David 🦁📟 🇮🇱

68.3K posts

David 🦁📟 🇮🇱 banner
David 🦁📟 🇮🇱

David 🦁📟 🇮🇱

@InvisibleTL

EPA retired. Environmental Systems Analyst. Cornell. Union Shop Steward. Opinions are my own. Trolls are tasty. Zionist. I'm not Hotu

Canada's 11th Province เข้าร่วม Kasım 2016
3.1K กำลังติดตาม3.5K ผู้ติดตาม
ทวีตที่ปักหมุด
David 🦁📟 🇮🇱
David 🦁📟 🇮🇱@InvisibleTL·
I love twitter. It's a safe quiet space where I can forget my ivy league environmental systems degree, 30 years EPA experience, time on the national hydrofracking workgroup and be lectured to by someone who just watched a YouTube video.
English
62
60
400
0
David 🦁📟 🇮🇱 รีทวีตแล้ว
Nicole Lampert
Nicole Lampert@nicolelampert·
John Simpson blocked me so he won’t see this but you might enjoy it - giftlink below 👇🏼
Nicole Lampert tweet media
English
52
252
1.1K
21.1K
David 🦁📟 🇮🇱 รีทวีตแล้ว
David 🦁📟 🇮🇱 รีทวีตแล้ว
𝔼𝕝𝕝𝕚𝕠𝕥 𝕄𝕒𝕝𝕚𝕟
This is false, by the way. @AIPAC supports the U.S.-Israel alliance. It does not support, nor is there evidence that it does support, Netanyahu in particular. He's the Prime Minister of the State of Israel. In the interest of their mission they meet with the entire government, including the opposition. In fact, the opposition leader spoke to AIPAC members at its latest gathering in Washington. What @jonfavs is trying to do here is say that AIPAC is an agent of Netanyahu and his government. That's simply false and a malicious misrepresentation of AIPAC and what it does. If you were to go to AIPAC I would guarantee that you talk to individual members they will tell you they disagree with Netanyahu and his government at times, and some will side with the opposition. The reason for that is their mission is purely the alliance and relationship between the United States and Israel. That is it. Bibi will leave at some point, and AIPAC will continue existing doing the same thing it has always done.
Pod Save America@PodSaveAmerica

Jon Favreau on AIPAC.

English
24
35
213
11.5K
David 🦁📟 🇮🇱 รีทวีตแล้ว
Claire
Claire@Claire_V0ltaire·
You’re missing the point. A lot of the feedback on Rama’s recent rape denial, Hamas support, and working for antisemites who sound like the second rising of Hitler was dismissed as reaction to October 7. The recent resurfacing of her past behavior online extends the bridge of her racism and vile beliefs as character flaws from earlier years and up to her late 20’s, and not a recent anomalous behavior.
Destiny | Steven Bonnell II@TheOmniLiberal

Good, there shouldn't be. Who the fuck cares what someone tweeted when they were 15? You people are a joke.

English
8
31
177
4.8K
Melat Kiros for Congress, CO-1
I’m the candidate challenging Diana DeGette. I’ll say it plain and clear: Free Palestine and we need an arms embargo on ALL weapons now. I’m not afraid to talk to voters about these issues directly and respectfully. If you want to connect, find me at kirosforco.com
Sunrise Movement 🌅@sunrisemvmt

BREAKING: Rep. DeGette gets heated with a constituent pressing her on why she voted to send bombs to Israel: "If this the only issue that you care about is this issue, then you should not vote for me" DeGette, who's 68, is facing a primary challenge from @MelatKirosCO.

English
230
2.7K
13.6K
292.2K
David 🦁📟 🇮🇱 รีทวีตแล้ว
Gabriel Epstein
Gabriel Epstein@GabrielEpsteinX·
Yesterday, Palestinian Islamic Jihad published the names of an additional 86 commanders killed during the Gaza war. Due to the list's size, this thread will analyze one half, which includes 3 journalists, 3 nurses, and 2 lawyers, among others. Details below: 🧵
Gabriel Epstein tweet media
English
4
179
558
16.8K
David 🦁📟 🇮🇱 รีทวีตแล้ว
Brianna Wu
Brianna Wu@BriannaWu·
What do I expect her to do? I expect her to hold a press conference, and unequivocally denounce the Jew violence she glorified. I expect her to show shame for feeling glee at Jews being forced to dig their own graves by terrorists. I expect her to cry about what happened to the Bibas infants, like any non-psychotic person would do. I expect her to ask for forgiveness and understand she deserves none. I expect my party to give her husband zero political future because we don’t celebrate people that cheerlead the rape and slaughter of civilians. I expect him to resign. Of course, we will get none of that. But it’s what what would happen if our party actually practiced what we preach.
Brianna Wu tweet media
English
867
1.1K
6.5K
379.8K
David 🦁📟 🇮🇱 รีทวีตแล้ว
Masih Alinejad 🏳️
Masih Alinejad 🏳️@AlinejadMasih·
This should have been on the front page of The New York Times. I speak to students in America and most have no idea that more than 30,000 Iranians were killed for protesting and demanding freedom. No names. No faces. No coverage. This silence kills me.💔 Thank you, Australia.
Masih Alinejad 🏳️ tweet media
English
683
16.8K
38.9K
370.7K
David 🦁📟 🇮🇱 รีทวีตแล้ว
Aizenberg
Aizenberg@Aizenberg55·
📌A video of President Clinton saying, “I killed myself trying to give the Palestinians a deal; all of Gaza and 97% of the West Bank. They turned it down. They never wanted peace,” is making the rounds again. Mehdi Hasan responded by telling people to “Google Taba,” referring to the Taba Summit held January 21–27, 2001, just after Clinton left office. The implication is clear: that at Taba, Arafat either accepted a deal or was on the verge of doing so but ran out of time. That narrative is false, and it is disproven by Arafat himself 18 months later. Arafat never said yes at Taba. He didn’t attend, didn’t accept any framework, and didn’t move on core demands like a literal “right of return.” We know this was a central reason he rejected Camp David and the Clinton Parameters, and the claim that the Palestinians were prepared to accept a symbolic or limited return is simply not true (this is clear from the Palestinian reply to the Clinton Parameters). Arafat did not compromise on this point, and he did not accept any deal. Yes, the negotiators, the ones with no power to actually approve any deal, to actually settle the core issues (e.g. refugees) said they were close when the summit ended, but there was thus no deal, no near-deal, and no missed deal due to merely to time. And we know this with certainty because 18 months later, Arafat suddenly claimed he would accept Taba. The Guardian, hardly a pro-Israel outlet, ran the headline: “Arafat approves Taba plan too late,” and reported that Arafat acknowledged the prior offers were not good enough and that he had not accepted any deal at the time. Only afterward did he say he would accept them. If Arafat had truly been ready at Taba, he could have said yes when it actually mattered: under the Clinton Parameters. He had weeks to do so, even after skipping the early January 2001 White House meeting where he was supposed to meet Clinton to accept the deal, despite committing to attend and say yes. Prince Bandar recounts in detail how Arafat left town without giving any answer. This is no longer disputed among the key people involved. Bill Clinton, Dennis Ross, Martin Indyk, Prince Bandar, and even Saeb Erekat all acknowledge the same core fact: Ehud Barak accepted the Clinton Parameters. Arafat did not. Subsequent disclosures have only reinforced this. The Bandar interview, the release of Israel’s formal acceptance, the Palestinian response document, and Clinton’s repeated confirmations all point in the same direction. There was a path to full Palestinian statehood. It was rejected. And the reason this keeps getting rewritten by people like Mehdi Hasan is obvious. This was the pivotal moment. A sovereign Palestinian state was on the table. The conflict could have ended, no more “occupation.” The entire trajectory of the conflict could have been different. And when given another opportunity years later, Mahmoud Abbas did the same with Olmert’s offer, later admitting he walked away.
Aizenberg tweet media
English
17
200
792
25.7K
Anne Pool
Anne Pool@AxelPool6·
@InvisibleTL @RoKhanna It doesn’t serve your cause to equate wealth with badness. Are you blocking out your party Nepo baby Donny bone spurs big bailed out from all his failed bankrupt casino deals, and real estate deals by Rich Nazi daddy.???ok w u?
English
1
0
0
8
David 🦁📟 🇮🇱 รีทวีตแล้ว
Josh
Josh@_j0sh_a_·
Two Israelis wanted to buy a book about Jerusalem, they didn’t expect what would happen next 😂🤣🇸🇩
English
92
459
2.5K
73.4K
David 🦁📟 🇮🇱 รีทวีตแล้ว
Margarita Simonyan
Margarita Simonyan@M_Simonyan·
"A decision was made to specifically hit that target, which means they knew it was a journalist. This was an assassination attempt by Israel to kill RT journalists." Scott Ritter gives us detailed breakdown of why the IDF strike on RT's Steve Sweeney was likely deliberate.
Margarita Simonyan@M_Simonyan

Our correspondent Steve Sweeney has been wounded by an Israeli strike in Lebanon. He says an IDF plane fired upon the car carrying Steve and his cameraman, as they were crossing a bridge in the south of the country. Both men are conscious in hospital, doctors are diagnosing extent of shrapnel damage. War journalists are not legitimate targets. We pray for them.

English
251
3.8K
11.3K
364.4K
Emily A. The Spirit of Jezebel
@brhodes @RobertMackey AIPAC supported Wesley Bell over Cori Bush in MO-01. Some of the people who canvassed and were the most vocal online for Bell were Trump supporters who didn’t even live in the district.
English
10
1
14
536