Thinky Crow

I have a name for this, and it’s “hypocrisy hypocrisy”. We all know perfectly well Rebekuh here does not want ID requirements to be uniform between voting and guns. She wants ID for guns, but NOT for voting. Earth to moron: YOU ARE JUST AS BIG A HYPOCRITE AS THOSE YOU ACCUSE.

Email to: PCFederalRegister@usps.gov Subject: Shipping firearms Dear Director, Product Classification, U.S. Postal Service, I strongly support the proposed rule to permit the general public to mail handguns through the United States Postal Service (USPS). This common-sense update modernizes an outdated restriction, respects the rights of law-abiding citizens, and aligns postal policy with the realities of legal firearm ownership and commerce in America. For over a century, the blanket prohibition on mailing handguns has imposed unnecessary burdens on responsible gun owners who comply with all federal, state, and local laws. Allowing mailed handguns under clear, enforceable regulations will reduce reliance on less convenient or more expensive shipping alternatives, facilitate lawful transfers between licensed parties, and remove artificial obstacles to exercising Second Amendment rights. Law-abiding Americans already have multiple legal avenues to acquire and transfer firearms—this change simply makes one of those avenues more practical and accessible without infringing on state laws. Concerns about risks to postal workers and the public can be effectively addressed through existing federal frameworks, including background checks, serialization requirements, age restrictions, and prohibitions on shipping to prohibited persons. USPS personnel routinely handle other regulated or potentially hazardous materials under established protocols; extending clear guidelines to handguns is neither impractical nor unprecedented. Proper packaging, labeling, and verification requirements will minimize theft, mishandling, or other incidents, while expanding options for secure, trackable shipment actually reduces the underground black-market incentives that thrive on restricted legal channels. This proposal is fully consistent with the Second Amendment. The century-old restriction was not a core public safety measure but a logistical policy that no longer reflects today’s regulated marketplace. Updating it strengthens the ability of responsible citizens to keep and bear arms while maintaining robust safeguards against misuse. Far from eroding safety, this rule promotes transparency, accountability, and equal access under the law for law-abiding Americans. I urge the USPS to finalize this proposed rule and bring postal policy in line with the constitutional rights and practical needs of today’s gun owners. Sincerely, [Your name] [Your mailing address, *IMPORTANT* USPS requires it]

@Movies_analyst No, Thompson was only commenting on Maguire’s APPEARANCE. Hunter complained he looked like a “wax doll” & as if he was melting. He’d been given a bald cap, as the book’s illustrator drew the kid as bald. Hunter said the real kid wasn’t bald, the artist just drew things “ugly”.

In Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas (1998), Johnny Depp wore Hunter S. Thompson’s real 1970s clothes which he loaned him after Depp spent 4 months living with him to study his mannerisms and voice. Thompson later slammed Tobey Maguire's performance as a “wax doll” and a “freak.”

@deltaozzimo “Straws”. Yes…

Sick, give me ten.

@mask_bastard Puke.

what would you rate this pizza?

@JimmyJoeRogres @GBNT1952 Oh? And what does “Filasteen” mean in Arabic?

@ThinkyCrow @GBNT1952 You didn't read my previous replies Thinky

The term Syria Palaestina, which later morphed into Palestine, was not created until between 132 and 135 AD (well after Jesus and his disciples, mind you) by the Roman Emperor Hadrian after the Bar Kokhba Revolt as a way to punish the Jewish people in an attempt to try and remove Jewish tradition from the lands of Judea. Johnny is an idiot and a liar, and people are incredibly stupid and completely devoid of any knowledge about actual history. 139,000 people liked this…

@a_hiding_person @gfodor Why would self interested people pick blue?

@ThinkyCrow @gfodor But some people are going to pick blue, for example, purely self-interested people.

Red and blue button experiment but where the button you push applies not to you but another person randomly assigned to you.

@SterlingHutch @WatcherontheWeb You say “but if they push blue”. I ask WHY are they pushing blue? There is zero logical reason to do so.

@ThinkyCrow @WatcherontheWeb So... If you don't want anybody to die.. you'd have to TRUST 100% of people push red. On the other hand, if you don't want people to die, you only have to trust half of people press blue... The trust required of pressing red is much more IF you care about lives other than yours

To the people saying "PrEsSiNg ReD iS lOw TrUsT" Yes..... If you read the question it's GLOBAL.... You are litterally voting against the 3rd world This is the very definition of a "low trust" environment Were you picturing only your local city voting or something?

@WolStar16 @Kyle_C137 They’re killing themselves.

@ThinkyCrow @Kyle_C137 I picked blue so that nobody dies, I don't want to risk killing someone

This is a weird debate. It's almost like communism vs. capitalism.

@a_hiding_person @gfodor No, pick red. Everyone red, nobody dead. The ONLY people who die in ANY outcome pick blue. There is NO reason to pick blue. None.

@ThinkyCrow @gfodor Voting red risks the lives put in danger by self-interest people who vote blue. Either option puts a life at risk, either ones assigned blue by others or the or the person I am assigned to. The calculus doesn't change, a large number of people are in danger. Pick blue.

Even George Carlin joked about this. “That’s what they tell you: Get on the plane, get on the plane. Fuck you, I’m getting IN the plane! Let Evel Knievel get ON the plane.”

+✈️|| Alright, so I can be in an helicopter but can't be in a plane b̸e̸c̸a̸u̸s̸e̸ t̸h̸a̸t̸'s̸ w̸h̸y̸? I thought they both fly🤔 Mehn, I h8t this English class 🤣🤣🤣

Send this to your parents.

@BlackDumpling All red, nobody dead. The only people who die in ANY outcome are blue. Blue creates the problem, just to give you a CHANCE to fix it. Red means there’s no problem to begin with.

Are you willing to publicly admit, before God and all, that you are a presser of the Red Button 🛑?

@Ephraim_12K @BlackDumpling Except before the buttons got pushed, there was nobody to “save”. The only people who die in ANY outcome are those push blue. Hence there is ZERO reason to push it.

@BlackDumpling red button pushers are cowards pure and simple

Everyone on earth is forced to vote. The genie who made the vote was generous enough to grant temporary understanding of the vote to everyone involved. Press red, you live. Press blue, and if >50% press it everyone lives, else instant blue death. What are you pressing?

@_wej01 I would miss coffee, but not that much. Also you didn’t say no caffeine. Caffeine pills are cheaper than coffee or energy drinks anyway.

You receive $2,000 a week for life, but you can never drink coffee/redbull again. Would you take the deal?????

Yes… it is. If I vote red, the other guy doesn’t matter. The tally will either be 98 or 99 blue. Either way all blues die. Yes obviously knowing others’ votes can change the choice. The point is in the original question, when nobody has chosen yet, there’s no logical reason for anyone to vote blue. There is no one to “save”.

@ThinkyCrow There is not a 100% certainty that blue loses if you don't vote for it. I said IF you and the other guy. You have to rely on the other guy too, that's the risk. You would press blue if it has a 0% chance of failing? But not a 55ish% chance of winning like most polls show?

@DafityDaf This itself is false equivalency, because it makes blue default. Blue is an action, and it is the ONLY action that puts your life in danger. The only reason anyone is in danger in this scenario is because they pushed blue.

@4thOfJuly365 Is it though? Once it hits two likes, there’s no reason for anyone else to like.

This is platform manipulation and engagement farming. But those rules only apply to the peasants and not the elite.

@DustyDevil19 I will when the poll is over.

@ThinkyCrow I don’t understand how much of a difference that would make. Possibly planning time? If the people are aware anyway, not that something like that matters in this poll as you’re the first guy voting. Might just be a me problem, if possible would you mind explaining?

So my twist on the button problem. Same rules, if more than 50% of people press blue, everyone survives. If less than 50% of people press blue, only people who pressed red survive. BUT: beknownst only to you, YOU are the first person in the whole world to push your button.

@DafityDaf In that case I would vote blue, as there 100% certainty blue loses if I don’t.

@ThinkyCrow Ok dude, in my scenario if you vote blue then the guy after you votes blue it would be 100 red and 100 blue and nothing would happen. That's the point

@Truth_in_Number @yoursimmo11 I’m not offended, that’s kinda funny.

@ThinkyCrow @yoursimmo11 Not that I'm trying to be insulting, I actually loved your reply, but the first reaction I had to seeing it was to want to reply to you saying, "Yeah, well, your mama is a chemical." Probably should have just kept that to myself.

One of these is alive. The other is a chemical. The supplement industry calls them identical.