Arama Sonuçları: "#HowToGetFilthyRich"

20 sonuç
great ytee
great ytee@yteefx_accademy·
Gary Stevenson says rich people leaving the country is good as normal people can own their assets, stocks and shares. This economist is delusional #Howtogetfilthyrich
English
0
0
2
35
BookofAEGIS
BookofAEGIS@BookofAEGIS·
A thread well worth reading by @samuel_leeds @DanielPriestley @DanNeidle and anyone else who watched #HowToGetFilthyRich with Gary Stevenson (@garyseconomics).
BookofAEGIS@BookofAEGIS

THREAD🧵1/8 @garyseconomics signature policy is a 2% annual wealth tax above £10m. Here's the fucking funny part... The UK already spent 2 years and an army of economists, tax lawyers, HMRC officials and Treasury experts figuring out whether that idea actually works. What was their answer? "No." So either Gary never read the homework or he's hoping you never will.

English
0
0
0
245
Naail Ishaq
Naail Ishaq@naail_ishy·
#howtogetfilthyrich @Channel4 doc by @garyseconomics poses an economic and moral question. Should we tax billionaires properly? It’s been a troubling watch but hopefully more people see this, and push our government to answer yes!
English
0
0
0
47
BookofAEGIS
BookofAEGIS@BookofAEGIS·
Listening to Gary Stevenson (@garyseconomics) last night on his documentary (#HowToGetFilthyRich), trying to grift the audience with his whole schtick about "how a £20k deposit isn't enough to buy a home anymore" without explaining why, was brutal on the ears and the senses. So let me explain the housing situation in London. The same logic can be extrapolated across much of the country. London has around 3.85 million homes. London has around 9.1 million people, with the population growing by roughly 90,000 to 100,000 people a year on average. Since 2018, NET international migration has added roughly 800,000 to 1.1 million people. Now ask yourself: Did London build hundreds of thousands of additional homes at the same pace? Answer: No. Why? Because under current conditions, it isn't fucking realistically achievable. London has only ever come close to building around 90,000 homes a year once before and that was in the 1930s, under completely different economic, political and planning conditions. To build 100,000 homes a year now, London would need to complete roughly 1,923 homes every single week from foundation to finish. Yet, in recent years, London has only managed to deliver around 34,000 to 41,000 homes annually. If demand rises faster than supply, housing becomes scarcer. If housing becomes scarcer, prices & rents rise. This isn't ideology. It isn't left or right. It isn't fucking complicated despite what Gary fucking tells you. You CAN'T fucking increase demand year after year while restricting supply and expect affordability to improve when that level of demand was already impossible to meet. Economics doesn't negotiate with politics and maths doesn't give a shit who you fucking vote for. If more people were economically literate, they'd understand why we're in this position. Instead, too many people listen to Gary and buy into an economics and politics of envy that repeatedly rewards dreadful economic & social policy, then refuse to take any responsibility for the consequences of their choices.
English
1
0
2
481
David Murphy
David Murphy@D1Smurphy·
Lot of larpers getting angry about #HowToGetFilthyRich tonight eh? And such crossovers with the other things they get upset about too...
GIF
English
0
0
4
185
Nicky Lloyd-Young
Nicky Lloyd-Young@LloydNly1982·
The only suitable solution to reduce the wealth and poor devide is that the wealthy pay more tax. To help equalise. The system especially those who are extremely wealthy for brief while. There are too many people seeking Wealth which creates Greed. #HowToGetFilthyRich
Brent, London 🇬🇧 English
0
0
1
151