Gnome Chomsky

139 posts

Gnome Chomsky

Gnome Chomsky

@BillyBlockforge

เข้าร่วม Ekim 2024
496 กำลังติดตาม63 ผู้ติดตาม
BitcoinSapiens ⚡️
BitcoinSapiens ⚡️@BitcoinSapiens·
If Bitcoin follows silver, we top at $400,000 BTC in 2026.
BitcoinSapiens ⚡️ tweet media
English
21
39
215
6.8K
Gnome Chomsky
Gnome Chomsky@BillyBlockforge·
@GaryLeland It is indeed. Wild to see an authentic rai stone denomited in french francs
English
1
0
2
22
Gnome Chomsky
Gnome Chomsky@BillyBlockforge·
@jsblokland I was thinking robots when i thought of China, but then who are the robots producing for
English
2
0
1
412
jeroen blokland
jeroen blokland@jsblokland·
Whenever I post something suggesting that the Chinese economy is not much different from other (aging) economies, a lot of people feel the need to explain to me that China is super productive and is a true growth miracle. The straightforward reality is that China is not super productive nor a GDP growth wonder. China’s population is aging and shrinking like no other. In the coming decades, the Chinese population will shrink by hundreds of millions. More importantly, so will China’s labor force, meaning China's primary source of GDP growth is outright negative. Connecting the dots: China’s debt accumulation is way above that of the United States and other aging countries, while its money supply has exploded. With a total unrealistic GDP growth target of 5% per year, China is a debt economy on steroids. And since debt and money supply are increasingly the same, China’s extraordinary money supply growth is easily explained. No productivity boom, no miracle. Final piece of the puzzle. This is why China has no alternative but to keep buying unprecedented amounts of gold if it wants a shot at ditching US dollar hegemony.
jeroen blokland tweet mediajeroen blokland tweet media
English
95
216
1.1K
227.7K
wschooi
wschooi@wschooi·
Badminton new scoring system approved by members. To be fully implemented in 2027
wschooi tweet media
English
18
136
448
165.5K
El Buffalo🦬 ∞/21M ⚡️☣️
Running a node. Running a lighting node. Running a Bitaxe Supra. Running bitcoin. Doing my part to confuse this Chinese "professor".
English
2
2
13
213
Brian Roemmele
Brian Roemmele@BrianRoemmele·
The Space Perspective company wants to take people 100,000 feet up using its space balloon, Spaceship Neptune.
English
32
23
207
13.9K
Ben Justman🍷
Ben Justman🍷@BenJustman·
What wine are you pairing with wild asparagus and 🥩?
Ben Justman🍷 tweet media
English
12
0
22
1.8K
Gnome Chomsky
Gnome Chomsky@BillyBlockforge·
@pete_rizzo_ Just heard him say ethrerium a few times, so basically a retard
English
0
0
0
33
Gnome Chomsky รีทวีตแล้ว
grubles
grubles@notgrubles·
I'm telling you Nic Carter is the Greta Thunberg of quantum.
English
82
109
1.8K
70.8K
Gnome Chomsky
Gnome Chomsky@BillyBlockforge·
@RaoulGMI @eli_schein It fitted 2021 to make digital tradable artifacts the topic of art, it suited the zeitgeist of the time. But art has moved on to other things
English
1
0
1
106
Raoul Pal
Raoul Pal@RaoulGMI·
Art is not dead. Art on blockchain is scarce. It is also not dead. Art that reflects the culture of today, permanently recorded on the blockchain is valuable. Scarce art on blockchain that has social consensus is priceless. Prices reflect this. Not all NFTs have equal value but some are very valuable or will be over time. Much art may not be valuable in a market place but they can be valuable to a collector because they love the art. It has always been so across all mediums of art and will always remain so.
English
70
31
482
47.7K
Eli Scheinman
Eli Scheinman@eli_schein·
NFTs are not coming back. As a category they are dead. But as a fundamental technology, they are nascent and growing. Exceptional art and collectibles that offer something new to the world and use this technology stack will capture global audiences in ways never before possible.
English
124
44
685
82K
Gnome Chomsky
Gnome Chomsky@BillyBlockforge·
@bwfmedia This is not a good move for badminton. Keep the 21!
English
0
0
17
1.6K
naiive
naiive@naiivememe·
One day, you burned a CD for the last time without even realizing it.
naiive tweet media
English
62
117
1.2K
41.2K
Gnome Chomsky
Gnome Chomsky@BillyBlockforge·
@pete_rizzo_ The only other thing as permanent as a bitcoin transaction is a booked plane ticket
English
0
0
0
13
naiive
naiive@naiivememe·
naiive tweet media
ZXX
277
4
168
26.2K
Michiel Lieuwma
Michiel Lieuwma@michiellieuwma·
Min of meer toevallig was de muziek tijdens de aftiteling van onze laatste aflevering over de gemeenteraad: met zijn allen van Henny Huisman. Grappig om te zien dat de sfeer nu daadwerkelijk is: we hebben allemaal een beetje gewonnen. Iedereen een My First Sony! 🔥
Michiel Lieuwma tweet media
Nederlands
3
2
26
1.6K
Jesse Klaver
Jesse Klaver@jesseklaver·
De energieprijzen stijgen hard, terwijl het leven al duur is. Bedrijven als Shell verdienen er grof geld aan. Gewone mensen betalen. De afwachtende houding van het kabinet is niet uit te leggen. Kom in actie, bereid maatregelen voor om mensen te beschermen tegen absurde prijzen.
Nederlands
1.7K
102
491
447.5K
Gnome Chomsky
Gnome Chomsky@BillyBlockforge·
@maxkeiser Birds are government drones and thats the end of the discussion
English
1
0
0
59
Max Keiser
Max Keiser@maxkeiser·
‘Birds are divinely designed’
Divinely Designed@DivinelyDesined

Here's something else that could not possibly evolve. Birds are clearly Divinely Designed. Everything about a bird is perfectly engineered for flight, from its shape to its organs. The idea that all the features in birds which enable flight could have evolved is absurd on its face. Most of these features would be useless, or actually harmful, if they appeared in an organism that didn't fly. On top of that, most of these features also rely on other features to make them functional, meaning they can't evolve step-by-step; the pieces of the system need to arise together. Air Sac System: Extra air sacs connected to the lungs let air flow straight through in one direction so the bird gets fresh oxygen even while breathing out during hard work. This system couldn't have evolved. First, any transitional form would need a hole punched in its diaphragm to start developing the air sacs, creating a debilitating hernia that would collapse the whole breathing apparatus. This would get eliminated by natural selection, the organism couldn't survive. Second, birds have a special bone that braces the thin-walled abdominal air sacs which prevents them from collapsing during inhalation. Without this uniquely designed bone placed exactly where it is, air sacs would flatten uselessly and offer no benefit, which means they couldn't evolve. Third, the air sacs require a full system of features - air sacs which also invade hollow bones, precise parabronchi tubes, countercurrent blood flow, and rigid skeletal supports. All these features work together, or the system fails, which means they can't evolve step-by-step. No observed fossils show functional intermediate steps. Hollow Bones: Birds have bones filled with air spaces and internal struts that make the skeleton light enough to lift off while still strong enough to handle the forces of flapping. An entire hollow skeleton would be detrimental to a land walking organism, as they would easily break, which means they wouldn't be selected for. Their hollow bone structures are also directly integrated into their breathing apparatus, the air sacs. This integration fills the bones with air via small openings (pneumatic foramina), reducing overall weight while internal struts keep the bones strong for flight. But the strongest point against the bird's gradual evolution is the fossil record. Birds appear suddenly, with fully formed and functional features in the fossil record. There is no stepwise evolutionary story of birds to be found on the fossil record. Birds were clearly intelligently designed. Everything about their anatomy shows purposeful function and intentional design features, engineered specifically for the purpose of flying. Evolutionary precursors would be harmed by partially formed and non-functional bird features. Birds couldn't have evolved.

English
11
14
123
21.2K