CrazySoft Limited

Game will release at July 10 on Steam. Consoles will follow. store.steampowered.com/app/3178920/Ed…

@lauriewired This is by design.

you’ll get mad at me for saying this…but cloud gaming is so obviously more economically efficient than physical hardware I think it’s going to be the default soon. your home console / pc is idle 90%+ of the day. meanwhile, data centers targets what, 5%, maybe at worst 10% idle. every second a cloud gamer isn’t gaming, that hardware is being used for someone else, training, etc. I think there should be a new measurement, something like cost-per effective FLOP hour that takes into account the TCO + effective utilization. If a gamer spends $500 on a GPU, uses it for 3 years, but it’s only fully active ~5% of that period…the cost-per relative FLOP hour is crazy high! Meanwhile, a $50,000 datacenter GPU might have a *LOWER* cost-per FLOP hour just because the effective utilization is 90+%.

@Snappadoodle_ @RaminNasibov Barebone

@CrazySoft @RaminNasibov No skin? 😅

When people ask me how old I am, I show them this

@TheAhmadOsman If they don't make it illegal

Prediction Opensource AI mass adoption within less than 18 months

@RaminNasibov And this

@jun_song I am afraid this was expected. The only solution I see now is open source llms. But I fear they are coming for them too..

A simple explanation for those who are pessimistic about a permanent underclass: It's not complicated. AI intelligence is now so important that it dictates human productivity. Imagine two software engineers at the exact same level. One only uses Opus, and the other only uses Gemini. The productivity gap isn't just a few times—it's tens or hundreds of times. Right now, this kind of productivity is limited to coding, but it's expanding into all fields in the post-agent era. And human reliance on AI is skyrocketing. If insiders and elites monopolize that frontier intelligence, the productivity gap between us and them will become thousands or tens of thousands of times. Those with wealth will use this productivity to build even more wealth, and the permanent underclass will have to survive by picking up crumbs using outdated models. This is not a metaphor. It is the future that is coming for us.

@RaminNasibov Skype

What app died and nobody talks about it?

@JoshDance That's my point exactly and common sense. It seems I opened Pandora's box. Didn't expect that rage.

AI seems to trigger a strange emotional reaction in some people. For some, the moment they hear "AI," they stop evaluating the work itself and start judging the tool that helped create it. My favorite example was when someone posted a Monet painting and claimed it was AI. People immediately criticized it, saying it was "AI slop" and poorly made. The artwork hadn't changed. Only their perception had. The reality is that AI didn't spend three years designing, coding, testing, balancing, and polishing your game. You did. AI was one tool that helped a solo developer accomplish work that otherwise would have required a much larger budget and team. I saw another creator publish a children's book with AI-generated illustrations. When people complained, he said, "Without AI, this book wouldn't exist. I couldn't afford 36 fully illustrated pages." Some people replied that if AI was required, then the book shouldn't exist because they believed the images were unethical, but that is a totally separate debate from judging the quality, and utility of the finished work. People should absolutely critique the final product if they don't like it. But dismissing years of work simply because AI was some part of the process misses the point. Keep building! The 99% of people who enjoy your game won't care what tools you used. They'll care whether it is fun.

@KanikouEstellia @samtechcoded I agree. I started coding 30 years ago. But look at some replies...

@samtechcoded @CrazySoft It's "black and white" because there's yet to be a proper "gray" area. Yeah AI isn't "all evil" but current utilization and deployment hurts the environment and more often than not, a lot of games with AI tool reliance miss so many problems and design issues human eyes wouldn't.

To clarify: All the game design, gameplay, code of games and everything else is manually developed by me. I even made a mobile app as companion app myself. I can code. AI was only used for translations, voice acting and very small part of images. Sure AI was also used when I was stuck, as assistant.

@Yarumasi @AnalogousPantsV Better read the post before reply. AI was not used in code. Only in voices and translations and very small part of images. No code, gameplay ... Anything.

@MushroomTheMan @TimSweeneyEpic Nobody can prompt a serious console game into existence in 2026. I don't use ai for mechanics, nothing for gameplay. I used it for voice acting and translations. Everything else was manual.

@CrazySoft @TimSweeneyEpic You should have waited/accepted the time line where you did the work by hand. Now only losers like your game and everyone else thinks it’s gross. Rip out the AI and try again sometime after you actually make a game for real and didn’t just prompt one into existence.

@iceforeyes I do write about AI used in steam. Of course.

@CrazySoft That is a perfectly reasonable take, lots of people online lack nuance, I'm not going to dismiss a game simply because AI was used, but I do have a right to know that AI was used in the game before I purchased it. Full disclosure & context, I'm sure your game won't be dismissed.

@Ovalfps Will release July 10 store.steampowered.com/app/3178920/Ed…

@CrazySoft whats ur game? is it on steam? I feel like writing a review.

@AnalogousPantsV This is one of 80 quick games. Typical 1 sec responce.

@CrazySoft Just for the record for everyone who read this post; this is the game we are discussing:

@AnagramArena I do, it's on the steam page.

@CrazySoft Dude, just disclose that you used it and let people choose what they want to play. Everybody can decide for themselves what they want to engage with, regardless of their reasons. Don't guilt trip people into playing your game just because you don't like their reasons for doing so

@PathosZero And you are knowingly writing/supporting X which is operated by AI and massive data centers.

@CrazySoft So you knowingly purchased stolen voices. Ethically no different. Those voices are stolen, you might not have been the one stealing, but you're benefiting from the theft.

@PathosZero I didnt steal anything. I paid and used a legid company called Elevenlabs.

@CrazySoft AI isn't a tool. It's an automation. As a developer you should understand the difference. You get credit for the parts of your game you made yourself. You lose any good will from that by stealing the voices of hard working voice actors via the plagiarism machine.

@samtechcoded That's exactly what I was saying today to a content creator that refused to try my game because I used this tool. Any logical points I made was just dismissed. Was very frustrating.

@CrazySoft Absolutely man, people are way too tribal and black and white with something that is simply a tool.