🕊 God is Good 🙏

3.5K posts

🕊 God is Good 🙏 banner
🕊 God is Good 🙏

🕊 God is Good 🙏

@GodisGood4EVR

Broken man saved by Christ ✝️. I'm here to uplift others, stand for Truth and share the Good News! ❤️

เข้าร่วม Kasım 2024
1K กำลังติดตาม637 ผู้ติดตาม
ทวีตที่ปักหมุด
🕊 God is Good 🙏
🕊 God is Good 🙏@GodisGood4EVR·
I made this today! If you weren't aware of some facts/evidence surrounding Jesus' crucifixion & resurrection, then check this out! I also made the acronym C.H.R.I.S.T to help remember/for quick reference 😁✝️ I got a lot of this info from Dr.Gary Habermas and @DrMikeLicona ❤️
🕊 God is Good 🙏 tweet media
English
4
3
21
1.2K
🕊 God is Good 🙏 รีทวีตแล้ว
The Conservative Alternative
The Conservative Alternative@OldeWorldOrder·
Charlie Kirk on Jesus's Sacrifice: "The Gospel in 4 words is 'Jesus took my place'. Three words is 'Him for me'. Two words is 'Substitutional Atonement'. And one word is 'Grace'."
English
43
1.7K
8K
93.8K
🕊 God is Good 🙏 รีทวีตแล้ว
James A. Furey
James A. Furey@JamesAFurey·
After 30 years of being an Atheist, tonight I will be baptized, confirmed, and reconciled to God. I cannot stop thinking about it.
English
4.4K
6.3K
78.9K
651.5K
Ridvan Aydemir | Apostate Prophet
1. The crowd = All Jews everywhere forever? 2. Have you heard of the phrase: "Father, forgive them, for they do not know what they are doing." (Luke 23:34) 3. Have you read Romans 11? Even as Paul was referring to those of Israel who were persecuting the Christians, he said the following: "As far as the gospel is concerned, they are enemies for your sake; but as far as election is concerned, they are loved on account of the patriarchs, for God’s gifts and his call are irrevocable." Romans 11:28-29
English
3
0
22
498
Ridvan Aydemir | Apostate Prophet
Most of those who hate Jews also hate Protestant Christians. It's only a matter of time until they expose themselves.
English
130
168
1.4K
24.1K
🕊 God is Good 🙏 รีทวีตแล้ว
PBD Podcast
PBD Podcast@PBDsPodcast·
A Case For Jesus Christ - @LeeStrobel (1:56) Who Killed Jesus (14:34) Proving Jesus (27:30) Relationship with Parents (34:04) Joining the Church & Billy Graham (43:56) Scandals & Churches (50:35) Evolution to Christian (1:04:44) Countries & Christianity (1:12:57) Barriers of Entry (1:24:38) Robert’s Testimony (1:30:10) Islam, Trump & Kirk (1:39:45) Seeing the Supernatural
English
145
630
2.6K
109.5K
Metatron
Metatron@pureMetatron·
Jesus is God.
English
192
202
3.6K
26.4K
🕊 God is Good 🙏
🕊 God is Good 🙏@GodisGood4EVR·
@LonghornJoker x.com/i/status/20325… This former lesbian (and biblically correct) person would disagree
Melissa the Hopeful🏠Homemaker@BiblicalBeauty

Rosaria Butterfield on the part of her testimony that squishy evangelicals find really offensive: "We are called not only to mortify the flesh, we're called to do more than that. We're called to get up and live in the righteousness of God. True believers are a Galatians 2:20 people: 'I've been crucified with Christ. It is no longer I who live, but Christ who lives in me, and the life I now live in the flesh, I live by faith in the Son of God who loves me and gave Himself for me.' God changed me. He changed my affections. He does that. I am no longer gay, and I am no longer an atheist, and I have been married to my godly husband, who is also my pastor, for almost as long as I have been a Christian. I met and married Kent two years after I committed my life to Jesus. And my marriage to Kent Butterfield has been my greatest protection over my heart and my soul and the particular way that the Lord used an agent of grace, my husband, to help my feelings and my affections change... And I'm a little baffled...why is no longer being gay considered inauthentic? I mean I've wondered, why was my past personal experience as a lesbian authentic, but my present life as a heterosexually married woman to a faithful godly husband with children and a grandson inauthentic? I mean, I'm just curious, but when did it become inauthentic in squishy evangelical-land to be a born again Christian?"

English
0
0
0
74
Against Atheism
Against Atheism@AgainstAtheismX·
Christians What is your favourite book of the Bible?
English
662
17
408
52.4K
🕊 God is Good 🙏 รีทวีตแล้ว
Charlie Kirk
Charlie Kirk@charliekirk11·
Today is Good Friday. Thank you, Jesus for your amazing and unthinkable sacrifice. You died so that we would have life, and life in abundance. “It was nine in the morning when they crucified him. The written notice of the charge against him read: the king of the jews … With a loud cry, Jesus breathed his last. The curtain of the temple was torn in two from top to bottom. And when the centurion, who stood there in front of Jesus, saw how he died, he said, ‘Surely this man was the Son of God!’” Mark 15
English
1.3K
12.5K
75.6K
1.3M
🕊 God is Good 🙏
🕊 God is Good 🙏@GodisGood4EVR·
@ConceptualJames Seems to be the case. Whether woke right or woke left, I basically look at them as people whom are ideologically captured via algorithms and propagandists, and then they embody resentment, envy, anger, depression/doomer mentality, and then they blame the so-called "oppressors".
English
0
2
9
392
James Lindsay, anti-Communist
James Lindsay, anti-Communist@ConceptualJames·
What you see almost endlessly from Tucker Carlson, "Comic" Dave Smith, Theo Von, etc., and the rest of the blackpillers amounts to a Critical America Theory. I'm not making this up. I'm explaining. Critical Theory was developed by neo-Marxist Max Horkheimer of the Frankfurt School in 1937. In an interview in 1969, Horkheimer explained what the Critical Theory is. He said (closely paraphrasing): "I developed the Critical Theory because we [Western neo-Marxists] realized we cannot articulate the good or ideal society on the terms of the existing society. What we can do is criticize those aspects of the existing society that we wish to change." In other words, a Critical Theory believes everything is so captured and corrupted by power and those who benefit from systems of power that it isn't even possible to talk about a better situation in clear terms. All that's available is criticism of why the system/society isn't better than it is. This activity has come to be known as identifying or "making visible" the various "problematics" in the existing system. A Critical Theory OF SOMETHING would focus this general mode of engagement into a particular domain. For example, a Critical Theory of Race in America would believe that racism is so endemic to a society and embedded within its systems to the benefit of whites that we cannot articulate a true "antiracist" vision on the terms available to us. All we could do is identify where "racism" manifests and criticize it for being there. We call that program "Critical Race Theory" because it is a Critical Theory of Race. What it does in practice is (1) identifies "hidden racism" in everything (criticizing those elements of the existing (racial) system they wish to change), called "identifying problematics"; (2) induces more people to think this way; nothing else. What a Critical America Theory would look like is not being able to articulate what a good or ideal America would look like on the terms of the existing America but criticizing those elements of America as it exists that we wish to change. That is, it would look for everything America isn't doing perfectly according to some ideal standard that doesn't exist, probably cannot exist, and cannot even be articulated and "make those problematics visible" in the hopes of changing the system. Leftists, including the whole of Critical Race Theory, do this endlessly. From Derrick Bell's (founder of CRT) 1970 book, Race, Racism, and American Law, forward, it is a relentless racial Critical America Theory. That's why it exported poorly and often hilariously to other countries that don't have the same law or racial history. Howard Zinn's A People's History of the United States (1980) is another example, a very naked example, of a work of Critical America Theory. Specifically, this book goes through every chapter of American history, from pre-founding (Christopher Columbus) to the present (1980 at the time) and catalogues how America cheated "the people," mainly workers, indigenous, racial minorities, and women (the intersectional coalition). What I'm telling you is that the blackpillers of Podcastistan and X, etc., very notably including Tucker Carlson, are doing a socially conservative variation on Critical America Theory. Whether Carlson or "Auron MacIntyre" (nhrn) from The Blaze, the undertone of every message is plainly "you don't hate your (real) country enough" as compared against an imaginary ideal that doesn't, can't, and won't ever exist. The Blackpill Comics all do the same thing, relentlessly identifying "problematics" and alleged hidden systems of control that delegitimize the country as it actually is against a standard that isn't even real. The thing is, Critical America Theory is a Critical Theory of America. That is, it is a Critical Theory. That is, when you participate in this slop, you are taking on a critical consciousness about America. Having a critical consciousness is being WOKE, by definition (of Woke). This slop is Woke. When this Critical America Theory slop takes on a socially Leftist slant, we call it Woke Left (or just Woke). When this Critical America Theory slop takes on a socially conservative or Rightist slant, we call it Woke Right (which is just Woke too). They are both Woke. They are both toxic. They are both false enlightenment into a kind of terrible darkness, entitlement, malice, despair, hatred, and failure. Reject Critical America Theory. Love your country. It's great, and it's worth it.
English
362
918
3.9K
346.3K
James Lindsay, anti-Communist
James Lindsay, anti-Communist@ConceptualJames·
Imagine doing this under the name "Jesus of Nazareth." The Woke Right is completely demonic.
James Lindsay, anti-Communist tweet media
English
31
25
374
9.7K
James Lindsay, anti-Communist
James Lindsay, anti-Communist@ConceptualJames·
Gotta say, watching the world turn against Israel for absolutely ridiculous Father-of-Lies reasons is pretty amazing to watch unfold.
English
208
152
2.2K
58.6K
Klamz
Klamz@jklamz1·
@TheGoldenAge777 @oliverburdick That was the Old testament. The New Testament Covenant now spreads the final message of Peace and love so there was an evolution between Covenants from Israelites to the whole world. Unfortunately some still hang on to the Old covenant.
English
3
0
0
79
Oliver Burdick
Oliver Burdick@oliverburdick·
God never commands genocide.
English
73
8
125
6.1K
RW
RW@RevealHisWorks·
@truedavidgravy @GodisGood4EVR @ConceptualJames Even more, how do you know it's not metaphorically/spiritually about Jesus. He is referred to as the Rock so many times, it's almost ignorance to think it has to be talking about Israel the nation
English
2
0
1
13