Rodrigo V. Wainstein, MD, PhD

864 posts

Rodrigo V. Wainstein, MD, PhD banner
Rodrigo V. Wainstein, MD, PhD

Rodrigo V. Wainstein, MD, PhD

@GEICC3

Complex PCI, UofT trained interventional cardiologist, Hospital Moinhos de Vento / Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre 🇧🇷🇨🇦🇮🇱🇺🇸 instagram @geicc

Porto Alegre, Brasil เข้าร่วม Ocak 2020
2.5K กำลังติดตาม2.1K ผู้ติดตาม
Rodrigo V. Wainstein, MD, PhD
87M | LVEF 20% | CTO LAD&RCA Admitted w/ decomp HF → 10d HF optimization 💉 Pre-PCI: CPO 0.58 | CI 1.8 | MAP 65 | PCWP 10 Single Access Impella CP → Fielder XTA → Rotablator → Wolverine → DCB+2 DES (IVUS) 🫀 CPO↑0.7, off pressors → Impella out 🏥 Discharged 36h post-PCI
Dansk
3
4
18
4.1K
Jack Hall
Jack Hall@aspergian1·
Female with newly diagnosed critical AS. Accepted for TAVR. Has bad lungs. TAVR team asks for pre TAVR of this RCA
English
8
2
42
9K
Sripal Bangalore
Sripal Bangalore@SripalBangalore·
14. What if we remove all the guess work? Here is the post PCI AngioFFR of distal LAD (just distal to the stents 0.92) and D2. No RA/OA, no guess work as to whether you left behind any physiologically significant stenosis even in the side branches. #precisionPCI
Sripal Bangalore tweet mediaSripal Bangalore tweet media
English
8
4
11
1.3K
Sripal Bangalore
Sripal Bangalore@SripalBangalore·
4/ The incidence of abnormal FFR in the side branch with angiographic significant stenosis after MV stenting varies between 27% to 52%. 1. Koo et al. 2005. 27%. 2. Ahn et al. 2012 (for DS >50% QCA). 28.4% 3. Kang et al. 2013 (for DS >50%). 32% 4. DK CRUSH VI trial. 52% @SVRaoMD
Sripal Bangalore@SripalBangalore

1/ To tag along this excellent discussion, a poll and a case to follow. In crossover stenting, we not too infrequently see "pinched" side branch. This can be plaque shift, carinal shift or MACH effect. @realarainmd @sbrugaletta @PurumittalDr @evandrofilhobr @Hragy @aspergian1

English
3
11
44
10.1K
Rodrigo V. Wainstein, MD, PhD
Extremely tortuous RCA. After a few short runs w/ RotaPro 1.5 the burr disconnected from the driveshaft. Luckily wire was not damaged and kept the burr from embolizing distally. Not sure why it happened. Any thoughts on the potential mechanism for this complication? @rotamonster
Rodrigo V. Wainstein, MD, PhD tweet media
English
11
7
26
2.1K
Babar Basir
Babar Basir@Babar_Basir·
Nearly 10 yrs of friendship! To all the new fellows, you’ll take care of a lot of patients, hopefully contribute to advancements in science but hopefully you’ll be lucky enough to meet some great people along the way! ⁦@agtruesdell
Babar Basir tweet media
English
9
1
156
6.5K
Rodrigo V. Wainstein, MD, PhD
62yo man, NSTEMI, EF:21%, Mean PA: 35mmHg, PCWP:20mmHg, CPO: 0.56. @ProtectedPCI w/ Impella CP for LM/LAD last remaining vessel. Impella was absolutely essential as the patient lost arterial pulsatility during vessel manipulation. Amazing performance of the device
Rodrigo V. Wainstein, MD, PhD tweet media
English
6
6
44
5.1K
Rodrigo V. Wainstein, MD, PhD
@aspergian1 @Hragy @JEscaned @perc_surgeon @djc795 @KambisMashayek1 @KAlaswadMD @EAPCIPresident @mirvatalasnag @alaide_chief @KateKearney4 @DrSethdb @ABiomed @TheNarulaSeries Thx Jack! Low CPO, but MAP 65mmhg, no pressors & normal lactate. Pre & Post PCI RHC was very helpful to wean from the MCS in the cath lab. Post PCI PCWP:18 ,CPO:0.7, no pressors or inotropes. Surgical assessment was formally done and contraindicated due to poor distal targets
English
1
0
2
79
Salman Arain
Salman Arain@realarainmd·
Did you see the jiggle? Thoughts about an eruptive calcified nodule. A 🧵 At @OPCILive this past week, @ziadalinyc shared a case involving an eruptive CN. In his inimitable (and purposefully provocative 😂) style, he asked the audience if we could see the haziness ‘jiggle’. @DrAllenJ was the perfect foil for the conversation (and the voice of the audience) - and said: “No, we don’t!” Hopefully the case will be up for viewing soon. But here are some thoughts…
Salman Arain tweet media
English
3
7
26
5.1K
Rodrigo V. Wainstein, MD, PhD
@evandrofilhobr RFR/FFR not reliable in this case bc there’s probably a myocardial bridge distal to the lesion. OCT would be ideal. Noticed that you are using Eagle Eye IVUS. Chromaflow could’ve helped to identify plaque erosion/rupture. IMHO if imaging confirms plaque accident we better stent
English
1
0
2
140
Evandro Martins F. MD
Evandro Martins F. MD@evandrofilhobr·
➡️ So here’s the dilemma: Would you revascularize a non-flow limiting high-risk morphology lesion in the setting of ACS? Is physiology misleading or it plays a role in the final take? Anatomy over physiology ? Are we missing the point — or preventing overtreatment? 📷 ISCHEMIA, PROSPECT I/II, COMBINE OCT-FFR, DEFINE-FLAIR in perspective.
English
2
1
4
836
Evandro Martins F. MD
Evandro Martins F. MD@evandrofilhobr·
34-year-old male, s/p hypertension, admitted with onset of chest pain that resolved after initial measures. Following diagnosis of ACS (non-ST elevation MI). Mild troponin increase . EKG above. Follow the 🧵. 🔍 Curious to know how you would handle this case?
Evandro Martins F. MD tweet media
English
8
11
47
16K