Justhuman
214 posts


@VicentYip 公路拦断了很多动物的路,妈妈在路这边,孩子在另外一边,过去就可能被撞死,原本属于动物的森林山脉,现在被人类无情的割断了,中国人是没有进化完成的动物,丝毫不考虑自己同类的生存,实在可悲。
中文

@KevinCastley The irony is that nobody in China cares about such videos because that’s just their home and nothing special. Yet here, it’s turned into a so-called political propaganda weapon and a show-off ad, which just goes to show how deep people's prejudices really are. smarty-pants.
English

@xianzhe9527 中國所謂中產本身就是偽命題。在一個國家沒有任何福利保障,一場病一個意外,分秒就可赤貧的中國中產,一切繁華都是虛假的。中國人骨子裡有嚴重不安全感,存錢是刻在基因裡的東西,美國人,哪怕窮,他今天也要開心過了。他基因裡沒有“為了明天今天要吃苦”。我在老一輩德國人身上也看到過這種不安全感
中文

我个人的感受就是,中国中产在消费欲望上跟美国人完全不是一个量级,根本没法比
我觉得国内50万年薪,和美国30万美元年薪,其实基本处在同一个社会收入层级。
国内年薪50万的人,几乎没有什么放纵式的享受型消费。
顶多就是买台三四十万的车,每年出门旅游一两趟,日常带家人偶尔下下馆子,不会在爱好和享乐上花太多钱
我认识的美国人里面,有不少属于年薪30万美金的群体,我感觉绝大部分人普遍是把玩当成人生第一目标,特别舍得为个人爱好砸钱
玩机车的,家里能囤五六台改装重机;玩音乐的,收藏一堆吉他、黑胶唱片堆得满满当当;玩模型的,半个车库摆满军舰、机甲模型,看得我口水横流;钓鱼佬买小游艇,买拖车,那更是我们想都不敢想的。
除此之外,几乎人人都会海外度假、玩野营,玩各种体育项目,讲的就是一个及时行乐
仔细一想,你愿意每年拿30万出来玩,在国内也能玩得这么开心,甚至更开心,但是这样的中国人,我一个都没见过
反过来,像我们这样克制的生活,攒钱买房的美国人,也许有,但我也是一个都没见过
中文

@commiepommie You don't get attacked for being underdeveloped, you get attacked for asking for trouble.
落后不会挨打,犯贱才会
中文

🇯🇵 Sanae Takaichi and Japanese Lawmakers Officially Make Taiwan Their Business 🇹🇼🇨🇳
Japan just dropped “China” from Its parliamentary group name and here’s what that means.
Japan’s pro-Taiwan parliamentary group just dropped the word “China” from its name entirely. The new name: Japan Taiwan Friendly Parliamentary Alliance.
The timing is deliberate. Furuya Keiji, the man behind the push, said the move makes sense because “now is the opportunity.” Sanae Takaichi is already in power and the pro-Taiwan faction inside the Diet is moving while she holds the top job. Photos from the event show Japanese and Republic of China flags side by side.
This is being framed as a natural evolution in how Japan describes its Taiwan ties. It is a political act. Not an administrative one.
When Japan recognised the People’s Republic of China as the sole legal government in 1972, it ended diplomatic relations with Taipei. The 1978 Treaty of Peace and Friendship was concluded on the basis of the one-China principle. Embedding “Taiwan” in the formal name of a parliamentary body and tying that explicitly to the prospect of a right-leaning government, is a deliberate breach of that foundation.
It fits a pattern that has been building for years. Japanese politicians have increasingly talked up the idea that a Taiwan contingency would automatically become a Japan contingency. They have expanded security cooperation, pushed values-based diplomacy and worked to pull Taiwan issues into regional forums. This renaming takes the next step, it makes the alignment more institutional and harder to walk back.
Being in China, you can observe the impact of these actions. They are not read as ambiguous. They are seen as deliberate attempts to normalise what was once kept at arm’s length, to test boundaries and to create facts on the ground.
The media have framed it as three dangerous signals. Pro-Taiwan forces in Japan are becoming more open about their agenda. Some politicians are explicitly banking on a Takaichi government to accelerate their push. And the move directly undermines the political foundation of China-Japan relations that has prevented worse outcomes so far.
Taiwan is not just another diplomatic file for Beijing. It sits at the absolute centre of China’s core interests. A parliamentary rebrand does not change that.
Around 321 Diet members are connected to this effort. The chairman is already subject to a China entry ban. These are not cost-free gestures. They embolden the most hardline elements in Taiwan, raise the risk of miscalculation and signal to Beijing that some in Tokyo see advantage in turning the island into a pressure point.
History does not reward that calculation. External powers that treat Taiwan as a geopolitical lever tend to find themselves exposed when the consequences arrive.
Japan’s parliamentary rebrand is the latest step in a longer trajectory. The same logic, followed consistently, points toward more direct involvement.
Beijing is not misreading the intent. It is watching the pattern and adjusting accordingly.
The question for Japanese strategists is whether they genuinely believe they can keep advancing this line without Beijing treating it as the strategic challenge it clearly is. That is the calculation now in play.


English

@shaunrein The fact is that no matter how right we are, and no matter how emotional our discussions, debates, or even insults about war become, the beginning and the end of war are not for us to decide.
English

@UKFREEDOMUNITE If a rapist is sentenced to death, the rapist is more likely to kill after the rape to reduce the probability of exposure, even if the exposure is arrested, there is no more punishment. So the number of victims of rape is less it will also lead to rapists are more likely to die.
English

@japan_nobunaga If UK does not handle this well, and protect its own people, it will be laughed at by the world and forever nailed to the historical stigma column. When it comes to universal values, I do not think the current handling shows any universal values.
English

As a Japanese watching the UK right now, I have one simple question.
A Sudanese asylum seeker just tried to behead a local man in Belfast. The victim lost an eye.
This comes after years of grooming gangs raping thousands of British girls — gangs that police and councils deliberately ignored because they were afraid of being called racist.
In Japan, even one case like this would have triggered national outrage and immediate policy reversal.
But in Britain, the conversation is still about “not being far-right.”
British people, at what point does protecting your own children become more important than protecting your reputation?
We genuinely do not understand this.
English



















