B1ackWo1f

Whatever ones views are on Witchcraft, Religion or Sex and Gender this series has a GREAT DEAL to offer. There doesn't HAVE to be Winners and thus Losers. Solutions CAN be found that are workable for both! But ONLY if we talk to, not at, each other! open.spotify.com/episode/0uMAxX…

The Bank of England DELIBERATELY FIXED the fake "public vote" to remove ALL historical figures from bank notes & replace them with nature images Freedom of Information requests by the Telegraph reveal the decision to remove historical figures was based on a "focus group" of a mere 119 people The Bank LIED because it previously claimed the decision was based on a "public vote". In truth, however, even this vote was FIXED. Instead of having HISTORY v NATURE, the bank deliberately split the "history" category into 3 sections: historical events, historical figures, architecture & landmarks. That was the only way that "nature" could win. However, of course bank notes always combine at least two of those history categories. For example: Churchill & Parliament or Wellington & Waterloo. The Bank's actions are indefensible and questions should be asked in the House. The Bank of England has clearly been captured by progressive woke ideology. A visit to the Bank of England with its permanent exhibition on slavery makes that clear This is part of the wider war on British history. It's an attempt to create a NEW BRITAIN, based on ridiculous myths that "Diversity Built Britain" and that Britain has always been multicultural. Remember: the Bank of England issued a 50p coin (held aloft by Rishi Sunak) which was imprinted with the nonsensical statement: "Diversity Built Britain" Anyone who lived behind the Iron Curtain will find all of this eerily and scarily familiar. The pulling down of statues, the renaming of streets and schools, the rewriting of history, denigrating heroes, changing bank notes etc....these were all tactics of the communists. Severing the connection between a people and their history is the best way to demoralise a society and prepare them for the imposition of new myths. Me on @GBNews:

To the Black people coming after me for not standing with Karmelo Anthony: I don’t have to support him just because he’s Black. I don’t owe him allegiance. I don’t owe him loyalty. I don’t owe him silence. A kid is dead. A family is destroyed. And yes, that child happened to be white. Too many of you are only defending Karmelo because he is Black. If the races were reversed, a lot of you would be screaming from the rooftops and demanding justice every single day. So miss me with the fake outrage. Being Black does not mean I have to defend every Black person accused of doing something evil. Being Black does not mean I have to ignore right and wrong. Being Black does not mean I have to celebrate or excuse the death of a child. I stand on morals, not skin color. You can be mad at me all you want, but I will never support turning a dead child into a race war just because the accused is Black and the victim was white. Wrong is wrong. And I said what I said.

“A culture that repeatedly devalues men should not be surprised when so many struggle to find purpose, confidence and direction.” So happy to see more women standing up and speaking out. Yes! From @russell_nm, columnist for USA Today: “Much of our culture—especially the left—has sent the message that masculinity is inherently old-fashioned, predatory and unnecessary. Now, amid mounting evidence that men are declining in education, work and mental health, many of those same voices seem puzzled by a crisis of their own making.”

I just watched Hasan Piker interviewed on @LBC and you can see why he was banned from the UK. Here he claims that Hamas didn’t intend to murder Jews on October 7. He even excuses the massacre as merely making the “occupation as costly as possible”. Despicable man.

@VitoComedy Do you think that there is a difference between eliminating a condition and executing a person in order to do it?

Correct. If humanity is to continue advancing, eugenics is necessary. We gain nothing from pretending there is some meaningful societal value to producing dependants of the state.

The current reality we are living in is extreme. None of this is normal. Yet, those of us who advocate for a return to normality by reversing decades of self-destructive policies are the ones labelled as ‘extreme’. The system is deliberately designed to work against us.

@OtakuEspiritu Hate to shatter your world view but that's not a flaw that only some on the right have!

I’ve noticed a LOT of VTubers and content creators who covered the Stellar Blade drama and called out the left and the “woke media” over it. But they left out a select person’s take on it all. This shows how spineless some of you are, and how you’re only calling it out because of who said it, not because of what was said. This shows how fake, yet again, some of you are on the right.

@LBC And he is right. But they don't care because that's NOT the real reason they are doing it!

'It's like taking booze from a raging alcoholic!' Matthew Wright hears from caller Steve, who is skeptical about a social media ban for under-16s.

@mikegalsworthy When its raining pointing to individuals (Farage, Musk, Vance, Trump etc) as the REASON why everybody is wet is dumb af and will fix nothing! Fix the rain NOT the people getting pissed off about it! We do have a 'Climate Crisis' just not the one we keep hearing about!

It really wasn’t. It was an outright abuse of Henry’s father’s wishes. And the US government is hardly in a place to reprimand the UK on police brutality, racism or error.

@zatzi Cognitive Dissonance at its strongest!

Lammy is so two tier himself he can’t see the step. Took the knee for an American criminal. Won’t take the knee for an innocent Brit. It’s clear where his priorities are. Same for the rest of this government. Their bias blinds them to the stark reality.

@NJ_Timothy The idea that something like 'crime' SHOULD be equally distributed across ANY demographic is SOOO incredibly stupid it should disqualify anybody that believes it from office!!!

Lammy justifies the police treating people differently on the basis of race. He says minorities are disproportionately in the justice system. This is how the scandal of the police response to Henry Novak’s murder happened. It’s completely wrong.

I was not being patronizing! It is genuinely baffling that a person does not understand that we have NO way of knowing that had we done 'X' thing a situation would have been eve better or worse! How in the would one track a metric like 'shame' like that! And of course Blocks me!

@cultured_spice And? Without some sort of machine enabling us to travel to alternate dimension it is impossible to know alternate outcomes. Like had we done 'X' would the outcome have been worse or better. You seem smart Rosie so I'm confused as to why u r even arguing about this!

@B1ackW01f We have abortion statistics from since before abortion was legalised.

Accusing people of being selfish, murderers or engaging in eugenics is NOT going to stop people from terminating pregnancies they no longer want due to disabilities like Down’s Syndrome. All this wailing and gnashing of teeth is utterly pointless.

You're arguing against a position that many people aren't actually making. Nobody has proved that Henry died because officers were "anti-white". Equally, you cannot simply dismiss concerns about institutional culture. Hampshire's own Race Action Plan commits the force to being "anti-racist in all it does", to understanding the historical experience of ethnic minorities and to improving outcomes for them. Similar policies exist across policing nationally. That does not mean every officer is biased. It does mean there are organisational priorities that may influence decision-making. And asking whether those priorities contributed to a situation where an allegation of racism appeared to receive immediate attention while a badly injured man was handcuffed is a perfectly legitimate question. As for demanding statistical proof already, these policies are relatively new. Institutional culture often takes years to produce measurable effects. The absence of long-term data is not evidence that no effect exists.

@Dplanet Stats can be VERY misleading and are often presented as such! They have become a weapon more than a tool!

🚨🇬🇧 My fellow white people all over the world. We are not oppressed because of our race. When we pretend we are, we look like idiots. The evidence on policing shows the opposite. Stop and search. Use of force. The Lammy Review. Macpherson. The disparities are documented, and they don’t show anti-white bias. The training that followed didn’t turn the police into an anti-white militia. That’s a story, not a fact. Here’s what is a fact. The police failed Henry. He told them he’d been stabbed. An officer said “I don’t think so, mate.” He died. Procedure wasn’t followed. That failure is real and it deserves answers. It had nothing to do with his race, or yours. Anyone telling you Henry died because the police have become anti-white is selling you something. Farage. Lowe. Braverman. Robinson. They need you angry, irrational, and not looking at the data - because persecution is the product. It keeps them relevant. They have no solution to a single real problem this country faces. Henry deserved better than to die. He also deserves better than to be turned into a false persecution narrative, or a culture war martyr - his own grieving father explicitly warned against this.

@Dplanet What do you believe the term "Be less White" means and why that came about?

@Samsuccess_4 But that IS the debate right? If being able to end the life of another should even be a 'choice' in the first place!

The truth is "it's okay to birth a down syndrome child if you do not want the choice to abort and that's totally fine" But it's also fine for someone else to make the opposite choice In this case, it's bigger than right or wrong, it's bigger than black or white, it's a choice of preparedness, of responsibility, of provision, of pausing your life forever It's bigger than right or wrong, it's not a debate please

@KayBurley @bbclaurak When its raining pointing to individuals (Farage, Musk, Vance, Trump etc) as the REASON why everybody is wet is dumb af and will fix nothing! Fix the rain NOT the people getting pissed off about it! We do have a 'Climate Crisis' just not the one we keep hearing about!

Two tier policing and a VP who doesn’t understand the topic… What matters now is Henry Nowak’s parents My thoughts @bbclaurak this morning.

Further to what I wrote in this piece Trevor Phillips has since made two really excellent points: 1. Starmer’s comments about George Floyd were made even BEFORE the trial had taken place. This is fascinating - by comparison JD Vance waited until after the the conviction and sentencing. Should Starmer - the lawyer and Mr Proper Process - not have known better than to risk prejudicing the George Floyd/Derek Chauvin trial? 2. Lammy used THE VERY SAME WORDS as Vance - defending “righteous anger” - in commenting on George Floyd. And yet Lammy and co have the audacity to hypocritically criticise Vance for daring to give this opinion spectator.com/article/j-d-va…

@JonathanPieNews That would require his cognitive dissonance to get out of the way Jonathan!

Even taking into account JD Vance's habit of political shit-stirring in the UK, it's not possible to convincingly deny the double-standards on display here. I'd have more respect for David Lammy if he'd dropped the act and said: "Yeah fair enough, we really fucked this one up."