Low Risk Rules

882 posts

Low Risk Rules banner
Low Risk Rules

Low Risk Rules

@LowRiskRules

Portfolio manager working with post-exit entrepreneurs. Not providing investment recommendations or advice. All views are my own.

www.lowriskrules.com เข้าร่วม Kasım 2008
627 กำลังติดตาม524 ผู้ติดตาม
ทวีตที่ปักหมุด
Low Risk Rules
Low Risk Rules@LowRiskRules·
Low Risk Rules tweet media
ZXX
0
1
5
585
Low Risk Rules รีทวีตแล้ว
Bruce Sellery
Bruce Sellery@brucesellery·
📈Entrepreneurs take risks to build wealth. But protecting that wealth requires a different mindset. Bruce talks with wealth manager/author Geoff Saab @LowRiskRules about low-risk investing, the hidden cost of fees & why “prestige” investments and illiquid assets can quietly erode returns. Watch 👇 youtu.be/LVSHmNLcSC4?si…
YouTube video
YouTube
English
0
1
1
222
Low Risk Rules รีทวีตแล้ว
Bruce Sellery
Bruce Sellery@brucesellery·
📈Entrepreneurs take risks to build wealth. But protecting that wealth requires a different mindset. Bruce talks with wealth manager/author Geoff Saab @LowRiskRules about low-risk investing, the hidden cost of fees & why “prestige” investments and illiquid assets can quietly erode returns. Watch 👇 youtu.be/LVSHmNLcSC4?si…
YouTube video
YouTube
English
0
2
1
246
Low Risk Rules รีทวีตแล้ว
High Yield Harry
High Yield Harry@HighyieldHarry·
S&P Futures -1.5% Nasdaq Futures -1.5% Bitcoin -1.6% My Private Credit marks 0%
English
21
40
1.6K
93.9K
Low Risk Rules รีทวีตแล้ว
Bruce Sellery
Bruce Sellery@brucesellery·
Today on Moolala, @SXMCanadaTalks 167 √ Janel Abrahami: Career Minimalism √ David Mak @Wealthsimple: Stock Lending √ Jon Shell: Employee Ownership Research Initiative √ Geoff Saab: @LowRiskRules book
Bruce Sellery tweet media
English
0
1
1
133
Low Risk Rules รีทวีตแล้ว
✒️
✒️@Literariium·
Dostoevsky wrote this after nearly being executed: “When I look back at my life, I feel pain not because of suffering, but because of wasted time. I see how carelessly I lived, how often I ignored the quiet voice of my soul, how rarely I understood the value of a single moment. Only when death stood before me did I realize that life is not merely existence—it is a miracle. Every minute is a treasure, and in every breath, there is the possibility of happiness.”
English
153
4.6K
26.5K
808.7K
Dave Collum
Dave Collum@DavidBCollum·
Stay out of helicopters flying over the Indonesian jungle today. The Metalverse just winked. (Sorry for the mixed metaphor; if you got both of them you win the internet.)
Dave Collum tweet media
English
19
4
85
10.2K
Low Risk Rules
Low Risk Rules@LowRiskRules·
@dailydirtnap I'm often surprised at the number of very successful people in our business who do this, or take sponsorships for the podcast, or whatever. The marginal dollar can't be worth it, in the big picture.
English
0
0
0
861
Jared Dillian
Jared Dillian@dailydirtnap·
There are quite a few stupidly rich people who charge for their Substacks. Blows my mind. I'm rich, but not stupidly rich, and I will never charge for my Substack. When you're already rich, isn't the goal to have more clout, rather than the marginal $10,000?
English
52
5
420
110.6K
Low Risk Rules
Low Risk Rules@LowRiskRules·
@PythiaR Too much headache to trade today, for example if you're selling US securities and buying Canadian you will go negative on cash. Nothing to lose by waiting 'till tomorrow.
English
0
0
1
2.2K
Pythia Cap: Partially Conductive
This is how strong Canadian capital markets are. Without the Americans, one of the largest TSX constituents traded less than $10m of volume & hasn’t had a trade in hours.
Pythia Cap: Partially Conductive tweet media
English
54
42
1.3K
162.1K
Low Risk Rules
Low Risk Rules@LowRiskRules·
Institutional and ETF buyers of BTC own it for one reason: because it goes up. Once it stops going up, there is no reason to own it. No fundamental value anchor. Theoretically, no floor.
Tracy Shuchart (𝒞𝒽𝒾 )@chigrl

The reason nobody is sure why BTC is pulling back is because everyone is looking for a single cause when this is actually a systems failure with multiple transmission mechanisms reinforcing each other. Here's what actually happened mechanistically: Bitcoin ran from $40,000 to $126,000 in less than a year on a very specific narrative: Federal Reserve easing cycle plus institutional adoption through ETFs equals sustained bull market. The market built up $94 billion in futures open interest, with some platforms offering leverage ratios as high as 1,001 to 1. That setup alone created extraordinary fragility. The trigger was simple but devastating. Fed officials reversed dovish expectations completely. The market went from pricing a 90 percent probability of December rate cuts to just 40 percent. Real yields on short term Treasuries stayed elevated above 5 percent. The entire macro story that justified Bitcoin at $126,000 collapsed in a matter of weeks. Now here's where the structural vulnerability shows up. The new ETF infrastructure that everyone celebrated as bringing institutional money actually created institutional scale sell liquidity that never existed before. When the macro narrative broke, institutions could exit with one click. We saw $1.1 billion in ETF outflows in just days. This isn't retail panic selling. This is professional portfolio managers rebalancing away from an asset whose fundamental thesis just evaporated. Simultaneously, long term holders who bought Bitcoin between $40,000 and $80,000 started distributing. They offloaded 815,000 Bitcoin in 30 days. These holders aren't selling because they think Bitcoin is worthless. They're selling because they see volatility ahead and they're sitting on 50 to 150 percent profits. Smart money doesn't ride drawdowns when they can step aside and rebuy lower with the same capital. Here's where it becomes a cascade. When price broke the $100,000 support level, technical stops triggered across the entire derivatives complex. Over $20 billion in leveraged positions got liquidated throughout October and November. Some single day events saw $3.2 billion wiped out. The liquidations themselves created additional selling pressure, which triggered more stops, which forced more liquidations. Open interest collapsed from $94 billion to $68 billion, but there's probably still more leverage that needs to clear. The critical insight everyone is missing: there are no natural buyers at these price levels. Institutions are rebalancing away from risk assets. Long term holders are waiting for lower prices to rebuy. Retail got scared off by the violence of the move. And new buyers won't step in until the leverage gets fully flushed and price stabilizes. So the market has to fall far enough to accomplish three things. Clear the remaining leverage completely. Reach prices where long term holders stop distributing and start accumulating again. Find the level where actual value buyers with real capital see opportunity worth the volatility risk. The $600 billion wipeout you're seeing is mostly the evaporation of unrealized gains that were paper wealth to begin with. When Bitcoin went from $40,000 to $126,000, that represented about $1.7 trillion added to market cap. A lot of that was pure multiple expansion based on a macro narrative that turned out to be wrong. Now the market is repricing based on reality: high real yields, no Fed easing, strong dollar environment. This isn't mysterious. It's textbook deleveraging dynamics in an asset with no cash flows to anchor valuation, extreme leverage ratios, and a macro thesis that broke. A 25 percent correction after a 215 percent rally with 1,000x leverage in the system is actually normal market behavior when the fundamental story changes. The violence of the move reflects the amount of leverage that was built up, not any change in Bitcoin's long term prospects. The real question isn't why did this happen. The real question is what price level actually clears the market and brings in genuine buyers rather than leveraged speculators. That's still being discovered.

English
0
0
0
126
Low Risk Rules รีทวีตแล้ว
Adam Grant
Adam Grant@AdamMGrant·
Bingeing TikTok reels may be hazardous to your well-being. 71 studies, >98k people: The more short-form videos teens and adults watched, the more they struggled with attention, self-control, and stress and anxiety. Read a book. Watch a movie. Long live longform.
Adam Grant tweet media
English
184
3K
9.2K
3.3M
BuccoCapital Bloke
BuccoCapital Bloke@buccocapital·
Do I need to spend time researching this Honeywell split or is this a boomer ShitCo value trap
English
24
0
258
59.3K
Low Risk Rules
Low Risk Rules@LowRiskRules·
@robjama They are both called "dollars," but they are not the same.
English
0
0
0
83
Low Risk Rules
Low Risk Rules@LowRiskRules·
"Far from being a distinct asset class, private equity is best understood as a leveraged, illiquid exposure to equities, carrying hidden risks that investors frequently underestimate, thus distorting asset allocation exercises."
Low Risk Rules tweet media
English
1
0
1
86
Low Risk Rules
Low Risk Rules@LowRiskRules·
@ronmortgageguy Short term path for rates is likely lower... but looking out a few years it is highly probable that out of control fiscal spending will keep inflation high and interest rates higher. If this plays out, current 5 year rates are kind of a bargain.
English
0
0
1
327
Ron Butler
Ron Butler@ronmortgageguy·
Variable Rates Are Popular Again: Good Move Or TRAP? After the Bank of Canada's rate cut last this month borrowers started to like Variable Rates again The choice of Variable shot up by 30% overnight People switched Fixed to Variable Mid Transaction Is this a good idea? 2/
English
25
14
203
43K
Low Risk Rules รีทวีตแล้ว
Chris Bakke
Chris Bakke@ChrisJBakke·
Chris Bakke tweet media
ZXX
408
3.2K
41.2K
1.8M
Vancouver Island Guy 🌊
Vancouver Island Guy 🌊@VanIsleInvestor·
BNN David Burrows: $TOU Tourmaline Oil We don't own it and have reduced our energy position from 12% to 6%. Natural Gas is tricky right now as we are now off season. I would wait for outperformce before I put money to work here. I don't know why the stock is down more than it's peers. We own Imperial Oil.
English
7
0
40
5.1K