Left4Bread

@BeatrixdeSol @brianatheroux What do you not understand here? Her idea of inversion is unintentionally revealing. She wasn’t trying to be hyperbolic. She was trying to present reality from the female perspective and revealed something we all know to be true despite women lying about it constantly.

@wuzLeft4Bread @brianatheroux Its just meant to be the inverse of the retweeted bait

Most women must decide between 3 men: 1) A man she is intensely physically attracted to, but who destabilizes her life because he’s chaotic, impulsive, and probably addicted to something insane. 2) A man she feels safe with, but who does not sexually excite her at all. 3) A man she loves, but who energetically feels more like another child than a leader. ***there are rare exceptions of course. Men who create real sexual polarity without bringing chaos, dysfunction, or emotional instability with them. But most women never meet one.

@adolfmaxxing x.com/wuzleft4bread/…

I'm not saying the older man here is wrong to do this, but it creates a vicious cycle. After this happens once, then the younger guy is going to be delayed and he's going to have to do the same thing

The girls are not all "Dating the same guy" in that stupid 18-29 gf/bf dataset. It's just that girls in their 20s, despite online "age gap" discourse, are often dating men 30+. Especially after 25.

@StonerArtistGF @brianatheroux Women will convince themselves of anything to avoid acknowledging their own brutality, including making up these complex frameworks to pretend that they’re not just sticking around with guys that give them stuff because they dont want to lose the stuff. Attraction is a necessity.

@wuzLeft4Bread @brianatheroux Yeah. That's dumb. And incorrect for the vast majority.

It should be common sense, but intelligence tracks with more stable pair bonding traits, better impulse control, and lower appetite for chaotic mating behavior. Higher intelligence men in this study reported more relationship investment and fewer coercive, insulting, controlling, and casual sex oriented behaviors. Pretending intelligence has nothing to do with relational or dating behavior is cope. Smarter men tend to be better at long term strategy and understanding the consequences of their behavior. That usually makes them better bets for marriage than men running on impulse, dominance games, and excessive novelty seeking. Maybe that’s why women rate Red Pill as one of the most repulsive belief systems a man can have. It is basically broadcasting/advertising that you are a high risk partner.

@anarch97 “25% of men are below average” Good lord, how do these women make it to adulthood?

@brianatheroux That’s just a smokescreen for whats actually happening. Women who are truly happy in LTR’s are just w/ men who still do enough of the “bad” manipulative things while offering enough “good” safe things that make them desperate enough to suppress their instinct to cheat.

No. Red pill advice is repulsive because it confuses anxiety, insecurities, control, and excessive disruptive novelty chasing with “reality.” Raw attraction matters. No one is denying that or said otherwise. But long term female desire is not built by making yourself emotionally unsafe, antagonistic, disloyal, or obsessed with dominance games. That does not reveal reality. It reveals why so many men steeped in those cultures can generate short term interest but cannot maintain respect, trust, or actual relationships.

@WestsideLAGuy Major short guy energy in this post

Hard pill for men to swallow but it needs to be said. If a girl swipes left on you on Hinge, she’s not “swiping right” because you cold approach her at trader joe’s. What a woman is attracted to does not magically change because it’s IRL.

@EdwardJSofel @Triceratops235 @janecoaston There are good studies showing men fall in love faster, say I love you sooner, and take longer to recover from breakups. Large majority of divorces are initiated by women. The issue is their inability to be loved and their constant desire for something better than what they have.

@wuzLeft4Bread @Triceratops235 @janecoaston Yes they have. They're porn-addled perverts who don't care about anyone or about their own virtue. Repulsive. Women can smell the perversion & inability to love so they've decided that if they have to settle for someone selfish, it might as well be Chad.

@Thisiswhyidrin1 @janecoaston Do you not realize the reason for that historical norm is polygyny? Men hoarded women like resources. It’s a bad thing that women are shifting societal behavior back toward a time when they were property. They should stop doing that.

@wuzLeft4Bread @janecoaston 2. And this doubled regression somehow still is more favorable than historic norm that it is regressing towards! It seems that the 40-50 years stretch when most men wrre coupling up is the anomaly for our species - the issue is then with the higher powers, not the bad, evil women

they are probably not dating *anyone.*

@Thisiswhyidrin1 @janecoaston Because it wouldn’t do anything. The fuckboy isn’t the one engaging in mass self delusion. He’s the symptom, not the disease. If you eliminated all of them, self deluded women would just go celibate. And social stature should never have been a culturally enforced mating criteria.

@wuzLeft4Bread @janecoaston Harems were few and far between too - how about taking issue with the local fuckboi who believes he is entitled to a roster his relative social stature wouldn't allow him in the past? What about humbling his hyper entitled behaviour powered by apps?

@EdwardJSofel @Triceratops235 @janecoaston Men haven’t changed. The primary cause of this is women feeling entitled to a highly attractive men because of the massive volume of attention they get on the apps. It’s a female problem.

@wuzLeft4Bread @Triceratops235 @janecoaston The primary cause of this is that men are fornicators who lack virtue.

@Thisiswhyidrin1 @janecoaston 1. Because men never changed. There have always been guys attractive enough to have harems. The problem is that apps convinced masses of women they’re all entitled to that guy. 2. The issue isn’t the aggregate, its the continued regression (doubling so far).

@wuzLeft4Bread @janecoaston 2. So 1/4 of men are sexless now, and that is a problem? I suggest you check the historic share of men who never reproduced. 1/4 is a very, very favorable setup, comparatively speaking

@EdwardJSofel @janecoaston Hypergamy IS aspirational. The only way the chart makes any sense is if it’s describing aspiration; 75% of young men still manage to get laid each year because women choose to settle for them.

@wuzLeft4Bread @janecoaston The author clearly seems to indicate a BREEDING pattern with this chart, not an ASPIRATIONAL pattern. If the chart is supposed to be aspirational, the word hypergamous is misplaced and the lack of indication that the lower echelon lines are only aspirational is misleading at best

@Triceratops235 @EdwardJSofel @janecoaston Any woman can get laid. Getting sex is not the arbiter of female sexual value. Value is measured by getting a man to devote his resources and effort to you alone. Even among rising sexlessness in the younger cohort, 87% of young women were able to get laid in the past year.

@wuzLeft4Bread @EdwardJSofel @janecoaston It sounds like they’re having a reasonably easy time getting laid. So whatever you want to say about their sense of attractiveness, it’s not “overinflated”

@janecoaston The issue is the behavioral outcome for women specifically. Women feel entitled and overshoot because of the mass attention they get on dating apps/IG and social consensus, so they get run through by hotter men who would never commit and end up wondering why no one wants to stay.

@wuzLeft4Bread and low status men think they deserve high status women. such as it ever was.

@Triceratops235 @EdwardJSofel @janecoaston 1. Women’s overinflated sense of attractiveness from dating apps/IG male attention ends with hating men for the endless cycle of getting used just for sex by more attractive men. 2. The counter reaction: 1/4 of the younger male cohort is sexless now, twice the rate of women.

@wuzLeft4Bread @EdwardJSofel @janecoaston Ok and? They don’t want to have sex with men they’re not attracted to. So they don’t. What’s not working?

@Thisiswhyidrin1 @janecoaston The problem is that 1. Women’s overinflated sense of attractiveness from app attention ends with hating men for the endless cycle of getting used for sex by more attractive men. 2. The counter reaction: 1/4 of the younger male cohort is sexless now, twice the rate of women.

@wuzLeft4Bread @janecoaston It seems that the problem is that while for men, as the saying goes, sex is like pizza - even the bad one is still good (or so they say, while exclusively chasing Stacy), for women it's good mate>being alone>suboptimal mate, and, idk, take it with God, Mother Nature or whatever

@Triceratops235 @EdwardJSofel @janecoaston That stops working when their sense of their own value is vastly overinflated by male attention on instagram and dating apps, so the only men they’re attracted to are guys that will just use them for sex and never commit.

@wuzLeft4Bread @EdwardJSofel @janecoaston What they want and think they deserve is to only have sex with men they’re attracted to. Thats an extremely reasonable expectation.

@cold_and_quiet The issue is that they think they have a chance to lock in a guy much more attractive than they can get bc they get tons of sexual attention on IG or dating apps and end up with an overinflated sense of their value to men. It’s hypergamy. Men get the opposite effect; loneliness.

@wuzLeft4Bread Okay but the issue isn’t hypergamy, it’s that they open their legs before they get a commitment

“Hypergamy” discussions are stupid. Everyone (male or female) wants the hottest, most desirable person they can get. If the issue is that women only care about looks and money then call them shallow, but also keep in mind that men are at least as shallow as women.