Conza

34.1K posts

Conza banner
Conza

Conza

@Conza

Intellectually honest | Mises Seminar: https://t.co/GfZck5OAEc | Praxeology | Austro-Libertarianism | https://t.co/EVTIHDUOHt | 🥩 #Bitcoin

เข้าร่วม Şubat 2009
1.3K กำลังติดตาม4.9K ผู้ติดตาม
ทวีตที่ปักหมุด
Conza
Conza@Conza·
A lesson I learned long ago: "Employ your time in improving yourself by other men’s writings so that you shall come easily by what others have labored hard for." — Socrates📖
Saifedean Ammous@saifedean

@Conza You are the world heavyweight champion when it comes to Austrian quotes

English
13
61
369
0
hodlonaut #BIP-110
hodlonaut #BIP-110@hodlonaut·
Missed this from some days back. Adam really really doesn’t like that I am investigating and shining a light on what’s been going on in Core. According to him it is lies and «fomenting torrents of hate”. He is trying to make me stop reporting by claiming I am responsible for people getting death threats and implying that I will get sued. All of this from documenting events with public record material. Fucking wild. «what you are actually doing is misrepresenting things, impugning others reputations with lies» «not everyone has the stomach for the torrent of hate you're fomenting» «people will get death threats from what you're doing» «also say you succeed in fomenting hate, social media mob bullying people» «what you're actually doing is the analog of, but worse quality than tabloid hit pieces that get sued retract and then pay the person compensation»
hodlonaut #BIP-110 tweet mediahodlonaut #BIP-110 tweet media
English
66
68
380
11.9K
Conza
Conza@Conza·
📔
Conza tweet media
QME
0
0
8
141
Breadman
Breadman@BTCBreadMan·
@1914ad Please explain to me how there’s an objective way to define “monetary transactions” at the policy layer without the need for subjectivity or social coordination. Perhaps there is and I just don’t understand it.
English
5
0
1
484
Breadman
Breadman@BTCBreadMan·
Bitcoin’s core innovation is neutrality. When you start filtering out “unacceptable” transactions, you introduce governance risk into a previously neutral system. This increases the odds of capture. Objective technical limits are good. Arbitrary/subjective filtering is bad.
English
29
3
30
4.6K
floppy.md
floppy.md@1440000bytes·
A malicious mint can link all cashu tokens belonging to a wallet
floppy.md tweet media
English
3
6
27
3.1K
Conza รีทวีตแล้ว
spoon
spoon@spoonmvn·
Holy shit, how big of a sign do you need that you’re mistaken to run Bitcoin Core?
spoon tweet media
English
21
22
171
2.7K
Conza รีทวีตแล้ว
Jim | #BIP110 | Bitcoin, not jpegs
Core is trying to centralize mempools. Core has centralized developers. Core has made their client less robust by centralizing user configurability. Core has focused too much on use cases and not enough on monetary maximalism. Fire @bitcoincoreorg and run @BitcoinKnots.
English
6
30
151
2K
Conza รีทวีตแล้ว
Arthur "lynch mob" van Pelt 🔥 ∞/21M ⚡
The Knotzis fight data spam from all angles. 1. fees 2. block size limit 3. mempool policy filters 4. tighter consensus rules 5. fix flaws & repair abuse floodgates The Core fans stopped at 2 in 2017, and allowed the blockchain to grow from 1% spam in 2016 to 40% spam in 2026.
English
5
22
105
2.3K
Conza รีทวีตแล้ว
Maxima Freiman
Maxima Freiman@MaximaFreiman·
"BIP110 is censorship!" Satoshi (2010): "Hold my coffee and hate me more, baby." ☕ He nuked 15 opcodes in one go just to make sure Bitcoin survived its infancy. Without BIP. If he did it to keep it as Electronic Cash, why are we crying over BIP110?
Maxima Freiman tweet media
English
20
80
290
7.3K
Conza
Conza@Conza·
And getting *any* of them (economically illiterate spam enablers) to admit an actual timeline/line in the sand (where monetary fee's outprice spam, or there's a % of spam on the network they think makes it enough to act) is an exercise in futility... cowards who don't actually have a principle to stand behind.
Conza tweet media
English
1
5
26
272