David

@RHHassall @RoryMaw @TerraOrBust x.com/terraorbust/st…

@RoryMaw @TerraOrBust OK. So just name ONE tangible benefit for me! Surely you can do that? And I do mean *tangible*!

Has anyone discovered any tangible benefits of Brexit yet? 🤔🤔

@RHHassall Here’s loads…

@Asascore @JoeleTax188567 @churchosaj @AEHALL1983 @GavinBarwell HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA None of it is online. Except for one excerpt of one of the 75, that I posted myself. The Bearly Politics posts gave up after 3 of the 75, as they kept having to admit I was right, and I posted my own rebuttal to every one they did. Why do you keep lying?

Blake Lively shockingly boasts about herself on Instagram, trying to now paint herself as a champion of issues with “digital violence” and sticking up for women who don’t have a voice. This comes after Lively used the courts to terrorize dozens of women online for criticizing her court case by demanding their private location and financial data, among other things. No threats to Lively were made from the critics who came forward after she subpoenaed our information. No violence occurred. Just pure disbelief from an incredibly entitled Hollywood star who couldn’t believe people weren’t fans of her. Lively tried to financially penalize and terrify 107 social media users across YouTube, TikTok, and X to the point that some anonymous content creators feared for their safety. All for the high crime of expressing negative opinions of her. Helpless women without the financial resources or legal knowledge to fight her were targeted for criticizing Blake Lively’s own recorded statements and actions. And the justice system offers no recourse for those of us whose privacy is threatened by wealthy elites who abuse the courts this way. Talk about digital abuse… Lively’s latest pivot is sickening.

@RainbowMdf @Millieruth13813 @Daily_MailUS No, it won't, because 10 of her 13 claims are dismissed.

@Millieruth13813 @Daily_MailUS

Read Blake Lively's five-page bragging letter about her 'immense' powers: 77 bullet points of pure cringe... as her own words backfire spectacularly in case against Justin Baldoni trib.al/QwClMyf

Now you’re just making things up. The EU does not negotiate gas prices as a block and has no influence on, say, the price of imported LNG. Nor does Norway, the biggest exporter of gas to EU countries, offer an EU block discount.

More gas coming into the UK from UK fields alters the supply picture, inevitably to the UK’s benefit, & anyone arguing otherwise is a fool or a liar.

Blake Lively is a LITERAL JOKE

@ZoeJardiniere x.com/v_j_freeman/st…

It is blowing my mind how many people don’t seem able to grasp that oil & gas in the North Sea is not “ours” but was sold off to private companies who will trade it on the international market like any other fuel. We don’t get any kind of privileged access to this fuel.

As someone with many years involvement in the physical movement of natural gas around Europe from field to end customer the ignorance in this post physically pains me.

That’s wrong. The Norwegian approach has very little in common with the UK nationalisation model and all profits are not ‘theirs’. Equinor (formerly Statoil) is 67% state owned, 33% private investors. Its shares are publicly traded on the Oslo and New York stock exchanges (since partial privatisation in 2001 — yes, privatisation!). The state receives dividends from its stake like any other shareholder. The Norwegian state also owns stakes (via shares) in oil and gas fields, pipelines and facilities on the Norwegian continental shelf through the State’s Direct Financial Interest (SDFI). This is state investment in the private sector. The SDFI participates in licenses as a commercial partner (paying costs and receiving revenues proportionally) and its net cash flow goes to the government (ultimately supporting the Government Pension Fund Global, or "Oil Fund"). The Norwegian government awards production licenses through competitive rounds open to multiple companies. Equinor and SDFI (via Petoro) often hold significant stakes in these licenses. But international oil companies (eg Shell, TotalEnergies, ConocoPhillips, BP) and other Norwegian or foreign firms participate as partners or operators. I made a documentary for the BBC way back in 1975 extolling the virtues of the Norwegian approach.

@Heccles94 Yes

Bombers leaving the UK to bomb Iran Did you consent to this?

None of this in any way shows the EU negotiating as a block and getting lower prices as a result. Establishing a trading platform is not the same as doing the trading. Others use the platform to do that. If the EU did what you claimed it would have negotiated a block discount with Norway, the EU’s biggest gas supplier. It hasn’t. Because it can’t.

I’ve read a lot of laughably disingenuous celebrity guff in my time, but this statement by Blake Lively takes the proverbial biscuit. She is destroying her brand with this ridiculous case, and is now reduced to playing the ‘I’m doing it for the world’s children!’ card. Pathetic.

@Asascore @JoeleTax188567 @churchosaj @AEHALL1983 @GavinBarwell So I actually agree that there are of course financial impacts to leaving. But here's the thing. The actual data shows that the impact of leaving is *less* than the current cost of membership. I can walk you though that if you need me to.

@Heccles94 You are a moron!

Billionaires do not create jobs. Stop saying it. Without billionaires, we would still build things, design things, teach things, sell things, buy things. Billionaires capitalise profits. That's it.

@CraigMurrayOrg You're confusing external self-determination, which applies only to overseas territories, with internal self-determination - the right to govern one's own affairs, which Scotland has. The UN’s list of Non-Self-Governing Territories does not include Scotland.

@2230Josh If that's what it self-determines, then it does.

Scots are a people with the inherent and inalienable right of self-determination under the UN Charter. We have a right to national Independence It is impossible to believe both that Scots have a right to self determination, and that Independence requires permission from London

Breaking: Three charged over antisemitic ambulance arson. Hamza Iqbal, 20, Rehan Khan, 19, and a 17-year-old dual British and Pakistani national.. all from East London, travelled to North London to carry out the attack. Now call it what it is - an Islamic terrorist attack.

@aliceking456141 @lewis_goodall @Channel4 Starmer has bombed Yemen.

@2230Josh @lewis_goodall @Channel4 I forgot Putin and the unknown leader of Iran .in fact all leaders who do not respect the right of all people to be able to lead free and happy lives without fear of being bombed.

A week since our documentary on the Keir Starmer premiership went out on @Channel4! Idea behind it is a simple one: how did Starmer go from winning one of the biggest landslides in political history, to quickly become one of our least popular prime ministers? What’s gone wrong? And how much of it is his fault? Or is there something deeper going on in British politics? A question of ungovernability which means we are destined to burn through prime ministers and governments? If you haven’t seen it yet, watch via link below 👇 channel4.com/programmes/kei…