Andronikus

@mannydhill44548 @Polymarket I also get scammed for 2k$ my friend. I hope they will do the right thing.

I was scammed by @Polymarket for $42,697.31 USDC with shares over 800K for the question - Will MicroStrategy sells any Bitcoin by May 31? I bet on "Yes". The description the question included originally below: "This market will resolve to "Yes" if MicroStrategy sells any of its Bitcoin by 11:59 PM ET on the date specified in the title. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No". The primary resolution source for this market will be information from MSTR and on-chain data, however a consensus of credible reporting will also be used". MicroStrategy did indeed sell Bitcoin between May 26 to May 31 based on Sec 8K filing reported on June 1 and on-chain data. On June 1 at 1PM ET, @Polymarket made a rule change that included the following: "No information from MSTR, on-chain data, or consensus of credible reporting confirmed that MicroStrategy sold Bitcoin within the market's timeframe. Confirmation achieved outside of the market's time frame does not qualify". The rule change completely resulted in "No" answer and changed the original interpretation that I had used. UMA oracle voters decided with "No" answer based on the rule change made by @Polymarket on June 1 at 1P.M. ET. This is completely unfair practice by @Polymarket . This has resulted in many other traders' losses as well. I hope @Polymarket do the right thing and atleast refund "Yes" traders on this market. Thank you very much.

@avi_eisen I bet u r from India

@Androkius Three dumb

Those who bought Yes contracts knowing polymarket had already clarified it for No could theoretically be declared mentally ill and involuntarily committed under US law

@Nik_Poly Polymarket scammed the users and u are a scammer like them. fu

This market just resolved to NO.❌ Friendly reminder to unfollow all the people on X telling you YES shares had even a slight chance. These guys were basically donating money right into other people's pockets.🤦‍♂️ If you lost money on this, you still have a lot to learn🧠

@PositionsFi It should be YES. POLYMARKET SCAMMED THE OWN USERS AND ALTERATE THE REALITY. Just stfu man

Today is a good day to unfollow anyone who convinced you to ape into YES.

@0x_exit Polymarket scammed me aswell for 2k

trader on Polymarket lost $96k on a single trade someone dropped ~$96k into YES on the MicroStrategy market in the final hours — when it was already pricing NO at 99%. not an insider. an insider bets the winning side. this guy bet the side that lost. so why pour six figures into a near-dead position at the buzzer? he was betting the dispute would flip. they didn't. market closed NO. $96k gone

@willo2_Poly I also get scammed by them. Lost 2k

FYI: I fully intend to get paid out from my bet on Polymarket. I bet $500K that Microstrategy had sold Bitcoin before May 31st. In fact, they did. And there's no world in which you can argue that they didn't. Where's the money Shayne?

@arkham Polymarket scammed everyone few hours ago. That it is not fair, at all.

It appears that an Arca-connected wallet lost $100K on Polymarket this morning. This Polymarket wallet received deposits from, and is signed by, an Arca wallet. It spent $100K on YES for the “Did Microstrategy Sell BTC By May 31st” market at an average price of 0.5c. The market expired to 0.

@glxyresearch So in the end polyscam scammed u aswell?

Disclosure: Galaxy Digital holds a financial interest in YES shares in this market (and routinely hedges prediction market positions). Full disclosure is in the report.

FIVE HOURS LEFT 🕔 @polymarket traders are livid over a proposal to resolve "no" on "@Strategy sells any BTC by May 31" even though $MSTR did sell $BTC in May. Final decision expected by 8pm ET. @wowens covered the dispute in a new report to our clients & counterparties.

@farazktwt Yes bro. Buy some yes and enjoy the ride. Do not sleep

A rumoured Polymarket insider just bought 20M shares for "Yes" Wallet address - 0x59aed45d6b8c0a4fc67af69a371007b3cceb22d5 What does he know? It's 3 am here - should I stay awake to watch the resolution? #Polymarket #PredictionMarkets #BTC #MicroStrategy

FOR THIS SITUATION The fair resolution should be YES. The market question is not “ polymarket.com/event/microstr… ” The question is whether MicroStrategy sells any Bitcoin by May 31, 2026, 11 :59 PM ET. Strategy’s own filing confirmed that it sold 32 BTC between May 26 and May 31, 2026. That means the sale occurred inside the market’s timeframe. The fact that the filing became public on June 1 does not change the actual event date. ⚠️⚠️ If Polymarket wanted this market to require confirmation before the deadline, the rule needed to say that clearly. It did not. The rule says “sells,” not “announces,” “discloses,” or “is confirmed before the deadline.” ⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️ There is also precedent. In the Khamenei “out as Supreme Leader by March 31” market, the resolution depended on whether the event occurred within the market timeframe, not simply whether every piece of confirmation was available before the deadline. That market went through disputes and still finalized YES. ⚠️⚠️⚠️ Applying a different standard here creates an unfair double standard. A later disclosure can still prove that the underlying event happened before the deadline. ⚠️⚠️⚠️ Otherwise, Polymarket is changing the question after the fact from “Did the event happen?” to “Was the event confirmed before the deadline?” The evidence is clear: Strategy sold Bitcoin between May 26 and May 31. Therefore, under the plain wording of the market, the correct outcome is YES.

We scammed our users. Here’s how:

Polymarket caught is 4K 📷 lmao Pay @willo2_Poly his damn $500,000 @Polymarket @PolymarketMoney

I have now sent the Polymarket evidence brief by email to: @CoinDesk @dlnews @CryptoSlate @FT @washingtonpost If you care about fair markets, please like, repost, and comment so more people can see this. If any journalist, editor, crypto researcher, legal analyst, or media friend is willing to review the evidence and write about this publicly, I would be deeply grateful. This should not fade away quietly. Too many users trusted the written rules. Too many people are now being ignored. We have to keep pushing. We have to fight this to the end. Rule before trade.

If Polymarket is forced to reverse this decision, these holders would receive over $40.6 MILLION collectively

why i think MicroStrategy sells any Bitcoin by May 31 should resolve YES. if the market hasn't resolved yet i believe the fair outcome is YES. anyone who actively uses prediction markets knows that many markets have a delay of several days to confirm information about an event after the deadline. that's just how it works. what raises more questions is the new rule that appeared after the fact: confirmation achieved outside of the market's time frame does not qualify. in my opinion the fair resolution is YES and polymarket should acknowledge the mistake. the alternative legitimizes adding rules after the market outcome. that destroys trust. YES went from 0.1 to 1.2 in the last few hours. that's a 12x.

I think im done with polymarket forever if this doesnt resolve to YES

#Polymarket faces #SCAM accusations over a $118M bet on whether #Strategy sold #BTC by May 31. Users claim the firm did sell, but Polymarket shifted rule interpretations post-closure and settled it as "No." Critics say traders lost #hundreds of thousands while Polymarket bagged $100k in fees. #MarketUpdate #StockMarket #trading #USA #stocks #Bullish #bearish #TRUMP $Trump #America #DonaldTrump #rates #GlobalTrade #altcoin #altcoins #altseason #coin #coins #token #cryptocurrency #UnitedStates #Bitcoin $BTC #POLY #MSTR $MSTR #HODL

you can’t change the rules after the game ends. apparently you can on Polymarket. the market was called “MicroStrategy sells any Bitcoin by May 31.” not “discloses a sale by May 31.” not “files an 8-K confirming a sale by May 31.” just “sells.” if the resolution standard is based on publicly available evidence before the deadline, fine. but then the market title needs to say that. ordinary users read “sells” as an event, not a disclosure event. those are two different things. the ambiguity wasn’t created by the traders. it was created by the wording. and then on June 1, after the deadline, Polymarket added a new rule: “confirmation achieved outside of the market’s time frame does not qualify.” you can’t add rules after the deadline has passed and the outcome is already in dispute. that’s not clarification. that’s rewriting the contract after the fact in your favor. you can defend the resolution all day. but you can’t defend adding rules after the deadline.

this is why prediction markets are worthless truth is up to some arbiter, who also has a conflict of interest