Guns & Guard Dogs

5K posts

Guns & Guard Dogs banner
Guns & Guard Dogs

Guns & Guard Dogs

@GunsnGuardDogs

Because guns are political. Staying safe, free, and sane in increasingly authoritarian, post-constitutional times. Pattern watcher. Counter-revolutionary.

เข้าร่วม Mart 2023
6.7K กำลังติดตาม5K ผู้ติดตาม
ทวีตที่ปักหมุด
Guns & Guard Dogs
Guns & Guard Dogs@GunsnGuardDogs·
The Truth About Politicians Who Advocate For Gun Control Many people make a fundamental mistake about politicians. They believe politicians want to solve our problems. They are mistaken. Politicians do not care about solving your problems or my problems. They are only interested in solving their own problems. Their biggest problem is, "How do I get elected?" Their second biggest problem is, "How do I get re-elected?" Whatever concern of theirs that comes in after that lags far, far behind the first two. As such, politicians are nothing more than professional leeches whose every public statement and utterance revolves around one main concern: Is what I am about to say going to garner me votes, or will it cost me votes? Thus they always choose what they say based on that calculation. So when you hear a politician say he's in favor of some sort of "gun control", that means he feels that the majority of his constituents favor that position, and that if he then advocates for it, it will make him more popular and increase his electoral viability. To put it another way, he feels he'll get more votes if he comes out in favor of it. The ONLY other reason a politician will advocate for gun control is a far more nefarious and sinister one: He doesn't really believe in the 2nd Amendment at all and thinks the American people should be disarmed. He can't come right out and say this (at least not yet), so you'll hear things like "common sense gun control" and "how many more people must die before we act?", but this individual really just wants us completely disarmed. He wants that because he is an autocrat who believes in an enormous, centralized government that controls every aspect of our lives (or at least every aspect that is important to them, of which our safety and security certainly isn't), and he understands that a disarmed populace is obviously much, much easier to dominate and control than an armed one. This person doesn't give a damn about saving lives, and that's not at all why he wants our guns. The only life he might ever have cared about saving was one that might vote for him. Beyond that he doesn't care at all. It's all about power and control and forcing us to bend to their will. And that's so much easier when none of us has any guns.
English
10
20
69
9K
Guns & Guard Dogs
Guns & Guard Dogs@GunsnGuardDogs·
Brilliant work by @StevenMurphy_2 in absolutely dismantling the biggest fake, phony fraud over at NRO, @AndrewCMcCarthy.
Steven Murphy@StevenMurphy_2

Andy - This article is the perfect example of why a lot of people don’t trust you and think that you are a secret Trump hater. 1. You begin by thanking people for supporting you. That’s fine. 2. You bring up Assange and “wacky” Roger Stone. Why call Roger Stone “wacky”? Stone is wacky. But why say it? It’s not the strongest of derogatory language but it’s stronger language than you use anywhere else in the piece when discussing what Mueller, Obama, and Clinton did. On one hand, we have a wacky guy. On the other side we have a group that tore the nation apart over a hoax. And the only place that you can insert an adjective is when discussing Stone! Right away my “bias radar” is activated and I think “Oh no! Andy’s doing it again!” 3. Then you go off the rails! You end the paragraph with “Stone was doing what the Clinton campaign did.” No he was not! You create a false equivalence out of two things that are wildly different. Stone was doing what everyone in politics did. He was looking for dirt on his opponent. Unsavory but typical. What Clinton was doing did was using the power of her position to unleash the greatest political dirty trick of all time. Obama, Comey, Brennan, and the lot of them all knew it was fake. It was such a big deal that they even had a meeting in the White House to discuss it. Susan Rice was so concerned that she had to write a memo to herself to protect herself. The Clinton crew then used the wheels of power to hobble the next President of the Inited States. It was far more than a hoax. And it wasn’t opposition research. It was a lie and they knew it. But how do you describe it? You say “Stone was doing what the Clinton campaign did.” Shame on you. And it’s a point in support of why I think you’re biased. 3. You then give a reasonably fair but uninspiring account of what happened with Assange and some other misdeeds of the Mueller probe. But you never import the magnitude of their ill deeds. You never place it in context. It just comes off like more of the typical dirty tricks like what “whacky” Roger Stone. Why do you avoid addressing magnitude of the sin? The Mueller team was doing horrible things and you mention the acts without discussing the incredible level of their misdeeds. And you can’t feign ignorance. You’re a former prosecutor. 4. Then you do it again. As you wrap up your story and get to the conclusion, you say: “To be clear, it's entirely possible that U.S. intelligence agencies were correct in assessing that Russia meddled in the 2016 election.” Why add this? This was the greatest political dirty tricks of all time. The investigation was massive. If there was any actual proof that Russia interfered in the election, they would have released it. They didn’t have any proof. It’s just speculation. But instead of concluding by summarizing the wild misdeeds of Mueller and team, you choose to put life back into the hoax. You choose to say Russia might have interfered. By doing this you distract from the confirmed bad acts to a speculative one that damages Trump. 5. Then you finish with an unemotional last two sentences that simply point out that Mueller didn’t prove his case. This is another example of why you come across as biased and not balanced. There was no equivalence between the actions of Roger Stone and the Clinton crew. The level of misdeed of the Clinton crew is top ten all time in American politics. You start with an implicit jab at Trump and end with a not so implicit jab at Trump. In the middle you do a reasonable recitation of the facts without ever giving the reader the context of the magnitude.

English
0
0
1
36
Guns & Guard Dogs
Guns & Guard Dogs@GunsnGuardDogs·
There really is no point in continuing this. If you can convince me otherwise feel free to try. I have no blind loyalty to any politician, although Trump is hardly a conventional politician by any stretch. At all. That's part of why he's hated so much. You think he's running the country into the ground. I think he saved this fuckin' country. He sleeps 2-3 hours a night, but he's still only human. He makes mistakes, and I don't always agree with everything he says and does. But there's never been anyone like him, and the reaction to this man becoming president, and what that has revealed about this country and the world we live in is the most astonishing thing I've seen in my lifetime. But he'll be gone in just a few years. And I voted for him. 3 times. You voted for Kamala. And Biden. And Hillary (If you were old enough). Didn't you?
English
1
0
0
22
Kohl
Kohl@R_Kohls21·
@GunsnGuardDogs @jonfavs Not a dem, just don’t fuck with needless spending from anyone. The orange dipshit is out here running up the countries debt by trillions in his first year. Not my problem your blind loyalty is helping run our country into the ground
English
1
0
0
16
Guns & Guard Dogs
Guns & Guard Dogs@GunsnGuardDogs·
So there was a downturn in crime before they were sent in. So what, that means it would've continued regardless of the presence of national guard troops? The guard had no discernible effect on crime continuing to decline? You know this? Let me ask you something, you have any relatives in law enforcement? Any family members who are cops? A son? A brother? Anyone?
English
0
0
0
32
Kohl
Kohl@R_Kohls21·
@GunsnGuardDogs @jonfavs lol bro I live in DC, we already had a downturn on crime before they were sent here. They literally sit on their asses all day and do jack shit here. Why tf are my tax dollars being used for pvt. Tom to stand on some grass and try to look tough?
English
3
0
0
34
Will
Will@willornot·
@GunsnGuardDogs @jonfavs Hell yeah! We’ve got you first on that list! Can’t wait for the gulag 😆
English
1
0
0
14
Guns & Guard Dogs
Guns & Guard Dogs@GunsnGuardDogs·
@R_Kohls21 @jonfavs Some documented evidence of the US citizens being arrested and all the rapes and killings would be appreciated. Tia.
English
0
0
0
11
Kohl
Kohl@R_Kohls21·
@GunsnGuardDogs @jonfavs As for ice bro what fucking crack are you smoking? The number of documented arrests on us citizens, rape of detainees, and extrajudicial killings are unreal. I’m all about legal immigration but they’re effectively just trumps gestapo at this point
English
1
0
0
17
Guns & Guard Dogs
Guns & Guard Dogs@GunsnGuardDogs·
@75TonyT @jonfavs No, actually it's a conclusion based on years of careful, insightful analysis, in addition to listening to, speaking with and reading many sophisticated, informed and astute observers of the political and social landscape.
English
1
0
0
8
Guns & Guard Dogs
Guns & Guard Dogs@GunsnGuardDogs·
@dummbrain @jonfavs Were you asleep during the 4 years the people who controlled what's left of Joe Biden's brain were the president?
English
0
0
0
9
Guns & Guard Dogs
Guns & Guard Dogs@GunsnGuardDogs·
Republicans are more often than not feckless, lying cowards with no backbone who fold like a cheap suit. Still, I can find a few that I like. Democrats, however, with the exception of John Fetterman (of all people) are a special kind of evil, who no one outside of an illegal alien (since that's who they exclusively stand for now) should vote for. As for Iran, I think he has very good reasons for doing what he's done and I don’t think it's a war for Israel.
English
0
0
0
13
Uncle Drew
Uncle Drew@drewthevirghoe·
@GunsnGuardDogs @jonfavs the man is declaring wars and threatening to invade countries for no reason but the liberals are the evil regime ok… what if, now stay with me here, both sides are evil?
English
1
0
0
35
Guns & Guard Dogs
Guns & Guard Dogs@GunsnGuardDogs·
Yeah, sure. I think the deployment of troops in DC resulted in a significant drop in crime. That's what they were sent there for. As for ICE, the people they target are usually people with prior arrests or pending charges, like for violent crimes and exual assaults. That's in addition to first breaking the law by coming into the country illegally. How is any of that oppressive?
English
1
0
0
30
Kohl
Kohl@R_Kohls21·
@GunsnGuardDogs @jonfavs Care to explain how the man sending the national guard to lock down cities and deploying untrained ice agents into peoples homes and communities isn’t “oppressive”
English
2
0
0
60
Harry Sisson
Harry Sisson@harryjsisson·
I expect every Republican who was outraged at people for celebrating Charlie Kirk’s death to immediately condemn Trump for saying “I’m glad he’s dead” about Robert Mueller. This is disgusting.
Harry Sisson tweet media
English
6.5K
10.2K
61.2K
2.7M
Guns & Guard Dogs รีทวีตแล้ว
Lindsey Bruce
Lindsey Bruce@_gypsy_queen_·
Robert Mueller harassed an innocent man (Peter W. Smith) until he commited suicide. Robert Mueller ruined HUNDREDS of lives based on a fraudulent case he KNEW was fabricated by Democrats. Robert Mueller drove families that had ZERO involvement with Russia into bankruptcy. Their children even received death threats. Spare me the pearl clutching over Trump's response to his death. Robert Mueller was heartless. ☠️
Lindsey Bruce tweet media
English
1.7K
14.9K
50.1K
551.1K
Help Street Dogs
Help Street Dogs@shouq_al90149·
Hello… 🐾🥺 I know you’re busy, I won’t ask for a follow. Just a little heart would make my day 💖
English
801
1.3K
5.3K
31.6K