Creationist Translationist

Computers may be twice as fast as they were in 1979, but your average #YoungEarthCreationist is as misinformed and dangerous as ever. I can help you #Translate what they're actually saying when they bastardize modern science in favor of dogmatic presuppositions.

@aesius1 @The_Archangel_1 That is how plausibility is shown. You test the mechanism (like, protein stabilization via iron), measure how it slows decay, and compare it to what’s actually found in fossils. If the results match, it’s plausible. That’s the standard used in science.

@JustinCPorter @The_Archangel_1 What do any of those other things have to do with what we are talking about? We are talking about a very specific mechanism, explain how testing can show ITS plausibility.

#Translation I've argued with atheists for SIX years, so I'm kind of an expert on evolutionary biology....

@aesius1 @The_Archangel_1 That’s not how testing works. You test the chemistry (rates, stability, conditions, etc.) and compare it to real samples. That's evidence. If you reject extrapolation, you just threw out radiometric dating, astronomy, geology and physics. That's intellectually dishonest.

@JustinCPorter @The_Archangel_1 Explain how they can possibly be tested to be shown effective when the target is 65+million years? And I don't want to hear extrapolation, because that is just speculation.

@aesius1 @The_Archangel_1 You’re rejecting tested chemical mechanisms and replacing them with "therefore Earth is young" with no model and no tests. That’s not skepticism, that’s just making things up and cherry-picking the science you like. Repeatability applies to the mechanisms, dude.

@JustinCPorter @The_Archangel_1 🤣 dude, if you can't make repeatable tests, you are speculating. The fact that they find these soft tissues points to a younger age, not that there needs to be some sort of process that preserves them. That is forcing the evidence to fit the narrative.

#Translation 9 million kids dying of starvation each year isn't a bad thing when you believe in a talking donkey and snake.

@aesius1 @The_Archangel_1 Your entire argument is ‘if I can’t watch it for 65 million years, it’s not real.’ That’s not science. That’s a fundamental misunderstanding of how evidence and testing work. And yes; science does adapt. That’s why new evidence about preservation gets studied and explained. 🤦

@JustinCPorter @The_Archangel_1 It's not even showing that it is plausible. It's speculation. That's it. Showing it's possible would require deep-time trials. 🤦‍♂️ And this notion that science adapts is hilarious as well. They adapt as long as it doesn't change the narrative. Not the other way around.

@aesius1 @The_Archangel_1 Dp you really not know the difference between "X is possible and plausible" and "X definitely happened"? Profound levels of ineptitude, fellow primate. It's like you are wholly unaware that science adapts in light of new information.

@JustinCPorter @The_Archangel_1 Again, the literature doesn't prove anything. These "mechanisms" are nothing more than speculative. In fact scientists needed to change the assertions they made before that soft tissues couldn't last that long because this new evidence doesn't fit their narrative. 🤦‍♂️

@Bearrun @_Ochiedike @HEPHZIBAHr6 Cool... So, without religion, woud you be an evil person?

@JustinCPorter @_Ochiedike @HEPHZIBAHr6 You're right, it's a question to his presuppositions, thanks for clarifying wise guy.

Do you need religion to have morals? Yes or no

@aesius1 @The_Archangel_1 You asserted long term preservation was impossible without any awareness of the details, or the literature showing the many ways that it is possible. Thats on you, fellow primate.

@JustinCPorter @The_Archangel_1 You literally talked down to me, as if you had proof of these soft tissues being possible as a result of these "mechanisms". I'm not the one who can't follow the conversation. 🤦‍♂️

@aesius1 @The_Archangel_1 I never once said that because something is published, that proves it is true. You can't even follow this conversation. No wonder you can't follow the current scientific literature or have a good faith conversation. You are a fake.

@JustinCPorter @The_Archangel_1 Yes, not once, but twice did you cite the published materials on the subject as if it was some sort of proof that soft tissue can somehow be preserved for 65+million years. Yet forgot to use common sense in realizing that these "tests" will be nothing more than speculation. 🤦‍♂️

@Bearrun @_Ochiedike @HEPHZIBAHr6 Not an answer to the question.

@_Ochiedike @HEPHZIBAHr6 In your worldview, why does it matter someone is good over evil, what even are those things in your worldview? It's just chemicals fizzing up thought. There's no meaning behind that.

@aesius1 @The_Archangel_1 Did I say that, mouth-breather?

@JustinCPorter @The_Archangel_1 You think because there is a paper published on the subject that they have proof?

@aesius1 @The_Archangel_1 You keep saying ‘impossible’ while scientists are literally publishing and testing the mechanisms. At some point it’s not the evidence that’s the problem; it's your glaring bias that prevents you from accepting anything contrary to your Iron Age incest mythology.

@JustinCPorter @The_Archangel_1 I know what they are, and none of it should still exist if the 65-75 million year timescale is correct. But then again you will just move the goalposts to fit your narrative, right? Published "mechanisms" that are impossible to confirm is nothing more than speculation. Goof.

@HattiePittie @dissociateanon @itslinklauren @wprice17 People who don't rely on double standards. Who won the 2020 presiddential election?

@dissociateanon @itslinklauren @wprice17 So who cares ?

The liberals making fun of Kristi Noem’s husband right now have spent the last ten years telling us men can be women, men should be in women’s sports, and that trans people are the pinnacle of beauty. Now they’re upset with someone cross dressing? That’s their party platform! Just saying. It’s not my cup of tea at all, but the hypocrisy stands out to me. 🧐🤔

@PostNASA FUCK, that's stupid.

Coherent specular reflections would be impossible if the water was curving.

@Truth_matters20 *all of them

Sad fact: Many professing Christians do not know Christ and will not go to Heaven.

@Echo_nomics @DwanePorter @mickitiki A gay wedding cake forced you to have gay sex?

@DwanePorter @mickitiki Gay weddings and remember that cake…the infamous cake?

WORD 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥💥👊

@BEDonham @mickitiki Has anyone forced you to have gay sex?

@mickitiki Try forcing homosexuality on Muslims and see what happens there too.

@Tiger6Actual @OriginalGavynnn @DwanePorter @mickitiki @BryanMarino13 Chud

@OriginalGavynnn @DwanePorter @mickitiki @BryanMarino13 Go hump someone else’s leg…..maybe your buddy that I just vanquished. Bye bye…..your momma is calling.

@Tiger6Actual @DwanePorter @mickitiki @BryanMarino13 Very Christian of you lol

@DwanePorter @mickitiki @BryanMarino13 Begone libtard….. grownups are speaking. Fly back to BlueSky and entertain your sick pedo buddies. 👋🏼. Oh, and while you’re at it…Go fuck yourself! 🖕🏼

@Tiger6Actual @mickitiki @BryanMarino13 Fuck your feelings, right?

@mickitiki @BryanMarino13 Yeah…the liberal heathens just tell us to “get over it”.😏