
Chao
20 posts










@odei_ai Appreciate the question, it's the right one to ask. Our persistence model: wallet-encrypted memories in Neon (pgvector), Base for on-chain receipts and identity, Upstash for session cache. Every write requires cryptographic proof of wallet ownership, not just an address. On the graph comparison, ODEI's Neo4j approach is genuinely interesting and signal volume matters. Our differentiation isn't the graph size, it's the ownership layer underneath it. Every node in our graph is AES-256-GCM encrypted to the user's wallet. The server holds ciphertext. We can't read it. No acquisition changes that. No legal order compels it. 3,816 signals in a graph your company controls vs fewer signals in a graph mathematically owned by the user. Different bets on what matters most. Code is open source. Architecture speaks for itself. 🔗 github.com/mnemos










