erika Kirk should SUE the people who keep defaming her
"Sue their A*S OFF!"
"I think you should SUE 'EM! I told her, you ought to SUE some of these people."
"They're so JEALOUS of Erika."
English
@BlakeSNeff @MrsErikaKirk There is zero audio, video or writing of Charlie saying he wanted Erika to take over. There is however, audio and video of Charlie saying exactly the opposite. In fact, the day he died, he told Erika to not come because "home needs you."
English
During the ASU event we got a question about @MrsErikaKirk becoming the new leader of Turning Point. My answer: There was absolutely no doubt who Charlie's successor was. Charlie knew it and we knew it.
English
@ShadowofEzra Trump is being insulated and getting really bad info on a host of issues, including this one.
English
President Trump tells Erika Kirk to sue everyone who is defaming her or making fun of her on the internet.
Trump says they are all just jealous of Erika.
"You have to be nicer. Sue their ass off."
English
@bren45000 No one "altered, destroyed or concealed" the footage. She hasn't even shown her recording of it. She only talks about what she saw. In no way does that impede anything.
English
Did Candace Owens break the law?
Did she just impede a federal investigation?
Months ago, she contacted a TPUSA staff member who grabbed the SD card out of the camera behind Charlie after he was shot.
TPUSA gave that SD card to law enforcement to help with their investigation.
Candace then secretly contacted the staff member and asked him to send her the footage. He didn’t feel comfortable doing that, but he showed her the footage over a video call.
Candace, being a snake, secretly recorded the footage using screen grab software.
She then shared this footage on her podcast to mislead people about exit wound speculations circulating online.
Well . . .
According to Candace, the FBI found out and had TPUSA contact her to inquire if she secretly recorded the footage during her meeting with the TPUSA staff member.
This enraged Candace because she couldn’t possibly understand why they would care.
The Law:
Core rule: Federal obstruction statutes (e.g., 18 U.S.C. § 1519) prohibit knowingly altering, destroying, or concealing records with intent to impede a federal investigation.
If the staffer was under explicit Law Enforcement instructions not to disseminate copies (to preserve chain of custody), he could face legal issues.
So Candace potentially asked this staff member to break the law.
ALSO …
If her release somehow prejudiced the prosecution (e.g., by tainting evidence or witness perceptions in the Tyler Robinson case), she could theoretically be charged with a crime as well.
Lastly, Candace’s ignorance is absolutely mind-blowing.
The fact that she couldn’t possibly understand WHY the FBI would be asking if she secretly recorded the footage, and her brain automatically went to “ZIONIST COVERUP, THEY KILLED CHARLIE” …
It just shows that Candace is incredibly uneducated.
English
Raven Rubottom ретвитнул
JUST IN: Mt. Everest guides accused of “poisoning” climbers to trigger helicopter rescues as part of an insurance scam.
The guides have allegedly been lacing hikers' food and pressuring them into taking expensive rescue helicopter evacuations.
"Guides with the trekking agencies allegedly poisoned tourists by putting baking soda in their food to trigger severe gastrointestinal distress that mimicked altitude sickness or food poisoning," the New York Post reports.
Operators would allegedly then forge medical documents and flight documents to charge international travel insurers.
According to police, the groups have received $19.69 million in insurance payouts.
Police in Nepal have charged 32 individuals for organized crime and fraud, including trekking company owners, helicopter operators, and hospital executives.
English
This is the team of Astronauts heading to the "Moon" tomorrow
What's the first thought that comes to mind when you see this picture?
English
@bennyjohnson @NASAAdmin I guess if you follow the TIm Alberino postulations, or even Vance's, technically no other life forms have not/are not visiting us... they were here first.
English
Obama said 'Aliens are Real'
JD Vance tells me they are 'Demons'
Congress revealed classified UFO footage
I asked the NASA Administrator what is going on.
Jared Isaacman provided an insider explanation for UFO sightings: 'I have looked into a lot of this...'
@NASAAdmin tells me life does exist beyond our planet and theres a 90% chance we discover it on Mars - but he sees no evidence that life has visited us.
"I personally have not seen any evidence that intelligent life has visited us yet. But I think it’s certainly interesting and certainly part of our job to go out and answer the question: are we alone?"
English
@officer_Lew can't serve both God and mammon. those who would profit off of you aren't happy when you chose the former.
English
WOW🚨: Jaden Ivey Speaks Out: Wife Ignores His Messages, Family Calls Him “Crazy” for Standing Firm in Christian Faith
After the Chicago Bulls waived him, Jaden Ivey dropped raw truth on IG Live:
“My wife has been ignoring all my messages… my whole family betrayed me, calling me crazy.”
All because he’s boldly preaching Jesus Christ and refusing to celebrate what he sees as unrighteousness.
Standing on faith comes with a cost. Praying for strength for Jaden.
What does it profit a man to gain the world and lose his soul? 🔥✝️
English
@InterstellarUAP @TheUfoJoe @galb_71 @bennyjohnson @mattgaetz yes he did. he said specifically "unclassified."
English
@TheUfoJoe @galb_71 @bennyjohnson @mattgaetz He does not specify in this clip whether it’s classified or unclassified setting.
English
🚨 Matt Gaetz : “There is an ALIEN Hybrid Breeding Program”
Rep. Matt Gaetz on what he was told in a classified congressional briefing by a uniformed U.S. Army officer:
“I had someone come and brief me who was in a military uniform, worked for the United States Army, that was briefing me on the locations of hybrid breeding programs where captured aliens were breeding with humans to create some hybrid race that could engage in intergalactic communication. An actual uniformed member of the United States Army briefed me on that.”
Gaetz added that recovered craft crashes examined by the CIA contained “non-human biologics” with no identifiable human source.
This is straight from a sitting Congressman under oath-level clearance. No speculation — just what he says he was officially briefed.
What do you make of it? 👇
---
English
@InterstellarUAP @mattgaetz It was NOT "classified congressional briefing." Sheesh. It was someone in Army uniform (not clear it was even an officer) who came to Matt's FLORIDA OFFICE to essentially "whistleblow." Matt says he did NOT verify the claims.
English
@GeneralMCNews He actually said he "did not verify" the claims made by uniformed Army who came to his office in Florida.
English
BREAKING: Matt Gaetz confirms the U.S. military is currently in possession of alien technology and has reverse-engineered their weapons, which are now available for use.
English
@Mappy6984 I guarantee you that bill already had 18%-22% figured in before the ADDTIONAL gratuity of $60.
English
@AndrewKolvet @FenixAmmunition Andrew should start by explaining the hug.
English
A lot of noise was made yesterday about the Daily Mail headline said the ATF could not match the gun to the bullet in the Tyler Robinson trial.
@FenixAmmunition joined us today to explain the actual facts.
English
@BlakeSNeff Or they want the Truth and to find ALL those involved rather than accept fed slop that this was a "lone gunman."
English
It's very obvious that a lot of people are not "brave truth-seekers." They just want Tyler Robinson to get off while smearing the people close to Charlie as much as possible.
We can only speculate as to their motives.
Colin Wright@SwipeWright
All the large accounts that present themselves as truth-seeking journalists or commentators, then quote posts like this and act utterly baffled—“What the hell!?” “WTF!?” “What’s going on here???”—are frauds. It took me less than a minute to see what the court documents actually said and understand what they meant. They do not show that the bullet was not fired from the gun. They show only that the bullet was too fragmented to confidently link it to ANY gun. This is not uncommon, and DOES NOT mean the bullet didn’t come from Robinson’s gun. Of course the defense attorneys are going to spin this as evidence that Robinson is innocent. That is what defense attorneys do. They scrape together every possible fragment of doubt and present it as if it were fully exculpatory. It’s not. Defense lawyers are paid to downplay or ignore evidence pointing to guilt, exploit people’s cognitive biases, and make fallacious arguments sound persuasive. This information about the bullet doesn’t erode the case for Robinson’s guilt in any way. It is totally neutral on that front. And it in no way invalidate the mountain of positive and mutually corroborating lines of evidence we do have for Robinson’s guilt. You should expect more from the commentators you follow, and hold them accountable by refusing to give them your attention in the future. If they could not be bothered to spend even one minute checking the facts before spreading confusion to you and millions of others on X, they do not deserve your attention. They are nothing more than grifting engagement farmers.
English