WhatIsTheTruth

26.6K posts

WhatIsTheTruth

WhatIsTheTruth

@AM_PMDespatch

1215 Magna Carta takes supremacy in law. All acts & statutes must follow its meaning or are themselves unlawful. Peace & Unity not hate.

OX39 4HY เข้าร่วม Mart 2020
1.6K กำลังติดตาม848 ผู้ติดตาม
David
David@DavidMcGregorBN·
Working class people do not need more chaos from the likes of Farage and Badenoch. We need decent pay, secure housing, rights at work and public services that function. That’s why I’m Labour. And I’m far from the only one.
English
1.3K
201
854
41.6K
Phil Myers
Phil Myers@PhilMyers53·
Since Labour's victory July 2024, there's been an orchestrated right-wing smear campaign. The truth is Labour are doing a good job #FixingBritain Never mind the Bollocks #VoteLabour on May 7th
Phil Myers tweet media
English
1K
367
1K
21.7K
WhatIsTheTruth
WhatIsTheTruth@AM_PMDespatch·
@1984_Reb_Elle @JoshPhillipsPhD @Jklunden People that are suggesting this are of low IQ & easily brainwashed so have academic qualifications. Have been through the education system and indoctrinated with marxist ideology.
English
0
0
0
5
Joshua D Phillips
Joshua D Phillips@JoshPhillipsPhD·
The more I read this, the more I realize how it is utterly illiterate. How exactly do you decolonize someone’s birthplace? He lived there. No one came in and conquered his house. It’s just a house of a man that exists. These people are exhausting 🙄
Joshua D Phillips tweet media
English
2.6K
4.8K
27.5K
11.4M
WhatIsTheTruth รีทวีตแล้ว
The Yorkshire Lass
The Yorkshire Lass@real_shirelass·
Red Nose Day….a day for the elites and globalists to steal money from the little people, to fund their child sex trafficking operations and paedophilia, to fund human slavery, using donations to provide legal advice to illegal immigrants, and launder masses of amount of money through corrupt off shore accounts. Don’t give to the beast.
The Yorkshire Lass tweet media
English
119
776
2.1K
21.6K
WhatIsTheTruth
WhatIsTheTruth@AM_PMDespatch·
Amen!
Bishop Ceirion H. Dewar FSHC@BishopDewar

As a Bishop, I cannot stay silent. I have today drafted and sent an open letter to His Majesty King Charles III, the text of which reads as follows: To: His Majesty, Charles III, King of the United Kingdom and the Realms, Supreme Governor of the Church of England, Bearer of the ancient title Defender of the Faith. Your Majesty, I write to you neither as a politician nor as a commentator, but as one of your loyal subjects who, as a bishop of Christ’s Church, cannot remain silent while the Christian foundations of this kingdom are steadily dismantled. Sir, there are moments in the life of a nation when silence becomes a form of betrayal. If I refused to speak to Your Majesty now, this would be such a moment. For more than a thousand years the Crown of this realm has stood in solemn covenant with the Christian faith. The laws of this land were shaped by it. The liberties of our people were nurtured by it. The conscience of our civilisation was formed by it. From the abbeys of medieval England to the parish churches of our villages, from the preaching of the Reformers to the missionary zeal that carried the Gospel to the ends of the earth, the Christian faith has not merely influenced Britain — it has defined her. Yet today that inheritance is being quietly but deliberately eroded. Across the institutions of this nation there is a growing hostility toward the faith that built them. Christian belief is mocked in the public square. Christian morality is dismissed as intolerance. Christian institutions are pressured to surrender doctrine in order to conform to the ideology of the age. Within the very Church that bears the name of England, voices have arisen that appear more eager to mirror the spirit of the age than to proclaim the eternal truth of the Gospel. Meanwhile, beyond the walls of our churches, powerful political movements openly speak of removing Christianity from its historic place within the life of this nation. What would once have been whispered is now proclaimed openly: that Britain must become a post-Christian state. It is in this context that I write to you, Your Majesty. For the British Crown does not stand apart from this crisis. The Sovereign of this realm bears a title that is not merely historic but sacred in its origin and meaning: Defender of the Faith. Those words are not decorative. They are a charge. They speak of a monarch whose duty is not merely to preside over the ceremonies of the Church, but to stand as a guardian of the Christian inheritance of the nation. Yet many among your subjects now ask, with increasing anxiety: “Who will defend that inheritance today?” They see a nation drifting from its foundations. And they ask whether the Crown will remain silent while that inheritance is dismantled. Your Majesty, may I be so bold as to observe that your coronation oath was not a poetic formality. It was a solemn vow made before Almighty God to maintain and preserve the Protestant Reformed Religion established by law. Those words bind the conscience of the sovereign. They remind the Crown that its authority is not merely constitutional but moral. The monarch is not merely a symbol of national continuity, but a custodian of the spiritual inheritance that shaped this realm. History records moments when kings and emperors were confronted by the Church and reminded that their authority was accountable before God. In the fourth century Ambrose of Milan stood before the Emperor Theodosius I and reminded him that even the ruler of an empire must bow before the moral law of Christ. That tradition of prophetic witness has never disappeared. Nor should it. For when rulers forget the foundations upon which their authority rests, the Church must speak — not with hostility, but with holy clarity. And so, I write to say this, Your Majesty: The Christian character of this nation is under profound and accelerating assault. If the Crown does not stand visibly and courageously in defence of that inheritance, history will record that the guardians of Britain’s institutions watched in silence as the foundations were removed. The issue before us is not nostalgia. It is civilisation. Remove Christianity from the story of Britain and you do not create a neutral society — you create a moral vacuum. And history teaches us that moral vacuums are never left empty for long. Your Majesty now stands at a crossroads that few monarchs in modern history have faced. For the erosion of Britain’s Christian inheritance will not ultimately be judged by speeches made in Parliament or debates in the press. It will be judged by whether those entrusted with the guardianship of our ancient institutions chose to defend them — or merely preside over their quiet surrender. You may preside over the quiet dissolution of Britain’s Christian identity. Or you may rise to the ancient responsibility entrusted to the Crown and speak with clarity about the faith that built this kingdom. The first path requires little courage. The second will require a great deal. But it is the path that history honours. Your Majesty’s subjects are not asking for religious coercion. They are asking for leadership. They are asking that the sovereign who bears the title Defender of the Faith remember what that title means. They are asking that the Crown hear the growing cry of anguish from Christians across this land who feel that the spiritual inheritance of their nation is being surrendered without resistance. And they are asking whether the Crown will stand with them. For the faith that shaped Britain is not merely a cultural ornament. It is the wellspring from which our laws, our liberties, and our moral imagination have flowed. If it is cast aside, the nation will discover — too late — that it has severed itself from the very roots that sustained it. Your Majesty, to many the Crown is a symbol of authority. But before God it is also a symbol of stewardship. And stewardship carries with it the duty to defend what has been entrusted. May Almighty God grant Your Majesty the wisdom to discern this hour, and the courage to fulfil the sacred duty entrusted to the Crown. Yours faithfully, Bishop Ceirion H. Dewar FSHC Missionary Bishop Diocese of Providence Confessing Anglican Church @PhilHs10 @RevBrettMurphy @revwickland @BishopRobert1 @GBNews @TalkTV @danwootton @Jacob_Rees_Mogg @LozzaFox @BackBrexitBen @RupertLowe10 @KemiBadenoch @JohnCleese

English
0
0
0
3
EarthDetective
EarthDetective@EarthDetect·
@AwakenedOf Is there no part of life that Labour does not want to control?
English
3
2
12
963
Clare Wills Harrison
Clare Wills Harrison@AwakenedOf·
I warmed months ago that the Govt were coming for private pension pots. It's all going to be done by Henry VIII powers in the pension reforms bill Can't tell you how many times I've warned about these powers too thisismoney.co.uk/money/pensions…
Clare Wills Harrison tweet media
English
52
450
758
27.4K
WhatIsTheTruth
WhatIsTheTruth@AM_PMDespatch·
@Arron_banks Only if its within the next few mths? Farage is Tory 2.0. He'll probably do a deal with tories again?
English
0
0
0
1
Arron Banks
Arron Banks@Arron_banks·
Every last person supporting Rupert & Ben will vote Reform in a general election. First past the post dictates it’s Reform vs Labour. Pick your horse 🐎
PoliticsHome@politicshome

Are new right-wing parties a headache for Farage? @ProfTimBale said that Restore Britain and Advance UK are currently "gnats, not mosquitoes" But he added that Reform may be tempted to shift to more hardline positions, which would risk damaging its overall electoral appeal writes @matilda__martin politicshome.com/news/article/a…

English
612
137
638
42.2K
Union Jack
Union Jack@shiningfourth·
Rupert Lowe fell out with Reform for one reason only, because he wanted to be leader, and they wouldn’t let him, so like any entitled toff, who doesn’t like to be told no, he threw his toys out of the pram and refused to play anymore. Fact.
Union Jack tweet media
English
930
170
847
108.3K
WhatIsTheTruth รีทวีตแล้ว
Ana Flavia RVJ
Ana Flavia RVJ@anaflaviarvj·
@triffic_stuff_ Join the growing Restore Britain movement ,follow and I’ll follow back.
Ana Flavia RVJ tweet media
English
0
1
6
47
WhatIsTheTruth รีทวีตแล้ว
David Stanley
David Stanley@davidericstan·
@triffic_stuff_ Normal now in our state run Police force it seems
David Stanley tweet media
English
2
4
14
360
WhatIsTheTruth รีทวีตแล้ว
7.283
7.283@SpatialPhysics·
Here's an image of the guy she killed: I'm all about self-defense, but the details of this case don't support that. Don't believe every teary eyed tale you hear - here's what actually happened. She was convicted by a jury of murder for a reason. When she stabbed the knife in his heart, he wasn’t attacking her, wasn’t assaulting her – they were simply arguing. The assault happened earlier and the friends intervened and stopped it. The way it went down: first, she was complaining about the speed the guy was driving, (they were seeing each other) and two other friends were present and witnessed everything. She got out of the car and slammed the door. He followed, grabbed her by the throat and forced her on her knees – the friends then intervened. That’s what is agreed was the sexual assault. No dicks came out, no cloths off, just the guy being a colossal douche. The physical part of the event was over, and she got back into the back of the car with him, where they proceeded to argue. It was during that argument, she pulled out the knife (she enjoyed bring with her to all her social events) and plunged it into his heart out of anger – not fear. That’s the difference. That’s why the bitch is now in prison. The two that were in the car, described everything to the jury. Her PTSD defense fell apart when they examined facebook messages from the time, meaning she exaggerated details on her previous assault. She lied about what happened, pretended she forgot the knife was in her hand – everything points to her just being a crazy attention seeking bitch. Maybe she’s this innocent thing, caught up in the miscarriage of justice: I wouldn’t put money on it. Was he a douche? Yeah. But she choose to get back into the car, continue to argue and then murder his ass.
7.283 tweet media
English
145
92
1.4K
78.7K
WhatIsTheTruth รีทวีตแล้ว
Lozzy B 🇦🇺𝕏
Lozzy B 🇦🇺𝕏@TruthFairy131·
🔥 BREAKING 🔥 A woman in the UK who stabbed a man to death as he sexually assaulted her has lost an appeal against her 17-year jail term. Martyna Ogonowska was handed almost a life sentence aged 18 after being convicted of the 2018 ‘murder’ of Filip Jaskiewicz, 23, in a Peterborough car park for using a knife she said she carried for self protection to DEFEND herself. Ogonowska had already suffered PTSD as a result of having been raped in 2015 when she was 14. Her rapist was not prosecuted and the judge said that the intercourse was consensual, despite her age. She was 14 YEARS OLD 😡 WHERE IS THE PUBLIC OUTRAGE? WHERE ARE THE PROTESTS? 17 years in jail for defending herself. The UK is basically saying, you cannot defend yourself against predators. Why isn’t anyone defending this woman? This could be your daughter, sister, wife or mother. Sick, twisted & deranged. Wake TF Up 🤨
Lozzy B 🇦🇺𝕏 tweet media
English
2.1K
11.2K
31.3K
890.4K
Joe Rich
Joe Rich@joerichlaw·
BREAKING: After much speculation, and an absence of any mention of anything like the controversial policy in its manifesto, Labour finally admits that it is opening the door to ‘Stalinist’ 15-minute cities across Britain (via @Telegraph) telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/01/2…
English
42
363
520
11.8K
Anas Huggan
Anas Huggan@huggan_anas·
Just a message to the unregistered Restore Britain supporters. Rupert Lowe was in a private meeting with Kemi Bedenoch and Boris Johnson. 👍🏽 Vote Reform or be scammed by Rupert, up to you really. ➡️
English
203
64
225
13.9K
DadDancer
DadDancer@DancerDad·
@AM_PMDespatch @shiningfourth Lowe threw Reform under a bus. There was no other option but to get rid of this person with delusions of grandeur
English
1
0
0
17