Michael (Classical Liberal)

@n3liason @memeticsisyphus The Judicial branch, including the SCOTUS, has no actual constitutional authority to review laws and executive action. It assumed this "power" for itself in 1803. We need to constitutional amendment to specify what it can and cannot do. We need limits on judicial tyranny.

@wakeupusa While not advocating political violence, I think that it is fair to say that, if the "right" actually retaliated with political violence (eye for an eye), the tone of the left would likely settle down. In the nuclear cold war this concept was called mutually assured destruction.

Nicolle Wallace: "Only the right is committing political violence." She needs to reconsider this statement given the recent events at the White House Correspondence Dinner

@ArmscorRIA I've lost faith in autos. I used to carry a .45 compact auto, but I had so many jams at the firing range that I switched to a .357 mag revolver, and keep it loaded with 200 grain bullets

Do we have any 10MM fans in the crowd? 📸 • @jasonshapiro1321

@SaltyGoat17 10mm or .357 mag. I load a 200 grain bullet. Fewer shots, but a revolver never jams, whereas I have seen multiple jams with autos.

This officer shot this insane lunatic several times but he kept coming and liberals want to use social workers for this? Nope!! This is the very reason I carry a 10mm and I was trained to shoot center mass and don’t stop until they drop.

@JunkScience Fix it.

New F-35s lack most advanced radar because Communist China makes 99% (and the US zero percent) of the world's gallium. Planes will instead contain deadweight in nosecones. "Over 11,000 components in the Pentagon’s defense systems require gallium. With nearly 85 percent of those supply chains depending on a Chinese supplier, the defense industry is at risk." wapo.st/4cykGL7

@BasedMikeLee She one of the nation's enemies, and yet she sits in Congress. Why???

Do you think she might be part of the problem?

@Insanevidz_ Deterrent works not just for the perp, but for would-be perps.

A drunk guy grabbed a guys wife ass in front of him... Is this the only way to respond?

@MilitaryCooI Any of the 300 magnums, or larger. At close range, a 45/70, at VERY lose range a magnum 12 Ga shotgun with a rifled slug. More normal might be a .375 magnum or a rifle with > .40 cal, used for big game.

Name the gun you would use to take out this hog.

Interesting how it works Elon puts up his own money, rounds up the absolute best AI talent on the planet, leverages every connection he has to secure serious resources, and launches OpenAI in 2015 as a pure non-profit explicitly created to develop AI for the benefit of humanity, with zero profit motive and open research Then the “team” decides they want the bag They push Elon out, take control, and quietly flip the entire thing into a for-profit machine All while preaching the same sanctimonious lines on repeat: “We’re still mission-driven!” “AI for the good of humanity!” “We’d never abandon our principles!” The ultimate betrayal: Elon got zero equity. Not a single share. He funded it. He built the foundation. He got nothing while they turned his non-profit into their personal cash cow This is the level of betrayal and hypocrisy we’re dealing with And for the record.... this lawsuit doesn’t put a single penny in Elon’s pocket. Any win goes straight back to the non-profit to restore the exact mission he founded

🇺🇸The Secret Service fired serval rounds at Cole Allen. And not one round was on target. Do we still have DEI hires on that detail? At a minimum their targets should look like this.🇺🇸

@MagaGrunt1 No one should have been able to get anywhere near the ballroom, but he did. Lax security. And why was he able to run so fast, so far? Where were the obstacles?

@Apple I keep getting a notice to set up an account recovery contact, even though I've already done this 3 times. It won't go away, and I don't want to keep bothering my contact with new requests, simply because Apple is so insecure. Apple has become very irritating here, and on my expired ipad, which I use as a Kindle reader. Constantly asking for a password but unwilling to accept it, because it is an older iPad (2016/7)

@jsolomonReports The president is a hostage to the IRGC.

Iran president: No direct negotiations while US blockade remains in effect justthenews.com/government/whi…

@atensnut Entertainment people live in a bubble that demands one opinion and feeds garbage information. Why does anyone care what someone from this cesspool thinks?

Then GET HELP! It’s mental illness!!

Ever wonder why our Governments never discuss or debate UN Agenda 2030, which they are all signed up to? Or the New World Order it will usher in for the ‘citizens of the World’? Read below the real mission goals of UN Agenda 2030 and you will see why they are never discussed.

@rshereme Why wouldn't he simply sit back and allow the EU to destroy NATO, as it has already been doing? No risk, no cost. Just wait and invade later.

An attack on the Baltic states is entirely plausible, and here’s why. There are at least three reasons. First and foremost: russia risks nothing. No matter how events unfold with the occupation of the Baltic countries, things will not get worse for russia. Sanctions are already in place. Europe no longer buys its oil or gas. Weapons are being supplied to Ukraine. From a purely military perspective, russia also risks nothing. It has nuclear weapons, so if it wins and occupies the Baltics, or even parts of them, no one will be able to push it out. And if it loses, it will not lose its own territory. It will simply retreat to its borders, and NATO will not invade russian territory because of those same nuclear weapons. So why not try? Second reason: the goals of the war. The objectives of russia go far beyond the occupation of the Baltics. Above all, russia is interested in weakening or dismantling NATO and the EU. From this perspective, any territorial gain in the Baltics would count as a victory. Even if russia does not capture Vilnius or Tallinn, but only a few border villages, that would still be a win, because it would demonstrate NATO’s inability to defend its members. So again, why not try? Third reason: russia has sufficient forces and resources in the potential conflict zone to carry out military objectives and achieve an acceptable outcome. In the Leningrad Military District, there is a combat-ready army of around 70,000 troops, which can easily be reinforced with reserves from the Ukrainian front. This army is mechanized, with around 700 tanks and a large amount of armored equipment. Separately, I would highlight the drone component, which has no real equivalent in NATO and could significantly shift the balance of power in the event of an invasion. If the forces are sufficient, then why not try? Thus, as of now, we are facing the following situation: russia has enough forces and resources to achieve its goals in the Baltics, and it does not face a bad scenario under any development of events. The situation is very similar to the one before the invasion of Ukraine, especially considering the law that allows putin to “protect russians abroad,” which was quickly introduced in the State Duma. The Baltic states have helped us more than anyone else, so I sincerely hope our friends will not face war. But to preserve peace, one must prepare for a major war. It is very good that our Baltic friends have learned from Ukraine’s mistakes and have built defensive lines and fortifications to repel an invasion. I very much hope that russia will break its teeth on the Baltics, just as it did on Ukraine. Source: translated and adopted from Serhii Marchenko

@RealSpitfire They can only project the ideas that they themselves would execute

Rabid mental illness. There is no unifying with these whack jobs.

@marcosagusstinn AKA the End Europe Forever movement

Europe must become a single state of 500M people. 1. Common capital markets 2. One regulatory system 3. Mostly energy independence (renewables + nuclear + electrification) 4. Unified army & foreign policy 5. Common industrial & tech projects Because the pieces are already there: - UK: 2nd biggest financial hub. 2nd largest hub by assets under management. Global leader in FX & derivatives. - Germany: 3rd largest economy. 2nd largest trade surplus in the world. - France: Global leader in nuclear energy, nuclear-armed military power, aerospace leader, and Europe’s leading agricultural powerhouse. - Spain: Renewable energy power + Massive Latin America influence (diplomatic + investment) - Italy: Manufacturing & exports Fragmented, Europe is weak. United, it’s a superpower. How to become one ↓ app.openmacro.ai/insights/what-…

@JDunlap1974 No charity

What percentage of your tax dollars would you find acceptable to send as aid to foreign countries?

@MichaelAArouet It will be the end of Europe, and everybody country within it

What do you folks think about this proposal? Is this a good idea? Is it even realistic to achieve given the political landscape in member countries?

@karma44921039 The WEF has no right to pretend to govern

Humans have no right to water