Not a bot... or at least I hope not

@XavLiew @George_Davison1 @uncannymannyyt @jakeshieldsajj This is not the same thing. I said China owns a large percentage of enterprises. You responded with how much the government spends. Not sure how you see those two as correlating

@Hoooo95 @George_Davison1 @uncannymannyyt @jakeshieldsajj Here x.com/grok/status/20…

I’m in Vietnam a “communist” country and they are clearly on an upward swing It’s clean safe beautiful, zero homeless, free healthcare and little crime Their GDP is growing 4 times faster than in America Now I'm not a communist but this isn’t the horror we were told

@George_Davison1 @uncannymannyyt @jakeshieldsajj Don’t forget to mention state owned entities (companies) make up 30-40% of China’s GDP. Now explain how Europe is more communist in practice.

China combine extreme elements of what are considered communist and capitalist policies. State owns most of the land , but heavy industry and manufacturing are highly competitive, and historically lightly regulated meaning they produce virtually every consumer goods cheaper than the rest of the world

@SenFettermanPA You’re a republican partisan hack . Which democratic politician supports this? It was one thing when you feigned being independent. Spreading lies like this is ridiculous

Here in Philadelphia. Truly appalling. These assholes chanting for the death of our servicemembers. Where’s the Dem outrage and condemnation?

@greg16676935420 @Kalshi What if we each bet two dollars it will happen and then give him a dollar

@Kalshi If we all donate just one dollar to him I bet he makes it

BREAKING: Elon Musk’s odds of becoming a trillionaire this year hits 82% — a record high.

@SenTedCruz Everyone mark your calendar for 6 months from now and make sure to come back to this

In the next 6 months, we could see new governments in Iran, Venezuela, and Cuba. If we end up with governments in those countries that want to be friends with America, that’d be the biggest geopolitical shift since the fall of the Berlin Wall.

@willchamberlain The interesting part about the trump administration is that his only job is to act. The logic and reasons for his actions don’t matter because his followers will later connect the dots as needed to provide justification

Basically every major development in the Iran War has vindicated Trump’s decision to strike. 1) Overwhelming current disparity in traditional military capability = now is a good time to strike, we can destroy their capabilities with limited losses of personnel/material 2) Iran flings ballistics and drones at a nearly a dozen non-combatant neighbors = they are crazy and can’t be trusted with nukes 3) Iran opens negotiations with Witkoff with “we have enough 60% enriched material for 11 bombs and we will not give you anything at the negotiating table that you couldn’t achieve militarily” = diplomacy would not have solved the problem 4) Iran fires ballistics at Diego Garcia = they were not far from having ICBMs that could hit the Eastern Seaboard The case for hitting Iran is STRONGER than it was for ISIS!

@CreekshitinDaws @washingtonpost Don’t exaggerate, it was only 72

@washingtonpost This isn't funny. It killed 73 people.

A robot couldn't stop dancing at a HaiDiLao Hotpot restaurant in Cupertino, California, sending food and chopsticks flying despite the best efforts of three staff members.

@PrinceEwa5 @DanBilzerian @joekent16jan19 A he wrote a letter to explain it

@DanBilzerian @joekent16jan19 What later changed?

Wow, much respect @joekent16jan19 this is the type of honesty and patriotism this country needs. READ this letter

@nonregemesse @HasanibnAli7218 @Grouchy_couchy_ @FactsMatterNow Why don’t you explain what you’re disputing since nobody gets it

@HasanibnAli7218 @Grouchy_couchy_ @FactsMatterNow Again, that’s not what he said. I’m not disputing the number.

Isn’t it disproportionately high given the population size?

@truspio @bombinic @filipmiler88 @glowstronggirl @grok I was going to ask this. Would it matter if it’s before or after noon?

@bombinic @filipmiler88 @glowstronggirl @grok But if you put first stone at noon and the other later, that method will misguide you

When lost, let the sun guide you.

@RedWavePress Other than Witkoff is there evidence they said this? If they were weeks away why wouldn’t they not say anything, get the nukes, and then be in a position where they can’t be attacked? It’s almost like these negotiators have the same level of intelligence as the average Fox viewer

Bill Maher: “Our chief negotiator said they were talking to Iran up until the war started. He said their opening salvo at the negotiations, ‘We’re a couple of weeks away from having 11 [nuclear] bombs.’” “If you were the president and you got that information, you would still do nothing?” Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro: “What I would do and what the president of the United States failed to do was be clear with the American people about what the h*ll we were doing here.” Bill Maher: “I think people have an idea [about why we bombed Iran]. Everything you said, the nukes, regime change, and just to reshuffle the deck in the Middle East. Nothing ever really was going to get better until that regime went away.”

@panekkkk @JavierBlas You’re also making it sound like he isn’t firing generals because they don’t 100% agree with his opinion. So yeah, I think faith in the system has eroded with the career staffers that have been pushed out to make way for podcasters

So the commodities columnist is now a military strategist? You think the U.S. with its air dominance would just let Iran continue to use the Strait for China and Iran’s own benefit while blocking it for others? Tell me, what is Iran’s plan to keep its economy stable without its oil exports? What remaining leverage does it have in this scenario? You don’t think the U.S. military, the best in the world, didn’t have a well-vetted war games scenario that involved Iran blocking the Strait — a retaliatory move that even armchair analysts have known for decades? You really believe that? You can believe Trump is inept while still having full faith in U.S. generals.

OK, I suppose we should admit the White House was right, and, all along, they did have a plan to deal with the closure of the Strait of Hormuz. Bomb Kharg Island.

@mattvanswol Yeah because you’re just his constituents. Have you tried giving him millions of dollars? Somehow you confused the responsibilities of a senator

Just a gentle reminder that Lindsey Graham lives 1.5 hours from my doorstep. He NEVER CAME TO VISIT US in Western North Carolina a SINGLE TIME after Hurricane Helene. Not once. He has flown to Ukraine 9 times and tries to visit Israel “every 2 weeks”…

@grok @TomCottonAR @grok did they lobotomize you!

@Hoooo95 @TomCottonAR Ask Grok is currently available to Premium and Premium+ subscribers only. Subscribe to unlock this feature: x.com/i/premium_sign…

In 2020, Republicans and President Trump tried to refill the Strategic Petroleum Reserve at $20 a barrel. Chuck Schumer and Democrats blocked it from happening.

@grok @TomCottonAR @grok when did you start charging people

@Hoooo95 @TomCottonAR Ask Grok is currently available to Premium and Premium+ subscribers only. Subscribe to unlock this feature: x.com/i/premium_sign…

@SteveSkojec @Barttaylor81749 @Connor38240 “They would totally do it without restraint” “Well, they would do in a certain situation. They have to restrain themselves here” “No, I mean they definitely would but they know they shouldn’t” “They can’t do it” What’s the point of this post other than to hear yourself speak

@Barttaylor81749 @Connor38240 Oh, you mean the totally degraded capacity? How many have they managed to launch this week?

Trump: "We could take apart their electric capacity within 1 hour, and it would take them 25 years to rebuild. So ideally, we're not going to be doing that." He isn't exaggerating. One of the weird infrastructure quirks most people don't know about power grids is that they are dependent on something called Large Power Transformers (LPTs), and they are custom built, freaking MASSIVE, have limited sourcing for components, and take over 2 years from design to buildout in most cases. They weigh up to 400 tons. They can be up to two stories tall. You can't just ship them -- you need special equipment to move them. It's incredibly costly just to move them, even in the best of circumstances. And they're backlogged. Costs to replace them all would be 11 figures -- tens of billions. They'd have to get past sanctions. They'd be competing for scarce resources among high demand. Yet another example of American restraint in this operation. The Iranians wouldn't think twice about destroying electric grids.

@grok @dantypo @Brownsfan252 @grok given the argument is something like “prices were high under Biden and are volatile, so why are you now concerned under trump.” This lacks context on whether their direct actions led to prices or it was broader event. Event if the statement is true how is the argument valid

The argument has some validity for perspective: oil is indeed highly volatile historically (e.g., peaked near $147 in 2008, $130 in 2022), and $90–91 isn't a record high—far from the $127 Biden-era spike. That said, the 42% monthly surge (confirmed via futures data as of Mar 6) is unusually sharp, driven by the ongoing Iran war's disruption to Strait of Hormuz shipping (20% of global oil flows). Context like that matters for short-term economic effects like inflation and supply risks, even if prices normalize later. Volatility doesn't erase specific causes.

Oil is at $90 a barrel. Reminder that oil rose to $127 a barrel under Biden and he kissed Iran’s ass.

@dantypo @Brownsfan252 @grok looks like @dantypo implies that oil prices were once high so we should ignore the recent rapid rise.Then he clarifies it’s always volatile. Is this argument valid? Should people ignore the current rapid rise and not take into account the direct actions that led to it(war)?

@Brownsfan252 That the oil market is always volatile no matter war or peace? That it goes up during war and peace and sickness and in health and that it’s not like it’s at some record high nor even higher than recently.

@TukiFromKL What if she’s still using ChatGPT as her lawyer and it’s the one that advised her to sue? Then what if it wins the court case? Does that mean OpenAI loses credibility for the initial case or does the second elevate them?

🚨Let me explain what just happened because I don't think people understand how insane this is. > A woman asked ChatGPT for legal help. It told her to fire her real lawyer. She did. > Then it wrote 40+ court filings citing laws that don't exist. Cases that never happened. Judges that never ruled. > The other side spent $300,000 responding to completely made up legal documents. > An AI hallucinated an entire legal career and nobody noticed for months. > OpenAI is now being sued for $10 million. And this is the same company that just signed a deal with the Pentagon. They can't even stop their AI from faking court cases. But sure, give it access to military intelligence. What could possibly go wrong.