Akuto ☦️

678 posts

Akuto ☦️ banner
Akuto ☦️

Akuto ☦️

@AkutoOrthodox

“God became man so that man might become god” - St. Athanasius the Apostolic

เข้าร่วม Şubat 2025
11 กำลังติดตาม27 ผู้ติดตาม
Cailey
Cailey@TheCaileyApoth·
ZXX
9
4
27
684
Akuto ☦️ รีทวีตแล้ว
John
John@John_markos_·
I'm ashamed that I forgot to post but yesterday was the feast of a great defender of Orthodoxy:
John tweet media
English
0
8
55
779
Akuto ☦️ รีทวีตแล้ว
Mar Damascene ☦️🥀
Mar Damascene ☦️🥀@ruckusofantioch·
Anathema! Sources: - council of Carthage - the Rudder by St. Nikodemos - Council of orange II - Jerusalem 1672
Mar Damascene ☦️🥀 tweet mediaMar Damascene ☦️🥀 tweet mediaMar Damascene ☦️🥀 tweet mediaMar Damascene ☦️🥀 tweet media
@

@Dimitrios1881 @Mattza1 Nobody inherits guilt or sin. Not possible. If my parents were thieves would I inherit the sin of theft? Of course not. Do I deserve punishment based on their crimes? Of course not. Am I a Thief by nature in virtue of them being thieves? Of course not.

English
5
5
33
1.3K
Akuto ☦️ รีทวีตแล้ว
Dmitry
Dmitry@dmitryprosper·
@Philip_Goff Christ Jesus was punished for our sins.
Dmitry tweet media
English
0
6
43
3.1K
MMA On Point
MMA On Point@mmaonpoint·
Renato Moicano had Joe Rogan thinking he dropped Islam Makhachev😅
English
29
21
3K
370.1K
Akuto ☦️ รีทวีตแล้ว
Dmitry
Dmitry@dmitryprosper·
‘The Cross of Christ was mysteriously proclaimed in advance and foreshadowed from generations of old and no one was ever reconciled with God except by the power of the Cross. After our First Parents transgressed against God through the tree in paradise, sin came to life, but we died, submitting, even before physical death, to the death of the soul, its separation from God. After the transgression we lived in sin and according to the flesh. Sin “..is not subject to the law of God, neither can [it] be. And they who are in the flesh, cannot please God.”(Rom. 8:7-8)’ –St. Gregory (Palamas), Sermon XI.1
Dmitry tweet media
English
1
16
58
2.7K
Akuto ☦️ รีทวีตแล้ว
Dmitry
Dmitry@dmitryprosper·
‘Another saint [Benedict of Nursia], one of the most perfect, saw the whole universe contained in a single ray of this intelligible sun—even though he himself did not see this light as it is in itself, in its full extent, but only to that extent that he was capable of receiving it. By this contemplation and by his supra-intelligible union with this light, he did not learn what it is by nature, but he learnt that it really exists, is supernatural and superessential, different from all things; that its being is absolute and unique, and that it mysteriously comprehends all in itself. This vision of the Infinite cannot permanently belong to any individual or to all men.’ –St. Gregory (Palamas), Triads, 1.3.22
Dmitry tweet media
English
1
22
76
2.1K
Akuto ☦️ รีทวีตแล้ว
Dmitry
Dmitry@dmitryprosper·
St. Gregory Palamas’ explicit affirmation that the effects/manifestations of the divine energy are created: ‘Unlike the nonsensical opinions of Akindynos, the energy of God is not and is not referred to by orthodox thinkers in terms of God's creations (Perish such a heresy!); rather, the effects of the divine energy are creatures. For if the energy is in the category of creatures or if these are uncreated (What madness!) in that they exist before they have been created or before creatures (What impiety!), God would not have an energy. But indeed he is eternally active and all-powerful—it is certainly not the energy of God, but its products and effects, however they might be named, which are creatures. God's energy is uncreated and coeternal with God, according to the theologians.’ –St. Gregory (Palamas), 150 Chapters, Ch. 140
Dmitry tweet media
English
2
9
47
1.6K
Akuto ☦️ รีทวีตแล้ว
Apophatic ☦️
Apophatic ☦️@apophatic_·
The Palamite Synods clearly teach that the manifestation of the divine energies within creation are created effects of the uncreated energy. It is evident that anybody claiming otherwise has not read Dr. Tikhon Pino's book. @Fearless__Truth
Apophatic ☦️ tweet media
English
18
8
41
3.9K
Akuto ☦️
Akuto ☦️@AkutoOrthodox·
@HunterHooten You’re not refuting a doctrine The Church teaches that Christ is a propitiation for our sins and offered Himself sacrificially so you’re just contradicting the Fathers.
English
0
0
5
58
Hunter Hooten
Hunter Hooten@HunterHooten·
Orthodox Christians who push PSA are just converts who couldn’t rewire their brain from their previous heresies.
English
15
0
6
1.7K
Akuto ☦️ รีทวีตแล้ว
John
John@John_markos_·
Here's Palamas refuting this garbage polemic for you. We all know that you got the Palamas quotes out of a quote mine, because not a single person who's ever read him has ever thought he believed in created energies or uncreated manifestations.
John tweet mediaJohn tweet mediaJohn tweet media
English
3
4
37
2.5K
Akuto ☦️ รีทวีตแล้ว
übe
übe@stpetermogila·
St. Augustine, infants do not have the personal sin of Adam.
übe tweet media
English
1
12
66
1.4K
Akuto ☦️ รีทวีตแล้ว
Dmitry
Dmitry@dmitryprosper·
‘“In the birth of children: in pain you will bear children.” Experience shows that the pains of childbirth are divided between those who give birth and those who are born. But this division would be unjust if the latter were not, like the former, guilty (виновны). To reconcile this kind of punishment with God's justice, it is necessary to acknowledge, on one hand, the suffering of parents is manifested in their children, and on the other, the sinful corruption of children is manifested in their parents.’ –St. Philaret (Drozdov), Interpretation of Genesis 3:14-19
Dmitry tweet media
English
2
6
24
817
prince ! ☆ ♡
prince ! ☆ ♡@princeisrevenge·
lol jwe owner hate's muslims
prince ! ☆ ♡ tweet media
English
5
5
8
975
LuchiW
LuchiW@luchisignature2·
fed owners i beg stop hosting ec's with no teaming rules because there are some people in the matches who arent friends with all the cornballs :)
English
1
0
0
46