Call Me Emo

And so we wait..... @LukeSo20 @RJDownard

@AndrewD82566840 @Sikervic @leroyb756 @ReasonGlobie @JesusSaaaves @NoDyeSaiyanHair Definition and observed example of Macroevolution

@Sikervic @leroyb756 @ReasonGlobie @JesusSaaaves @NoDyeSaiyanHair Evolution on a macro scale has not occurred. It is unbelievable to me that people believe this. Darwin would have laughed at his theory if he had today's knowledge

Exactly Disproven claims. Zero proof.

@PeshatDuel @AiG Very rapid evolution indeed. What Creationists accept as Variation is no different from Macroevolution.

Young Earth Creationists do believe in very rapid evolution - as in both "micro" and "macro-evolution" at the family level for groups like cats. Rapid speciation after the flood is necessary for their interpretation of scripture.

Evolution isn’t compatible with the Bible.

@jrmiller777 @AiG There's no real distinction between variation within and between "Kinds"

@AiG Even speciation (adaptation & change within a kind)? Do you not make a distinction between micro & macro-evolution?

@Megalithic343 @Rainmaker1973 Definition and observed example of Macroevolution:

@Rainmaker1973 Macro evolution has a lot of problems. The biggest being, that it does NOT follow the scientific method. Macro evolution can't be observed, can't experiment on it, can't duplicate it... Almost all genetic mutations are negative. Source: news.umich.edu/study-most-sil…

If humans die out, octopuses already have the chops to build the next civilization, scientist claims. Source: biologist Tim Coulson, Ph.D., who researches ecology and evolution at the University of Oxford.

@GIFATJO23 @BumpyAstronaut @joelithic @Dexerto We sure can. Here's the definition and an observed example of Macroevolution.

@BumpyAstronaut @joelithic @Dexerto To prove something means to show there cannot be another way. I cannot show you that. But now you need to have the intellectual honesty to also admit that you yourself ca not objectively prove that macro evolution is real as the evidence only takes you so far, just like with God-

A Pokemon fan got Pope Leo to sign his Popplio

@RGoslingadmirer @MindVsMyth What exactly constitutes as a "New Trait"??

@MindVsMyth Macro evolution is the idea that mutations which are usually lethal and catastrophic can somehow create new traits that will lead to the creation of a new distinct organism. We have not observed that.

The story of Genesis and the theory of evolution can’t both be literally true. Genesis describes the universe, Earth, and all life as being created in six days, with humans formed fully and separately from the dust, just a few thousand years ago. It presents a static, top-down process where species appear by divine command, each “after its kind,” with no transformation or shared ancestry. Evolution, on the other hand, shows life emerging slowly over billions of years through natural processes—mutation, selection, genetic drift—and all living beings, including humans, sharing common ancestors.

@Rashiq_Shahzad @MacklemoreZabe @Key4SkeletonA Not really necessarily..... some Macroevolutionary events can and do happen in very few, or in single generations.

@Rashiq_Shahzad @MacklemoreZabe @Key4SkeletonA So at what point does Microevolution become Macroevolution? Meaning what would the generation that marks the dawn of a Macroevolutionary event look like when compared to the generation that immediately preceded it??

@Rashiq_Shahzad @MacklemoreZabe @Key4SkeletonA There's no real distinction between Micro and Macro evolution. Because at what point does Microevolution becomes Macroevolution?

@Rashiq_Shahzad @MacklemoreZabe @Key4SkeletonA I literally just showed what different Families can look like. So its pretty clear that "entirely new bodyplans" (whatever that means), and entirely new functions and major structural innovations is NOT a requirement to produce New/Different Families.

@Rashiq_Shahzad @MacklemoreZabe @Key4SkeletonA What do you mean by "Higher level" transitions? How different organisms must become to be considered different Families?

@Rashiq_Shahzad @MacklemoreZabe @Key4SkeletonA That's fine. However, the phenomenon of Macroevolution has already been observed. No need to observe every instance of a phenomenon to acknowledge that the phenomenon occurs

@kenlovesuuu @ScienceQriosity @TPhillykeys @AskPerplexity @ToastyVegemite @pat7teen @conquistadorof1 @MattWalshBlog So no actual argument. Cool.

The fact that a foreign socialist even has a chance to be elected mayor of NYC proves that the voters in our major cities are essentially suicidal. They want to see their own communities destroyed. It’s a spiritual and mental sickness. I don’t think there’s any way to fix it.

@AskPerplexity @kenlovesuuu @ScienceQriosity @TPhillykeys @ToastyVegemite @pat7teen @conquistadorof1 @MattWalshBlog Oh I know. That's a common Creationist tactic to appeal to ridicule instead of providing cogent rebuttals.

It looks like there isn't really a "joke" here in the traditional sense. They seem to be using the laughing emojis and the GIF to dismiss your point as ridiculous instead of offering a counter-argument. The head-patting GIF is generally used to be patronizing, which tracks with them calling you "lil guy."

@ByJimbob @Norse_Chieftain @AgainstAtheismX Evolution is a readily observed and observable phenomenon.

@Norse_Chieftain @AgainstAtheismX Now what? Evolution fails to go through the scientific method. Therefore, it’s not a valid scientific theory.

Christians! I want to hear your best arguments against the theory of evolution. These Atheists just don't seem to get it

@dennisdjackson @ScienceQriosity @wendelltalks Definition and observed example of Macroevolution. And why can't the woodpecker evolve?

@ScienceQriosity @wendelltalks Macroevolution has never been observed and cannot be reproduced. Further, it fails at logic. The evolution necessary to produce a woodpecker would never result in a living creature.

How to become a Christian apologist: • Study Resurrection Facts • Pray for Boldness • Memorize scripture • Read Apologetics Books • Avoid Atheist Traps • Train Mind Daily • Share Gospel Truth • Skip False Teachings • Build Faith Network • Learn Logic Skills • Ignore Secular Noise What would you add?

@Flank_Em @PMADDOGMAC @AgainstAtheismX Definition and observed example of Macroevolution

Case And point... There's always something we're missing or don't understand as if we all didn't grow up taking the same high school biology classes. 🤦🏼‍♂️ Macroevolution is impossible since no new information can ever be added during mutation, ergo nothing ever grows more complex while microevolution is just a fancy way to say variation. Evolution doesn't have a vestigial leg to stand on and is pure fantasy. You're conflating law with theory and putting it all under the same heading. Meanwhile, the Bible actually proves itself historically, prophetically and archaeologically. Seek Jesus friend. We're entering the last days spoken of.

Atheists: "You believe in God? You're so stupid!" Literally the greatest scientist to ever live:

@dennisdjackson @ScienceQriosity @wendelltalks Definition and observed example of Macroevolution