550M

119 posts

550M banner
550M

550M

@chart550M

Chart analysis and dark pool/option flow insights provided are for educational purposes only. Not financial advice or a trade signal.

Присоединился Mart 2026
17 Подписки1.1K Подписчики
Закреплённый твит
550M
550M@chart550M·
The prevailing fintwit narrative comparing this current $QQQ and $SPY rally to April 2025 overlooks several critical structural divergences. While the 'price action' may mimic April 2025 on a surface level, the underlying mechanics are completely different this time around: > Dollar divergence: Last year’s uptrend was fueled by a weakening dollar - $DXY put in a death cross in April 2025. This time, equities are fighting a golden cross on the DXY. The tailwind has officially become the headwind. > Sector rotation: The overall trend is still towards defensive sectors on the weekly and monthly timeframes. Last April, it was a violent rotation back towards offensives. > Broken breadth: While the indices look strong, the % of stocks reclaiming their 20dma and 200dma is struggling. Completely different than the April 2025 recovery where these moving averages were reclaimed with absolute ease. > Anemic volume: We are seeing significantly less conviction than we did in 2025. This move up is on even lower volume than last year. > Macro context: All of this is happening against the backdrop of an unprecedented, imminent energy shock. This move higher lacks the structural integrity of last year. It's a hollow rally.
English
2
3
30
15K
550M
550M@chart550M·
@m0rten1337 Excellent overlay. These structural cycles align with the monthly 8/21ema bearish crosses I'm tracking.
English
0
0
2
138
550M
550M@chart550M·
While everyone was distracted by earnings noise, $MSFT just finalized a decade-level structural signal: $MSFT officially printed a monthly 8/21ema bearish cross this week. This has happened only 4 other times since its 1986 IPO... Every single occurrence coincided with a major macro regime change: > 2000: The dot-com peak > 2006: The top of the housing bubble > 2008: The GFC acceleration > 2022: The end of the zero interest rate policy era And 2026 is now the 5th time: The global energy crisis. Trends at this scale move slowly, but they are the most objective indicators of capital flow. Given Microsoft's index weight, this breakdown represents a significant structural headwind for both $SPY and $QQQ. It's a sign of things to come. (8ema🟠/ 21ema🟣/ bearish cross🟥)
550M tweet media
English
10
11
87
16.5K
Nicolas Chéron
Nicolas Chéron@NCheron_bourse·
Fait amusant je pense qu’on aurait pu lire exactement ce genre de messages en l’an 2000. « This Time is different »
Firisis@Firisis_

Je trouve que c'est complètement absurde de comparer l'IA à la bulle internet simplement parce qu'on voit l'augmentation rapide de la valorisation de certaines entreprises. À part le fait qu'on parle de révolution technologique associée à une forme de spéculation, je ne vois absolument aucune autre similitude. L'IA n'est pas une promesse qui se réalise difficilement et pas en >15 ans comme internet. L'IA a déjà transformé nos sociétés en moins de 4 ans. L'adoption est rapide, explosive et massive. Internet allait impulser une transformation mais la digitalisation a pris 20 ans et n'est pas terminée Les sociétés qui explosent font factuellement des croissances de leurs marges et CA dans un délai extrêmement court. En 2000 tout le monde pouvait réunir une équipe de développeurs et créer une .com. Avec l'IA c'est du hardware qui explose, avec une barrière à l'entrée qui est massive : - Sur les matières premières - Des MOAT massifs sur des sociétés qui ont 15 ans de R&D derrière elles et un business impossible à répliquer sans poser des 10 voire 100 aines de milliards sur la table (coucou Terafab). - Il y a des enjeux souverains et de données. Et encore, elles sont valorisées sur leurs bénéfices actuels et sur un forward court. Alors que leur business est pour beaucoup IMPOSSIBLE à répliquer. Moi je trouve au contraire le marché encore sous-valorisé en tenant compte de cela. La seule raison qui pourrait justifier le fait qu'on ait des valorisations excessives, c'est que pour une raison ou une autre on ait moins besoin d'hardware que prévu pour faire tourner l'IA. C'est vraiment le seul risque à mon sens. D'où le fait qu'à mon sens faut surtout lire prendre le temps de lire les papiers de recherche des différents labo d'IA pour mesurer ce risque (JEPA avec LeWM, Neural computer etc..)

Français
27
2
73
48.8K
Heisenberg
Heisenberg@Mr_Derivatives·
$SPY 10 of the 13 new Fed chairs saw at least a 10% drawdown in their first year. Warsh can officially start as early as this month I believe. Fwiw H/t Barclays, Fundstrat
Heisenberg tweet media
English
26
15
151
23.4K
Michael Bento
Michael Bento@MichaelPBento·
Those seeds have already been sown over the last couple of weeks. Everyone is in, and no one thinks anything can bring this market down. It’s exactly the conditions in which prior crashes have taken place. Will it happen Monday? Probably not, but we are probably measuring in months not years now
Concepts@everyvote_prize

@MichaelPBento Everyone’s going to act so shocked and befuddled when it happens too. I can’t say when the music is going to stop, but I can’t say say this is so much worse than regular people understand.

English
9
3
90
8.3K
The Kobeissi Letter
The Kobeissi Letter@KobeissiLetter·
Tech layoffs are skyrocketing: Tech companies announced 81,747 layoffs in Q1 2026, the highest quarterly total since at least Q1 2024. Layoffs have more than DOUBLED from the previous quarter and have risen +580% since Q4 2025. March alone saw 45,800 announced job cuts, the worst single month for tech layoffs in at least 2 years. Tech layoffs are set to remain elevated with Meta's, $META, recent plans to cut ~8,000 employees. Furthermore, Microsoft, $MSFT, is offering voluntary retirement to ~7% of its US workforce, which could transition into layoffs if participation is low. This comes as tech giants shift spending toward AI chips and data centers, trimming staff to free up capital for infrastructure. US tech employment is rapidly contracting.
The Kobeissi Letter tweet media
English
225
692
2.7K
432.6K
TT3
TT3@TradingThomas3·
Historically, after a 10%+ monthly move, the market tends to transition from a strong trend into a more choppy, range-bound environment. It shifts into a stock picker’s market, where the broader index stalls, but leaders (often semis and Mag7) can still grind higher while laggards play catch-up, making rotation more important than overall direction. Dip buyers remain active, so pullbacks are typically bought, but the upside usually cools off from explosive rallies into a slower, more methodical grind higher.
English
29
24
382
44.4K
550M
550M@chart550M·
@JohnSmithxmo0 The VIX defines the expected range, but not the direction since it only measures vol. For the actual direction of the move, examining the internal structure is a much more reliable tell.
English
0
0
0
57
John Smith
John Smith@JohnSmithxmo0·
@chart550M Suppose when the VIX gives some more signals for now not much
English
1
0
1
97
550M
550M@chart550M·
Almost no one uses this chart correctly... but it's one of the best ways to tell if a move up will continue or fail. The answer becomes very apparent for the current $QQQ and $SPY move when you look at the internal structure under a different light: This is a daily chart of the percentage of $SPY stocks above the 50 day moving average. I removed the candlesticks because what matters most is not the actual raw percentage, but the interaction between its own moving averages. Specifically the 10ema🟠 and 200sma🟢 for the percentage itself. The last time the 10ema struggled to get above the 200sma following a deep move in breadth was Feb 2025 prior to the tariff selloff. We are seeing that same failed expansion pattern happening right now. Conversely, in order for a move up to fully sustain, the 10ema needs to slice above the 200sma with absolute ease like it did back in May 2025 during the recovery. That is clearly not the case currently. This doesn't necessarily mean the exact top, but when internal momentum stalls against long-term moving averages while also making lower highs, it's worth paying attention to.
550M tweet media
English
4
9
85
25.5K
550M
550M@chart550M·
Fair point, anything can resolve upward. But this is about weighing probabilities, as you already know well. A stall at the 200sma with accelerating internal decay isn't usually the foundation for a sustainable breakout, especially in the context of significant sector rotation toward defensives in both equal and market-cap weighted terms.
English
0
0
2
188
Swingtrader
Swingtrader@Swingtrader·
I do similar stuff like this, it’s a good concept but there’s also something else to mention here The line can ultimately end up moving up instead of down - meaning people start bidding stocks That’s how breakouts form So while it’s a good concept - it’s not gonna tell you the move, it’s just another data point and good to “look back at” and say “duh!”
550M@chart550M

Almost no one uses this chart correctly... but it's one of the best ways to tell if a move up will continue or fail. The answer becomes very apparent for the current $QQQ and $SPY move when you look at the internal structure under a different light: This is a daily chart of the percentage of $SPY stocks above the 50 day moving average. I removed the candlesticks because what matters most is not the actual raw percentage, but the interaction between its own moving averages. Specifically the 10ema🟠 and 200sma🟢 for the percentage itself. The last time the 10ema struggled to get above the 200sma following a deep move in breadth was Feb 2025 prior to the tariff selloff. We are seeing that same failed expansion pattern happening right now. Conversely, in order for a move up to fully sustain, the 10ema needs to slice above the 200sma with absolute ease like it did back in May 2025 during the recovery. That is clearly not the case currently. This doesn't necessarily mean the exact top, but when internal momentum stalls against long-term moving averages while also making lower highs, it's worth paying attention to.

English
1
1
22
5.9K
550M
550M@chart550M·
@ihavedumbtakes Happy to help, internal structure is everything right now
English
0
0
0
53
550M
550M@chart550M·
10ema🟠 continues to stall out below the 200sma🟢 Underlying decay is accelerating, while $SPY remains only slightly red. This structural divergence usually resolves with a sharp move, especially in the context of massive sector rotation towards defensives. Clear risk off.
550M tweet media
English
1
0
8
861
550M
550M@chart550M·
@Mr_Derivatives $RSP is about to put in an 8/21ema bearish cross on the 4 hour chart. The last time it did that was March 4th, the start of the $SPY March correction. Think a bounce is unlikely here.
550M tweet media
English
0
0
0
235
Heisenberg
Heisenberg@Mr_Derivatives·
$RSP Equal weighted S&P500 etf is now down 7 days in a row. Tied for the longest losing streak since April 2024.. Play for a bounce soon?
English
18
3
86
27.1K
550M
550M@chart550M·
@yes_risk @JavierBlas I'm leaning more towards offshore rigs basket $NE $BORR $SDRL $VAL $RIG
English
1
0
4
382
Javier Blas
Javier Blas@JavierBlas·
The world is calling on the barrel of last resort — and it’s brutal for the US. American total petroleum exports (crude and refined products) surged last week to an all-time high >14m b/d. The price? US total inventories plunged at ~3.5 million b/d last week. Unsustainable.
English
58
422
2K
195.1K
jbulltard
jbulltard@jbulltard1·
CENTCOM HAS PREPARED FOR SHORT WAVE OF STRIKES ON IRAN i guess back to war
English
8
2
85
9.3K
Ariel Hernandez
Ariel Hernandez@RealSimpleAriel·
We just aren't seeing that breadth expansion as I'm sure most of us would have loved to see. $XLI $XLU $XLV $XLP $XLF $XLB $XLC $XLY all slightly underwhelming right now. Maybe things change after this FOMC and big 4 earnings reports tonight.
TheChartGuys@ChartGuys

@RealSimpleAriel I would have preferred a bit more rotation during this semis consolidation. XLV weekly bear flag. XLF saw a bit. IGV nothing.

English
13
4
68
32.6K
550M
550M@chart550M·
The $RSP 4 hour chart is also on the verge of an 8/21ema bearish cross. The last time we saw this structural breakdown was March 4th, the beginning of the March $SPY correction. Internal momentum is diverging across the board.
550M tweet media
English
1
0
14
1.5K
Joeri
Joeri@joeriwestland·
The higher oil prices go, the more likely Trump is to issue some kind of oil/product export restrictions or bans. If so, Brent-WTI spread will show a massive blow out. Brent exposure >>> WTI exposure imo $OOTT
English
22
6
167
22.4K