Richard Rothwell

21.1K posts

Richard Rothwell

Richard Rothwell

@M3othra012

เข้าร่วม Temmuz 2015
21 กำลังติดตาม612 ผู้ติดตาม
Friends of Narcissus
Friends of Narcissus@cultofnarcissus·
@WillBlair1982 @medialens @25_cycle These "so called" models are not forecast models. They use multiple parameters then retrospectively pick the forcing variable version that matches after the fact. This is the same as making 1000 stock market predictions then picking the best one after you know the answer.
English
6
0
1
55
Media Lens
Media Lens@medialens·
It's a myth. While a few sensationalised media stories in the 1970s (like a brief article in Newsweek or Time) speculated about an imminent ice age, the scientific community never predicted global cooling. In 2008, a comprehensive review published in the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society analyzed peer-reviewed climate literature from 1965 to 1979. The findings were stark: 62 papers predicted global warming caused by carbon dioxide. Only 7 papers predicted global cooling. Even in the 1970s, the overwhelming scientific consensus was already pointing toward greenhouse gas-induced warming.
Vincent J. Curtis@VincentJCurtis1

@medialens What a poor excuse for failed predictions. On the flip of a coin, up or down, more than half of the models selected predicted warmth. Given that the 1970s were the decade of the coming ice age, the coldest of the 20th century, it was reasonable to say the future will be warmer.

English
15
6
44
2.1K
Richard Rothwell
Richard Rothwell@M3othra012·
@HuppenthalJohn When you imagine you are smarter than a climate scientist, but only just noticed a contradiction in the propaganda messages.
English
0
0
0
2
John Huppenthal
John Huppenthal@HuppenthalJohn·
This is particularly amazing given that all these areas are experiencing explosive growth, thanks to CO2 moving from 369 in 2000 to 420 in 2024.
Dr. Matthew M. Wielicki@MatthewWielicki

@BasedMikeLee If climate change is causing a global wildfire crisis, why has global burned area been flat or declining for more than two decades?

English
4
2
12
408
Richard Rothwell
Richard Rothwell@M3othra012·
@elonmusk In today’s news: man is excited that “normal people” want 1930’s Germany. Meanwhile “normal people” follow a personality cult, are promised a golden age, bread & circuses, territorial expansion, war, are excited by monumental architecture and are addicted to propaganda.
English
0
2
4
20
Richard Rothwell
Richard Rothwell@M3othra012·
@craigkellyAFEE When you know you are not smarter than a climate scientist, so you make up a fairy tale about children. The reality is that the Little Ice Age finished around 1850. A 0.5C cooling at worst. Possibly even ended by the Industrial Revolution and CO2. But Goldilocks lives.
English
0
0
0
11
Craig Kelly:🇦🇺Foundation for Economic Education
Gullible and uneducated children have been brainwashed to fear any warming. The reality is that the warming has been highly beneficial, it’s helped save the world from the Little Ice Age.
Robin Monotti@robinmonotti

THE LITTLE ICE AGE - The real reason why climate has been warming of recent is entirely natural: it is because we are still emerging from The Little Ice Age. See painting of a frozen over Thames by Graham Turner. In the winter of 1683/84, the ice was almost a foot thick and the Thames remained frozen for weeks. Boats were fitted with skates and stalls set up with food, shops and games. The Little Ice Age (LIA) was a period of significant regional cooling, particularly in Europe, characterized by harsh winters, and expanded glaciers. Winter temperatures in Europe dropped as much as 2°C below modern averages. The event lasted from roughly 1300 to 1850, spanning nearly 500 years. It is generally divided into phases: an initial cooling around 1300, a slightly warmer period in the 1500s, and the coldest interval between 1645 and 1715 (known as the Maunder Minimum). The LIA was primarily triggered by the Grand Solar Minima, which caused reduced solar irradiance, and therefore cooling. We are still emerging from the Little Ice Age, and that is the only reason some areas are warmer than centuries ago. This has very little to do with CO2 and everything to do with the Sun. To put it simply, both the activity of the Sun and the Sun-Earth distance changes, and this modulates the amount of both solar irradiance and solar radiation, which affects clouds, and this combined change is what leads to long term changes in climatic temperatures. It's definitely not CO2 causing any of this.

English
5
21
73
1.8K
Social Hypocrisy
Social Hypocrisy@SocialHypocris1·
@M3othra012 WTH...Did you just troll my page and assume my gender? I expected more from a liberal.
English
1
1
2
46
sprk
sprk@orange_sprk·
@M3othra012 @FPerrefort I agree, conservatives are retarded. Are you doing your part by eating bugs to save the planet?
English
1
0
0
6
Felix Perrefort
Felix Perrefort@FPerrefort·
Michael E. Mann never wanted the public to read this. Keith Briffa, IPCC author, e-mailed the report's lead author: "I do not believe that global mean annual temperatures have simply cooled progressively over thousands of years as Mike appears to." "There is strong evidence of major changes in climate over the Holocene." (the current epoch/the last 11,700 years) In other words: one of the IPCC's own most important paleoclimatologists rejected the simplistic climatic history implied by the Hockey Stick. Erase the past and you can manufacture the present. Climate panic is MANN-made.
Felix Perrefort tweet media
English
18
62
205
6.2K
Richard Rothwell
Richard Rothwell@M3othra012·
@orange_sprk @FPerrefort Sea level rise since 1850 is measured to be 8 inches. This slow trend will not continue because of the way ice melts suddenly. But you just provided another data point for my hypothesis that the conservative mind cannot comprehend the concept of past-present-future.
English
1
0
0
8
sprk
sprk@orange_sprk·
@M3othra012 @FPerrefort True. With so much melting at the caps I had to paddle my way to work this morning
English
1
0
0
5
Richard Rothwell
Richard Rothwell@M3othra012·
@GerhardLenz … The C budget work has been done. It’s consistent. The C isotope work has been done. It’s consistent. The oxygen work has been done. It’s consistent. Therefore the Technical University of Athens employs morons.
English
0
0
0
9
Gerhard Lenz
Gerhard Lenz@GerhardLenz·
»Eine neue Studie der Technischen Universität Athen stellt die Klimawissenschaft auf den Kopf. Sie zeigt: In den letzten 40 Jahren hat sich die isotopische Signatur des atmosphärischen CO2 nicht verändert – menschliche Emissionen sind schlicht nicht erkennbar. Damit wird die Grundannahme der UNO und des IPCC, wonach fossile Brennstoffe die Hauptursache des Klimawandels seien, fundamental infrage gestellt. Seit Jahrzehnten predigen die Hohepriester des Weltklimarats (IPCC), dass die Menschheit durch ihre fossilen Emissionen das Klima der Erde ins Wanken bringe. Das Mantra lautet: Mehr CO2 in der Luft, mehr Hitze auf dem Planeten, mehr Katastrophen vor unserer Haustür. Doch eine neue Studie aus Griechenland zerschmettert dieses Glaubensgebäude – und das mit nüchternen, überprüfbaren Daten. Demnach hat sich die isotopische Signatur des atmosphärischen CO₂ in den letzten 40 Jahren nicht im Geringsten verändert. Mit anderen Worten: Es gibt keine Spur fossiler Brennstoffe in unserer Luft. Der Mensch ist im atmosphärischen Kohlenstoffkreislauf schlicht nicht erkennbar.« 👇🏻 Mehr dazu: report24.news/co2-signatur-s…
Gerhard Lenz tweet media
Deutsch
420
5.4K
11.4K
223.4K
Richard Rothwell
Richard Rothwell@M3othra012·
@GerhardLenz When you imagine you are smarter than a climate scientists, but don’t believe in the Conservation of Mass Law learnt in high school chemistry. It’s simple, we know how much stuff we burn, and we know how much ends up in the atmosphere/ocean system. It makes sense. …
English
0
0
0
9
Richard Rothwell
Richard Rothwell@M3othra012·
@FPerrefort .. There is no hidden cabal of researchers doing anti-global warming research. There are only incompetents and nutters.
English
0
0
0
15
Felix Perrefort
Felix Perrefort@FPerrefort·
97 Prozent der Wissenschaftler seien sich einig, dass es einen menschengemachten Klimawandel gebe. Mit dieser Behauptung zementierte die Klimaideologie ihre Macht. Obama postete sie damals. Noch heute geistert diese Mär durch die Kommentarspalten. Das Problem: Sie stimmt nicht. Die Studie (Cook 2013) ist Wissenschaftsbetrug. Die Daten wurden bewusst irreführend verzerrt. In Wahrheit ließ sich nur ein Bruchteil der untersuchten Arbeiten der Position zuordnen, der Mensch verursache den Klimawandel in entscheidender Weise. Weniger als 1 Prozent tat dies. Die Mehrheit – rund zwei Drittel – positionierte sich überhaupt nicht. Man nahm diese Arbeiten einfach aus der Prozentangabe heraus. Sie haben uns belogen und manipuliert. Auch mich. Ich habe es damals geschluckt. Es handelt sich nicht einfach um eine „kontroverse Studie“. Mit ihr wurde kritischer Widerspruch systematisch und skrupellos im Keim erstickt. Ganze Gesellschaften wurden gebrainwasht, Generationen entsprechend sozialisiert. Ein propagandistisches Verbrechen. Und ein Offenbarungseid über die wahre Schwäche ihres Gedankengebäudes. Wie sagen die Linken nicht immer: „Ihr seid noch nicht wütend genug.“ nius.de/politik/mensch…
Felix Perrefort tweet media
Deutsch
121
482
1.4K
26.1K
Richard Rothwell
Richard Rothwell@M3othra012·
@FPerrefort … Man believes climate denier fantasy about research fraud to stroke his prejudices. But is too lazy to verify by checking all the other data.
English
0
0
1
19
Richard Rothwell
Richard Rothwell@M3othra012·
@FPerrefort … Meanwhile in the real world, the crackpots leeching off the hard work of real scientists, do manage to publish. But the flaws are obvious. So they go on right wing podcasts to push their shit.
English
1
0
0
27
Richard Rothwell
Richard Rothwell@M3othra012·
@FPerrefort When you imagine you are smarter than a climate scientist, but think 50% of climate scientists are hiding in caves, too afraid to publish anything or to perform any research at all. …
English
0
0
1
19
Richard Rothwell
Richard Rothwell@M3othra012·
@BGatesIsaPyscho In today’s news: man thinks this happened yesterday. These are WW2 B17 bombers, because 4 piston engines have 4 exhausts.
Richard Rothwell tweet media
English
1
0
1
31
Concerned Citizen
Concerned Citizen@BGatesIsaPyscho·
Pre-Covid they had even ever heard of the word ‘Chemtrail’. They certainly hadn’t ever heard of the term ‘Aerodynamic Contrail’ nor had anyone ever filmed this made up phrase to try and excuse this new phenomenon. Why? Because it never used to happen. Please take all the time you need.
English
93
374
810
20.3K
Richard Rothwell
Richard Rothwell@M3othra012·
@respect65 When you know you are not smarter than a climate scientist, but think a lie about imaginary people believing in CO2 as a “deadly poison”, is a lie that will generate enthusiasm.
English
0
0
1
9
Richard Rothwell
Richard Rothwell@M3othra012·
@_iheartcanines In todays news: man still in kindergarten shows a picture with a horizon. Being geometry deficient, he doesn’t realise that a flat earth cannot have a horizon.
English
0
0
1
34
Elias Charon ✝️🐺
Elias Charon ✝️🐺@_iheartcanines·
“Flat earthers didn’t pass kindergarten” really? It seems it’s the globe believers that are having trouble understanding basic shapes & geometry. #science
Elias Charon ✝️🐺 tweet media
English
94
8
37
3.2K
Richard Rothwell
Richard Rothwell@M3othra012·
@robinmonotti … For those who do history, and can’t do math, this is also the Little Ice Age.
Richard Rothwell tweet media
English
0
0
0
46
Robin Monotti
Robin Monotti@robinmonotti·
THE LITTLE ICE AGE - The real reason why climate has been warming of recent is entirely natural: it is because we are still emerging from The Little Ice Age. See painting of a frozen over Thames by Graham Turner. In the winter of 1683/84, the ice was almost a foot thick and the Thames remained frozen for weeks. Boats were fitted with skates and stalls set up with food, shops and games. The Little Ice Age (LIA) was a period of significant regional cooling, particularly in Europe, characterized by harsh winters, and expanded glaciers. Winter temperatures in Europe dropped as much as 2°C below modern averages. The event lasted from roughly 1300 to 1850, spanning nearly 500 years. It is generally divided into phases: an initial cooling around 1300, a slightly warmer period in the 1500s, and the coldest interval between 1645 and 1715 (known as the Maunder Minimum). The LIA was primarily triggered by the Grand Solar Minima, which caused reduced solar irradiance, and therefore cooling. We are still emerging from the Little Ice Age, and that is the only reason some areas are warmer than centuries ago. This has very little to do with CO2 and everything to do with the Sun. To put it simply, both the activity of the Sun and the Sun-Earth distance changes, and this modulates the amount of both solar irradiance and solar radiation, which affects clouds, and this combined change is what leads to long term changes in climatic temperatures. It's definitely not CO2 causing any of this.
Robin Monotti tweet media
English
76
446
1.2K
21.1K
Richard Rothwell
Richard Rothwell@M3othra012·
@robinmonotti When you imagine you are smarter than a climate scientist, but numbers are too complicated for you. The Little Ice Age was on average less than 0.5C cooler than the 1850 preindustrial. It’s was cool, but punctuated by some cold years. …
English
0
0
0
12
Richard Rothwell
Richard Rothwell@M3othra012·
@Keeperofthefir2 When you imagine you are smarter than a climate scientist, but need to play tricks with percentages. Life skill: wanna know if a person is a liar. Wait to see if they contradict themselves. 1. 0.04% CO2 is insignificant. - for climate. 2. 0.04% CO2 is significant - for plants.
English
0
0
2
12