German Knight ✈️
6.3K posts
@GermaKnight
From Germany for Germany 🇩🇪💙🔥 Christianity prevails ✝️ Remigration ✈️ #WhiteLivesMatter 🥛 | Repost ≠ Endorsement
TRUMP LETS IT SLIP: He accidentally admitted he's been using nuclear weapons against Iran!!
Erklärung von Ulmens Anwälten! 1. Fernandes wurde in Spanien ihrerseits wegen Körperverletzung gegen ihren Mann festgenommen. 2. Beim spanischen Verfahren verweigert Fernandes die Kooperation ebenso wie damals beim deutschen.
By the way, every second statement by the US during this war involves nukes. Threatening their use, implying their use or pointing out that they're trying to stop Iran from obtaining them. Given Iran's surface appearance of restraint, what is the fear of nukes? Of course, it's below threshold and covert use of nuclear weapons, which are the ONLY MEANS by which modern warfare can be fought in the age of deep underground military bunkers and advanced fortifications.
Evidence for Tartus nuke (Dec 15 ’24, UTC) rests on 6 independent geophysical evidences (remote and local radiation, seismic waveform and amplitude, crater size, pressure damage). Every single one of these evidences are at variance with the unbased though widespread claim of a conventional explosive. Since more than a year, no single valid scientific argument has been presented against these evidences, despite unbased claims to the contrary. As some of these unbased claims are as unlikely to be correct as finding one particular atom in the entire Universe, yet find their way into absurdly "not even wrong" and misleading CN’s, here is a comprehensive rebuttal: 1) The observed radiation peak intensity in Cyprus (and Turkey) is in complete agreement with the quantitative predictions of a US DoD fallout model based on a 99.9% clean weapon [Housatonic ,1962] and a 0.3kt yield following independent from crater size *and* seismic data. 2) ) The unbased claim that observed radiation peaks are within “normal radiation levels”, blatantly ignores the fact in *all* 7 (!) Cyprus stations on Dec 16 ’24 are at 4-12 sigma above background. In addition, there are signals at 6 Turkish stations each with >7 sigma signals. The likelihood of all of these signals being random is much less than 1 in 10^52, or as absurdly unlikely as finding one particular atom in the whole of Earth. [Note that *one single* 5-sigma observation is sufficient for scientific discovery in Particle Physics, 2 sigma in Biology]. 3) There is a similar unbased claim that the Tartus GZ radiation readings were random. Instead of sending a team in Dec ’24, IAEA sponsored the DoD co-sponsored “GoodISIS” to produce an entirely flawed report containing above erroneous arguments. The readings of 6000nSv/h, finally performed after 3 months, exceeded those of Hiroshima and Nagasaki after a shorter time. Observed Tartus GZ radiation levels *exceeded* the published background levels in Syria of 94 +/- 8 nSv/h by more than 700 sigma (!), The claim of a a random occurrence is even less likely to be correct than finding one particular atom in the entire Universe. And - last not least : 4) CTBTO Chief Rob Floyd has recently admitted that his organization is fundamentally unable to detect nukes with yield of <0.5kt ( that includes “dirty” ones). Thus CTBTO cannot detect the Tartus nuke of 0.3kt (B61-12 at lowest yield). Thus the claim that international agencies would have reported an event of the size of Tartus nuke is absurd and manifestly erroneous. In conclusion, every single one of these misleading claims attempting to refute the overwhelming evidence for Tartus nuke has been obliterated. ctbto.org/resources/for-…
TRUMP LETS IT SLIP: He accidentally admitted he's been using nuclear weapons against Iran!!
Dear Mrs von der Leyen, Did you also discuss with @POTUS that you are fully aware that Nordstream was nuked (sic!) under US/NATO auspices, ever since receiving my geophysical Report on April 24 2023, (19:15) (previously also sent to 3 Physics Nobel Laureates and @SecGenNATO on April 4 (07:48) and @IntlCrimCourt on April 9). The nuclear destruction of Nordstream constitutes a war crime according to the Rome statute to which all EU states are signatories (Art 8.2 (b) (ii), (iv), (xiii), and potentially (xv)). A summary of my evidence proving the nuclear (!) destruction of Nordstream 1+2 beyond the shadow of a doubt was subsequently presented to the UN Security Council on Sept 26 2023 (SC/15422). Instead of following up on my report, responsibility of an investigation was offloaded to authorities of Sweden, Denmark and Germany with the former two promptly aborting their investigations shortly afterwards, while the matter was buried by DE til the recent arrest of an alleged member of an Ukrainian yacht diving crew which merely serves as a smokescreen to deflect from the real perpetrators US/NATO. Here again a historical summary for your convenience: US LNG export capacity increased from ~0 in '16 to that of Nordstream 1+2 in '20 (within few percent) before Nordstream was destroyed by a Mini-Nuke under US/NATO auspices exactly on Donetsk Referendum Day, serving as covert shock wave attack towards Kaliningrad as evidenced by seismic measurements. This was a US/NATO masterstroke: The covert nuclear nature of this attack subjugated DE and DK unconditionally to US/NATO orders including the EU as now has become evident, and coerced SW & FI into NATO. x.com/Ben68638515/st…
Evidence for Tartus nuke (Dec 15 ’24, UTC) rests on 6 independent geophysical evidences (remote and local radiation, seismic waveform and amplitude, crater size, pressure damage). Every single one of these evidences are at variance with the unbased though widespread claim of a conventional explosive. Since more than a year, no single valid scientific argument has been presented against these evidences, despite unbased claims to the contrary. As some of these unbased claims are as unlikely to be correct as finding one particular atom in the entire Universe, yet find their way into absurdly "not even wrong" and misleading CN’s, here is a comprehensive rebuttal: 1) The observed radiation peak intensity in Cyprus (and Turkey) is in complete agreement with the quantitative predictions of a US DoD fallout model based on a 99.9% clean weapon [Housatonic ,1962] and a 0.3kt yield following independent from crater size *and* seismic data. 2) ) The unbased claim that observed radiation peaks are within “normal radiation levels”, blatantly ignores the fact in *all* 7 (!) Cyprus stations on Dec 16 ’24 are at 4-12 sigma above background. In addition, there are signals at 6 Turkish stations each with >7 sigma signals. The likelihood of all of these signals being random is much less than 1 in 10^52, or as absurdly unlikely as finding one particular atom in the whole of Earth. [Note that *one single* 5-sigma observation is sufficient for scientific discovery in Particle Physics, 2 sigma in Biology]. 3) There is a similar unbased claim that the Tartus GZ radiation readings were random. Instead of sending a team in Dec ’24, IAEA sponsored the DoD co-sponsored “GoodISIS” to produce an entirely flawed report containing above erroneous arguments. The readings of 6000nSv/h, finally performed after 3 months, exceeded those of Hiroshima and Nagasaki after a shorter time. Observed Tartus GZ radiation levels *exceeded* the published background levels in Syria of 94 +/- 8 nSv/h by more than 700 sigma (!), The claim of a a random occurrence is even less likely to be correct than finding one particular atom in the entire Universe. And - last not least : 4) CTBTO Chief Rob Floyd has recently admitted that his organization is fundamentally unable to detect nukes with yield of <0.5kt ( that includes “dirty” ones). Thus CTBTO cannot detect the Tartus nuke of 0.3kt (B61-12 at lowest yield). Thus the claim that international agencies would have reported an event of the size of Tartus nuke is absurd and manifestly erroneous. In conclusion, every single one of these misleading claims attempting to refute the overwhelming evidence for Tartus nuke has been obliterated. ctbto.org/resources/for-…
Netflix has applied to re-register its trademark in Russia. It's over...
Vance suggests Iran could have used nuclear suicide vests: “You talk about people who walk into a crowded supermarket and have a vest on, and they blow up the vest and a couple of people get killed, and that's a terrible tragedy. What happens when what's on the vest is not something that can kill a couple of people, but can kill many, many tens of thousands of people?”
