Bruno J. Escobedo

199 posts

Bruno J. Escobedo

Bruno J. Escobedo

@escobedev

Hello! I'm Bruno Escobedo, a passionate human with interests in software development, cybersecurity, physics, mathematics, psychology, philosophy and politics.

Присоединился Haziran 2024
154 Подписки4 Подписчики
Bruno J. Escobedo
Bruno J. Escobedo@escobedev·
@caval1924 @Jhonabarez @SantiagoGastana Yo no sería tan ingenuo, las dinamicas de poder nos puede convertir en bananeros así la diplomacia exista solo sobre papel. No me opongo a negociar con EEUU pero nuestros diplomáticos debieron protestar ante las amenazas gratis recibidas y el trato desigual.
Español
0
0
4
38
Carlos Valencia
Carlos Valencia@caval1924·
@Jhonabarez @escobedev @SantiagoGastana Que pensamiento tan atrasador e inútil. En Chile, Argentina, tienen hace años y claro que les es mega útil. La industria no es hacer solo tornillos y fideos, cojudon. El mundo avanza y hssta la IA necesita de terreno especial donde invertir. Qué va a entender de eso un mono?
Español
2
0
0
52
Santiago Gastañadui Ramirez
Santiago Gastañadui Ramirez@SantiagoGastana·
Estados Unidos primero nos impone un arancel del 10%, luego nos aplica una tarifa del 50% a las manufacturas de cobre, pese a que tenemos un TLC vigente con ellos. Hace poco, su embajador nos extorsiona para comprar aviones F16 y amenaza con sanciones si no lo hacemos. Y la cereza de la torta es que en abril USA en aplicación a su política migratoria inhumana expulsó a peruanos a la República Democrática del Congo. ¿Y nuestro Embajador en EEUU dice que las relaciones diplomáticas están en su mejor momento? Parece que vive en un mundo paralelo.
RPP Noticias@RPPNoticias

🇵🇪🇺🇸 Perú y Estados Unidos están en su mejor momento de relación diplomática, destaca embajador Alfredo Ferrero rpp.pe/politica/gobie…

Español
38
611
2K
37.3K
Javier Hdez
Javier Hdez@Javierhdvl·
@AlertaNewsPlus Y? El dueño hace lo que quiera. Sino que los pro Palestinas abran un periódico y despidan a los que no apoyen a Palestina. Ahhh para que ya lo hacen, se llama Al Jazeera 🕺🏻
Español
7
0
1
415
AlertaNewsPlus
AlertaNewsPlus@AlertaNewsPlus·
🇮🇱 | Döpfner, propietario de The Telegraph y Politico, pidió la dimisión de los periodistas que no apoyaran a Israel.
AlertaNewsPlus tweet mediaAlertaNewsPlus tweet media
Español
9
45
233
4.8K
Bruno J. Escobedo
Bruno J. Escobedo@escobedev·
@Jhonabarez @SantiagoGastana En la UNI se ha abierto una carrera de ingeniería aeroespacial por ese mismo motivo, pero aún tienen q pasar años. Y sí, dado q es proyecto de la Nasa va a estar bajo su control por eso están incrementando su seguridad militar construyendo más bases y vendiendonos esos aviones.
Español
1
0
3
125
Jhonathan
Jhonathan@Jhonabarez·
@SantiagoGastana A mi me llama la atención además que el Gobierno vaya a construir un puerto espacial en Piura cuando no tenemos ni carrera espacial, investigadores, nada de nada, quién lo va a usar? Los gringos? Nos están utilizando? Ese dineral puede ir a atender otras necesidades.
Español
4
2
29
1.5K
Bruno J. Escobedo
Bruno J. Escobedo@escobedev·
@QuoteNietzsche Nop, it’s shaped by our emotional being. Fear, empathy, shame is shaped by culture, traumas, experiences. Our rational self only analyzes the scenario, identify all the options, gets filled with nuance, but our emotions narrow the options by impulse so we can be decisive.
English
0
0
0
4
Friedrich Nietzsche Notebook
Friedrich Nietzsche Notebook@QuoteNietzsche·
Do you think there is something like 'objective morality'? Why or why. not?
English
34
1
22
3.7K
Bruno J. Escobedo
Bruno J. Escobedo@escobedev·
@LeadSat @CFC_Junior_ @MrBeast Also blue is only symbolic. Nothing happens if they win, outcome is unaltered. The button can be removed preserving the same dynamic. So in a game with just 1 button: you have the option to press the button to kill those who didn’t or not press it at all. Why would you press it?
English
0
0
0
12
MrBeast
MrBeast@MrBeast·
Everyone on earth takes a private vote by pressing a red or blue button. If more than 50% of people press the blue button, everyone survives. If less than 50% of people press the blue button, only people who pressed the red button survive. Which button would you press? BE HONEST.
English
9.7K
3K
29.9K
38.5M
Bruno J. Escobedo
Bruno J. Escobedo@escobedev·
@LeadSat @CFC_Junior_ @MrBeast Ok, you wanna fight? Eat this: Blue wins -> everyone parties. Red wins -> some people die. Blue mentality -> Let’s party 😀 Red mentality -> Let’s kill some people and blame it on them for exposing. Rap*st mentality -> Let’s r*pe some girls and blame it on them for exposing.
English
0
0
0
8
Bruno J. Escobedo
Bruno J. Escobedo@escobedev·
@corsaren In fairness, blue button is not required to exist since blue winning means nothing happens. so if you remove it, it becomes whether you press the red button to kill those who didn’t or not press it at all. Why would you press it?
English
0
0
0
15
corsaren
corsaren@corsaren·
Kinda interesting how hard blue lost here. Because, ya know, an absolute fuckton of 18 year olds are still gonna vote blue. I guess we stop caring about kids at 18? (In fairness, the question should shift your expectation of the outcome toward red, so you *should* vote redder)
corsaren tweet media
corsaren@corsaren

BONUS ROUND: Every able-bodied, mentally cogent adult between the ages 18 and 80 must press a button. No children, no mentally handicapped. Reds live regardless; blues die unless >50% vote blue. No cheating this time. You don't know how people have voted so far.

English
48
0
47
8.7K
Bruno J. Escobedo
Bruno J. Escobedo@escobedev·
@SwordMasterPub Actually, refuse to push any button is the same as voting blue. At the start everyone is alive. If blue wins that keeps the same. It’s like the blue button is not even required to exist. It’s just people choosing red and kill those who didn’t.
English
0
0
0
260
Sword Master Publications
Sword Master Publications@SwordMasterPub·
I presented the red vs blue button scenario to my wife and three children. I was not all that surprised at their answers, but the most interesting answer I received was from my middle child (the younger of twin 16-year-olds). She said, "I would refuse to push the buttons." We have talked about the trolley problem in the past and various iterations of it: Joker in Batman, Green Goblin and Spiderman, etc. In those scenarios, there was conversation about scripts and artificial outcomes written by authors as well as the ability to overcome the impossible situation because, well, superheroes are supposed to do that. That's what makes them super. But the lesson we talked about a lot was subverting the question, not allowing the premise itself. My daughter said that nothing was said about what happened if you didn't press a button so she would refuse to participate in such a stupid scenario.
English
77
6
84
21.2K
Bruno J. Escobedo
Bruno J. Escobedo@escobedev·
@CodyLibolt @jwlecheminant You’re hiding the killing factor. No one is hunting for blues until people choose “safety”. In reality they’re choosing “hunt the blues”.
English
0
0
2
31
Cody Libolt
Cody Libolt@CodyLibolt·
Assuming you don’t care about other factors, which do you choose?
Cody Libolt tweet media
English
114
19
482
9.7K
MUY
MUY@muyhiram·
Everyone who presses the 🔵Blue button will die if more than 50% of people presses the 🔴Red button. PRESS ONE BUTTON!!
English
89
25
574
46.5K
Bruno J. Escobedo
Bruno J. Escobedo@escobedev·
@TexasAnCap It’s not the same starting conditions, cuz everyone starts by not jumping in. As if everyone voted red and you’re asking them if they want to change their vote. It’s not the same.
English
0
0
2
68
Texas AnCap
Texas AnCap@TexasAnCap·
Let's try a new prompt. Everyone is safely standing on the side of a raging river. If nobody jumps in, then everyone lives. If someone jumps in, the only way they survive is if over 50% of the people standing on the side of the river also decide to jump in. Do you jump?
English
59
7
40
3.8K
Bruno J. Escobedo
Bruno J. Escobedo@escobedev·
@Nobleshield @OrwellsNotebook Blue wins -> everyone parties. Red wins -> some people die. Blue mentality -> Let’s party 😀 Red mentality -> Let’s kill some people and blame it on them for exposing. Rap*st mentality -> Let’s r*pe some girls and blame it on them for exposing.
English
0
0
0
18
Nobleshield
Nobleshield@Nobleshield·
@OrwellsNotebook Only an idiot would pick blue anyway. You take a risk, whereas red comes with no risk at all except that the morons (who pressed blue) might die.
English
6
0
21
405
Bruno J. Escobedo
Bruno J. Escobedo@escobedev·
@OrwellsNotebook Saving doesn’t exist, it’s not wanting to harm. There are 2 outcomes: Blue wins -> people party and hug each other. Red wins -> people are murdered. Retards -> Let’s murder the blues and blame it on them :D
English
0
0
2
27
Bruno J. Escobedo
Bruno J. Escobedo@escobedev·
@VitoComedy There are 2 outcomes: Blue wins, nobody was harmed. Red wins, people will die. Red retards: Let’s murder some people :D
English
0
0
0
10
MAX MEMES
MAX MEMES@VitoComedy·
Adding babies to it is moronic because then the question is just would you risk your life to save half the world's babies Which is just not that interesting to debate
Russell@theramblingfool

Every Pro-red argument: (1) Cynicism: "It's impossible for blue to win. Don't be suicidal." (2) Narcissism: "There is no downside to pressing red." (3) Changing the hypo: "Babies don't count. That'd be stupid! So there's a blender..." (4) Psychopathy: "Blue pressers deserve to die." (5) General poor analytic reasoning: "If everyone just pressed red!"

English
192
17
656
24.4K
Bruno J. Escobedo
Bruno J. Escobedo@escobedev·
@hate__criminal @YeaItsMeMilky If it were real, someone would have to kill the blues. People don’t die because they lose. Having to vote for an explicit killer put reds explicitly as the violent option, people wouldn’t go for that so blue will win even by a higher poll.
English
0
0
0
17
The Man Of The Hour
The Man Of The Hour@hate__criminal·
@YeaItsMeMilky the funniest part is you know all the people saying they would pick blue are just virtue signaling and would 100% pick red if this were real
English
16
0
42
1K
Bruno J. Escobedo
Bruno J. Escobedo@escobedev·
@TexasAnCap No one knows if you’re living around killers, so people constantly test by risking themselves a little disguising as prey to address the predators in the room.
English
0
0
0
19
Texas AnCap
Texas AnCap@TexasAnCap·
This is an IQ test, and a lot of people are failing...
Texas AnCap tweet media
English
99
36
1K
8.9K
ayush
ayush@ayushthehipster·
@muyhiram @get_dunk I honestly don’t get it. To me the only people who would press blue are those who want to die. By pressing red I’m giving them what they want? What is the imperative to press blue?
English
8
0
5
1.1K
Bruno J. Escobedo
Bruno J. Escobedo@escobedev·
@TheTarch @chaitinsgoose It actually is the same. They’re just explicitly mentioning the killer, how do you think people die? The original game mentions blues are going to die, but someone has to kill them. And those are the reds if they win.
English
0
0
2
53
Gradient Dissent
Gradient Dissent@TheTarch·
@chaitinsgoose This is not isomorphic to the original. In the original, it would be akin to electing the entity that foisted the dilemma on everyone in the first place. Resisting tyranny is much more obviously worth dying for.
English
23
0
232
13.2K
Chaitin's goose
Chaitin's goose@chaitinsgoose·
i realized framing impacts me too there is an election. if candidate A wins, nothing happens. if candidate B wins, he kills all those who voted A. who do you vote for?
English
199
28
557
89.4K
Bruno J. Escobedo
Bruno J. Escobedo@escobedev·
@infe_____ @GardenMama22 @Echoez_of_tRuTh @MrBeast In real life it would still be context-dependent. The game has no context. Frame isn’t narrow enough. So people analyze by different focuses and interpretations. Like this: you’re electing between 2 leaders: 1 chill guy, 1 extremist that will kill every infidel if he gains power.
English
0
0
0
10
infe
infe@infe_____·
@escobedev @GardenMama22 @Echoez_of_tRuTh @MrBeast social cooperation only thrives when it brings undisputed benefit to all. When the matter is survival, it's in natural instincts to preserve one's self and in a real life scenario blue button would get 30% at most.
English
1
0
0
23
Bruno J. Escobedo
Bruno J. Escobedo@escobedev·
@LeadSat @CFC_Junior_ @MrBeast It’s just a game. The scenario allows multiple framings (these are not interpretations, they’re focuses: risk vs outcome vs responsibility vs trust), that’s why I said it doesn’t really have one. Just chill, people lose their heads over nothing.
English
1
0
0
15
RZMC
RZMC@LeadSat·
@escobedev @CFC_Junior_ @MrBeast Interpretation is counterproductive as for example some may presume death as merely the next step towards reincarnation. I don't have the time to try and reinterpret what someone really means, if they want an specific question then can ask right the first time.
English
1
0
0
25

Открыть

@caval1924 @Jhonabarez @SantiagoGastana @Javierhdvl @AlertaNewsPlus @QuoteNietzsche @LeadSat @CFC_Junior_